{"id":296024,"date":"2026-02-17T18:14:09","date_gmt":"2026-02-17T18:14:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/296024\/"},"modified":"2026-02-17T18:14:09","modified_gmt":"2026-02-17T18:14:09","slug":"the-space-review-musks-moon-mania","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/296024\/","title":{"rendered":"The Space Review: Musk\u2019s Moon mania"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/5160a.jpg\" width=\"600\" height=\"339\" alt=\"Moonbase Alpha\"\/><\/p>\n<p>In a presentation to xAI employees, Elon Musk described establishing a \u201cMoonbase Alpha\u201d that would build AI data center satellites and launch them using a mass driver. (credit: xAI)<\/p>\n<p>by Jeff Foust<br \/>Monday, February 16, 2026<\/p>\n<p>\nWhat has been the most surprising development in space in the last year? Perhaps it was the saga of Jared Isaacman\u2019s nomination to be NASA administrator. That was an unprecedented ordeal, with Isaacman\u2019s nomination suddenly withdrawn only for him to be renominated months later. But in the end, the result was what most expected a year ago: Isaacman leading the space agency.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor those unaware, SpaceX has already shifted focus to building a self-growing city on the Moon, as we can potentially achieve that in less than 10 years, whereas Mars would take 20+ years,\u201d Musk wrote.<\/p>\n<p>\nPerhaps it was NASA\u2019s budget, with the White House proposing severe cuts to overall spending and even steeper cuts in areas like science and space technology, along with cancellations or early terminations of key elements of Artemis. But by the time the final fiscal year 2026 spending bill was enacted in January, NASA\u2019s 2026 budget was close to its 2025 budget, with few cancellations.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nArguably the biggest surprise in the last year is the one that has developed just in the last several weeks: SpaceX\u2019s sharp pivot to the Moon. A year ago, it seemed that Elon Musk, using his influence in the new Trump Administration, was shifting space policy from a return to the Moon towards human missions to Mars. That was evident in everything from Trump\u2019s mention of \u201claunching American astronauts to plant the Stars and Stripes on the planet Mars\u201d in his inaugural address to a budget proposal that included funding for new Mars exploration technology initiatives.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nNow, though, it\u2019s SpaceX that\u2019s changing course. The administration has made clear its near-term focus in human space exploration is the Moon, returning astronauts to the lunar surface before China can land its first taikonauts there. A White House executive order in December, which effectively serves as the national space policy, calls for a human landing on the Moon by 2028 and beginning work on a permanent outpost there by 2030. Mars is only mentioned in passing as a goal for the indefinite future.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nSpaceX, already under pressure to accelerate work on the lunar lander version of Starship for NASA\u2019s Human Landing System program (see <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thespacereview.com\/article\/5094\/1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cThe (possibly) great lunar lander race\u201d<\/a>, The Space Review, November 3, 2025), seems to shifted even more towards the Moon in recent weeks, culminating in a social media post by Musk February 8, just as the Super Bowl was about to kick off.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\u201cFor those unaware, SpaceX has already shifted focus to building a self-growing city on the Moon, as we can potentially achieve that in less than 10 years, whereas Mars would take 20+ years,\u201d he <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/elonmusk\/status\/2020640004628742577\" rel=\"nofollow\">wrote<\/a>.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nNeedless to say, most were unaware of that shift in focus. For most of SpaceX\u2019s nearly quarter-century history, the company, and Musk, were deeply associated with a human presence on Mars, not the Moon. That was the subject of numerous presentations by Musk over the years, which have described making humanity \u201cmultiplanetary\u201d by establishing human settlements, even large cities, on Mars in the next few decades.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nThat included, as an example, a talk he gave at Starbase in May around the time of a Starship test flight. \u201cProgress is measured by the timeline to establishing a self-sustaining civilization on Mars,\u201d he said then (see <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thespacereview.com\/article\/5002\/1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cStarship setbacks and strategies\u201d<\/a>, The Space Review, June 9, 2025).\n<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAlong the way we can do cool things, like have a Moon base, like Moonbase Alpha,\u201d Musk said last May.