{"id":402577,"date":"2026-04-21T00:45:14","date_gmt":"2026-04-21T00:45:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/402577\/"},"modified":"2026-04-21T00:45:14","modified_gmt":"2026-04-21T00:45:14","slug":"reliability-assessment-of-the-non-rigid-registration-for-central-incisors-movement-evaluation-based-on-cbct-registration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/402577\/","title":{"rendered":"Reliability assessment of the non-rigid registration for central incisors movement evaluation based on CBCT registration"},"content":{"rendered":"

Al-Taai, N., Levring Jaghagen, E., Persson, M., Ransjo, M. & Westerlund, A. A. Superimposition-based cephalometric method to quantitate craniofacial changes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 18 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/ijerph18105260<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n

Contini, E., Orthod, D., Campi, S. & Caprioglio, A. Profile changes following lower incisor repositioning: A comparison between patients with different growth pattern. Minerva Stomatol. 64, 75\u201385 (2015).<\/p>\n

CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yang, S. et al. Effect of mesiodistal angulation of the maxillary central incisors on esthetic perceptions of the smile in the frontal view. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 148, 396\u2013404. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2015.03.021<\/a> (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Crum, W. R., Hartkens, T. & Hill, D. L. Non-rigid image registration: Theory and practice. Br. J. Radiol. 77 Spec No 2, S140-153 (2004). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr\/25329214<\/a><\/p>\n

Graf, C. C., Dritsas, K., Ghamri, M. & Gkantidis, N. Reliability of cephalometric superimposition for the assessment of craniofacial changes: A systematic review. Eur. J. Orthod. 44, 477\u2013490. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ejo\/cjab082<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

H\u00e4ner, S. T., Kanavakis, G., Matthey, F. & Gkantidis, N. Voxel-based superimposition of serial craniofacial CBCTs: Reliability, reproducibility and segmentation effect on hard\u2010tissue outcomes. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 23, 92\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ocr.12347<\/a> (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sheeran, S., Hartsfield, J. Jr., Omami, G. & Bazina, M. Comparison of two 3-dimensional user-friendly voxel-based maxillary and 2-dimensional superimposition methods. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 163, 117\u2013125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2022.10.004<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Colceriu-\u015eimon, I. M. et al. Clinical indications and radiation doses of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Med. Pharm. Rep. 92, 346\u2013351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15386\/mpr-1434<\/a> (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Signorelli, L., Patcas, R., Peltom\u00e4ki, T. & Sch\u00e4tzle, M. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. J. Orofac. Orthop. 77, 9\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00056-015-0002-4<\/a> (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Besl, P. J. & Mckay, N. D. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 14, 239\u2013256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/34.121791<\/a> (1992).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ge, Y. Y. et al. Evaluation of orthodontic treatment based on the registration of X-ray image features. Chin. Autom. Congr. 4383\u20134387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/Cac51589.2020.9327422<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n

Bazina, M. et al. Precision and reliability of Dolphin 3-dimensional voxel-based superimposition. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 153, 599\u2013606. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2017.07.025<\/a> (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cevidanes, L. H. et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 34, 369\u2013375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/dmfr\/17102411<\/a> (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cevidanes, L. H., Heymann, G., Cornelis, M. A., DeClerck, H. J. & Tulloch, J. F. Superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models of growing patients. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 136, 94\u201399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2009.01.018<\/a> (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cevidanes, L. H., Motta, A., Proffit, W. R., Ackerman, J. L. & Styner, M. Cranial base superimposition for 3-dimensional evaluation of soft-tissue changes. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 137, 120\u2013129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2009.04.021<\/a> (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Machin, D., Campbell, M. J., Tan, S. B. & Tan, S. H. Sample size tables for clinical studies (Wiley, 2011).<\/p>\n

Baumrind, S. & Frantz, R. C. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am. J. Orthod. 60, 111\u2013127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9416(71)90028-5<\/a> (1971).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Abreu, D., Freitas, K. M., Nomura, S., Valarelli, F. & Can\u00e7ado, R. Comparison among manual and computerized cephalometrics using the softwares dolphin imaging and dentofacial planner. Dent. Oral Craniofac. Res. 2 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15761\/DOCR.1000186<\/a> (2016).<\/p>\n

