On Thursday U.S. president Donald Trump announced on his social media platform Truth Social that he would direct the Department of Defense and other federal agencies to \u201cbegin the process of identifying and releasing Government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters.\u201d<\/p>\n
The directive came after a podcast interview last week in which former president Barack Obama said that he believed aliens were \u201creal\u201d but that he hadn\u2019t seen evidence of them during his presidency.<\/p>\n
Speaking to reporters onboard Air Force One on Thursday, Trump criticized Obama\u2019s remarks, alleging that the former president\u2019s comments had disclosed \u201cclassified information.\u201d (Trump himself has previously faced charges<\/a> for improper handling of classified materials.) Trump\u2019s declassification order, the current president said, \u201cmay get [Obama] out of trouble.\u201d<\/p>\n On supporting science journalism<\/p>\n If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing<\/a>. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.<\/p>\n Sean Kirkpatrick, who served as the first director of the Pentagon\u2019s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office<\/a> (AARO) from 2022 to 2023, tells Scientific American that \u201cObama said nothing classified and, in fact, said nothing that hasn\u2019t been said in many forums\u2014including in congressional testimony.\u201d<\/p>\n Trump\u2019s announcement also comes hot on the heels of the contentious release of other government documents\u2014a vast, heavily redacted database of materials<\/a> derived from federal investigations into disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, with whom Trump and many other powerful world figures had been associated.<\/p>\n What do President Trump and former President Obama know about aliens?<\/p>\n Obama has since clarified his views on aliens after his podcast interview caused uproar, saying in an Instagram post<\/a> that he \u201csaw no evidence during my presidency that extraterrestrials have made contact with us. Really!\u201d The assertion that aliens are real, the former president said, was a matter of statistics<\/a>: \u201cThe universe is so vast that the odds are good there\u2019s life out there,\u201d he wrote. \u201cBut the distances between solar systems are so great that the chances we\u2019ve been visited by aliens is low.\u201d<\/p>\n Obama\u2019s view is one echoed by Bill Diamond, president and CEO of the SETI Institute in Mountain View, California, a research organization dedicated to the search for extraterrestrial intelligence and other astrobiology topics. \u201cThe statistical probability that we are alone in the universe is zero,\u201d Diamond says.<\/p>\n Trump, for his part, explained to reporters onboard Air Force One that he, too, is in the dark, saying that \u201cI don\u2019t know if they\u2019re real or not.\u201d<\/p>\n Is there evidence that aliens have ever visited Earth?<\/p>\n To date, no U.S. government report or investigation has produced any evidence that extraterrestrials have visited Earth despite many decades of official study tracing back to the mid-20th century. In the past decade, the Pentagon\u2019s AARO<\/a>, as well as a NASA-commissioned expert panel<\/a>, have documented sightings of unexplained objects, now generally referred to as unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs), but neither has concluded that any of these incidents are evidence of alien technology or life.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is no evidence to suggest that any of these UAP sightings are extraterrestrial in nature,\u201d Kirkpatrick says. \u201cThere is, however, a tendency to sensationalize sightings<\/a> for which there is little hard data.\u201d<\/p>\n Many such events have been ultimately attributed<\/a> to misidentified aircraft, atmospheric phenomena or sensor artifacts\u2014although experts acknowledge there is much still to learn<\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cAs a scientist and a member of NASA\u2019s UAP panel, I haven\u2019t seen anything that indicates we have observed phenomena that violate the laws of physics and require an alien society visiting us to be explained,\u201d says Federica Bianco, an astrophysicist at the University of Delaware. \u201cWe have shown in our NASA study group that even the most unusual sightings could be explained by known human-built technologies when the right assumptions were made.\u201d<\/p>\n The fact that so many people believe UAPs are evidence of contact with extraterrestrial beings \u201csays much more about human nature than it does about the presence of any compelling evidence suggesting alien visitation,\u201d Diamond adds. \u201cClearly, as a species we don\u2019t want to be alone.\u201d<\/p>\n Beyond the federal realm, some space scientists such as Avi Loeb, an astrophysicist at Harvard University, and Beatriz Villarroel, a researcher at the Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics in Sweden, have independently presented claims of evidence for possible alien visitation. Much of Loeb\u2019s focus<\/a> has been on the surprising behavior of interstellar objects<\/a> passing through the solar system. Meanwhile Villaroel has argued that lights in the sky that appeared on pre-space-age photographic plates could indicate artificial objects that were in Earth orbit<\/a> before the launch of humanity\u2019s first satellites.<\/p>\n These claims have been widely met with skepticism by other scientists, with some arguing that these observations can be explained by natural causes or human activity.<\/p>\n Thomas Zurbuchen, an astrophysicist and former associate administrator of NASA\u2019s Science Mission Directorate, who set up the agency\u2019s UAP panel, says that scientific investigations of potential alien encounters should not be inappropriately stigmatized and that the recommendations in the group\u2019s final report<\/a> still stand.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s a good idea to look at various datasets and to look for unusual activity\u2014and learn from it as much as we can,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n The scientific search for extraterrestrial life is alive and well. Loeb, for instance, has launched the Galileo Project<\/a>, a network of small telescopes and other instruments that could observe and study overflying UAPs. And multiple modest SETI efforts<\/a> exist to look for electromagnetic transmissions<\/a> washing over Earth from putative cosmic civilizations. Like all previous searches, these have yet to deliver any conclusive evidence of aliens.<\/p>\n NASA, for its part, has spent decades and billions of dollars on the quest to find life elsewhere in the universe. Most recently, the space agency launched Europa Clipper<\/a> to scout out the habitability of a moon of Jupiter and developed the flying drone Dragonfly<\/a> to study the environment of Titan, Saturn\u2019s largest and perhaps most astrobiologically intriguing moon.<\/p>\n But NASA\u2019s most notable search for aliens is probably its effort to identify possible signs of ancient life on Mars and to bring samples back to Earth. The agency\u2019s Mars Sample Return program, however, has been plagued by budget overruns and schedule delays. Earlier this year its funding was zeroed out<\/a>, effectively canceling the mission.<\/p>\n Meanwhile observations of potentially habitable exoplanets by the James Webb Space Telescope have also uncovered what some scientists have controversially interpreted as possible biosignatures<\/a>. NASA is now in the midst of developing an even more ambitious telescope, the Habitable Worlds Observatory<\/a>, that is targeted for the 2030s and could more closely study promising exoplanets for potential signs of life.<\/p>\n \u201cThe scale of the search effort in both space and time,\u201d Diamond says, \u201cis vast and challenging\u2014particularly when we don\u2019t quite know exactly what we are looking for or what is the best possible method.\u201d<\/p>\n What happens next?<\/p>\n Trump\u2019s Thursday directive did not specify which government files will be declassified or when they might be made public but rather signaled the start of a process in which officials will review relevant documents and other evidence for potential disclosure. The selection, review, declassification and eventual release of any materials could take weeks, months or even years.<\/p>\n Kirkpatrick expects any release will contain \u201cno new revelations.\u201d<\/p>\n While acknowledging that she lacks access to classified information, astrophysicist Bianco says that \u201cthe timing convinces me that this is but a move to distract the people in the United States from multiple ongoing political and societal crises and the failures of this administration.\u201d<\/p>\n