Feigin VL, et al. Pragmatic solutions to reduce the global burden of stroke: a world stroke Organization–Lancet neurology commission. Lancet Neurol. 2023;1:1–47.
Nitsche MA, et al. Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003;15:619–26.
Jacobson L, Koslowsky M, Lavidor M. tDCS Polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review. Exp Brain Res. 2012;216:1–10.
Herrmann CS, Rach S, Neuling T, StrĂĽber D. Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:279.
Nejati V, Salehinejad MA, Nitsche MA, Najian A, Javadi AH. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves executive dysfunctions in ADHD: implications for inhibitory control, interference control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. J Atten Disord. 2020;24:1928–43.
Fregni F, et al. Evidence-based guidelines and secondary meta-analysis for the use of transcranial direct current stimulation in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;24:256–313.
Hoyer EH, Celnik PA. Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29:395–409.
Liu J, Tan G, Wang J, Wei Y, Sheng Y, Chang H, Xie Q, Liu H. Closed-loop construction and analysis of cortico-muscular-cortical functional network after stroke. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2022;41:1575–86.
Du J, Yang F, Hu J, Hu J, Xu Q, Cong N, et al. Effects of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in early stroke patients: evidence from a randomized controlled trial with clinical, neurophysiological and functional imaging assessments. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2019;21:101620.
Fregni F, et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2006;21:1693–702.
Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport. 2005;16:1551–5.
Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005;128:490–9.
Hummel F, Cohen LG. Improvement of motor function with noninvasive cortical stimulation in a patient with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:14–9.
Naros G, Gharabaghi A. Physiological and behavioral effects of β-tACS on brain self-regulation in chronic stroke. Brain Stimul. 2017;10:251–9.
Santos Ferreira I, et al. Searching for the optimal tDCS target for motor rehabilitation. J Neural Eng. 2019;16:1–12.
Wade S, Hammond G. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over premotor cortex facilitates observational learning of a motor sequence. Eur J Neurosci. 2015;41:1597–602.
Kang EK, Paik NJ. Effect of a tDCS electrode montage on implicit motor sequence learning in healthy subjects. J Exp Stroke Transl Med. 2011;3:4.
Reis J, Fritsch B. Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011;24:590–6.
Ciechanski P, Kirton A. Transcranial direct-current stimulation can enhance motor learning in children. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:2758–67.
Notturno F, Marzetti L, Pizzella V, Uncini A, Zappasodi F. Local and remote effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the electrical activity of the motor cortical network. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35:2220–32.
Kim H, et al. Optimal stimulation site for rtms to improve motor function: anatomical hand knob vs. hand motor hotspot. Neurosci Lett. 2021;740:135424.
Hu C, Ti CHE, Yuan K, Chen C, Khan A, Shi X, Tong RK. Y. Effects of high-definition tDCS targeting individual motor hotspot with EMG-driven robotic hand training on upper extremity motor function: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2024;21:169.
Krause V, Meier A, Dinkelbach L, Pollok B. Beta band transcranial alternating (tACS) and direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied after initial learning facilitate retrieval of a motor sequence. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016;10:4.
Hamoudi M, Schambra HM, Fritsch B, Schoechlin-Marx A, Weiller C, Cohen LG, Reis J. Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances motor skill learning but not generalization in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32:295–308.
Pantovic M, Albuquerque LL, d., Mastrantonio S, Pomerantz AS, Wilkins EW, Riley ZA, Guadagnoli MA, Poston B. Transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex over multiple days improves motor learning of a complex overhand throwing task. Brain Sci. 2023;13:1441.
Kim J, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic changes after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the anatomical hand knob and hand motor hotspot: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2020;38:407–17.
Sriraman A, Oishi T, Madhavan S. Timing-dependent priming effects of tDCS on ankle motor skill learning. Brain Res. 2014;1581:23–9.
Inukai Y, Saito K, Sasaki R, Tsuiki S, Miyaguchi S, Kojima S, Onishi H. Comparison of three non-invasive transcranial electrical stimulation methods for increasing cortical excitability. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:668.
Yamaguchi T, Moriya K, Tanabe S, Kondo K, Otaka Y, Tanaka S. Transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with attention increases cortical excitability and improves motor learning in healthy volunteers. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17:1–13.
Meng H, Houston M, Dias N, Guo C, Francisco G, Zhang Y, et al. Efficacy of high-definition transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS) at the M1 hotspot versus C3 site in modulating corticospinal tract excitability. Biomedicines. 2024;12:2635.
Pozdniakov I, Vorobiova AN, Galli G, Rossi S, Feurra M. Online and offline effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Sci Rep. 2021;11:3854.
Tan G, Wang J, Liu J, Sheng Y, Xie Q, Liu H. A framework for quantifying the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery from hemiparesis: corticomuscular network. J Neural Eng. 2022;19:026053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ac636b
Agboada D, et al. Semi-automated motor hotspot search (SAMHS): a framework toward an optimised approach for motor hotspot identification. Front Hum Neurosci. 2023;17:1228859.
Meincke J, Hewitt M, Batsikadze G, Liebetanz D. Automated TMS hotspot-hunting using a closed loop threshold-based algorithm. Neuroimage. 2016;124:509–17.
Weiss C, et al. Mapping the hand, foot and face representations in the primary motor cortex—retest reliability of neuronavigated TMS versus functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2013;66:531–42.
Kallioniemi E, Pitkänen M, Könönen M, Vanninen R, Julkunen P. Localization of cortical primary motor area of the hand using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, BOLD and arterial spin labeling fMRI. J Neurosci Methods. 2016;273:138–48.
