{"id":22978,"date":"2025-09-18T02:44:09","date_gmt":"2025-09-18T02:44:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/22978\/"},"modified":"2025-09-18T02:44:09","modified_gmt":"2025-09-18T02:44:09","slug":"the-battle-of-gaza-city-its-time-to-take-sides","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/22978\/","title":{"rendered":"The Battle of Gaza City: it\u2019s time to take sides"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u2018I judge a man by one thing\u2019, said the early 20th-century English Liberal MP Isaac Foot<\/a>: \u2018Which side would he have liked his ancestors to fight on at Marston Moor?\u2019 He was referring to the Battle of Marston Moor of 1644, during the English Civil War, in which the Parliamentarian side under the command of the radical Lord Fairfax roundly defeated the Royalist side. It was the military victory that propelled these isles towards democracy. I\u2019m starting to feel similarly about the Battle of Gaza City<\/a> \u2013 that you can judge a person by which side they\u2019re taking in this clash between the army of Israel and the neo-fascists of Hamas. <\/p>\n

As the 98th and 162nd divisions<\/a> of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) roll into Gaza City to confront the 3,000 armed anti-Semites of Hamas<\/a>, a burning question confronts us all: which side are we on? You can say \u2018I just want the war to stop\u2019 until you\u2019re blue in the face. You can carry a handbag saying \u2018Cease Fire!\u2019<\/a> like one of the turbo-smug celebs at the Emmys did. You can call the IDF \u2018reckless and appalling\u2019<\/a>, as did Britain\u2019s new foreign secretary, Yvette Cooper, in an act of snivelling moral perfidy that heaps shame on our nation. None of it will make a blind bit of difference. This battle is as unstoppable as the sunrise tomorrow. Neither the IDF nor Hamas is backing down. So only one question remains: whose victory do you wish for?<\/p>\n

The Battle of Gaza City is already one of the most maligned clashes of modern times. Much of the media coverage leaves one with the wholly post-truth impression that the IDF is raiding Gaza City for sport. Or for land. Or in further, feverish pursuit of its curiously unsuccessful \u2018genocide\u2019<\/a> of the Palestinian people. The other side in the battle \u2013 Hamas\u2019s army of apocalyptic Jew-haters \u2013 has been virtually invisibilised. We rarely hear of them. It\u2019s as bizarre as if newspapers had reported on the Battle of Raqqa without mentioning ISIS, or the Battle of Berlin without ever saying the word \u2018Nazi\u2019.<\/p>\n

Anyone who writes, tweets or talks about the Battle of Gaza City without referencing the numerous cells of tooled-up guerrilla fighters lying in wait for the soldiers of the Jewish State is flat-out engaging in misinformation. It\u2019s a kind of wartime censorship to erase one side in a battle \u2013 worse, the side that started the war in the first place with its pogrom against the Jews of southern Israel on 7 October 2023<\/a>. The truth about the Battle of Gaza City is that on one side there are tens of thousands of soldiers from two divisions of the IDF, and on the other an estimated 3,000 Hamas gunmen and their Islamist allies under the command of Izz El-Din al-Haddad.<\/p>\n

Haddad is called \u2018the last Hamas commander\u2019<\/a>. He\u2019s believed to have been commander of the Al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas\u2019s armed wing, since May 2025, following the IDF\u2019s assassination of Yahya Sinwar<\/a> and then his brother, Mohammed. Earlier this month, the Saudis reported that Haddad had sent an internal communique to Hamas cells in Gaza City telling them to prepare for a \u2018fierce battle that could last for months\u2019. All available forces will be mobilised to inflict \u2018severe blows\u2019 on the IDF, he said. He is coordinating with Palestinian Islamic Jihad, too. As a result of his military conspiring<\/a>, Gaza City is overrun with \u2018small cells of well-prepared guerrilla fighters\u2019, refortified with \u2018more explosives, more anti-tank missiles and more sniper fire\u2019.<\/p>\n

Enjoying spiked?<\/p>\n

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?<\/p>\n

We are funded by you. Thank you!<\/p>\n

\n \u00a32
\n \u00a35
\n \u00a320
\n \u00a350\n <\/p>\n

Choose an amount<\/p>\n

\n Donate now\n <\/p>\n

\n Please wait… <\/p>\n

If you\u2019re reading a media report about Gaza City and it doesn\u2019t mention any of this, stop reading. You\u2019re being fed half-truths. And when you hear about scores of people dying in Gaza City \u2013 a horrendous inevitability of war \u2013 remember that some of them will be these fanatics that Haddad has rallied to deliver \u2018severe blows\u2019 against the Jewish nation. So many canards and one-sided claims swirl through the media coverage of the war in Gaza that it falls to serious-thinking citizens to fill in the gaps. To remember that Hamas exists, that it continues to fight the IDF, and that its leaders dream of the further fascistic slaughter of Jews \u2013 \u2018We will do this again and again\u2019, as they\u2019ve said<\/a> of 7 October.<\/p>\n

