{"id":288130,"date":"2026-02-12T20:52:17","date_gmt":"2026-02-12T20:52:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/288130\/"},"modified":"2026-02-12T20:52:17","modified_gmt":"2026-02-12T20:52:17","slug":"some-on-wall-street-think-u-s-jobs-number-is-implausible-and-will-be-corrected-downward","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/288130\/","title":{"rendered":"Some on Wall Street think U.S. jobs number is \u2018implausible\u2019 and will be corrected downward"},"content":{"rendered":"

S&P 500 futures were up 0.32% this morning after the index closed flat yesterday at 6,941. Investors seem to be buoyed by the strong job-market numbers published yesterday<\/a> by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. With unemployment falling from 4.4% to 4.3%, many Wall Street analysts are saying that this means the U.S. Federal Reserve is now less likely to cut interest rates further. If the economy is doing just fine, there\u2019s no need to risk inflation by delivering still more cheaper money, the theory goes.<\/p>\n

Some of them think the labor market is now so tight that the Fed may even raise rates (a scenario likely to provoke rage from President Donald Trump<\/a>).\u00a0<\/p>\n

But, as always, the devil is in the details. A couple of analysts are worried that the latest number might be wrong, and that the level of job creation in the U.S. is lower than the stats suggest.<\/p>\n

First, the number of jobs added in January\u2014130,000\u2014was roughly double analysts\u2019 expectations. Analysts aren\u2019t always right, of course. But it is interesting that the reported number was way out of line with economists\u2019 estimates.<\/p>\n

Second, the BLS revised downward the number of jobs it previously reported for 2024\u201325. The real number was just 181,000, the agency said, and not the 584,000 it had estimated earlier.<\/p>\n

That suggests the January number may also be revised downward in the months to come.<\/p>\n

Right now, traders are choosing to believe the numbers. The highly reliable CME FedWatch index, which tracks bets on future rate-setting decisions by the Fed, shows a 92% chance of the Fed keeping rates at the 3.5% level in March, and a 78% chance of that hold continuing in April. Only in June does the chance of a cut hit 50%.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe broad-based strength in the January jobs report vindicates our view that the Fed won\u2019t cut under [current Fed Chair Jerome] Powell,\u201d Shruti Mishra and her team at Bank of America<\/a> advised in a note seen by Fortune.\u00a0(Powell is due to leave office in May.)<\/p>\n

Analysts at Macquarie went so far as to argue that the Fed may be forced to raise rates if the job market continues to tighten. \u201cWe continue to expect that the rate cutting is complete with the next move likely to be a hike, potentially in 2026,\u201d David Doyle and Chinara Azizova told clients.\u00a0<\/p>\n

But others think the headline jobs number conceals weakness below the surface. \u201cI wouldn\u2019t exhale with today\u2019s job numbers. The job market remains fragile and highly vulnerable,\u201d Moody\u2019s chief economist Mark Zandi told followers on X<\/a>. \u201cYes, payroll employment increased by 130,000 in January, but given the big downward revisions to history, there has been no job growth since last April (Liberation Day).<\/p>\n

\u201cIndeed, over the past year, without the job gains in health care, the economy would have lost a bunch of jobs,\u201d he said, illustrating his point with this chart:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Samuel Tombs and Oliver Allen at Pantheon Macroeconomics went further. They noticed that most of the jobs created were in health care, and the \u201cimplausible\u201d new number seems way out of trend.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn January 2025, the model inferred that 40K jobs were created on net at health care businesses that either set up or closed. This January, the model assumes 85K jobs were created. Our chart [below] shows the openings-to-employment ratio in the health care sector has fallen recently and now is below its long-run average, suggesting a much weaker pace of growth in payrolls lies ahead.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

That massive spike in January reflects the flawed statistical model used to collect the data, they argue. <\/p>\n

\u201cIt is premature to conclude the labor market has turned a corner just yet,\u201d they said. \u201cAs a result, we still expect the FOMC [Federal Open Market Committee] to ease policy by 75 basis points this year, but we now look for cuts in June, July, and September, rather than March, June, and September.\u201d<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s a snapshot of the markets ahead of the opening bell in New York this morning:<\/p>\n

S&P 500 futures were up 0.32% this morning. The last session closed flat at 6,941.<\/p>\n

The STOXX Europe 600 was up 0.45% in early trading.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The U.K.\u2019s FTSE 100 was up 0.3% in early trading.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Japan\u2019s Nikkei 225 was flat.\u00a0<\/p>\n

China\u2019s CSI 300 was up 0.12%.<\/p>\n

The South Korea KOSPI was up 3.13%.<\/p>\n

India\u2019s Nifty 50 was down 0.57%.<\/p>\n

Bitcoin was up at $67.5K.<\/p>\n

Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit May 19\u201320, 2026, in Atlanta. The next era of workplace innovation is here\u2014and the old playbook is being rewritten. At this exclusive, high-energy event, the world\u2019s most innovative leaders will convene to explore how AI, humanity, and strategy converge to redefine, again, the future of work. Register now<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"S&P 500 futures were up 0.32% this morning after the index closed flat yesterday at 6,941. Investors seem…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":288131,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[114,184,13753,4318,85,46,190,5615],"class_list":{"0":"post-288130","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-economy","8":"tag-business","9":"tag-economy","10":"tag-fed-interest-rate","11":"tag-federal-reserve","12":"tag-il","13":"tag-israel","14":"tag-markets","15":"tag-stock"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288130","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=288130"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/288130\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/288131"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=288130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=288130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=288130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}