Sign up to see the future, today<\/p>\n
Can\u2019t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech<\/p>\n
For years now, NASA\u2019s Hubble Space Telescope has had its fair share of brushes with death. The groundbreaking observatory launched into low-Earth orbit 36 years ago, and it\u2019s now been operational two decades<\/a> longer than its expected lifespan, delivering a treasure chest of invaluable scientific insights<\/a> that have greatly expanded our understanding of the universe.<\/p>\n But time hasn\u2019t been kind to the telescope. It\u2019s been in and out of \u201csafe mode\u201d several<\/a> times<\/a>, had computer glitches<\/a> bring it to its knees, and even started teetering thanks to most of its six gyros designed to keep it stabilized breaking down.<\/p>\n Most severely of all, its orbit has steadily decayed, foreshadowing its ultimate demise as much of it burns up in the Earth\u2019s atmosphere and any remains plummet to the planet below.<\/p>\n For decades, Hubble has circled our planet in a circular low-Earth orbit at an altitude of approximately 340 miles. But how much longer it will be able to hang on has become increasingly uncertain.<\/p>\n According to a graph posted on Bluesky<\/a> by Harvard astronomer and space tracker extraordinaire Jonathan McDowell<\/a>, the historic artifact could deorbit sooner than expected, possibly even before 2030. The visualization shows its altitude plunging from around 330 miles to just 300 miles between 2020 and 2026, a major decline compared to more steady downward shifts since the late 1990s \u2014 a \u201cdeath spiral,\u201d in the reckoning of The Register<\/a>.<\/p>\n In contrast, per NASA\u2019s website, Hubble is \u201cnot expected to re-enter Earth\u2019s atmosphere until the mid 2030s at the earliest,\u201d despite atmospheric drag causing its altitude to \u201cslowly\u201d decrease.<\/p>\n \u201cA propulsion module will eventually be attached to the telescope to complete either a controlled reentry into the South Pacific Ocean, or to boost Hubble into a much higher orbit to keep the inoperative telescope aloft for several more decades,\u201d the space agency\u2019s website reads. (However, when the page was last updated and whether NASA still has plans to visit the telescope once more for such an upgrade, remains unclear.)<\/p>\n What makes it an especially bittersweet moment is the fact that Hubble was designed to be serviced in person by astronauts. The observatory was visited by NASA\u2019s Space Shuttle five times<\/a> between 1990 and 2009, allowing astronauts to repair, upgrade, and maintain the telescope, giving it a new lease on life each time. Some of these efforts can be seen reflected in McDowell\u2019s graph, showing its altitude suddenly rising throughout the 1990s as the shuttle upgraded its orbit.<\/p>\n Since the retirement of the Shuttle, visiting the telescope has proven essentially impossible. According to a 2019 study<\/a>, the Hubble was meant to be retrieved by the Space Shuttle at the \u201cend of its life\u201d \u2014 except that \u201cno one foresaw that it would outlive the Space Shuttle Program.\u201d<\/p>\n The study predicted Hubble could enter the atmosphere as early as 2029, with the most likely scenario being 2033. A follow-up study<\/a> published in November also concluded that Hubble will most likely reenter in 2033.<\/p>\n One wildcard: NASA\u2019s new leader, who has been adamant that it\u2019s not time to give up on Hubble just yet. Billionaire SpaceX astronaut Jared Isaacman, who was sworn in as NASA administrator earlier this year, first proposed in 2022<\/a> to visit the telescope on board a SpaceX Crew Dragon to repair it \u2014 and even personally foot the bill<\/a> of such a mission.<\/p>\n NASA, however, has argued that the risks of damaging the aging telescope were too great<\/a>, especially considering the inherent differences between SpaceX\u2019s spacecraft and the Space Shuttle.<\/p>\n Now, of course, he\u2019s calling the shots at the agency \u2014 so it\u2019s within the realm of possibility that the Hubble could have one more Hail Mary in store.<\/p>\n