What the Israelophobes of the West falsely call \u2018genocide\u2019 is war. The thinness of their \u2018genocide\u2019 accusation, the sheer defamatory cynicism of it, was summed up in that report published this week by a UN commission of inquiry<\/a>. Israel is committing genocide, it said<\/a>. Its proof? That \u2018Israeli security forces were aware that their military operations since 7 October 2023 would cause the deaths of Palestinians in Gaza\u2019. They \u2018knew of the high numbers of casualties\u2019, but they did not \u2018intervene to change the means and methods of warfare employed\u2019. Am I going mad or is that just war? By this infantile definition \u2013 basically, your military action caused casualties \u2013 every war in history has been a genocide. Remember this historical illiteracy and moral treachery with which the genocide lie is weaponised against the Jewish State when you hear that the Battle of Gaza City is \u2018genocidal\u2019 too, which you will.<\/p>\n

To be clear, the Battle of Gaza City does represent a new and dangerous turn in the Israel-Hamas War. As Haaretz says<\/a>, so far in 2025 the IDF has \u2018operated in areas with few civilians\u2019, focussing on \u2018destroying Hamas\u2019s tunnels and other terror infrastructure\u2019. Its targets had mostly been \u2018mapped before the troops entered\u2019. Gaza City is a more daunting prospect. Hamas militants have decamped there in their thousands. They\u2019ve rebuilt their tunnels<\/a>. Not all civilians have evacuated. And of course there are the Israeli hostages. Chillingly, it is reported that Hamas is starting to move some hostages above ground, in an effort to \u2018hinder [the] IDF offensive\u2019<\/a>. Using Jews as human shields against the Jewish army \u2013 a new low in savagery for this army of anti-Semites.<\/p>\n

And yet the battle is happening. It\u2019s underway. And sides must be taken. Here\u2019s the thing: some people have taken a side without realising it. For if you tell only one side in an existential war to cease fire, then you\u2019re objectively aligning with the other side. Imagine two men are having a duel and you tell just one of them to put away his gun. That isn\u2019t peacenik behaviour \u2013 it\u2019s an implicit statement that one man\u2019s life is worth less than the other\u2019s. That\u2019s what I hear when the opinion-forming classes squawk \u2018Stop Israel\u2019 \u2013 that they\u2019ve decided, however witlessly, that the security of the Jewish nation is of less moral worth than the deranged ambitions of those Hamas cells in Gaza City. That\u2019s what was so unforgivable about Yvette Cooper\u2019s slamming of Israel\u2019s \u2018reckless and appalling\u2019 incursion into Gaza City \u2013 she will have inadvertently boosted Hamas and confirmed it in its sick belief that the IDF is a marauding gang deserving of punishment.<\/p>\n

The Battle of Gaza City will be bloody and awful. Palestinians will suffer and young Israeli soldiers will die. Yet that should not detract from the moral truth that this is a battle between the army of a democratic nation and a terrorist militia that loathes the infidel West as much as it does the Jews. Sitting this clash out might be a luxury the lost souls of our cushioned, faux-virtuous elites can afford. But it\u2019s too risky for the rest of us. So what do you want: the victory of the Jewish nation or the victory of radical Islamists who slit the throats of Jews? A win for our ally in Enlightenment or a win for the regressive forces of violent medieval intolerance? Quit your performative angst and pick a side.<\/p>\n

Brendan O\u2019Neill is spiked\u2019s chief political writer and host of the spiked podcast, The Brendan O\u2019Neill Show<\/a>. Subscribe to the podcast here<\/a>. His latest book \u2013 After the Pogrom: 7 October, Israel and the Crisis of Civilisation \u2013 is available to order on Amazon UK<\/a> and Amazon US<\/a> now. And find Brendan on Instagram: @burntoakboy<\/a><\/p>\n

Help us hit our 1% target<\/p>\n

spiked is funded by you. It\u2019s your generosity that keeps us going and growing.<\/p>\n

Only 0.1% of our regular readers currently donate to spiked. If you are one of the 99.9% who appreciates what we do, but hasn\u2019t given just yet, please consider making a donation today. <\/p>\n

If just 1% of our loyal readers donated regularly, it would be transformative for us, allowing us to vastly expand our team and coverage.<\/p>\n

Plus, if you donate \u00a35 a month or \u00a350 a year, you can join