Mohseni, N., McMahon, P. L. & Byrnes, T. Ising machines as hardware solvers of combinatorial optimization problems. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 363–379 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Lucas, A. Ising formulations of many NP problems. Front. Phys. 2, (2014).

Bybee, C. et al. Efficient optimization with higher-order Ising machines. Nat. Commun. 14, 6033 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Nikhar, S., Kannan, S., Aadit, N. A., Chowdhury, S. & Camsari, K. Y. All-to-all reconfigurability with sparse and higher-order Ising machines. Nat. Commun. 15, 8977 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Bhattacharya, T., Hutchinson, G. H., Pedretti, G. & Strukov, D. HO-FPIA: high-order field-programmable Ising arrays with in-memory computing. In 2024 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI) 252–259 https://doi.org/10.1109/ISVLSI61997.2024.00054 (2024).

Higgins Hutchinson, G. et al. Compressed high-order Ising machines. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst. 16, 577–592 (2026).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Duffee, C. et al. P-dits: probabilistic d-dimensional bits for extended-variable probabilistic computing. Phys. Rev. Appl. 24, 044077 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Callahan-Coray, K., Lee, K., Jiang, K. & Camsari, K. Y. Restoring sparsity in potts machines via mean-field constraints. npj Unconv. Comput. 3, 50 (2026).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Iyer, D. & Achour, S. Efficient optimization with encoded Ising models. In 2025 IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA) 85–98 https://doi.org/10.1109/HPCA61900.2025.00018 (2025).

Garg, C. & Salahuddin, S. Efficient optimization accelerator framework for multi-state spin Ising problems. Nat. Commun. 16, 9601 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Singh, N. S. et al. Hardware demonstration of feedforward stochastic neural networks with fast MTJ-based p-bits. In 2023 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM45741.2023.10413686 (2023).

Hong, S. Solving inference problems of bayesian networks by probabilistic computing. AIP Adv. 13, 075226 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Ghantasala, L. A. et al. Improving deep neural network performance through sampling. npj Unconv. Comput. 3, 18 (2026).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Wang, Z., Marandi, A., Wen, K., Byer, R. L. & Yamamoto, Y. Coherent Ising machine based on degenerate optical parametric oscillators. Phys. Rev. A 88, 063853 (2013).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Inagaki, T. et al. A coherent Ising machine for 2000-node optimization problems. Science 354, 603–606 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

McMahon, P. L. et al. A fully programmable 100-spin coherent Ising machine with all-to-all connections. Science 354, 614–617 (2016).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Honjo, T. et al. 100,000-spin coherent Ising machine. Sci. Adv. 7, eabh0952 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Pierangeli, D., Marcucci, G. & Conti, C. Large-scale photonic Ising machine by spatial light modulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 213902 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Roques-Carmes, C. et al. Heuristic recurrent algorithms for photonic Ising machines. Nat. Commun. 11, 249 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Gao, Y. et al. Photonic Ising machines for combinatorial optimization problems. Appl. Phys. Rev. 11, 041307 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Kalinin, K. P. et al. Analog optical computer for AI inference and combinatorial optimization. Nature 645, 354–361 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Veraldi, D. et al. Fully programmable spatial photonic Ising machine by focal plane division. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 063802 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Aadhi, A. et al. Photonic Ising machines toward and beyond a million spins. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.13446 (2026).

Wang, T. & Roychowdhury, J. OIM: oscillator-based Ising machines for solving combinatorial optimisation problems. In Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation (eds McQuillan, I. & Seki, S.) 232–256 (Springer, 2019).

Bashar, M. K., Mallick, A. & Shukla, N. Experimental investigation of the dynamics of coupled oscillators as Ising machines. IEEE Access 9, 148184–148190 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Ahmed, I., Chiu, P.-W., Moy, W. & Kim, C. H. A probabilistic compute fabric based on coupled ring oscillators for solving combinatorial optimization problems. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 56, 2870–2880 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Maher, O. et al. A CMOS-compatible oscillation-based VO2 Ising machine solver. Nat. Commun. 15, 3334 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Graber, M. & Hofmann, K. An integrated coupled oscillator network to solve optimization problems. Commun. Eng. 3, 116 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Su, Y., Do, A. T., Kim, T. T.-H. & Kim, B. ROC-spin: a 28 nm 2,000 ring-oscillator-collapse spins for solving combinatorial optimization problems. In 2024 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (a-SSCC) 1–3 https://doi.org/10.1109/A-SSCC60305.2024.10848963 (2024).

