Updated at\u00a015.04 EST<\/p>\n
Key events<\/p>\n
Show key events only<\/p>\n
Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature<\/p>\n
Former Washington Post editor calls Trump’s comments on murder of Jamal Khashoggi ‘a disgrace’<\/p>\n
Marty Baron, the former executive editor of the Washington Post, called Donald Trump\u2019s remarks on Tuesday, in which the president dismissed concerns about the Saudi regime\u2019s 2018 murder of the Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, \u201ca disgrace\u201d in an email to TheWrap<\/a>.<\/p>\n As our colleague Julian Borger reports<\/a>, when an ABC News reporter confronted<\/a> Trump\u2019s guest, Mohammed bin Salman, the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia, over the US intelligence assessment that he ordered the brutal murder of the dissident Saudi columnist, Trump stepped in to defend the Saudi leader, saying that \u201ca lot of people didn\u2019t like\u201d the murder victim before pointing at bin Salman, and adding: \u201cthings happened, but he knew nothing about it\u201d.<\/p>\n Trump then attacked the reporter<\/a>, Mary Bruce, and suggested that the FCC should strip ABC of its broadcast license because she asked what the president called \u201ca horrible, insubordinate and just a terrible question\u201d of the Saudi leader, a man the president said was \u201chighly respected\u201d.<\/p>\n Trump\u2019s comments were a disgrace,\u201d Baron wrote to TheWrap, a media business outlet. \u201c\u2018Things happen,\u2019 he said. Actually, someone made them happen. And that was the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia. He had Jamal Khashoggi assassinated, and then he and his government lied about what happened.\u201d<\/p>\n Trump couldn\u2019t care less about the killing of a journalist unless he viewed that journalist as a supporter of his,\u201d Baron continued. \u201cIn this instance, he suggests the killing was justified on the grounds that \u2018a lot of people didn\u2019t like\u2019 Khashoggi. And then he ignores the facts of the brutal murder itself, suggesting MBS was clueless. Just when you think Trump has gone as low as possible, he goes still lower.\u201d<\/p>\n Three weeks after Trump left office in 2021, US intelligence agencies concluded<\/a> that the crown prince, known as MBS, \u201capproved an operation in Istanbul, Turkey to capture or kill Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi\u201d and noted \u201cthe Crown Prince\u2019s support for using violent measures to silence dissidents abroad\u201d.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a016.51 EST<\/p>\n Here’s a recap of the day so far<\/p>\n The US House overwhelmingly approved a bill demanding that the Justice Department release all files related to its investigation into the convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein. The finally tally was 427-1, with five members not voting. The near-unanimous vote was the culmination of a months-long effort led by a bipartisan group of House members that initially faced deep opposition from the president and House leadership. But as it became clear the Speaker\u2019s manoeuvring to prevent a vote on the petition would not succeed, Trump reversed course and threw his support behind the effort.<\/p>\n The bill next moves to the Senate. If it is approved by the upper chamber, it would then go to Trump for his signature. After the House voted today, the Senate\u2019s top Republican, John Thune told reporters that a vote on the bill would happen \u201cfairly quickly\u201d. Thune added that it\u2019s \u201cnot likely\u201d the legislation will have any further amendments. This, despite calls from House speaker Mike Johnson and several GOP lawmakers, to make changes to further protect victims\u2019 identities. A reminder, provisions to redact names and child abuse materials are already part of the legislation. For his part, Donald Trump has signaled he would sign the bill if it reached his desk.<\/p>\n A panel of federal judges has ruled<\/a> that Texas cannot use the 2025 congressional map for the midterms. Instead, the state must use the 2021 boundaries in the upcoming election. The map, drawn by the GOP lawmakers in Texas at the behest of Donald Trump<\/a>, was the catalyst of a nationwide redistricting battle. In response, California voters passed a ballot initiative to redraw their own maps, offsetting the five seats that Republicans gained in Texas in the process. In today\u2019s ruling, the judges, which included a Trump appointee, said that the creation of a new map appeared unconstitutional and \u201cracially gerrymandered\u201d.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, at the White House today, the president welcomed Saudi Arabia\u2019s de facto leader, Mohammed bin Salman. It was the crown prince\u2019s first visit to Washingtong since the 2018 killing of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi by Saudi agents in Istanbul. In the Oval Office, Trump brushed off questions from a reporter about MBS\u2019s role in Khashoggi\u2019s killing, saying \u201cthings happen\u201d. The president added that bin Salman \u201cknew nothing about it, and we can leave it at that\u201d. In 2021 US intelligence concluded that bin Salman had approved the capture or killing of Khashoggi<\/a>, a fierce critic of the Saudi regime.