Chen, D. et al. Three-dimensional reconstructions in spine and screw trajectory simulation on 3D digital images: A step by step approach by using Mimics software. J. Spine Surg. 3, 650\u2013656. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/jss.2017.10.09<\/a> (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gliddon, M. J. et al. The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 64, 194\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joms.2005.10.028<\/a> (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Turkoz, C. & Iscan, H. N. Evaluation of extraction and non-extraction treatment effects by two different superimposition methods. Eur. J. Orthod. 33, 691\u2013699. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ejo\/cjq143<\/a> (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Standerwick, R. G., Roberts, E. W., Jr. Hartsfield, J. K., Babler, W. J. & Katona, T. R. Comparison of the Bolton Standards to longitudinal cephalograms superimposed on the occipital condyle (I-point). J. Orthod. 36, 23\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1179\/14653120722896<\/a> (2009). discussion 13\u201324.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huja, S. S., Grubaugh, E. L., Rummel, A. M., Fields, H. W. & Beck, F. M. Comparison of hand-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions. Angle Orthod. 79, 428\u2013435. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2319\/052708-283.1<\/a> (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Standerwick, R., Roberts, E., Hartsfield, J. Jr., Babler, W. & Kanomi, R. Cephalometric superimposition on the occipital condyles as a longitudinal growth assessment reference: I-point and I-curve. Anat. Rec (Hoboken). 291, 1603\u20131610. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ar.20761<\/a> (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cook, P. A. & Gravely, J. F. Tracing error with Bjork\u2019s mandibular structures. Angle Orthod. 58, 169\u2013178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1043\/0003-3219(1988)058%3C0169:TEWBMS%3E2.0.CO;2<\/a> (1988).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Iseri, H. & Solow, B. Growth displacement of the maxilla in girls studied by the implant method. Eur. J. Orthod. 12, 389\u2013398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ejo\/12.4.389<\/a> (1990).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Baumrind, S., Miller, D. & Molthen, R. The reliability of head film measurements. 3. Tracing superimposition. Am. J. Orthod. 70, 617\u2013644. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0002-9416(76)90224-4<\/a> (1976).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ghafari, J., Engel, F. E. & Laster, L. L. Cephalometric superimposition on the cranial base: A review and a comparison of four methods. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 91, 403\u2013413. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0889-5406(87)90393-3<\/a> (1987).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Buschang, P. H., LaPalme, L., Tanguay, R. & Demirjian, A. The technical reliability of superimposition on cranial base and mandibular structures. Eur. J. Orthod. 8, 152\u2013156. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ejo\/8.3.152<\/a> (1986).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Goel, S., Bansal, M. & Kalra, A. A preliminary assessment of cephalometric orthodontic superimposition. Eur. J. Orthod. 26, 217\u2013222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ejo\/26.2.217<\/a> (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Houston, W. J. & Lee, R. T. Accuracy of different methods of radiographic superimposition on cranial base structures. Eur. J. Orthod. 7, 127\u2013135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ejo\/7.2.127<\/a> (1985).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Roden-Johnson, D., English, J. & Gallerano, R. Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: Landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 133, 556\u2013564. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajodo.2006.03.041<\/a> (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Arat, Z. M., Turkkahraman, H., English, J. D., Gallerano, R. L. & Boley, J. C. Longitudinal growth changes of the cranial base from puberty to adulthood. A comparison of different superimposition methods. Angle Orthod. 80, 537\u2013544. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2319\/080709-447.1<\/a> (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Arat, Z. M., Rubenduz, M. & Akgul, A. A. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: A comparison of three superimposition methods. Angle Orthod. 73, 374\u2013380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1043\/0003-3219(2003)073%3C0374:TDOCRL%3E2.0.CO;2<\/a> (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

You, Q. L. & Hagg, U. A comparison of three superimposition methods. Eur. J. Orthod. 21, 717\u2013725. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ejo\/21.6.717<\/a> (1999).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lenza, M. A. et al. Radiographic evaluation of orthodontic treatment by means of four different cephalometric superimposition methods. Dent. Press. J. Orthod. 20, 29\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/2176-9451.20.3.029-036.oar<\/a> (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nielsen, I. L. Maxillary superimposition: a comparison of three methods for cephalometric evaluation of growth and treatment change. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 95, 422\u2013431. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0889-5406(89)90304-1<\/a> (1989).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cook, A. H., Sellke, T. A. & BeGole, E. A. The variability and reliability of two maxillary and mandibular superimposition techniques. Part II. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 106, 463\u2013471. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0889-5406(94)70068-0<\/a> (1994).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Guo, L., Feng, Y., Guo, H. G., Liu, B. W. & Zhang, Y. Consequences of orthodontic treatment in malocclusion patients: Clinical and microbial effects in adults and children. BMC Oral Health. 16, 112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12903-016-0308-7<\/a> (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Thiruvenkadam, G., Asokan, S., John, J. B., Priya, G., Prathiba, J. & P. R. & Oral health-related quality of life of children seeking orthodontic treatment based on child oral health impact profile: A cross-sectional study. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 6, 396\u2013400. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0976-237x.161899<\/a> (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Al-Taai, N., Levring Jaghagen, E., Persson, M., Ransjo, M. & Westerlund, A. A. Superimposition-based cephalometric method to quantitate…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":402578,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[41761,114,190504,190503,1112,1541,4068,85,46,1717,4069,89892,21752,141,190502],"class_list":{"0":"post-402577","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-business","8":"tag-anatomy","9":"tag-business","10":"tag-central-incisor","11":"tag-cone-beam-computed-tomography","12":"tag-diseases","13":"tag-health-care","14":"tag-humanities-and-social-sciences","15":"tag-il","16":"tag-israel","17":"tag-medical-research","18":"tag-multidisciplinary","19":"tag-orthodontics","20":"tag-radiology","21":"tag-science","22":"tag-tooth-movement"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/402577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=402577"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/402577\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/402578"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=402577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=402577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=402577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}