<\/p>\n<p>\nHe used that talk to outline plans for sending Starships to Mars, starting as soon as the next launch opportunity in 2026. That plan called for sending 500 landers to Mars in 2033, each capable of carrying 300 tons of payload. The goals for that launch campaign included establishing global mobility and communications at Mars as well as resource extraction and \u201cincrease independence from Earth.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\nMusk made only a passing reference to the Moon in that talk. \u201cAlong the way we can do cool things, like have a Moon base, like Moonbase Alpha,\u201d he said, referencing the classic sci-fi TV series \u201cSpace: 1999\u201d. (\u201cMoonbase Alpha\u201d was also the name of <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Moonbase_Alpha\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a video game released in 2010<\/a> developed in cooperation with NASA, in which the player is an astronaut at a lunar base in the then-distant future of 2025.)\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\u201cWe should have a Moonbase Alpha. The next step after the Apollo program would be to have a base on the Moon,\u201d Musk said. That base, he suggested, would be a \u201cgigantic science station.\u201d But after that brief digression, Musk returned to talking about sending humans to Mars, the main thrust of the talk.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nMusk has talked about establishing a lunar base off and on in the past, even using the same name for it. For example, at one conference in July 2017 he expressed his support for a lunar base. \u201cIf you want to get the public really fired up, you\u2019ve got to have a base on the Moon,\u201d he said then.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nA few months later, talking about what was then called BFR at the International Astronautical Congress in Adelaide, Australia, he mentioned the ability of that predecessor of Starship to support a lunar base, which he also called Moonbase Alpha. \u201cIt\u2019s 2017,\u201d he said in that speech. \u201cI mean, we should have a lunar base by now. What the hell\u2019s going on?\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\nThese concepts, though, seemed like side quests: nice things to do but not on the critical path to making humanity multiplanetary. The company\u2019s interest in the Moon appeared largely limited to developing the HLS lander version of Starship, along the way gaining experience in technologies like in-space propellant transfer also needed for Mars.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nSo what changed? Musk, in his Super Bowl Sunday announcement, suggested it was a matter of speed. \u201cIt is only possible to travel to Mars when the planets align every 26 months (six month trip time), whereas we can launch to the Moon every 10 days (2 day trip time),\u201d he wrote. \u201cThis means we can iterate much faster to complete a Moon city than a Mars city.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\nThat, however, has always been the case. In the past SpaceX was willing to overlook any advantages rapidly iterating at the Moon offered in favor of pressing ahead as fast as possible to Mars.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nThe shift from Mars to the Moon comes as part of some of the biggest changes at SpaceX in years. In December, SpaceX executives said that the company was preparing to go public after years of claiming it would remain private: \u201cWe can\u2019t go public until we\u2019re flying regularly to Mars,\u201d SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell said in 2018 (see <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thespacereview.com\/article\/5122\/1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cSpaceX, orbital data centers, and the journey to Mars,\u201d<\/a> The Space Review, December 15, 2025).\n<\/p>\n<p>\nWhile the company\u2019s CFO, Bret Johnsen, said that the proceeds for an IPO would allow SpaceX to \u201cbuild Moonbase Alpha and send uncrewed and crewed missions to Mars,\u201d the near-term factor in that decision was developing orbital data centers intended to serve what is, for now, an insatiable demand for computing power for AI applications.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nTwo weeks ago, Musk took another step in that direction when he announced that SpaceX would acquire xAI, his AI and social media company. The goal, he said, was to create a vertically integrated company that could both deploy and use the orbital data centers he insists is the future of AI.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\u201cMy estimate is that within 2 to 3 years, the lowest cost way to generate AI compute will be in space,\u201d he wrote in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.spacex.com\/updates#xai-joins-spacex\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a memo announcing the deal<\/a> that was published on SpaceX\u2019s website. \u201cIn the long term, space-based AI is obviously the only way to scale.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re going to make it real. We\u2019re actually going to have a mass driver on the Moon,\u201d he said. \u201cI really want to see the mass driver on the Moon that is shooting AI satellites into deep space.