Chen, X. et al. Oscillatory neural network-based Ising machine using 2D memristors. ACS Nano 18, 10758–10767 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Sun, L., Burns, M. X. & Huang, M. C. General oscillator-based Ising-machine models with phase-amplitude dynamics and polynomial interactions. Phys. Rev. Appl. 24, 044035 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Behera, N. et al. Nanosecond phase ordering in ultra-large spin hall nano-oscillator lattices for unconventional computing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 21, 1105–1112 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-026-02216-y (2026).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Ekanayake, E. M. H., Khan, N. & Shukla, N. Configuring oscillator Ising machines as p-bit engines. Commun. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-026-02492-z (2026).

Fahimi, Z., Mahmoodi, M. R., Nili, H., Polishchuk, V. & Strukov, D. B. Combinatorial optimization by weight annealing in memristive hopfield networks. Sci. Rep. 11, 16383 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Jiang, M., Shan, K., He, C. & Li, C. Efficient combinatorial optimization by quantum-inspired parallel annealing in analogue memristor crossbar. Nat. Commun. 14, 5927 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Yue, W. et al. A scalable universal Ising machine based on interaction-centric storage and compute-in-memory. Nat. Electron. 7, 904–913 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Iftakher, M. A. et al. Intrinsic annealing in a hybrid memristor–magnetic tunnel junction Ising machine. Nat. Commun. 17, 5246 (2026).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Aramon, M. et al. Physics-inspired optimization for quadratic unconstrained problems using a digital annealer. Front. Phys. 7, (2019).

Yamaoka, M. et al. A 20k-spin Ising chip to solve combinatorial optimization problems with CMOS annealing. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 51, 303–309 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Goto, H., Tatsumura, K. & Dixon, A. R. Combinatorial optimization by simulating adiabatic bifurcations in nonlinear hamiltonian systems. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav2372 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Goto, H. et al. High-performance combinatorial optimization based on classical mechanics. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe7953 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Tatsumura, K., Yamasaki, M. & Goto, H. Scaling out Ising machines using a multi-chip architecture for simulated bifurcation. Nat. Electron. 4, 208–217 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Kanao, T. & Goto, H. Simulated bifurcation assisted by thermal fluctuation. Commun. Phys. 5, 153 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Aadit, N. A. et al. Massively parallel probabilistic computing with sparse Ising machines. Nat. Electron. 5, 460–468 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Chowdhury, S. et al. Pushing the boundary of quantum advantage in hard combinatorial optimization with probabilistic computers. Nat. Commun. 16, 9193 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Smithson, S. C., Onizawa, N., Meyer, B. H., Gross, W. J. & Hanyu, T. Efficient CMOS invertible logic using stochastic computing. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 66, 2263–2274 (2019).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Singh, N. S. et al. CMOS plus stochastic nanomagnets enabling heterogeneous computers for probabilistic inference and learning. Nat. Commun. 15, 2685 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Selcuk, K. et al. DAC-free p-bits: asynchronous self-coloring and on-chip annealing. In 2025 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM50572.2025.11353558 (2025).

Whitehead, W., Nelson, Z., Camsari, K. Y. & Theogarajan, L. CMOS-compatible Ising and potts annealing using single-photon avalanche diodes. Nat. Electron. 6, 1009–1019 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Borders, W. A. et al. Integer factorization using stochastic magnetic tunnel junctions. Nature 573, 390–393 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Li, S. et al. An ultra-low power and fast Ising machine using voltage-controlled magnetoresistive random access memory. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.19106 (2026).

Yang, S. et al. 250 magnetic tunnel junctions-based probabilistic Ising machine. Nat. Commun. 17, 5368 (2026).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Camsari, K. Y., Faria, R., Sutton, B. M. & Datta, S. Stochastic p-bits for invertible logic. Phys. Rev. X 7, 031014 (2017).


