Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Analysis of bowel cancer outcomes for the National bowel cancer screening program: 2018. Canberra: AIHW; 2018. Report No.: Cat. no. CAN 113.


Google Scholar
 

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National bowel cancer screening program monitoring report 2024. Canberra: AIHW, Australian Government; 2024.


Google Scholar
 

Lew JB, St John DJB, Xu XM, Greuter MJE, Caruana M, Cenin DR, et al. Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National bowel cancer screening program in australia: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(7):e331–40.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Cancer Council Australia Colorectal Cancer Screening Working Party. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer: Population screening. [Internet]. Cancer Council Australia. 2023. Available from: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/j1Q1Xj

Tsipa A, O’Connor DB, Branley-Bell D, Day F, Hall LH, Sykes-Muskett B, et al. Promoting colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of interventions to increase uptake. Health Psychol Rev. 2021;15(3):371–94.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

McIntosh JG, Emery JD, Wood A, Chondros P, Goodwin BC, Trevena J et al. SMARTERscreen protocol: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial of patient SMS messaging in general practice to increase participation in the Australian National bowel cancer screening program. Trials. 2023;24(1)723.

Menzies School of Health Research. The alternative pathway in your health centre: A manual for getting started. Menzies School of Health Research. Casuarina;2019.

Volk RJ, Linder SK, Lopez-Olivo MA, Kamath GR, Reuland DS, Saraykar SS, et al. Patient decision aids for colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):779–91.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Long NN, Lau MPXL, Lee ARYB, Yam NE, Koh NYK, Ho CSH. Motivational interviewing to improve the uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.889124.

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Goodwin BC, Ireland MJ, March S, Myers L, Crawford-Williams F, Chambers SK, et al. Strategies for increasing participation in mail-out colorectal cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):257.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Bellhouse S, McWilliams L, Firth J, Yorke J, French DP. Are community-based health worker interventions an effective approach for early diagnosis of cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncol. 2018;27(4):1089–99.

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Dougherty MK, Brenner AT, Crockett SD, Gupta S, Wheeler SB, Coker-Schwimmer M, et al. Evaluation of interventions intended to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(12):1645–58.

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Jager M, Demb J, Asghar A, Selby K, Mello EM, Heskett KM, et al. Mailed outreach is superior to usual care alone for colorectal cancer screening in the USA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64(9):2489–96.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Myers L, Goodwin B, Ralph N, Castro O, March S. Implementation strategies for interventions aiming to increase participation in Mail-Out bowel cancer screening programs: A realist review. Front Oncol. 2020;10:543732.

Ramli NS, Manaf MR, Hassan MR, Ismail MI, Nawi AM. Effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening promotion using E-media decision aids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158190.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Rubin L, Okitondo C, Haines L, Ebell M. Interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening adherence in low-income settings within the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107522.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Rana T, Chan D, Nguyen K, Choi KC, So WKW. Effectiveness of community health worker–led interventions in improving the CRC screening uptake rate in Racial and ethnic minority populations. Cancer Nurs. 2023;47(5):368–376 .

Durkin S, Broun K, Guerin N, Morley B, Wakefield M. Impact of a mass media campaign on participation in the Australian bowel cancer screening program. J Med Screen. 2020;27(1):18–24.

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Dodd N, Carey M, Mansfield E, Oldmeadow C, Evans TJ. Testing the effectiveness of a general practice intervention to improve uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2019;43(5):464–9.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Lofti-Jam K. Increasing bowel cancer screening participation in South Eastern melbourne: evaluation report. Cancer Council Victoria. 2021.

Brown L, Moretti C, Roeger L, Reed R. Patients’ views on involving general practice in bowel cancer screening: a South Australian focus group study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(5):e035244.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Goodwin B, Crawford-Williams F, Ireland MJ, March S. General practitioner endorsement of mail-out colorectal cancer screening: the perspective of nonparticipants. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(2):366–74.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Brown LJ, Roeger SL, Reed RL. Patient perspectives on colorectal cancer screening and the role of general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20(1):109.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Cancer Council Australia Colorectal Cancer Screening Working Party. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer: Risk and screening based on family history. [Internet]. Cancer Council Australia. 2023. Available from: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/jz5DdE

Australian Department of Health and Aged Care. The role of health professionals and providers in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/national-bowel-cancer-screening-program/managing-bowel-screening-for-participants/the-role-of-health-professionals-and-providers-in-the-national-bowel-cancer-screening-program

Trankle SA, Metusela C, Reath J. Undertaking general practice quality improvement to improve cancer screening – a thematic analysis of provider experiences. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22(1):230.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Lee S, Obamiro K, Cooper A, Barnett T. General practitioner perspectives on barriers and enablers to bowel cancer screening in rural Tasmania: a thematic analysis of face-to-face interviews. Aust J Gen Pract. 2021;50:158–63.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Emery JD, Jenkins MA, Saya S, Chondros P, Oberoi J, Milton S et al. The CRISP trial: RCT of a decision support tool for risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening. Br J Gen Pract. 2023;73(733):e556–e565.

Trevena L. Which test is best? A Cluster-Randomized controlled trial of a risk calculator and recommendations on colorectal cancer screening behaviour in general practice. Public Health Genomics. 2022;25(5-6)193–208.

