{"id":351985,"date":"2026-03-22T08:12:21","date_gmt":"2026-03-22T08:12:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/351985\/"},"modified":"2026-03-22T08:12:21","modified_gmt":"2026-03-22T08:12:21","slug":"i-shot-200-photos-with-galaxy-s26-ultra-vs-iphone-17-pro-max-theres-a-clear-winner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/351985\/","title":{"rendered":"I shot 200 photos with Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max \u2014 there’s a clear winner"},"content":{"rendered":"

Now that I\u2019ve spent time with the Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max<\/a>, it\u2019s time to finally determine which is indeed the best camera phone<\/a> around. Apple\u2019s flagship has remained at the top ever since its release last fall, but Samsung is looking to reclaim the crown.<\/p>\n

Apple\u2019s 48MP triple camera setup has proven to be as reliable as ever for a number of different shooting situations, but it also received a big upgrade in the form of its 18MP Center Stage selfie camera. In our iPhone 17 Pro Max review<\/a>, my colleague Mark Spoonauer showed how it continues to be a master in low light.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Samsung has stepped up its game too with its quadruple camera system \u2014 which consists of a beefy 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide, 10MP 3x telephoto, and 50MP 5x telephoto. Around the front, there\u2019s a 12MP selfie shooter. While the specs indicate nothing\u2019s changed, two important upgrades we point out in our Galaxy S26 Ultra review<\/a> are its wider apertures for the main and 5x telephoto cameras.<\/p>\n

Article continues below <\/p>\n

You may like<\/p>\n

Are these upgrades enough for the Galaxy S26 Ultra to supplant the iPhone 17 Pro Max? I went out and captured over 200 photos to see how they compare across different scenarios, grading each one after inspecting the images on my monitor. Here\u2019s what I found.<\/p>\n

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Daytime<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve been enjoying the 2026 Chevrolet Corvette E-Ray for nearly a week now, and it gets the proper treatment from each phone. This one\u2019s a tough call, but I\u2019m giving it to the Galaxy S26 Ultra because it\u2019s much sharper with the details and handles the strong light source hitting the grass in the foreground better \u2014 plus, it has nicer contrast.<\/p>\n

Even though the iPhone 17 Pro Max produces a brighter picture, it results in a more low-contrast look. When I zoom into different parts of the shot, I also notice it’s not as sharp.<\/p>\n

Winner: Galaxy S26 Ultra<\/p>\n

Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.<\/p>\n

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Ultrawide<\/p>\n

You\u2019ll need to zoom into the shots above overlooking a busy spot on 34th Street in New York City, as these ultrawide cameras appear to deliver similar results at first glance.<\/p>\n

However, the iPhone 17 Pro Max draws my attention more for how it effectively adds contrast to the shot while maintaining sharper definition. For example, the bricks on the building to the left are much more clearly defined. The S26 Ultra’s pick looks a bit washed out where the sun hits.<\/p>\n

Winner: iPhone 17 Pro Max<\/p>\n

What to read next<\/p>\n

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Colors<\/p>\n

Under artificial indoor lighting, it\u2019s fascinating to see how these main cameras behave \u2014 particularly regarding their color reproduction. They\u2019re on opposite ends of the spectrum: the iPhone 17 Pro Max appears oversaturated, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit flatter. I\u2019m inclined to say that the Galaxy S26 Ultra\u2019s colors are more true-to-life.<\/p>\n

Beyond the colors, I like how both phones capture exquisite detail from the same vantage point. I was even able to read the UPC codes and numbers on all the soda packaging.<\/p>\n

Winner: Galaxy S26 Ultra<\/p>\n

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Dynamic range<\/p>\n

The shots above really test the dynamic range performance of both camera phones, as the strong light source from the sun overhead creates harsh shadows across the buildings.<\/p>\n

The Galaxy S26 Ultra is better at compensating for the exposure across the entire scene, whereas the iPhone 17 Pro Max maintains a stronger contrast that makes the overall image look darker.<\/p>\n

Winner: Galaxy S26 Ultra<\/p>\n

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Macro<\/p>\n

I really love how these macro close-ups of the lily turned out, especially with all the rich detail and definition they capture. Shooting in macro mode is challenging due to the narrow focal point required to keep the subject sharp.<\/p>\n

Although they both manage to take crisp-looking images that detail the pollen and petals nicely, the Galaxy S26 Ultra gets my vote for showing more definition when I zoom in. Not only that, but it also manages to keep more of the flower in focus too. The iPhone 17 Pro Max, by comparison, has a much shallower depth of field that blurs out the edges of the lily.<\/p>\n

Winner: Galaxy S26 Ultra<\/p>\n

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Selfie<\/p>\n

The iPhone 17 Pro Max easily gets my vote with the selfie it captured of my colleague Paul Antill<\/a> and me down by Bryant Park on a cloudy day. First and foremost, its new 18MP Center Stage camera offers a much wider field of view, making it far more practical for group selfies. More importantly, it manages to match the level of detail and definition found in the competition \u2014 giving me extra flexibility to crop the shot later without significant detail loss.<\/p>\n