Google Scholar
 

Hayakawa, K. et al. Nanosecond random telegraph noise in in-plane magnetic tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 117202 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Safranski, C. et al. Demonstration of nanosecond operation in stochastic magnetic tunnel junctions. Nano Lett. 21, 2040–2045 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Ackley, D. H., Hinton, G. E. & Sejnowski, T. J. A learning algorithm for boltzmann machines. Cognit. Sci. 9, 147–169 (1985).


Google Scholar
 

Singh, N. S. et al. Beyond Ising: mixed continuous optimization with Gaussian probabilistic bits using stochastic MTJs. In 2024 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM50854.2024.10873478 (2024).

Kalinin, K. P. & Berloff, N. G. Simulating Ising and n-state planar potts models and external fields with nonequilibrium condensates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 235302 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Chowdhury, S. et al. A full-stack view of probabilistic computing with p-bits: devices, architectures, and algorithms. IEEE J. Explor. Solid-State Comput. Devices Circuits 9, 1–11 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Weitz, G., Pira, L., Ferrie, C. & Combes, J. Subuniversal variational circuits for combinatorial optimization problems. Phys. Rev. A 112, 032418 (2025).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Abdelrahman, A. S., Chowdhury, S., Morone, F. & Camsari, K. Y. Generalized probabilistic approximate optimization algorithm. Nat. Commun. 17, 498 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S. & Zhou, L. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm and the sherrington-kirkpatrick model at infinite size. Quantum 6, 759 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Preskill, J. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Mohseni, M. et al. How to build a quantum supercomputer: scaling from hundreds to millions of qubits. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.10406 (2025).

Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D. & Vecchi, M. P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220, 671–680 (1983).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Yamamoto, Y. et al. Coherent Ising machines — optical neural networks operating at the quantum limit. NPJ Quantum Inf. 3, 49 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Kadowaki, T. & Nishimori, H. Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model. Phys. Rev. E 58, 5355–5363 (1998).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Suzuki, M. Relationship between d-dimensional quantal spin systems and (d + 1)-dimensional Ising systems: equivalence, critical exponents and systematic approximants of the partition function and spin correlations. Prog. Theor. Phys. 56, 1454–1469 (1976).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Camsari, K. Y., Chowdhury, S. & Datta, S. Scalable emulation of sign-problem–free hamiltonians with room-temperature p-bits. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 034061 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Denchev, V. S. et al. What is the computational value of finite-range tunneling? Phys. Rev. X 6, 031015 (2016).


Google Scholar
 

Boixo, S. et al. Evidence for quantum annealing with more than one hundred qubits. Nat. Phys. 10, 218–224 (2014).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Grimaldi, A. et al. Experimental evaluation of simulated quantum annealing with MTJ-augmented p-bits. In 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 22.4.1–22.4.4 https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM45625.2022.10019530 (2022).

Onizawa, N., Kubuta, T., Shin, D. & Hanyu, T. Energy-efficient p-bit-based fully-connected quantum-inspired simulated annealer with dual BRAM architecture. IEEE Access 14, 5092–5103 (2026).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Waidyasooriya, H. M. & Hariyama, M. Highly-parallel FPGA accelerator for simulated quantum annealing. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 9, 2019–2029 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Raimondo, E. et al. High-performance and reliable probabilistic Ising machine based on simulated quantum annealing. Phys. Rev. X 15, 041001 (2025).


Google Scholar
 

Swendsen, R. H. & Wang, J.-S. Replica Monte Carlo simulation of spin-glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2607–2609 (1986).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Hukushima, K. & Nemoto, K. Exchange Monte Carlo method and application to spin glass simulations. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 1604–1608 (1996).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Marinari, E. & Parisi, G. Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme. EPL 19, 451–458 (1992).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Earl, D. J. & Deem, M. W. Parallel tempering: theory, applications, and new perspectives. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3910–3916 (2005).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Aadit, N. A., Mohseni, M. & Camsari, K. Y. Accelerating adaptive parallel tempering with FPGA-based p-bits. In 2023 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology And Circuits (VLSI technology and circuits) 1–2 https://doi.org/10.23919/VLSITechnologyandCir57934.2023.10185207 (2023).

Nakayama, H., Koyama, J., Yoneoka, N. & Miyazawa, T. Description: Third Generation Digital Annealer Technology (Fujitsu Ltd., 2021).

