{"id":476074,"date":"2026-06-04T15:19:12","date_gmt":"2026-06-04T15:19:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/476074\/"},"modified":"2026-06-04T15:19:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-04T15:19:12","slug":"knesset-advances-bill-to-split-and-weaken-attorney-general-role","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/476074\/","title":{"rendered":"Knesset advances bill to split and weaken attorney-general role"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpost.com\/tags\/knesset\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Knesset<\/a>\u2019s passage this week of a bill to split the attorney-general\u2019s role was framed by supporters as a long-overdue correction to one of the most powerful legal offices in Israel.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">But the proposal, which passed in its first reading early on Tuesday morning by a vote of 65-47, does more than divide one job into two. It would reshape the relationship between the government, its legal advisers, the prosecution, and the courts.<\/p>\n<p>The bill, advanced by Religious Zionist Party MK Simcha Rothman through the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, would split the current attorney-general\u2019s powers between two officials: an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpost.com\/israel-news\/politics-and-diplomacy\/article-895698\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">attorney-general<\/a>, who would advise the government and represent the state in most legal proceedings, and a prosecutor-general, who would head the criminal prosecution system.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpost.com\/israel-news\/politics-and-diplomacy\/article-898001\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Israel\u2019s attorney-general<\/a> is not simply the equivalent of the US or UK attorney-general. The Israeli role combines several functions: legal adviser to the government, interpreter of the law for the executive branch, representative of the state in court, head of the state prosecution system, and final authority on major criminal decisions involving senior public officials.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">That is why the bill is not only about who prosecutes criminal cases. It is also about whether the government\u2019s legal adviser remains an independent gatekeeper whose legal opinions bind the executive branch, or becomes an adviser whose position the government can set aside.<\/p>\n<p><img alt=\"MK Simcha Rothman leads a Constitution, Law and Justice Committee meeting at the Knesset, the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, May 27, 2026.\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"822\" height=\"829\" decoding=\"async\" data-nimg=\"1\" style=\"color:transparent\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/724310.jpeg\"\/>MK Simcha Rothman leads a Constitution, Law and Justice Committee meeting at the Knesset, the Israeli parliament in Jerusalem, May 27, 2026. (credit: YONATAN SINDEL\/FLASH90)<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Supporters of the bill argue that the current model concentrates too much power in one unelected official. They also point to a built-in tension: The same official who advises ministers may also oversee criminal proceedings against them.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Splitting the A-G&#8217;s role is a necessary step to return power to the people&#8217;<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Rothman put the argument sharply at the Israel Bar Association conference in Eilat this week.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">\u201cIf we are a country in which governing power is effectively in the hands of the attorney-general, then splitting the attorney-general\u2019s role is a necessary step to return power to the people,\u201d Rothman said. \u201cThe question is whether we really want all governing power concentrated in the hands of a figure who is not elected by the public.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Critics do not deny that the Israeli model is unusual, or that a serious discussion could be had about splitting the role. Their argument is that this bill is not the subject of that discussion.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Prof. Barak Medina, a prominent Israeli legal scholar and former rector of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, told The Jerusalem Post that dividing the attorney-general\u2019s powers could be justified in principle, but only after a professional, nonpartisan process.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">\u201cThis is an issue that is so central to the Israeli legal system that it must be based on a thorough discussion by a professional committee,\u201d Medina said, adding that such a change should win broad political support and apply only to a future government.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Instead, he said, the current proposal is being advanced rapidly, without the backing of the professional civil service and amid a broader confrontation between the government and the legal system.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">The government has repeatedly clashed with Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara, whom ministers accuse of blocking policy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Critics point to the coalition as trying to remove or weaken the official responsible for telling it when its actions cross legal lines.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">The bill also comes against the backdrop of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu\u2019s ongoing criminal trial. Netanyahu is barred from involvement in matters that create a conflict of interest with his trial. Opponents allege that one possible effect of the bill could be to alter the legal structure around the prosecution system while the trial is ongoing. The coalition rejects the claim that the bill is designed around Netanyahu\u2019s personal legal interests.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Under the proposal, the two new offices would be appointed differently.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">The attorney-general (the government\u2019s chief legal adviser) would be appointed by the government on the recommendation of the prime minister and justice minister. That official\u2019s term would be tied to the term of the government that appointed them.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">The prosecutor-general would be appointed by the government from candidates recommended by a public committee, for a six-year term. The bill states that the prosecutor-general would be independent in criminal matters and subject only to the law.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">But critics have focused less on the formal split itself and more on what the bill does to the attorney-general\u2019s current authority.