{"id":532271,"date":"2026-07-09T02:50:12","date_gmt":"2026-07-09T02:50:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/532271\/"},"modified":"2026-07-09T02:50:12","modified_gmt":"2026-07-09T02:50:12","slug":"sonoma-county-supervisors-advance-proposed-135-million-mental-healthcare-project-while-dropping-another","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/532271\/","title":{"rendered":"Sonoma County supervisors advance proposed $135 million mental healthcare project while dropping another"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sonoma County supervisors took action this week to advance a bold new project \u2013 the term most frequently used was \u201cmoonshot\u201d \u2013 to address glaring needs in the county\u2019s system of treating people with mental health and substance abuse disorders.<\/p>\n

In a unanimous vote Tuesday, July 7, board agreed to continue pursuing funds to build new 88-bed inpatient care campus that would in part replace a behavioral health wing once envisioned but never built at the county jail.<\/p>\n

The $135 million initiative, gets its unwieldy name, the Behavioral Health Continuum Infrastructure Program (BHCIP) \u2014 or \u201cB-chip\u201d \u2014 from a state grant awarded to the county\u2019s Health Services department two years ago<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Those funds are meant to go toward the construction of two mental health rehabilitation centers, each with 16 beds, along with a 56-bed substance use disorder treatment facility.<\/p>\n

While a potential game changer, the proposal is also an admitted long shot \u2013 a \u201cHail Mary\u201d county staff wouldn\u2019t normally bring to the board given the challenges, Assistant County Administrator Jennifer Solito said, if not also a \u201conce in a generation opportunity.\u201d<\/p>\n

Due to rising construction costs and other factors, the BHCIP\u2019s cost had nearly tripled in the two years since the $66.7 million award was granted. Even after scaling the project down from 104 treatment beds (projected cost: $160.2 million) to 88 treatment beds ($135.5 million) and a reduced state funding offer of $54.6 million, the county is still looking a shortfall of $49.9 million.<\/p>\n

To help cobble together funds to close the funding gap, supervisors also voted Tuesday to return a different state grant and kill a zombie project that never came to fruition at the jail, a much-touted 72-bed mental health wing to house detainees in need of more advanced supervision.<\/p>\n

The jail project, also a moonshot of sorts when it was approved by the board in 2015 \u2013 \u201cheralded as this program that was going to save us,\u201d Supervisor James Gore recalled Tuesday \u2013 could serve as a cautionary tale as much as a last-ditch funding source.<\/p>\n

Abandoning that wing would mean relinquishing a $40 million state grant, but $27 million set aside so far by the county to build and operate the specialized jail unit could be reallocated to shrink the new project\u2019s funding gap.<\/p>\n

If the county continues to reserve an annual $6.6 million envisioned for future operating costs, officials could squirrel away an additional nearly $20 million by the time the new complex is envisioned to open.<\/p>\n

Nolan Sullivan, the county\u2019s health services director, said the need for the BHCIP\u2019s 32 mental health rehab center beds \u2013 locked, \u201chigh-intensity, high-needs inpatient mental health facilities\u201d \u2013 is especially urgent today.<\/p>\n

At this time, he said, no such beds exist in the county, which as a result must often send those patients to \u201cvery expensive private facilities.\u201d<\/p>\n

On average, he said at Tuesday\u2019s meeting, his department annually \u201cserves about 200 conserved clients\u201d \u2013 high-needs patients requiring such advanced care. Of those, around 60% are sent out of the county, \u201cbecause we don\u2019t have local beds.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"Nolan<\/p>\n

Sonoma County<\/p>\n

Sonoma County Health Services Director Nolan Sullivan (Sonoma County)<\/p>\n

Sonoma County spent $6.8 million in the fiscal year that just ended to house those patients \u201cin out-of-county facilities that are often for profit\u201d because state-funded sites are \u201ccompletely full,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Sullivan said the county also pays \u201cthe additional labor cost of transport, travel, getting folks back and forth.\u201d<\/p>\n

Building a pair of mental health recovery centers would \u201csignificantly reduce\u201d the county\u2019s ongoing expenditures. Adding those beds would also create the opportunity for Sonoma to partner with surrounding counties \u201cthat maybe don\u2019t have access to the number of beds or facilities,\u201d Sullivan said.<\/p>\n