Zhang, Y. et al. A parallel tempering processing architecture with multi-spin update for fully-connected Ising models. In 2024 Design, Automation & Test In Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE) 1–6 https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE58400.2024.10546862 (2024).

Zhu, Z., Ochoa, A. J. & Katzgraber, H. G. Efficient cluster algorithm for spin glasses in any space dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 077201 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Zhang, X. et al. Parallel tempering-inspired distributed binary optimization with in-memory computing. Phys. Rev. Appl. 23, 034031 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Sajeeb, M. M. H. et al. Probabilistic computers for MIMO detection: from sparsification to 2D parallel tempering. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.09037 (2026).

Zhu, R. et al. A fully parallel densely connected probabilistic Ising machine with inertia for real-time applications. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.17109 (2026).

Hopfield, J. J. & Tank, D. W. ‘Neural’ computation of decisions in optimization problems. Biol. Cybern. 52, 141–152 (1985).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Sajeeb, M. M. H. et al. Scalable connectivity for Ising machines: dense to sparse. Phys. Rev. Appl. 24, 014005 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Delacour, C. Self-adaptive Ising machines for constrained optimization. In 2025 Design, Automation & Test In Europe Conference (DATE) 1–7 https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE64628.2025.10992982 (2025).

Lee, J., Miller, B. T., Damjanović, A. & Brooks, B. R. Enhancing constant-pH simulation in explicit solvent with a two-dimensional replica exchange method. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 2560–2574 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Delacour, C., Sajeeb, M. M. H., P. Hespanha, J. & Camsari, K. Y. Two-dimensional parallel tempering for constrained optimization. Phys. Rev. E 112, L023301 https://doi.org/10.1103/mr2n-qqrb (2025).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Grimaldi, A. et al. Constrained parallel tempering in traveling-salesman problems with circular neighborhoods. Phys. Rev. Appl. 25, 024023 (2026).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Yamamoto, D. Correlated cluster mean-field theory for spin systems. Phys. Rev. B 79, 144427 (2009).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Xing, E. P., Jordan, M. I. & Russell, S. A generalized mean field algorithm for variational inference in exponential families. In Proc. Nineteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 583–591 (Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2002).

Huang, Y. et al. GPipe: efficient training of giant neural networks using pipeline parallelism. In Proc. 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 10, 103–112 (Curran Assoc. Inc, 2019).

Narayanan, D. et al. PipeDream: generalized pipeline parallelism for DNN training. In Proc. 27th ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles 1–15 https://doi.org/10.1145/3341301.3359646 (2019).

Qi, P., Wan, X., Huang, G. & Lin, M. Zero bubble (almost) pipeline parallelism. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2024).

Shoeybi, M. et al. Megatron-LM: training multi-billion parameter language models using model parallelism. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.08053 (2019).

Tanaka, M., Taura, K., Hanawa, T. & Torisawa, K. Automatic graph partitioning for very large-scale deep learning. In 2021 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) 1004–1013 https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPS49936.2021.00109 (IEEE, 2021).

Zhou, L., Wang, S.-T., Choi, S., Pichler, H. & Lukin, M. D. Quantum approximate optimization algorithm: performance, mechanism, and implementation on near-term devices. Phys. Rev. X 10, 021067 (2020).


Google Scholar
 

Basso, J., Farhi, E., Marwaha, K., Villalonga, B. & Zhou, L. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm at high depth for MaxCut on large-girth regular graphs and the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model. In 17th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2022) (eds Le Gall, F. & Morimae, T.) vol. 232, 7:1–7:21 (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2022).

Sakai, R., Matsuyama, H., Tam, W.-H. & Yamashiro, Y. Transferring linearly fixed QAOA angles: performance and real device results. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.12632 (2025).

Cerezo, M. et al. Variational quantum algorithms. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 625–644 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Morone, F., Kent, A. D. & Sels, D. Variational iterative rotation algorithm: combinatorial optimization with classical kicked tops. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.01512 (2026).

Alsawidan, Z. et al. Probabilistic approximate optimization using single-photon avalanche diode arrays. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.13943 (2026).

Adame, J. I. & McMahon, P. L. Inhomogeneous driving in quantum annealers can result in orders-of-magnitude improvements in performance. Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 035011 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Mohseni, M. et al. Nonequilibrium Monte Carlo for unfreezing variables in hard combinatorial optimization. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.13628 (2021).