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Today, the attorney-general\u2019s legal opinions are generally treated as binding on the executive branch unless a court rules otherwise. Under the bill, the government could decide that a particular legal opinion does not reflect the law and exempt executive bodies from treating it as binding.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">That provision is the heart of the bill.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">For Medina, this is where the proposal moves from splitting the role to weakening it. The attorney-general currently functions as the government\u2019s internal legal gatekeeper, he said \u2013 the official who determines what the executive branch may legally do before the matter reaches court.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">\u201cThe entire issue is that this function of the attorney-general as a gatekeeper, as someone who is essential for the protection of the rule of law, will be lost,\u201d Medina said. \u201cThis is someone that will check the government, and the court cannot do that by itself.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Supporters argue that courts, not legal advisers, should have the final word on legality. If a government action is unlawful, they say, petitioners can challenge it in court.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Medina said that this view misunderstands how illegality is usually prevented.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">\u201cIn practice, the court deals with just the tip of the iceberg,\u201d he said. \u201cMost of the functions of protecting the rule of law are done internally by legal advisers within the government.\u201d Relying only on courts, he said, would be ineffective and impractical, especially when decisions must be made quickly, or unlawful action could cause irreversible damage.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;We will lose a protective envelope for democracy; all systems will be harmed&#8217;<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Deputy Attorney-General Gil Limon made a similar argument at the Eilat conference.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">\u201cOn the day after this bill passes, we will lose an essential protective envelope for democracy,\u201d Limon said. \u201cToday, the state\u2019s first line of defense is the attorney-general, under whom the legal advisers in government ministries operate. Once these roles become political, all the systems beneath them will be harmed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">The bill would also change how the state is represented in court. It provides that the attorney-general would present the state\u2019s position in legal proceedings, but the authority to determine that position would lie with the government. If the attorney-general believes the government\u2019s position cannot be presented, or if the relevant minister believes it will not be properly represented, the government could authorize another lawyer to present it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Supporters say this would stop unelected legal advisers from overriding elected officials. Critics say it would allow the government to bypass independent legal review and present legally indefensible positions as the state&#8217;s position.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Former attorney-general Yehuda Weinstein was blunt in his criticism.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">\u201cThe judicial overhaul is a collapse of systems,\u201d Weinstein said at the IBA conference. Rothman\u2019s proposal to split the attorney-general\u2019s role, he said, was \u201cthe elimination of the system as we have known it for 75 years.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Weinstein said Netanyahu had opposed splitting the attorney-general\u2019s role when he served as attorney-general, and argued that Netanyahu\u2019s position had changed because of his indictment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Medina said a split could theoretically be designed to preserve the rule of law. But the legal adviser to the government would need to remain professionally independent; legal opinions would need to remain binding unless the government went to court; and the prosecutor-general would need to be bound by the attorney-general\u2019s interpretation of the law, so that the state does not speak in two contradictory legal voices.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">Otherwise, he warned, the state could reach a situation in which the attorney-general tells a minister an action is legal, while the prosecutor-general later decides it is criminal.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">\u201cYou need some coordination function,\u201d Medina said. \u201cThe attorney-general nowadays serves in this position to coordinate the activities of all enforcement mechanisms.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">That is why critics consider the bill\u2019s title to understate its significance. The immediate question is not only whether Israel should have one attorney-general or two. It is whether the government\u2019s chief legal adviser remains independent enough to block unlawful action from within, or whether the main check on government legality shifts almost entirely to the courts.<\/p>\n<p class=\"article-paragraph-section article-body-paragraph\">The bill now returns to the Constitution Committee for preparation for its second and third readings. The coalition is expected to try to advance it quickly, amid uncertainty over the Knesset\u2019s future and the possible dissolution of the current parliament.<\/p>\n<p>For supporters, the bill is a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpost.com\/israel-news\/politics-and-diplomacy\/article-898203\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">democratic correction<\/a> to an overly powerful legal office. For opponents, it is one of the most consequential pieces of the government\u2019s legal overhaul: a measure that not only splits the attorney-general\u2019s role, but changes what that role is for.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Knesset\u2019s passage this week of a bill to split the attorney-general\u2019s role was framed by supporters as&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":476075,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[21624,49,85,46,14406,43,35649],"class_list":["post-476074","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-israel","tag-attorney-general","tag-benjamin-netanyahu","tag-il","tag-israel","tag-knesset","tag-news","tag-religious-zionist-party"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476074","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=476074"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/476074\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/476075"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=476074"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=476074"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=476074"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}