In its original plans for the new project, the county envisioned building both the mental health facility and substance use treatment site at the Orenda Center, its existing Santa Rosa drug treatment center near Farmers Lane.<\/p>\n

But further inspections revealed that the Neotomas Avenue site presents \u201csubstantial grading, slope stabilization, and infrastructure challenges,\u201d according to a county report, that increased the cost of the project by $20 to $25 million.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/p>\n

John Burgess \/ The Press Democrat file<\/p>\n

The Orenda Center in 2023. (John Burgess \/ The Press Democrat file)<\/p>\n

The county is now considering two options.<\/p>\n

In the first scenario, all three facilities \u2014 the two mental health rehab centers, and the 56-bed substance use disorder treatment center \u2014 will be built at the county\u2019s 200-acre Los Guilicos campus just east of Santa Rosa on Highway 12 across from Oakmont.<\/p>\n

In the second scenario, the current Orenda Center will be demolished, followed by the construction of a new, 56-bed substance use treatment facility.<\/p>\n

In this split scenario, the two 16-bed mental health rehab centers would be built at Los Guilicos.<\/p>\n

To further narrow the funding gap faced by the project, the county intends to take $3.8 million from its pool of state opioid settlement funds.<\/p>\n

Several speakers criticized that plan during a public comment period. Funneling all available opioid settlement funds into the BHCIP project, they fear, diminishes the possibility<\/a> that a sober living house proposed for Forestville will ever get built.<\/p>\n

That Forestville facility would be the fourth such sober living house to result from a public-private partnership between Sonoma County, Santa Rosa-based Poppy Bank, and Buckelew Programs, a nonprofit provider of mental health and substance use services.<\/p>\n

But that project hinges on the county\u2019s willingness to contribute $1.4 million of opioid settlement funds \u2014 which would be matched by Buckelew, using a low interest loan from Poppy Bank, whose founder and chairman is Bill Gallaher.<\/p>\n

With Sullivan laser focused on making the BHCIP project happen, that $1.4 million award seemed like a longshot Tuesday.<\/p>\n

Sullivan confirmed last week, the new project takes precedence over additional sober living homes, crucial as they may be.<\/p>\n

He went on to say that he would welcome collaboration \u201cwith Poppy Bank and other community partners to help make this once-in-a-generation investment\u201d \u2013 BHCIP \u2013 \u201ca reality.\u201d<\/p>\n

If the project comes in under budget, any savings could be put back into other important initiatives, like recovery, Sullivan told The Press Democrat Tuesday.<\/p>\n

\"Buckelew<\/p>\n

Kent Porter \/ The Press Democrat<\/p>\n

Buckelew CEO Chris Kughn, left, and Cindy Gallaher discuss the progress of Hope Village in Santa Rosa, Tuesday, Aug. 15, 2023. (Kent Porter \/ The Press Democrat)<\/p>\n

Cindy Gallaher, co-founder of the Windor-based Gallaher Companies, which is building three Santa Rosa sober living houses at cost, was present for part of Tuesday\u2019s Board of Supervisors meeting. Asked if the Gallahers\u2019 construction company might bid on some part of the BHCIP project, she didn\u2019t rule it out.<\/p>\n

While the 32 high-security mental health recovery facilities are not in their wheelhouse, she said, the 56 treatment beds probably are.<\/p>\n

A new proposal built on an old one<\/p>\n

In 2015<\/a>, the Press Democrat reported on the state\u2019s approval of a $40 million grant to build a behavioral health wing at the Sonoma County jail, located just Highway 101 in north Santa Rosa. The $48 million project envisioned 72 beds and a slate of mental health and substance abuse services.<\/p>\n

It was billed as a desperately needed response to a jail ill-equipped<\/a> to serve a growing number of inmates with mental health conditions that had made the facility the county\u2019s largest<\/a> de facto psychiatric facility in the county. The new wing was slated to open as early as 2020.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/p>\n

Chad Surmick \/ The Press Democrat file<\/p>\n

The view from the gated intake sally port of the Sonoma County jail in Santa Rosa. Short staffing at the Sonoma County jail has greatly reduced inmates\u2019 out-of-cell time and burdened deputies with crippling workloads and overtime hours. Photo taken Wednesday, Dec. 27, 2023. (Chad Surmick \/ The Press Democrat file)<\/p>\n

