{"id":333286,"date":"2026-03-11T10:06:39","date_gmt":"2026-03-11T10:06:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/333286\/"},"modified":"2026-03-11T10:06:39","modified_gmt":"2026-03-11T10:06:39","slug":"govt-no-longer-required-to-pay-rm1-7-billion-in-pension-arrears-to-531976-retirees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/333286\/","title":{"rendered":"Govt No Longer Required To Pay RM1.7 Billion In Pension Arrears To 531,976 Retirees"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Follow us on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/saysdotcom\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">Instagram<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tiktok.com\/@saysdotcom\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">TikTok<\/a>, and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.whatsapp.com\/channel\/0029VZzynzi6RGJG0QbRfy3O\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener nofollow\">WhatsApp<\/a>\u00a0for the latest stories and breaking news.<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Appeal today, 9 March, overturned an earlier High Court ruling that would have seen the government paying out RM1.7 billion to over half a million retirees<\/p>\n<p>The case started when Aminah Ahmad, a former officer at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, together with 56 other retirees, filed a judicial review seeking to have their pensions adjusted based on the pre-2013 formula, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.freemalaysiatoday.com\/category\/nation\/2026\/03\/09\/govt-wins-appeal-high-court-order-compelling-pension-adjustment-set-aside\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">FMT<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>This formula required the government to review retirees&#8217; pensions in line with the salary adjustments for active civil servants.<\/p>\n<p>In January 2023, the High Court allowed the application, effectively granting the retirees&#8217; request and ordering the government to pay arrears totalling RM1.7 billion to 531,976 retirees.<\/p>\n<p>The payout was based on adjustments under the 2013 formula, which the applicants argued was more favourable than the current method outlined in the 2016 Service Circular.<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"img-fluid\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/ABdGbH5w-image-1024x683.png\" alt=\"Aminah Ahmad, a former officer at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs\"  \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"img-caption\">Pensioner Aminah Ahmad, a former Wisma Putra staff who retired in 2002, brought the action in 2017.<\/p>\n<p>Image via <a href=\"https:\/\/theedgemalaysia.com\/node\/745541\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Zahid Izzani\/The Edge<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Why did the Court of Appeal change the decision?<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Appeal, in a unanimous decision by a three-judge panel chaired by Justice Azhahari Kamal Ramli, overturned the High Court ruling.<\/p>\n<p>The appellate court ruled that the matter had already been decided in a 2022 Court of Appeal judgment that invalidated the 2013 amendment to the Pension Adjustment Act, which had provided retirees with a fixed annual 2% increase.<\/p>\n<p>The judges said that the retirees&#8217; current application was res judicata \u2014 a matter already adjudicated \u2014 and therefore constituted an abuse of the court process.<\/p>\n<p>The panel agreed with the government&#8217;s argument that the 2016 Service Circular PP 1\/2016 was an &#8220;enhancement&#8221; to the civil service scheme rather than a mandatory salary revision.<\/p>\n<p>Justice Lim Chong Fong and Justice Meor Hashimi Abdul Hamid clarified that today&#8217;s ruling applies specifically to the 57 respondents in this case, not all retirees nationwide.<\/p>\n<p>The court also noted that Aminah failed to prove she had suffered any loss from the 2013 amendment and had not appealed the 2022 decision at the time.<\/p>\n<p>How does this affect retirees?<\/p>\n<p>The government is no longer required to pay the RM1.7 billion in pension arrears previously ordered by the High Court.<\/p>\n<p>The total payout of RM1.7 billion in pension arrears, distributed among the 531,976 retirees involved, would have amounted to an average of approximately RM3,195 per person.<\/p>\n<p>While the court&#8217;s specific ruling on &#8220;abuse of process&#8221; was directed at the 57 respondents, setting aside the High Court order means all 531,976 retirees will not receive the previously mandated adjustment.<\/p>\n<p>Putrajaya is no longer bound to adjust pensions based on the 2016 Service Circular (PP 1\/2016), as the court agreed it was an &#8220;enhancement&#8221; rather than a salary revision.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s next?<\/p>\n<p>Lawyers representing the retirees, including Baljit Singh Sidhu and Gurpreet Kaur Pannu, said they intend to seek leave to appeal the decision at the Federal Court.<\/p>\n<p>The government was represented by Federal Counsel Sallehuddin Ali.<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"img-fluid\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/gnTX2hhx-image-1024x683.png\" alt=\"SAYS.com\"  \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"img-caption\">Aminah Ahmad (fifth from right) with lawyers Datuk Dr Abd Shukor Ahmad (her left) and Datuk Baljit Singh Sidhu (second from left) and the other pensioners.<\/p>\n<p>Image via <a href=\"https:\/\/theedgemalaysia.com\/node\/728779\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">The Edge<\/a><br \/>\n<script async src=\"\/\/www.instagram.com\/embed.js\"><\/script><script async src=\"\/\/www.tiktok.com\/embed.js\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Follow us on\u00a0Instagram,\u00a0TikTok, and\u00a0WhatsApp\u00a0for the latest stories and breaking news. The Court of Appeal today, 9 March, overturned&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":333287,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[114,163977,782,268,85,46,43,2955,14314,266,267,31120,4839],"class_list":{"0":"post-333286","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-personal-finance","8":"tag-business","9":"tag-courtofappeal","10":"tag-courts","11":"tag-finance","12":"tag-il","13":"tag-israel","14":"tag-news","15":"tag-pension","16":"tag-pensioner","17":"tag-personal-finance","18":"tag-personalfinance","19":"tag-putrajaya","20":"tag-retirees"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=333286"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/333286\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/333287"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=333286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=333286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=333286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}