Nevada will pay $447,000 in court-ordered fines for continued delays in providing mental health care to criminal defendants in Clark County, the latest sign of its struggles to quickly provide treatment.<\/p>\n
Defendants deemed unfit for trial are supposed to be transferred to a mental health facility within seven days of a court order, but the state has consistently failed to meet this deadline amid a shortage of mental health facilities.<\/p>\n
Last year, a Clark County judge held the state in contempt and placed sanctions of $500 for each day a transfer is delayed. Since then, there have been 32 orders when sanctions applied, adding up to the $447,000 penalty.<\/p>\n
The state has been assessed $1.4 million in fines related to delays in mental health care over the past two years, with more than half coming last year via a $753,500 penalty<\/a> in Washoe County.<\/p>\n Tuesday\u2019s approval from the Board of Examiners \u2014 a panel consisting of the governor, attorney general and secretary of state \u2014 came with no discussion. The state\u2019s Division of Public and Behavioral Health, which is responsible for connecting defendants with treatment, did not respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n It needs one more final approval from the state\u2019s Interim Finance Committee (IFC), a group of lawmakers that makes financial decisions when the Legislature is not in session. The money will go to Mojave Mental Health, a clinic affiliated with UNLV.<\/p>\n The continued payouts reflect the struggles facing the state in providing care to defendants deemed unfit to stand trial.<\/p>\n The issue dates back to 2005, when a man sued the department after never being transported to a treatment center. The state previously sued to stop the fines, arguing the seven-day timeline would be \u201cimpossible\u201d to meet and that consistent fines would put the agency \u201con a debt treadmill,\u201d but the Nevada Supreme Court upheld<\/a> them in 2023.<\/p>\n In a December Clark County court hearing, attorneys representing the public health agency argued that it could not legally pay for the fees because its budget does not account for these payments. The agency can go to IFC for extra funding when the Legislature is not in session.<\/p>\n \u201cIt is unclear to the court why the division failed to address this issue prior to the end of the last legislative session or during the special session, or at other interim IFC meetings,\u201d District Court Judge Christy Craig said at the hearing, according to a transcript. <\/p>\n Craig said she was concerned about the frequency of the delays, even if the agency is making efforts to lower wait times.<\/p>\n These efforts include placing certain individuals into nursing facilities, bringing on staff to divert defendants who might be better served outside of hospitals, renovating a mental health building to increase capacity and starting mental health programming in detention centers, where defendants are held prior to receiving treatment.<\/p>\n The agency\u2019s latest budget also allocates $17.6 million for 21 additional beds for Southern Nevada patients and 53 new positions related to care for criminal defendants. The state is also planning to build a new mental health treatment facility in Southern Nevada, set to open in 2029.<\/p>\n \u201cIt seems as if it\u2019s just become a kind of a cost of doing business \u2014 that sanctions are going to be imposed and that the division is going to pay them,\u201d Craig said. \u201cI recognize that the division is attempting to do things to try to ameliorate the problem of the failure to promptly transport, but it has been 20 years of these issues.\u201d<\/p>\n As of last February, the treatment wait times were decreasing. The agency did not respond to a request for more recent wait time data.<\/p>\n Craig also noted that these delays can have negative downstream effects, referring to one recent case where a man \u2014 detained at a county jail while awaiting mental health treatment \u2014 picked up an additional battery charge while in custody.<\/p>\n \u201cIncapacitated criminal defendants suffer from various harms while they languish in facilities that are not equipped to treat them while awaiting transport,\u201d Craig said. \u201cThese harms include worsening of their mental illness, bodily harm, and even death.\u201d<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n