\"A<\/p>\n

Chad Surmick \/ The Press Democrat<\/p>\n

A jail correctional officer and medic check on an inmate in a holding cell in the booking area of the Sonoma County jail in Santa Rosa, Wednesday, Dec. 27, 2023. Short staffing at the Sonoma County jail has greatly reduced inmates\u2019 out-of-cell time and burdened deputies with crippling workloads and overtime hours.(Chad Surmick \/ The Press Democrat)<\/p>\n

Show Caption<\/p>\n

Chad Surmick \/ The Press Democrat file<\/p>\n

1 of 2<\/p>\n

The view from the gated intake sally port of the Sonoma County jail in Santa Rosa. Short staffing at the Sonoma County jail has greatly reduced inmates\u2019 out-of-cell time and burdened deputies with crippling workloads and overtime hours. Photo taken Wednesday, Dec. 27, 2023. (Chad Surmick \/ The Press Democrat file)<\/p>\n

Expand<\/a><\/p>\n

But more than a decade later, construction remained on hold.<\/p>\n

At the Tuesday meeting, Solito cited ballooning construction and operating costs that had created an insurmountable funding gap. \u201cFurther, the design of the project is over a decade old and would have to be redone if we want to proceed with the project, which would further drive up additional costs and time constraints,\u201d she told the board.<\/p>\n

According to a last update<\/a> in October 2024, construction costs were estimated at $69.5 million, with a $15.5 million funding gap. Projections for operating expenses had risen sharply, too, to $11 million annually, up from the $6.62 million the county had been setting aside each year for that purpose.<\/p>\n

Cost estimates would likely be substantially higher now, Solito told The Press Democrat.<\/p>\n

In the intervening years, the county had to navigate a series of now-familiar setbacks, from devastating wildfires to the Covid-19 pandemic. Later, staffing shortages at the jail created concerns that even existing facilities could be maintained. Meanwhile, construction costs continued to rise.<\/p>\n

In that same period since 2015, the county has spent at least $4.6 million on the project, including $2.8 million on design as well various legal, environmental and project management costs, according to county records.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt is hard to get things built for what one would want to assume is a reasonable price. So many things work against you,\u201d said Supervisor David Rabbitt, who was chair of the board when the project was first dreamed up.<\/p>\n

\"SupervisorSupervisor David Rabbitt during a scheduled 10 a.m. public hearing at the supervisors chambers in Santa Rosa, Tuesday May 6, 2014. (Kent Porter \/ Press Democrat) 2014<\/p>\n

$40 million seems like a lot, and it is, Rabbitt said. At the time, the concern was more focused on the operational costs, and \u201cevery year you wait, construction costs go up.\u201d<\/p>\n

The county was also navigating bureaucratic hurdles and requirements tied to the state funds, and Rabbitt noted that when applying for grants, wiggle room, related to extra costs and delays, isn\u2019t always accounted for. The legitimate intent of the project, \u201cat the end of the day\u201d over a decade later, Rabbitt said \u2014 \u201cwe haven\u2019t achieved that because of the inflexibility and maybe our own exuberance in thinking we could bring it in for that amount of money.\u201d<\/p>\n

The similarities \u2014 in need, intent and pitfalls \u2014 between the old and new projects aren\u2019t lost on Sullivan.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019d applied for the $67 million based on a quote from a professional scoping company, and by the time this award came back, the costs almost doubled,\u201d Sullivan said, citing a variety of issues like tariffs and the limited pool of specialized contracting options.<\/p>\n

Applying for the new grant, the county didn\u2019t learn from its past lesson and should have added 30% to its estimated costs for that latest proposal, he said.<\/p>\n

The difference, this time, is \u201cit\u2019s a much shorter do or die. It\u2019s not going to linger for years and years,\u201d Sullivan said. \u201cWe\u2019re really stretching here to see if we can make it work. A big piece of that will be if we get a bunch of quotes in that are astronomical, the project\u2019s dead.\u201d<\/p>\n

Solicitations for competitive bids would need to out by the end of July, followed by \u201ca very short turnaround time\u201d for the county to share its plans with the state\u2019s health department,\u00a0 \u201cSeptember at the very latest,\u201d said Ricardo Goodridge, special project director in the county health department.<\/p>\n