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\nJust a few days earlier, SpaceX filed an application with the FCC for an orbital data center constellation of up to one million satellites. The satellites would operate in both sun-synchronous and mid-inclination orbits between 500 and 2,000 kilometers. The spacecraft in sun-synchronous orbits would be oriented to be in near-constant sunlight, providing continuous services, while those in mid-inclination orbits would handle peaks in demand.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nThe brief application had little in the way of technical details\u2014nothing about the size and power of the satellites or specific orbital planes\u2014but plenty of grandiose visions. \u201cLaunching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step toward becoming a Kardashev Type II civilization \u2014 one that can harness the sun\u2019s full power \u2014 while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity\u2019s multiplanetary future among the stars,\u201d the company stated.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nMusk used some of the same language in the memo discussion the xAI acquisition. \u201cBy directly harnessing near-constant solar power with little operating or maintenance costs, these satellites will transform our ability to scale compute. It\u2019s always sunny in space!\u201d he wrote. \u201cLaunching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centers is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization, one that can harness the Sun\u2019s full power, while supporting AI-driven applications for billions of people today and ensuring humanity\u2019s multi-planetary future.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\nMusk added that, eventually, the orbital data center satellites might be built and launched from the Moon, enabling terawatts of AI computing power. \u201cThanks to advancements like in-space propellant transfer, Starship will be capable of landing massive amounts of cargo on the Moon. Once there, it will be possible to establish a permanent presence for scientific and manufacturing pursuits,\u201d he wrote.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\u201cFactories on the Moon can take advantage of lunar resources to manufacture satellites and deploy them further into space. By using an electromagnetic mass driver and lunar manufacturing, it is possible to put 500 to 1000 TW\/year of AI satellites into deep space, meaningfully ascend the Kardashev scale and harness a non-trivial percentage of the Sun\u2019s power,\u201d he said. No one could accuse Musk of not thinking big.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nLast week, xAI posted <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/xai\/status\/2021667200885829667\" rel=\"nofollow\">a video of a company all-hands meeting<\/a> hosted by Musk. Most of the 45-minute session involved updates from employees on various projects, but Musk closed the presentation with another vision of a lunar-enabled future for AI.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\u201cUltimately, you have to go out there and explore the universe to understand it, and that\u2019s the motivation behind the combination of SpaceX and xAI,\u201d he said. By launching spacecraft from Earth, he said the combined company could deploy 100 to 200 gigawatts of AI compute a year, with a path to one terawatt a year.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\u201cBut what if you want to go beyond a mere terawatt?\u201d he asked. (AI data centers used about four gigawatts of power in the US in 2024, and are projected to grow to 123 gigawatts by 2035, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/action.deloitte.com\/insight\/4718\/ai-data-centers-jolt-power-demand\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a study by Deloitte<\/a> last year.) \u201cIn order to do that, you have to go to the Moon.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\nHe described a factory that would build data center satellites on the Moon, launching them using a mass driver, which he described as a concept from science fiction. \u201cWe\u2019re going to make it real. We\u2019re actually going to have a mass driver on the Moon,\u201d he said. \u201cI really want to see the mass driver on the Moon that is shooting AI satellites into deep space.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\nOn screen, an illustration of such a mass driver appeared, looking not unlike concepts from half a century ago proposed by Gerard K. O\u2019Neill and other advocates of space colonies, who proposed building those free-space settlements using lunar resources transported by mass drivers.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n\u201cI can\u2019t imagine anything more epic than a mass driver on the Moon and a self-sustaining city on the Moon and going beyond the Moon to Mars,\u201d he concluded, \u201cgoing throughout our solar system and ultimately being out there among the stars.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMusk is making a huge mistake,\u201d Zubrin wrote. \u201cMusk\u2019s tweet is nonsense.