<\/p>\n When it came to matters of business, MBS announced Saudi Arabia was raising its planned investments in the US to almost $1tn, up from $600bn that the Saudis said they planned to invest when Trump visited the kingdom in May. Trump also confirmed that he had agreed to sell the Saudis F-35 fighter jets despite some concerns within the administration that the sale could lead to China gaining access to the US technology behind the advanced weapon system.<\/p>\n The Department of Education (ED) announced today that it is outsourcing a number of its functions to different agencies, in a move that is part of the administration\u2019s wider plans to totally dismantle the department. The ED said that through six new interagency agreements<\/a>, with the Department of Labor, Department of the Interior, and Department of Health and Human Services, it would \u201cbreak up the federal education bureaucracy\u201d and \u201cmove closer to fulfilling the President\u2019s promise to return education to the states\u201d.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a016.21 EST<\/p>\n Education department shifts functions to other agencies as part of administration’s wider dismantling plan<\/p>\n The Department of Education (ED) announced today that it is outsourcing a number of its functions to different agencies, in a move that is part of the administration\u2019s wider plans to totally dismantle the department.<\/p>\n The ED said that through six new interagency agreements<\/a>, with the Department of Labor, Department of the Interior, and Department of Health and Human Services, it would \u201cbreak up the federal education bureaucracy\u201d and \u201cmove closer to fulfilling the President\u2019s promise to return education to the states\u201d.<\/p>\n Trump ran on the promise that he would do away with the department responsible for the country\u2019s education policy, and in March, he signed an executive order to dismantle the agency. Shuttering it outright requires congressional approval, but under the guise of education secretary, Linda McMahon, the scope of the department has diminished.<\/p>\n Share<\/a> The House of Representatives<\/a> just voted to rebuke retiring Democratic congressman Chuy Garc\u00eda for what his detractors said was a scheme to ensure that his chief of staff would be the only Democrat left on the ballot next year in his heavily blue district.<\/p>\n The resolution, proposed by fellow Democrat Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, passed with almost all Republicans<\/a> in favor, along with 23 Democrats. Three Democrats voted present.<\/p>\n Perez accused Garcia of \u201celection subversion\u201d for announcing that he would not seek re-election next year, while, as the Chicago Sun-Times reported<\/a>, quietly collecting signatures for his chief of staff, Patty Garcia, to be on the ballot. The two Garcias are not related.<\/p>\n Democratic party leaders in the House had encouraged members to vote against the resolution, issuing a joint statement where they decried the \u201cmisguided resolution\u201d and defending Chuy Garcia as \u201ca good man who has always prioritized the people he represents, even while experiencing unthinkable family tragedy.\u201d His wife is struggling with multiple sclerosis, and Garcia has said he is stepping down on the advice of his cardiologist. In 2023, his office announced the death of his daughter Rosa at the age of 28.<\/p>\n Fabiola Rodriguez-Ciampoli, a spokesperson for the congressman, said, \u201che followed every rule and every filing requirement laid out by the state of Illinois. At a moment like this, he hopes his colleagues, especially those who speak about family values, can show the same compassion and respect that any family would want during a health crisis.\u201d<\/p>\n Others disagreed, with longtime Democratic strategist David Axelrod calling his actions \u201cold-style, Chicago machine tactics to ensure his chief-of-staff would be the only name on the Dem ballot. It\u2019s election denial of another kind!\u201d<\/p>\n Democratic senator Andy Kim said: \u201cChuy Garcia\u2019s decision to end his re-election at the last second and plant his chief of staff as the only candidate to succeed him was undemocratic and should not be allowed. Standing against corruption means standing up no matter which political party violates.\u201d<\/p>\n Share<\/a>Senate majority leader says Epstein vote will happen ‘fairly quickly’ in upper chamber<\/p>\n John Thune, the majority leader and top Senate Republican, said that a vote on the full release of the Epstein files will happen \u201cfairly quickly\u201d.<\/p>\n Speaking to reporters on the Hill after the House voted, almost unanimously, for the justice department to release their complete trove of documents relating to the disgraced financier, Thune said that it\u2019s \u201cnot likely\u201d the legislation will have any further amendments. This, despite calls from House speaker Mike Johnson and several GOP lawmakers, to make changes to further protect victims\u2019 identities.<\/p>\n A reminder, provisions to redact names and child abuse materials are already part of the legislation.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a016.06 EST<\/p>\n As we mentioned earlier, the sole holdout in today\u2019s vote to release the justice department files on Jeffrey Epstein<\/a> was Republican congressman Clay Higgins. He said that the bill, in its current form, doesn\u2019t adequately protect victims, survivors, and \u201cthousands of innocent people\u201d.