Carleo, G. & Troyer, M. Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks. Science 355, 602–606 (2017).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Fabiani, G. & Mentink, J. H. Investigating ultrafast quantum magnetism with machine learning. SciPost Phys. 7, 004 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Schmitt, M. & Heyl, M. Quantum many-body dynamics in two dimensions with artificial neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 100503 (2020).

Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar
 

Vicentini, F. et al. NetKet 3: machine learning toolbox for many-body quantum systems. SciPost Phys. Codebases 7 https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.7 (2022).

Schmitt, M. & Reh, M. jVMC: versatile and performant variational Monte Carlo leveraging automated differentiation and GPU acceleration. SciPost Phys. Codebases 2 https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.2 (2022).

Chen, A. & Heyl, M. Empowering deep neural quantum states through efficient optimization. Nat. Phys. 20, 1476–1481 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Moss, M. S., Wiersema, R., Hibat-Allah, M., Carrasquilla, J. & Melko, R. G. Leveraging recurrence in neural network wavefunctions for large-scale simulations of Heisenberg antiferromagnets on the square lattice. Phys. Rev. B 112, 134450 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Chowdhury, S., Pieterse, J., Aadit, N. A., Mentink, J. H. & Camsari, K. Y. Probabilistic computers for neural quantum states. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.24558 (2025).

Chowdhury, S., Çamsari, K. Y. & Datta, S. Emulating quantum circuits with generalized Ising machines. IEEE Access 11, 116944–116955 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Troyer, M. et al. Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum Monte Carlo simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 170201 (2005).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Hangleiter, D., Roth, I., Nagaj, D. & Eisert, J. Easing the Monte Carlo sign problem. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb8341 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Marvian, M., Lidar, D. A. & Hen, I. On the computational complexity of curing non-stoquastic Hamiltonians. Nat. Commun. 10, 1571 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Jung, G. et al. Roadmap on machine learning glassy dynamics. Nat. Rev. Phys. 7, 91–104 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Schuetz, M. J. A., Brubaker, J. K. & Katzgraber, H. G. Combinatorial optimization with physics-inspired graph neural networks. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 367–377 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Williams, R. J. Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Mach. Learn. 8, 229–256 (1992).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Bojesen, T. A. Policy-guided Monte Carlo: reinforcement-learning Markov chain dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 98, 063303 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Wu, D., Wang, L. & Zhang, P. Solving statistical mechanics using variational autoregressive networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 080602 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Nicoli, K. A. et al. Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers. Phys. Rev. E 101, 023304 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Sanokowski, S., Hochreiter, S. & Lehner, S. A diffusion model framework for unsupervised neural combinatorial optimization. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.01661 (2025).

Sanokowski, S. et al. Scalable discrete diffusion samplers: combinatorial optimization and statistical physics. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.08696 (2025).

Hibat-Allah, M., Inack, E. M., Wiersema, R., Melko, R. G. & Carrasquilla, J. Variational neural annealing. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 952–961 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Ma, Q., Ma, Z., Xu, J., Zhang, H. & Gao, M. Message passing variational autoregressive network for solving intractable Ising models. Commun. Phys. 7, 236 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Zhang, Y.-H. & Ventra, M. D. A generative neural annealer for black-box combinatorial optimization. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.09742 (2025).

Bunaiyan, S., Delacour, C., Chowdhury, S., Lee, K. & Camsari, K. Y. IsingFormer: augmenting parallel tempering with learned proposals. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.23043 (2025).

Invernizzi, M., Krämer, A., Clementi, C. & Noé, F. Skipping the replica exchange ladder with normalizing flows. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 11643–11649 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Zhang, L. et al. Accelerated parallel tempering via neural transports. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.10328 (2025).

Del Bono, L. M., Ricci-Tersenghi, F. & Zamponi, F. Demonstrating real advantage of machine-learning-enhanced Monte Carlo for combinatorial optimization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 123, e2534768123 (2026).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Lee, K. et al. Stochastic sparse attention for memory-bound inference. In Proc. 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2026).

Liu, Y. et al. Energy-efficient parallel Ising SoftMax engine for transformer attention based on asynchronous SOT-p-bits. In IEEE Electron Device Letters 1–1 https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2026.3691358 (2026).