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\nIn none of the filings, memos, or presentations did Musk provide a schedule for his AI-enabled space ambitions, including a lunar satellite factory and self-sustaining city, beyond the comment in his post that a city on the Moon is potentially possible feasible within a decade. Most in the space industry, though, know such schedules are, as Musk himself has acknowledged, \u201caspirational.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\nIt does, though, suggest a new underlying thesis for Musk and SpaceX. He previously said that the company\u2019s Starlink constellation would help fund human missions to Mars: \u201cStarlink internet is what\u2019s being used to help pay for humanity getting to Mars,\u201d he said at Starbase last year, thanking Starlink customers \u201cfor helping secure the future of civilization and helping make life multiplanetary.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\nPerhaps that business case no longer closes, either because of a better understanding of the revenues Starlink can generate or the costs of getting humans to Mars. Or the opportunity presented by AI and the demand for data centers is so compelling that it warrants going to the Moon first to enable that, even if satellite factories on the Moon are still decades away.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nWhatever the reason, it has dismayed Mars advocates, the biggest of whom is Robert Zubrin. \u201cMusk is making a huge mistake,\u201d Zubrin wrote in <a href=\"https:\/\/unherd.com\/newsroom\/abandoning-mars-could-be-elon-musks-biggest-mistake\/?mc_cid=da4e989e55&amp;mc_eid=3c7e60889a\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">an essay<\/a> published last week, citing the lack of resources there for a \u201cself-sustaining city\u201d and propulsion constraints. \u201cIn short, Musk\u2019s tweet is nonsense.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\nZubrin speculates Musk is motivated by the vast wealth AI data centers on the Moon could generate. \u201cOr it might be where his winning streak ends,\u201d he speculates. If lunar or orbital data centers can\u2019t compete with terrestrial data centers\u2014and Zubrin is skeptical they can\u2014he worries \u201cit could prove a financial disaster that collapses his credibility, and with it his entire corporate empire.\u201d\n<\/p>\n<p>\nMusk has said he is not giving up on Mars. \u201cSpaceX will also strive to build a Mars city and begin doing so in about 5 to 7 years, but the overriding priority is securing the future of civilization and the Moon is faster,\u201d he wrote in the post announcing the shift to the Moon. He has subsequently suggested this new approach could actually speed up that city on Mars.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nAnd he has a need to speed things up: in June he will turn 55. If he still wants to achieve a goal he has long mentioned of dying on Mars\u2014\u201cjust not on impact,\u201d he would frequently add\u2014a focus in the near term on the Moon needs to be an enabler if not accelerator of his Mars vision, not a diversion.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nPerhaps in a year this will look like what happened with the NASA administrator confirmation process or the agency\u2019s budget: a period of wild, unexpected swings that end up back to \u201cnormal,\u201d in this case with Musk and SpaceX again monomaniacally focused on Mars. If not, this could turn out to be one of the biggest shifts in spaceflight so far this century.\n<\/p>\n<p class=\"byline\">Jeff Foust (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thespacereview.com\/article\/5160\/mailto:jeff@thespacereview.com\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">jeff@thespacereview.com<\/a>) is the editor and publisher of The Space Review, and a senior staff writer with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spacenews.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">SpaceNews<\/a>. He also operates the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spacetoday.net\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Spacetoday.net<\/a> web site.  Views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author alone.<\/p>\n<p class=\"info2\">Note: we are now moderating comments. There will be a delay in posting comments and no guarantee that all submitted comments will be posted.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In a presentation to xAI employees, Elon Musk described establishing a \u201cMoonbase Alpha\u201d that would build AI data&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":296025,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[85,46,141,145],"class_list":["post-296024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-space","tag-il","tag-israel","tag-science","tag-space"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=296024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296024\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/296025"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=296024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=296024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=296024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}