No doubt, it\u2019s an extreme example. Yet, it reflects the pitfalls of thematic equity investing that my colleague Dan Sotiroff<\/a> described in a terrific article called Don\u2019t Fall for a Good Story<\/a>. Dan sees thematic investors as making a trifecta bet: First, that the theme will pan out; second, that chosen investments will benefit; and third, that stock prices will rise. Themes are typically widely appreciated. Perceived beneficiaries tend to be high-priced.<\/p>\n Last year, Morningstar launched 15 Thematic Consensus Indexes<\/a>, which include the stocks most commonly held by mutual funds and ETFs focused on specific themes. Their behavior and composition highlight the challenges thematic investors face.<\/p>\n Picking Winning Themes Is Hard<\/p>\n My first takeaway from the exhibit is that it\u2019s difficult to beat the market. Seven of the themes outperformed the broad global equities universe over the past five years; seven underperformed. (Thematic consensus indexes\u2019 prelaunch returns were simulated based on historical fund holdings data. Nano Technology & New Materials<\/a>\u2018 history was insufficient.)<\/p>\n At a glance, all the themes look like legitimate growth trends. Who doesn\u2019t like food\u2014especially as diets in the developing world change? The global energy transition, the healthcare needs of an aging demographic, and the spread of digital payments and cryptocurrencies will all be familiar to readers. The technology trends captured by the indexes all seem inexorable.<\/p>\n I\u2019m not surprised to see that the best-performing themes in recent years are tech-focused, given that sector\u2019s market leadership. But the fact that two themes outperformed the Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence + Big Data Consensus Index<\/a> over the past five years was eyebrow-raising.<\/p>\n I wouldn\u2019t say the two top performers, Future Mobility<\/a> and Robotics & Automation<\/a>, have been more successful than AI as themes. AI is attracting trillions in corporate spending, even as questions remain about its impact. When I look at those two thematic indexes, I notice both have devoted more weight to Nvidia NVDA<\/a>, whose gain of more than 1,200% over the past five years is a key driver of relative returns. Nvidia\u2019s technology enables autonomous vehicles and robots, as well as AI.<\/p>\n Review Top Stocks in Morningstar’s Global Consensus Indexes <\/p>\n On the other end of the performance spectrum, the healthcare sector has been a serious laggard in recent years, which explains poor returns from Wellness<\/a> and Life Sciences<\/a>. Policy concerns<\/a> are a big part of the story. The sector has been weighed down by expectations of downward pressure on pricing. While that has opened up company-specific investment opportunities, according to my colleagues on Morningstar Equity Research, it has made for a disappointing recent investment experience.<\/p>\n Why has Battery Technology<\/a> been such a dud? Isn\u2019t energy storage crucial to decarbonization, electric vehicles, and all manner of devices? Yes, but the index contains a bunch of lithium producers<\/a> who have been hit by a price collapse thanks to oversupply. Investing in commodities is not for the faint of heart<\/a>.<\/p>\n More Top Stocks in Morningstar’s Thematic Consensus Indexes Do Themes Add to a Portfolio?<\/p>\n Thematic investors might ask themselves whether they are not already sufficiently exposed through other portfolio holdings. The tech sector already exceeds 25% of global equities market value; in the US, tech stocks represent one-third of the market. Many of the thematic consensus indexes are heavy on technology, and because they are market-capitalization-weighted, they include generous helpings of mega-caps like Nvidia.<\/p>\n Given holdings overlap, correlations are unsurprisingly high between some of the thematic indexes and the broad global equities universe (the first index listed in the matrix below.)<\/p>\n You\u2019ll see that the healthcare-focused themes have lower correlations. That\u2019s not surprising given the underperformance of the healthcare sector and its falling share of the global equities market. I was surprised to see the cybersecurity index with a relatively low correlation to the broad equity market, though.<\/p>\n Mixed performance for thematic indexes is telling. Bets against the broad stock market are hard to get right. That\u2019s evident in the woeful performance of most active managers<\/a>. It also goes for systematic approaches, like those based on investment factors<\/a>.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, high correlations between many themes and the broad market should prompt questions about whether separate thematic investments are superfluous. Growth trends like AI explain much of the market\u2019s recent gains. Most of the largest stocks are thematic beneficiaries. It\u2019s also the case that many of the companies on the leading edge of themes are private. That goes for SpaceX<\/a>, OpenAI<\/a>, and Stripe<\/a>, a fintech.<\/p>\n Contrarian investors, for their part, might be drawn to underperformers and less-correlated themes. Perhaps the coming years will see a recovery for themes like Life Sciences<\/a> and Wellness<\/a>, or those that include lots of basic materials stocks. The diversification they provide will be especially appreciated if AI, like the internet and many prior growth trends, leads to a bubble, then a crash.<\/p>\n![\"this](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/SK2HTY6C4RECLOAJVESRCRHCPQ.jpg\")
Source: Morningstar Direct. <\/p>\n![\"Photo](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/2NYQD5BU7NDQJJSK2GKBQDB5WM.png\")
<\/a>Lessons for Thematic Investors<\/p>\n
![\"Collage](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/42QK2APFUBHDFFAI4EZMWN2BGQ.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n