More people can fit on to the top deck of a standard London bus than will be directly employed on the new Jackdaw gasfield in the North Sea, industry documents show.<\/p>\n
Only 27 direct full-time jobs would be created by Jackdaw, one of the biggest gasfields remaining in the North Sea<\/a>, according to an environmental impact assessment<\/a> filed publicly by its owner, Adura, a joint venture between Shell and Norway\u2019s Equinor.<\/p>\n The document states: \u201cOver the lifetime of the field there would be a consistent level of employment averaging at nearly 500 jobs a year in direct, indirect and induced employment \u2013 this includes 273 direct jobs which exist on the Shearwater host installation and [an] additional 27 Jackdaw-specific jobs.\u201d<\/p>\n The fossil fuel industry, along with the Conservatives, Reform UK and sections of the Labour party, is lobbying Andy Burnham, the incoming prime minister, for Jackdaw and Rosebank<\/a>, an oilfield west of Shetland, to be given the go-ahead.<\/p>\n On Thursday some media reports suggested Burnham was preparing to announce new drilling. Advocates say the sites would support thousands of jobs.<\/p>\n But green campaigners said the impact on the UK economy of exploiting the fields would be minimal. Angharad Hopkinson, a political campaigner at Greenpeace, which uncovered the Jackdaw jobs figure, said: \u201cFossil fuel cheerleaders have repeatedly defended new oil and gas developments by claiming they are vital for employment. Those claims look increasingly difficult to justify when the developer\u2019s own documents tell a very different story.\u201d<\/p>\n Tessa Khan, the executive director of Uplift, a campaign group, said: \u201cIt would be a mistake if the first thing Andy Burnham<\/a> does as prime minister is cave into the demands of the profiteering oil and gas industry.<\/p>\n \u201cThese are companies that have made obscene profits, while our energy costs have skyrocketed. New North Sea drilling will not take a penny off our bills, it will just make a handful of executives and their shareholders even richer.\u201d<\/p>\n The platform for drilling Jackdaw will be unstaffed for most of its operating life. Much of the construction has already taken place in Norway, with limited scope for UK workers.<\/p>\n Hopkinson said: \u201c[This] confirms it\u2019s never been workers who stand to gain most from projects like Jackdaw \u2013 it\u2019s fossil fuel companies and their shareholders. If this is the best case they can make for more oil and gas under a collapsing climate, it\u2019s a case that\u2019s run out of road.\u201d<\/p>\n Adura said Jackdaw would support additional jobs in the supply chain. A spokesperson said: \u201cJackdaw and Rosebank will support 3,500 jobs at peak construction with 880 high-quality, well-paid jobs sustained throughout production in communities across the UK.<\/p>\n \u201cThe projects will generate a combined gross value added of over \u00a328bn across their lifetimes and generate immediate tax revenues of \u00a31.4bn before the end of this parliament.\u201d<\/p>\n Equinor\u2019s Oseberg gas platform in the North Sea, 90 miles from Bergen, Norway. Photograph: Bloomberg\/Getty Images<\/p>\n Jobs in the North Sea have been in decline for two decades<\/a> as more than 90% of the resources has been extracted.<\/p>\n Uplift has cast doubt on industry claims of tax revenues from the projects, because the tax reliefs offered on developments are so high that they will largely outweigh any returns<\/a>. The British public would carry almost all of the costs of the development of Rosebank in the form of tax breaks, the group argues.<\/p>\n Labour made a manifesto promise that no new oil or gas licences would be issued. However, both fields were in the licensing system at the last general election, so proponents argue they can go ahead without breaching the commitment.<\/p>\n