What if the retirement system we rely on for decades of support wasn’t as essential as we thought? One university professor has ignited controversy by suggesting that retirement pensions may need to be drastically rethought—or even halted—for certain groups. His bold claims are stirring debate across the United States and beyond.

Scott Galloway, a professor at the Stern School of Business at NYU, doesn’t mince words : he believes the current system is unsustainable and unfair to younger generations.

The wealthiest generation in historyJeff Bezos, founder of Amazon, in conflict with Elon Musk: “We can move heavy, polluting industries into space—Earth should be reserved for living and light industry.”The largest great white shark ever recorded spotted near this popular tourist destination

Galloway argues that retirees today are the wealthiest generation in history, often with enough assets to comfortably live without government support. He suggests that a one-third reduction in retirement benefits would be reasonable, claiming that many retirees simply don’t need the full payout.

According to the professor, anywhere from 10 to 30 percent of current pension recipients might not need these benefits at all. Meanwhile, younger generations are struggling financially, burdened with student debt, housing costs, and stagnant wages, while seniors enjoy financial security that many never had at the same age.

Protecting the vulnerable

That said, Galloway doesn’t advocate for cutting everyone off. His proposal focuses on ensuring that retirement benefits go to those who truly need them—people living in poverty or without sufficient savings. He emphasizes that the program should not support those already financially secure, while still recognizing that for many Americans, these payments remain a lifeline.

The underlying idea is simple : balance the system so that younger generations aren’t penalized by policies designed decades ago, while maintaining support for the most vulnerable populations.

A call for fundamental reformEveryone throws it away, but it contains 22-karat gold that could be worth thousands of dollars7 things lower-middle-class families still display in the living room that say more than they realize

Galloway’s message is clear : “This situation must end.” He calls for a fundamental overhaul of the pension system, aiming to reduce government spending while ensuring fairness across generations. He warns that without serious reform, younger Americans may continue to face a more precarious economic future.

Many experts agree that the retirement system is under strain, citing rising life expectancy, demographic shifts, and economic pressures. What’s different about Galloway’s stance is the blunt acknowledgment of wealth inequality between generations—and the proposal to reallocate resources where they’re most needed.

Personally, it made me reflect on my own grandparents’ generation. While they worked tirelessly and relied on pensions for stability, I realized how dramatically the economic landscape has shifted. Could future generations expect the same support, or will tough choices need to be made?

What do you think? Should retirement pensions be reduced for the wealthy, or does everyone deserve a guaranteed safety net? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments—we’d love to hear your perspective on this generational debate.