Sign up to see the future, today<\/p>\n
Can\u2019t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech<\/p>\n
With trillions of dollars on the line, it should come as no surprise that tech companies are spending gobs of cash on the upcoming US midterm elections. What is surprising is the scale of electoral financing, as certain newly-founded AI super PACs are now spending more on candidates than the candidates are spending on themselves.<\/p>\n
According to reporting by the Los Angeles Times<\/a>, political finance groups linked to tech companies including OpenAI and Anthropic are already some of the top spenders in the 2026 elections. So far, they\u2019ve distributed a combined $37 million on various campaigns, a number which is expected to skyrocket as November draws closer (and those are just the ones we know about, as numerous tech-backed PACs are alleged to have evaded federal reporting requirements<\/a>.)<\/p>\n While one might expect these companies to flock to the typically pro-business and small-government Republican party, an LA Times infographic shows that they\u2019re cynically playing both sides. ChatGPT maker OpenAI, for example, is heavily linked to both the American Mission PAC, which has donated $8 million to Republicans, and the Think Big PAC, which has spent $14.1 million on Democrats so far.<\/p>\n Anthropic, meanwhile, is linked to the Jobs and Democracy PAC and Defending Our Values PAC, which gave $11 million and $5.2 million to Democrats and Republicans, respectively.<\/p>\n As former Google public policy executive Adam Kovacevich told the Times, AI companies are quickly becoming \u201ccomfortable with using their power to achieve a political goal.\u201d<\/p>\n Zooming out a bit, funding both sides of the aisle makes tactical sense, at least if you\u2019re an AI company. One of the key benefits of backing mainstream political contenders seems to be the crushing effect it has on non-partisan candidates, who may come into office with populist ideas like regulating generative AI<\/a> or restricting data center construction<\/a>.<\/p>\n These include figures like Al Olszewski, a candidate who styled himself as a \u201cgrassroots conservative\u201d in Montana\u2019s Republican primary. While Olszewski had the benefit of running as an incumbent, he got walloped in the party primary<\/a> after a super PAC affiliated with OpenAI\u2019s co-founder spent nearly $900,000 backing his opponent.<\/p>\n \u201cThere was no way as a grassroots person that I could compete with that kind of money,\u201d Olszewski told the Times. \u201cI got crushed.\u201d<\/p>\n