Guiriguet C, Muñoz-Ortiz L, Burón A, Rivero I, Grau J, Vela-Vallespín C, et al. Alerts in electronic medical records to promote a colorectal cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(648):e483–490.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Rat C, Pogu C, Le Donné D, Latour C, Bianco G, Nanin F, et al. Effect of physician notification regarding nonadherence to colorectal cancer screening on patient participation in fecal immunochemical test cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(9):816–24.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Le Breton J, Ferrat É, Attali C, Bercier S, Le Corvoisier P, Brixi Z, et al. Effect of reminders mailed to general practitioners on colorectal cancer screening adherence: a cluster-randomized trial. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2016;25(5):380–7.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

NPS Medicine Wise. Population health cancer management plan. Central Eastern Sydney Primary Health Network. Sydney;2020.

Ludwick T, Nightingale C, Brotherton J. Maximising cancer screening participation through primary care in response to COVID-19 in melbourne’s North West corridor. Melbourne School of Population & Global Health: Centre for Health Policy; 2021.


Google Scholar
 

Garvey G, Brands J, Tighe B, Westby M, Arley B. National Indigenous bowel screening pilot final report October 2020. Menzies School of Health Research. Casuarina;2020.

Cancer Screening Unit. Evaluation Report – Cancer screening quality improvement in primary healthcare settings. Department of Health. Brisbane;2022.

GP Education and Promotion Project Final Report December. 2021. Cancer Council Western Australia. Perth;2021.

PDSA Evaluation Report. Cancer Council Western Australia. Perth;2020.

Aubin-Auger I, Laouénan C, Le Bel J, Mercier A, Baruch D, Lebeau JP, et al. Efficacy of communication skills training on colorectal cancer screening by gps: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Care. 2016;25(1):18–26.

CAS 

Google Scholar
 

Holden CA, Frank O, Caruso J, Turnbull D, Reed RL, Miller CL, et al. From participation to diagnostic assessment: a systematic scoping review of the role of the primary healthcare sector in the National bowel cancer screening program. Aust J Prim Health. 2020;26(3):191–206.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):37.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Taylor N, McKay S, Long JC, Gaff C, North K, Braithwaite J, et al. Aligning intuition and theory: a novel approach to identifying the determinants of behaviours necessary to support implementation of evidence into practice. Implement Sci. 2023;18:29.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Verbunt E, Boyd L, Creagh N, Milley K, Emery J, Nightingale C, et al. Health care system factors influencing primary healthcare workers’ engagement in National cancer screening programs: a qualitative study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.13272.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17:75.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Fernandez ME, Abadie B, Damschroder LJ. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions. Implement Sci. 2019;14:42.

Powell BJ, Waltz Tj, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Morrow A, Chan P, Tiernan G, Steinberg J, Debono D, Wolfenden L, et al. Building capacity from within: a qualitative evaluation of a training program aimed at upskilling healthcare workers in delivering an evidence-based implementation approach. Transl Behav Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibab094.

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Gertig D, Lee J. Supporting health care providers in cancer screening: the role of the national cancer screening register. Med J Aust. 2023;219(3):94–8.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Holden C, Turnbull D, Frank O, Olver I. General practice perspectives on a bowel cancer screening quality improvement intervention using the consolidated framework for implementation research. Public Health Res Prac. 2021;31(3):30452016.

Verbunt E, Boyd L, Creagh N, Milley K, Emery J, Nightingale C et al. Health care system factors influencing primary healthcare workers’ engagement in National cancer screening programs: a qualitative study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022.

Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group A guide to understanding budgets for primary care practice-based research. Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PC4); 2020.

Australian Department of Health. Alternative access to bowel screening kits for healthcare providers [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/national-bowel-cancer-screening-program/alternative-access-to-bowel-screening-kits-for-healthcare-providers#about-the-alternative-access-to-bowel-screening-kits-model-

Furler J, O’Neal D, Speight J, Manski-Nankervis J-A, Gorelik A, Holmes-Truscott E, et al. Supporting insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes in primary care: results of the stepping up pragmatic cluster randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ (Online). 2017;356:j783. ((Furler, Manski-Nankervis, Young) Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC 3053, Australia).

PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Medical Board of Australia. Registration standard: Continuing professional development. Melbourne;2023.

Medical Board of Australia. Good medical practice: a code of conduct for doctors in Australia [Internet]. Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. 2020. Available from: https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Policies/Code-of-conduct.aspx

Paul CL, Piterman L, Shaw JE, Kirby C, Forshaw KL, Robinson J, et al. Poor uptake of an online intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial of online diabetes education for rural general practitioners. Trials. 2017;18(1):137.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Gattellari M, Hayen A, Leung DYC, Zwar NA, Worthington JM. Supporting anticoagulant treatment decision making to optimise stroke prevention in complex patients with atrial fibrillation: a cluster randomised trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):102.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Kirk JW, Nilsen P, Andersen O, Powell BJ, Tjornhoj-Thomsen T, Bandholm T et al. Co-designing implementation strategies for the WALK-Cph intervention in Denmark aimed at increasing mobility in acutely hospitalized older patients: a qualitative analysis of selected strategies and their justifications. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:8.

Taylor N, Lawton R, Moore S, Craig J, Slater B, Cracknell A, et al. Collaborating with front-line healthcare professionals: the clinical and cost effectiveness of a theory based approach to the implementation of a national guideline. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):648.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar
 

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2024 [cited 2025 Aug 11]. Health workforce. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/workforce/health-workforce