Al-Taai, N., Levring Jaghagen, E., Persson, M., Ransjo, M. & Westerlund, A. A. Superimposition-based cephalometric method to quantitate craniofacial changes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 18 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105260 (2021).
Contini, E., Orthod, D., Campi, S. & Caprioglio, A. Profile changes following lower incisor repositioning: A comparison between patients with different growth pattern. Minerva Stomatol. 64, 75–85 (2015).
Yang, S. et al. Effect of mesiodistal angulation of the maxillary central incisors on esthetic perceptions of the smile in the frontal view. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 148, 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.021 (2015).
Crum, W. R., Hartkens, T. & Hill, D. L. Non-rigid image registration: Theory and practice. Br. J. Radiol. 77 Spec No 2, S140-153 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/25329214
Graf, C. C., Dritsas, K., Ghamri, M. & Gkantidis, N. Reliability of cephalometric superimposition for the assessment of craniofacial changes: A systematic review. Eur. J. Orthod. 44, 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab082 (2022).
Häner, S. T., Kanavakis, G., Matthey, F. & Gkantidis, N. Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial CBCTs: Reliability, reproducibility and segmentation effect on hard‐tissue outcomes. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 23, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12347 (2019).
Sheeran, S., Hartsfield, J. Jr., Omami, G. & Bazina, M. Comparison of two 3-dimensional user-friendly voxel-based maxillary and 2-dimensional superimposition methods. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 163, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.10.004 (2023).
Colceriu-Şimon, I. M. et al. Clinical indications and radiation doses of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Med. Pharm. Rep. 92, 346–351. https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1434 (2019).
Signorelli, L., Patcas, R., Peltomäki, T. & Schätzle, M. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. J. Orofac. Orthop. 77, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-015-0002-4 (2016).
Besl, P. J. & Mckay, N. D. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 14, 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.121791 (1992).
Ge, Y. Y. et al. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment based on the registration of X-ray image features. Chin. Autom. Congr. 4383–4387. https://doi.org/10.1109/Cac51589.2020.9327422 (2020).
Bazina, M. et al. Precision and reliability of Dolphin 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 153, 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.07.025 (2018).
Cevidanes, L. H. et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 34, 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/17102411 (2005).
Cevidanes, L. H., Heymann, G., Cornelis, M. A., DeClerck, H. J. & Tulloch, J. F. Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 136, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.018 (2009).
Cevidanes, L. H., Motta, A., Proffit, W. R., Ackerman, J. L. & Styner, M. Cranial base superimposition for 3-dimensional evaluation of soft-tissue changes. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 137, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.021 (2010).
Machin, D., Campbell, M. J., Tan, S. B. & Tan, S. H. Sample size tables for clinical studies (Wiley, 2011).
Baumrind, S. & Frantz, R. C. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am. J. Orthod. 60, 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90028-5 (1971).
Abreu, D., Freitas, K. M., Nomura, S., Valarelli, F. & Cançado, R. Comparison among manual and computerized cephalometrics using the softwares dolphin imaging and dentofacial planner. Dent. Oral Craniofac. Res. 2 https://doi.org/10.15761/DOCR.1000186 (2016).
Chen, D. et al. Three-dimensional reconstructions in spine and screw trajectory simulation on 3D digital images: A step by step approach by using Mimics software. J. Spine Surg. 3, 650–656. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.10.09 (2017).
Gliddon, M. J. et al. The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 64, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.028 (2006).
Turkoz, C. & Iscan, H. N. Evaluation of extraction and non-extraction treatment effects by two different superimposition methods. Eur. J. Orthod. 33, 691–699. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq143 (2011).
Standerwick, R. G., Roberts, E. W., Jr. Hartsfield, J. K., Babler, W. J. & Katona, T. R. Comparison of the Bolton Standards to longitudinal cephalograms superimposed on the occipital condyle (I-point). J. Orthod. 36, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1179/14653120722896 (2009). discussion 13–24.
Huja, S. S., Grubaugh, E. L., Rummel, A. M., Fields, H. W. & Beck, F. M. Comparison of hand-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions. Angle Orthod. 79, 428–435. https://doi.org/10.2319/052708-283.1 (2009).
Standerwick, R., Roberts, E., Hartsfield, J. Jr., Babler, W. & Kanomi, R. Cephalometric superimposition on the occipital condyles as a longitudinal growth assessment reference: I-point and I-curve. Anat. Rec (Hoboken). 291, 1603–1610. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20761 (2008).
Cook, P. A. & Gravely, J. F. Tracing error with Bjork’s mandibular structures. Angle Orthod. 58, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1988)058%3C0169:TEWBMS%3E2.0.CO;2 (1988).
Iseri, H. & Solow, B. Growth displacement of the maxilla in girls studied by the implant method. Eur. J. Orthod. 12, 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/12.4.389 (1990).
Baumrind, S., Miller, D. & Molthen, R. The reliability of head film measurements. 3. Tracing superimposition. Am. J. Orthod. 70, 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90224-4 (1976).
Ghafari, J., Engel, F. E. & Laster, L. L. Cephalometric superimposition on the cranial base: A review and a comparison of four methods. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 91, 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90393-3 (1987).
Buschang, P. H., LaPalme, L., Tanguay, R. & Demirjian, A. The technical reliability of superimposition on cranial base and mandibular structures. Eur. J. Orthod. 8, 152–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/8.3.152 (1986).
Goel, S., Bansal, M. & Kalra, A. A preliminary assessment of cephalometric orthodontic superimposition. Eur. J. Orthod. 26, 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.2.217 (2004).
Houston, W. J. & Lee, R. T. Accuracy of different methods of radiographic superimposition on cranial base structures. Eur. J. Orthod. 7, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/7.2.127 (1985).
Roden-Johnson, D., English, J. & Gallerano, R. Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: Landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 133, 556–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.041 (2008).
Arat, Z. M., Turkkahraman, H., English, J. D., Gallerano, R. L. & Boley, J. C. Longitudinal growth changes of the cranial base from puberty to adulthood. A comparison of different superimposition methods. Angle Orthod. 80, 537–544. https://doi.org/10.2319/080709-447.1 (2010).
Arat, Z. M., Rubenduz, M. & Akgul, A. A. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: A comparison of three superimposition methods. Angle Orthod. 73, 374–380. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073%3C0374:TDOCRL%3E2.0.CO;2 (2003).
You, Q. L. & Hagg, U. A comparison of three superimposition methods. Eur. J. Orthod. 21, 717–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/21.6.717 (1999).
Lenza, M. A. et al. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods. Dent. Press. J. Orthod. 20, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.029-036.oar (2015).
Nielsen, I. L. Maxillary superimposition: a comparison of three methods for cephalometric evaluation of growth and treatment change. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 95, 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(89)90304-1 (1989).
Cook, A. H., Sellke, T. A. & BeGole, E. A. The variability and reliability of two maxillary and mandibular superimposition techniques. Part II. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 106, 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(94)70068-0 (1994).
Guo, L., Feng, Y., Guo, H. G., Liu, B. W. & Zhang, Y. Consequences of orthodontic treatment in malocclusion patients: Clinical and microbial effects in adults and children. BMC Oral Health. 16, 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0308-7 (2016).
Thiruvenkadam, G., Asokan, S., John, J. B., Priya, G., Prathiba, J. & P. R. & Oral health-related quality of life of children seeking orthodontic treatment based on child oral health impact profile: A cross-sectional study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 6, 396–400. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237x.161899 (2015).