Regional differences<\/p>\n
The researchers note that aerosols can also contribute to cloud formation, which also causes further losses. But the degree of that contribution is much harder to estimate, so the researchers focus on aerosols for much of the analysis. Some of those aerosols occur naturally, typically from dust kicked up by winds in desert regions. However, despite deserts\u2019 reputation as sunny paradises, the world as a whole hasn\u2019t built much solar infrastructure in the desert yet, so this isn\u2019t as much of a factor as you might expect.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Coal appears to be a major contributor. It\u2019s estimated that sulfur dioxide aerosols, primarily produced through coal burning, account for nearly half of the aerosols analyzed here. Carbon-rich material, which also typically comes from fossil fuels, accounts for another 18 percent.\u00a0<\/p>\n
The impact of aerosols, however, is not evenly distributed. In China, the researchers estimated that aerosols were reducing solar production by 7.7 percent overall and offsetting anywhere from a third to half of its annual growth. The researchers note that \u201cthe spatial distribution of photovoltaic losses in China mirrors that of its coal-fired power capacity,\u201d and an analysis of pollution data from China shows that 30 percent of the losses due to aerosols can be attributed to coal burning.\u00a0<\/p>\n
In contrast, most solar production in the US takes place in the south and west, while coal plants are more common in the east and northeast. As a result, the annual losses in the US were less than half of those seen in China (3 percent).<\/p>\n
The good news is that things are getting better in China. In response to some severe pollution problems, the country built a new generation of high-efficiency coal plants and retired some of the worst polluters. And the data show that this is also benefiting solar power, with the impact of aerosols dropping over the last few years.<\/p>\n
Even with the improvements, it\u2019s striking that coal appears to be the only power source that actively reduces the productivity of what\u2019s shaping up to be its primary competitor. It should also provide an impetus to move off coal more quickly, as at least some of the loss of coal production will be offset by enhanced productivity from solar.<\/p>\n