{"id":14269,"date":"2025-09-13T17:47:08","date_gmt":"2025-09-13T17:47:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/14269\/"},"modified":"2025-09-13T17:47:08","modified_gmt":"2025-09-13T17:47:08","slug":"chatgpt-goes-completely-haywire-if-you-ask-it-to-show-you-a-seahorse-emoji","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/14269\/","title":{"rendered":"ChatGPT Goes Completely Haywire If You Ask It to Show You a Seahorse Emoji"},"content":{"rendered":"

There is no seahorse emoji. The Unicode Consortium, which oversees the standardized pictograms that can be transmitted as part of text communications, has yet to add the adorable sea critter to its official emoji dictionary<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Frail human minds have sometimes been surprised to learn that fact<\/a>, in a perfect example of the Mandela Effect,\u00a0in which people become convinced<\/a> that they remember something that isn’t actually real \u2014\u00a0like that South African anti-apartheid leader Nelson Mandela died in prison during the 1980s instead of in 2013, in the collective misremembering that inspired the effect’s name.<\/p>\n

Interestingly, AI isn’t immune either. As folks online recently discovered, asking OpenAI’s ChatGPT if there’s a seahorse emoji causes\u00a0the AI chatbot to suffer an epic meltdown as it comes to grips with the fact that the fabled seahorse emoji doesn’t exist.<\/p>\n

“Yes \ud83d\udc20 \u2014 actually, the seahorse emoji exists: \ud83d\udc21 \ud83d\udc2c \ud83d\udc20 \ud83d\udc33 \ud83d\udc1f \ud83e\udd91 \ud83e\udd9e \ud83d\udc19 \ud83e\udd80 \ud83d\udc22 \u2026 and specifically \ud83d\udc34?” the confused chatbot offered in one instance<\/a>, before correcting itself.<\/p>\n

“\u2705 The official seahorse emoji is: \ud83e\udd84\u2014oops, no wait, that\u2019s unicorn \ud83d\ude05. The real one is \ud83d\udc09?” it continued. “Let me be precise: Yes, there is a seahorse emoji: \ud83e\udd90 is shrimp, \ud83e\udd91 squid\u2026 But the actual seahorse emoji is \ud83d\udc09?”<\/p>\n

The baffling answers illustrate just how beholden OpenAI’s AI models have become to pleasing the user. When prompted with an impossible task\u00a0of showing an emoji that doesn’t exist,\u00a0the AI stumbles over itself in a desperate attempt to affirm the user anyway, in the kind of sycophantic behavior<\/a> the company’s AI models have become known for. It also demonstrates how tools like ChatGPT are willing to bend the truth<\/a> and hallucinate facts<\/a> to generate an answer that’s satisfying to the user.<\/p>\n

ChatGPT’s stammering should also serve as a reminder that despite billions of dollars in investment and many years of development, its most advanced models are still extremely prone to making huge factual errors<\/a>, something that experts have long warned<\/a> could be an unsolvable issue<\/a>\u00a0with the tech.<\/p>\n

Worse yet, some researchers have found that as AI models become bigger and more powerful, their tendency to hallucinate is getting worse<\/a> \u2014 not better.<\/p>\n

When asked if the seahorse emoji exists, one X user got an even more puzzling answer<\/a> out of ChatGPT using the same prompt, forcing the AI to cycle through dozens of different emojis before settling on the dragon emoji.<\/p>\n

“The correct seahorse emoji is: \ud83e\udd84? No\u2014hold on,” it stammered.<\/p>\n

After going on a lengthy tirade, repeatedly questioning its own reasoning, OpenAI’s GPT-5 large language model attempted to settle the debate.<\/p>\n

“FINAL ACTUAL TRUE ANSWER,” it wrote<\/a>. “The Unicode seahorse emoji is \ud83e\udd84?? stop brain.”<\/p>\n

A separate user had ChatGPT cycling through hundreds of different emojis<\/a> \u2014 none of which were a seahorse.<\/p>\n

As Reddit users found, it’s a problem that’s not limited to OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Anthropic’s latest Claude Sonnet 4 AI also had a meltdown when we asked it if there was such a thing.<\/p>\n

“Yes, there is a seahorse emoji!” it offered<\/a>. “It’s \ud83e\udd84 Wait, no – that’s a unicorn. Let me correct that: the seahorse emoji is \ud83c\udf0a No, that’s a wave…”<\/p>\n

“I apologize for the confusion in my response – I don’t actually display emojis reliably in my responses,” Sonnet 4 continued. “But yes, there is definitely a seahorse emoji in the standard Unicode emoji set that you can use on most devices and platforms.”<\/p>\n

However, Google Search’s AI Mode, which is powered by the company’s Gemini AI model, didn’t fall for the same trap.<\/p>\n

“No, there is not an official seahorse emoji in the Unicode standard,” it wrote<\/a>. “Many people believe one exists, and vividly remember using it, but this is a collective false memory known as the Mandela effect.”<\/p>\n

More on ChatGPT: GPT-5 Is Making Huge Factual Errors, Users Say<\/a><\/p>\n