While the Galaxy S26 Ultra produces good results by capturing all the details around my face, it tends to wash out the image, which makes the highlights appear overexposed.<\/p>\n

Winner: iPhone 17 Pro Max<\/p>\n

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Panorama<\/p>\n

Yet again, these two phones deliver near-identical results with the panoramic shots above. The first thing I look for is how well they balance the exposure throughout the scene, which thankfully isn\u2019t a problem for either.<\/p>\n

When I look toward the left walkway with the paved bricks, the stronger contrast of the Galaxy S26 Ultra makes them more identifiable. Details appear exquisite throughout the scene, but the Galaxy S26 Ultra looks sharper when I zoom in. The iPhone 17 Pro Max isn\u2019t bad either, but it has a smidge less definition upon closer inspection.<\/p>\n

Winner: Galaxy S26 Ultra<\/p>\n

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Zoom<\/p>\n

When I pointed both cameras at the Empire State Building\u2019s spires and set them to 40x zoom, the results appeared similar \u2014 but the Galaxy S26 Ultra benefits from its slightly longer 5x optical zoom.<\/p>\n

Not only is the overall image sharper with the S26 Ultra, but I can more clearly make out smaller details, like the spotlights running across the base of the spire. Don\u2019t get me wrong, the iPhone 17 Pro Max\u2019s 4x optical zoom camera works nicely, but it\u2019s applying more digital cropping at this magnification, which results in a tad more softness.<\/p>\n

Winner: Galaxy S26 Ultra<\/p>\n

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Indoors<\/p>\n

With all the artificial lighting coming from the ceiling in the shots above, I prefer how the iPhone renders the scene with its stronger contrast and richer colors. You could argue that it\u2019s a little more aggressive with the saturation, but the added contrast enhances the image nicely.<\/p>\n

The Galaxy S26 Ultra looks pleasant as well, but the highlights suffer, making the overall shot appear slightly washed out an hazy.<\/p>\n

Winner: iPhone 17 Pro Max<\/p>\n

Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Low light<\/p>\n

Despite its wider aperture, the Galaxy S26 Ultra still can\u2019t beat the iPhone 17 Pro Max in low-light conditions. The Galaxy struggles to tame the strong light source from the street lamp, while simultaneously underexposing the left side of the scene.<\/p>\n

In comparison, the iPhone 17 Pro Max handles these challenges much more effectively \u2014 and the results speak for themselves. From its brighter overall image to its superior shadow exposure, the iPhone 17 Pro Max remains the king of low light.<\/p>\n

I’ve also included some additional side-by-side low light samples below, which all illustrate the better low light performance with the iPhone 17 Pro Max.<\/p>\n

Winner: iPhone 17 Pro Max<\/p>\n

Image 1 of 10<\/p>\n

\"SamsungGalaxy S26 Ultra(Image credit: Tom’s Guide \/ John Velasco)\"AppleiPhone 17 Pro Max(Image credit: Tom’s Guide \/ John Velasco)\"SamsungGalaxy S26 Ultra(Image credit: Tom’s Guide \/ John Velasco)\"AppleiPhone 17 Pro Max(Image credit: Tom’s Guide \/ John Velasco)\"SamsungGalaxy S26 Ultra(Image credit: Tom’s Guide \/ John Velasco)\"AppleiPhone 17 Pro Max(Image credit: Tom’s Guide \/ John Velasco)\"SamsungGalaxy S26 Ultra(Image credit: Tom’s Guide \/ John Velasco)\"AppleiPhone 17 Pro Max(Image credit: Tom’s Guide \/ John Velasco)\"SamsungGalaxy S26 Ultra(Image credit: Tom’s Guide \/ John Velasco)\"AppleiPhone 17 Pro Max(Image credit: Tom’s Guide \/ John Velasco)Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max: Verdict<\/p>\n

\n

\"Galaxy\n<\/p>\n

(Image credit: Tom’s Guide \/ John Velasco)<\/p>\n

After tallying the results, we have a new winner: the Galaxy S26 Ultra. This has been a long time coming, as Apple has held the top spot for nearly two years, fending off Samsung\u2019s flagships in the process.<\/p>\n

I feel the Galaxy S26 Ultra is truly the best camera phone around \u2014 not only for the exceptional photos it captures, but also for its utility and various shooting modes. As someone who shoots photography professionally, I can\u2019t emphasize enough how valuable it is to have true manual controls at my disposal.<\/p>\n

For the average shooter who wants excellent shots each and every time \u2014 especially in low light \u2014 the iPhone 17 Pro Max continues to be a stellar option. Its no-fuss handling means you\u2019ll get outstanding results regardless of your skill level.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

\"Google\n<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Follow Tom’s Guide on Google News<\/a> and add us as a preferred source<\/a> to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. <\/p>\n

More from Tom’s Guide<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Now that I\u2019ve spent time with the Galaxy S26 Ultra vs. iPhone 17 Pro Max, it\u2019s time to…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":351986,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[85,46,321,125],"class_list":{"0":"post-351985","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-mobile","8":"tag-il","9":"tag-israel","10":"tag-mobile","11":"tag-technology"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351985","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=351985"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/351985\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/351986"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=351985"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=351985"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=351985"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}