The project then needs to finished by June 2030, he said.<\/p>\n

Longstanding need<\/p>\n

While one ambitious undertaking has given way to another, the need that existed a decade ago for mental health support in and outside the jail remains today.<\/p>\n

The county tried various avenues to combine the two projects and their funding \u2013 meeting with state officials with the help of state Sen. Mike McGuire, trying to pass legislation \u2013 to no avail.<\/p>\n

The new complex won\u2019t serve as many inmates, but there will be some overlap that can hopefully alleviate some pressure on the criminal justice system while also helping to divert some people away from jail in the first place, Sullivan said.<\/p>\n

\u201cJails are the largest mental health care provider in almost every county in the state,\u201d Sullivan said. \u201cPart of the problem, in my opinion, really is the tale of\u201d the twin projects \u2014 representing the criminal justice and behavioral health departments working with the same population from two different sides. \u201cWe need to all sync up and work together,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

\"Sonoma<\/p>\n

Kent Porter \/ The Press Democrat<\/p>\n

Sonoma County sheriff corrections officer checks jail cells in the mental health wing at the Sonoma County Main Adult Detention Facility in Santa Rosa in November. In 2016, the Sonoma County Jail held an average of 429 inmates daily with mental illness, ranging from mild depression to severe schizophrenia, up from 228 in 2008. (Kent Porter \/ The Press Democrat)<\/p>\n

\"Sonoma<\/p>\n

Christopher Chung\/ The Press Democrat<\/p>\n

Sonoma County Correctional Deputy Nick Lund works in the F-Module, mental health unit, of the Sonoma County Jail, in Santa Rosa, on Wednesday, July 31, 2013. (Christopher Chung\/ The Press Democrat)<\/p>\n

\"The<\/p>\n

The mental health block at the Sonoma County’s Main Adult Detention Facility in Santa Rosa, Friday May 24 2013. Instead of those incarcerated moving in to the state prison system, inmates are being held longer in county jail to lessen the burden on overcrowding at state facilities. (Kent Porter \/ Press Democrat) 2013<\/p>\n

Show Caption<\/p>\n

Kent Porter \/ The Press Democrat<\/p>\n

1 of 3<\/p>\n

Sonoma County sheriff corrections officer checks jail cells in the mental health wing at the Sonoma County Main Adult Detention Facility in Santa Rosa in November. In 2016, the Sonoma County Jail held an average of 429 inmates daily with mental illness, ranging from mild depression to severe schizophrenia, up from 228 in 2008. (Kent Porter \/ The Press Democrat)<\/p>\n

Expand<\/a><\/p>\n

Sonoma County Sheriff Eddie Engram, who previously oversaw the jail and was shepherding the jail project since taking office in 2023, was unavailable for an interview, but a department spokesperson indicated the Sheriff\u2019s Office is supportive of the new project.<\/p>\n

\u201cThere are always lessons to be learned,\u201d Rabbitt said.<\/p>\n

Just because funding\u2019s available, \u201cdoesn\u2019t mean it will always be a fit,\u201d he said. \u201cIf you go after something, understand the full consequences of it.\u201d<\/p>\n

But, the promise of BHCIP, if it comes together, could be \u201ca generational kick for the county to get this number of beds we desperately need,\u201d Rabbitt said.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe need to exhaust all the avenues before we turn around and say, \u2018OK, that\u2019s not going to work for us.\u201d<\/p>\n

You can reach senior reporter Marisa Endicott at 707-521-5470 or marisa.endicott@pressdemocrat.com. On X @marisaendicott and Facebook @InYourCornerTPD.<\/p>\n

You can reach Staff Writer Austin Murphy at austin.murphy@pressdemocrat.com or on Twitter @ausmurph88.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Sonoma County supervisors took action this week to advance a bold new project \u2013 the term most frequently…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":532272,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[242936,242939,163,521,85,46,242937,242938,242935],"class_list":["post-532271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-healthcare","tag-bhcip","tag-david-rabbitt","tag-health","tag-healthcare","tag-il","tag-israel","tag-mental-health-rehab","tag-nolan-sullivan","tag-sonoma-county-supervisors"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/532271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=532271"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/532271\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/532272"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=532271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=532271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=532271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}