Taylor Swift is taking new steps to protect her voice and likeness from AI misuse. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Subscribe to read this story ad-free <\/p>\n
Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content.<\/p>\n
![\"arrow\"](\"https:\/\/media-cldnry.s-nbcnews.com\/image\/upload\/rockcms\/2026-01\/arrow-f55fa5.svg\"){kind=icon}
<\/p>\n
The global pop superstar on Friday filed trademark applications for two audio clips of her voice. In one, she says: \u201cHey, it\u2019s Taylor Swift, and you can listen to my new album, \u2018The Life of a Showgirl,\u2019 on demand on Amazon Music Unlimited.\u201d<\/p>\n
In the other, she says in a lower register: \u201cHey, it\u2019s Taylor. My brand new album \u2018The Life of a Showgirl\u2019 is out on Oct. 3 and you can click to presave it so you can listen to it on Spotify.\u201d<\/p>\n
Swift also filed for a third trademark to protect an image of her onstage, wearing one of her signature sparkly bodysuits and strumming a pink guitar.<\/p>\n
The Grammy winner has been the target of numerous deepfakes in recent years. Fake clips of her promoting a brand of cookware<\/a> have tricked fans online, sexually suggestive deepfakes of her have gone viral on social media<\/a>, and even President Donald Trump shared manipulated photos of her<\/a> supporting his candidacy.<\/p>\n Swift is one of many celebrities confronting the issue as AI content generation tools become ever more sophisticated, even as AI companies add guardrails to prevent harmful uses of their models.<\/p>\n In January, Matthew McConaughey became the first A-lister to file a series of trademarks<\/a> \u2014 including images, video and audio of himself \u2014 to protect his own likeness as AI-generated deepfakes become increasingly realistic and easy to create.<\/p>\n AI experts have suggested that individual trademarks from celebrities like Swift could become more common as stars attempt to attain stronger legal standing to sue if their likenesses were replicated without explicit permission.<\/p>\n Sound marks, or trademarks of distinctive audio cues, have historically been filed to protect iconic brand sounds such as MGM\u2019s lion roar, NBC\u2019s chimes or the Pillsbury Doughboy\u2019s giggle.<\/p>\n 00:41<\/p>\n Matthew McConaughey trademarks himself to fight AI<\/p>\n 00:0000:00<\/p>\n But trademark attorney Josh Gerben, who first reported Swift\u2019s new trademark applications, wrote in a blog post<\/a> that \u201cattempting to register a celebrity\u2019s spoken voice is a new use of trademark registration that has not been tested in court before.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cHistorically, singers relied on copyright law to protect their recorded music. But AI technologies now allow users to generate entirely new content that mimics an artist\u2019s voice without copying an existing recording, creating a gap that trademarks may help fill,\u201d Gerben wrote. \u201cBy registering specific phrases tied to her voice, Swift could potentially challenge not only identical reproductions, but also imitations that are \u2018confusingly similar,\u2019 a key standard in trademark law.\u201d<\/p>\n Swift has filed hundreds of trademarks throughout her career, but most have aimed to protect her name, lyrics, merchandise and other components of her brand identity. This appears to be the first instance Swift has pursued sound mark protection. <\/p>\n The attorney listed on the applications, Rebecca Liebowitz, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. <\/p>\n A spokesperson for Swift also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n Celebrities continue to sound the alarm over AI misuse, with some calling for stronger protections.<\/p>\n In 2023, Scarlett Johansson\u2019s attorney demanded that<\/a> an AI app stop using her likeness in an advertisement. The actor also called out OpenAI in 2024 for using an \u201ceerily similar\u201d voice to hers for their GPT-4o chatbot despite having declined the company\u2019s request to provide her voice. OpenAI <\/a>subsequently announced it would no longer be using the voice, but did not indicate why.<\/p>\n In 2024, Tom Hanks called out<\/a> the \u201cmultiple ads over the internet falsely using my name, likeness, and voice promoting miracle cures and wonder drugs.\u201d <\/p>\n \u201cBreaking Bad\u201d star Bryan Cranston raised similar concerns<\/a> last year about OpenAI\u2019s Sora 2 product and its ability to replicate his and other celebrities\u2019 likenesses without permission. (OpenAI announced last month<\/a> that was shutting down its Sora video creation app).<\/p>\n In January, more than 700 creatives, including Johansson, Cate Blanchett and Joseph Gordon-Levitt, backed a campaign called \u201cStealing Isn\u2019t Innovation<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n Organized by a coalition called The Human Artistry Campaign (composed of a mix of unions representing creators, artists\u2019 rights groups and trade associations), the movement calls on tech companies to stop training their generative AI tools on copyrighted works without express permission from creatives. <\/p>\n As likeness protection becomes a growing concern for public figures, some companies appear eager to partner on the issue. <\/p>\n Last week, YouTube unveiled a deal with several talent agencies that would open up its proprietary deepfake detection tool<\/a> to celebrities and entertainers, who can now more easily request their unauthorized likenesses be removed from the platform.<\/p>\n