Matilainen N, Kataja J, Laakso I. Predicting the hotspot location and motor threshold prior to transcranial magnetic stimulation using electric field modelling. Phys Med Biol. 2023;69:015012.
Choi GY, et al. An artificial neural-network approach to identify motor hotspot for upper-limb based on electroencephalography: a proof-of-concept study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18:1–10.
Choi GY, Kim WS, Hwang HJ. Electroencephalography-based a Motor Hotspot Identification Approach Using Deep-Learning. In Proceedings of 2021 9th International Winter Conference on Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), 1–4 (2021).
Choi GY, et al. Motor hotspot localization based on electroencephalography using convolutional neural network in patients with stroke. bioRxiv; 2024. pp. 1–32.
Fong KN, Ting KH, Zhang JJ, Yau CS, Li LS. Event-related desynchronization during mirror visual feedback: a comparison of older adults and people after stroke. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:PMC8200456.
Bartur G, Pratt H, Soroker N. Changes in mu and beta amplitude of the EEG during upper limb movement correlate with motor impairment and structural damage in subacute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;130:1644–51.
Li H, et al. EEG changes in time and time-frequency domain during movement preparation and execution in stroke patients. Front Neurol. 2020;14:827.
Yoo HJ, Ham J, Duc NT, Lee B. Quantification of stroke lesion volume using epidural EEG in a cerebral ischaemic rat model. Sci Rep. 2021;11:2308.
Rubega M, et al. EEG fractal analysis reflects brain impairment after stroke. Entropy. 2021;23:592.
Pell G. Use and misuse of likert scales. Med Educ. 2005;39:970.
Carifio J, Perla R. Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing likert scales. Med Educ. 2008;42:1150–2.
Niering M, Seifert J. The effects of visual skills training on cognitive and executive functions in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024;21:41.
Ludwig KA, Miriani RM, Langhals NB, Joseph MD, Anderson DJ, Kipke DR. Using a common average reference to improve cortical neuron recordings from microelectrode arrays. J Neurophysiol. 2009;101:1679–89.
Gustafsson F. Determining the initial states in forward-backward filtering. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 1996;44:988–92.
Mitra SK. Digital signal processing: a computer-based approach. McGraw-Hill High Educ. 2001;ISO:690.
Mammone N, La Foresta F, Morabito FC. Automatic artifact rejection from multichannel scalp EEG by wavelet ICA. IEEE Sens J. 2011;12:533–42.
Winkler I, Haufe S, Tangermann M. Automatic classification of artifactual ICA-components for artifact removal in EEG signals. Behav Brain Funct. 2011;7:1–15.
Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134:9–21.
https://eeglab.org/tutorials/06_RejectArtifacts/RunICA.html
Amo Usanos C, Boquete L, de Santiago L, Navarro B, R., Cavaliere C. Induced gamma-band activity during actual and imaginary movements: EEG analysis. Sens. 2020;20:1545.
Amo C, et al. Induced gamma band activity from EEG as a possible index of training-related brain plasticity in motor tasks. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0186008.
Ginter J Jr, et al. Propagation of EEG activity in the beta and gamma band during movement imagery in humans. Methods Inf Med. 2005;44:106–13.
Ball T, et al. Movement related activity in the high gamma range of the human EEG. Neuroimage. 2008;41:302–10.
Seo JK, Baik S, Lee SH. Simulating the architecture of a termite incipient nest using a convolutional neural network. Ecol Inf. 2018;44:94–100.
Seo JK, et al. Differentiation of the follicular neoplasm on the gray-scale Us by image selection subsampling along with the marginal outline Using convolutional neural network. Biomed Res Int. 2017;1:3098293.
Malkauthekar MD. Analysis of Euclidean distance and Manhattan distance measure in face recognition. In Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Information Technology (CIIT 2013), 503–507 (2013).
Sundar BR, Chunduru A, Tiwari R, Gupta A, Muthuganapathy R. Footpoint distance as a measure of distance computation between curves and surfaces. Comput Graph. 2014;38:300–9.
Yu K, Wang X, Li Q, Zhang X, Li X, Li S. Individual morphological brain network construction based on multivariate Euclidean distances between brain regions. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:204.
Ahdab R, Ayache SS, Brugières P, Farhat WH, Lefaucheur JP. The hand motor hotspot is not always located in the hand knob: a neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain Topogr. 2016;29:590–7.
Malcolm MP, et al. Reliability of motor cortex transcranial magnetic stimulation in four muscle representations. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1037–46.
Rubega M, Formaggio E, Molteni F, Guanziroli E, Di Marco R, Baracchini C, et al. EEG fractal analysis reflects brain impairment after stroke. Entropy. 2021;23:592.
Vimolratana O, Aneksan B, Siripornpanich V, Hiengkaew V, Prathum T, Jeungprasopsuk W, et al. Effects of anodal tDCS on resting state EEG power and motor function in acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024;21:6.
Dallmer-Zerbe I, Popp F, Lam AP, Philipsen A, Herrmann CS. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) as a tool to modulate P300amplitude in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): preliminary findings. Brain Topogr. 2020;33:191–207.
Breitling C, et al. Improving interference control in ADHD patients with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10:1–10.
Brunelin J, et al. Examining transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) as a treatment for hallucinations in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169:719–24.
George MS, et al. A controlled trial of daily left prefrontal cortex TMS for treating depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;48:962–70.
Nitsche MA, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a review. Exp Neurol. 2009;219:14–9.
Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche MA, Rigonatti SP, Pascual-Leone A. Cognitive effects of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with depression. Depress Anxiety. 2006;23:482–4.
Padberg F, et al. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as treatment for major depression: study design and methodology of a multicenter triple blind randomized placebo controlled trial (DepressionDC). Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017;267:751–66.