<\/p>\n The Louisiana lawmaker added:<\/p>\n If the Senate amends the bill to properly address privacy of victims and other Americans, who are named but not criminally implicated, then I will vote for that bill when it comes back to the House.<\/p>\n Clay Higgins speaks during a budget hearing on Capitol Hill, 16 April 2024. Photograph: Julia Nikhinson\/AFP via Getty Images<\/p>\n However, there are provisions in the legislation, as written, which redacts identities and examples of child abuse. If the upper chamber issues an amendment, the House will need to vote on the bill again. A move that the bipartisan co-sponsors say is a delay tactic and unnecessary.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n In a statement after Tuesday\u2019s vote, congressman Robert Garcia, the ranking Democrat on the House oversight committee demanded that the Senate majority leader John Thune take up the bill \u201cimmediately\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cDonald Trump is panicking and trying to stop our investigation. We need to know what he\u2019s hiding, and what powerful men are responsible for the rape and abuse of children and women,\u201d Garcia said. \u201cAnd let\u2019s be clear \u2013 Donald Trump<\/a> has the power to release the files today. But he chooses to delay and deflect.\u201d<\/p>\n He added: \u201cNo more lies. No more secrets. We will get justice for the survivors. Release the files, NOW.\u201d<\/p>\n Share<\/a>US House approves bill to force release of Epstein files in near-unanimous vote<\/p>\n The US House overwhelmingly approved a bill demanding that the Justice Department release all files related to its investigation into the convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein. The finally tally was 427-1, with five members not voting.<\/p>\n Cheers rang out in the chamber, when the gavel banged the vote closed.<\/p>\n Congressman Clay Higgins of Louisiana, a staunch ally of Donald Trump, was the sole House member to vote against the measure.<\/p>\n The near-unanimous vote was the culmination of a months-long effort led by a bipartisan group of House members that initially faced deep opposition from the president and House leadership. But as it became clear the Speaker\u2019s manoeuvring to prevent a vote on the petition would not succeed, Trump reversed course and threw his support behind the effort.<\/p>\n The bill next moves to the Senate. If it is approved by the upper chamber, it would then go to Trump for his signature. Trump told reporters on Monday he would sign the legislation if it reached his desk \u2013 still an if.<\/p>\n Democrats, as well as the bill\u2019s bipartisan sponsors, have called on Trump not to wait for Congress to act and instead to order the Justice Department to release the files, which he has the power to do.<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a015.04 EST<\/p>\n While the House votes, the Guardian\u2019s congressional correspondent Chris Stein sends this dispatch from Capitol Hill.<\/p>\n As the House debates the bill to require release of the government\u2019s investigative files related to alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein<\/a>, survivors of his abuses clapped from the chamber\u2019s gallery, prompting an admonition from the chair.<\/p>\n \u201cI rise today to acknowledge the survivors, family members and advocates who are here today and have never given up the legislation in front of us, at its core is about something very simple: The survivors deserve justice. The American people deserve the truth,\u201d said Democratic congresswoman Adelita Grijlava.<\/p>\n \u201cProtecting women and children from pedophiles should not be a Democratic issue. Should not be a Republican issue. It should be a human rights issue and a matter of justice. I urge my colleagues to vote yes.\u201d<\/p>\n The group broke into applause after Grijalva \u2014 who, after a lengthy delay<\/a>, provided the final signature on a discharge petition that forced a vote on this bill \u2014 finished her remarks.<\/p>\n The Republican lawmaker presiding over the House then addressed the group, saying \u201cthe chair will remind all persons in the gallery that they are here as guests of the House, and that any manifestation of approval or disapproval of proceedings is in violation of the rules of the House.\u201d<\/p>\n Jamie Raskin, the Democratic congressman managing the party\u2019s debate, chimed in, saying: \u201cI\u2019ll just add, they\u2019re here as honored guests of the House, and we\u2019re delighted they\u2019re here.\u201d<\/p>\n Share<\/a><\/p>\n Updated at\u00a014.24 EST<\/p>\n Congressman Jamie Raskin, who has been leading the debate for Democrats<\/a> on the House floor, issued a forceful rebuttal of the Speaker\u2019s comments before the chamber moved to a vote.<\/p>\n \u201cWe want the whole truth to come out,\u201d Raskin said, arguing that it was Johnson and Republicans<\/a> who have been dragging their feet on releasing the files, including delaying the swearing in of Adelita Grijalva, who provided the 218th signature to advance the petition.<\/p>\n \u201cEven the British Monarchy wouldn\u2019t put up with this,\u201d Raskin continued. \u201cHow about the American democracy? How about we say: \u2018No way we\u2019re not going to allow this cover up to go on for one day more.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n![\"Chris](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/1763503031_465_Chris_Stein.png\")
Chris Stein<\/p>\nChris Stein<\/p>\n