{"id":573671,"date":"2026-08-03T17:20:09","date_gmt":"2026-08-03T17:20:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/573671\/"},"modified":"2026-08-03T17:20:09","modified_gmt":"2026-08-03T17:20:09","slug":"trump-administration-sued-for-blocking-insurance-coverage-of-gender-affirming-healthcare-trump-administration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/573671\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump administration sued for blocking insurance coverage of gender-affirming healthcare | Trump administration"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">US federal employees and their families are joining a class-action lawsuit against the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/trump-administration\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" data-component=\"auto-linked-tag\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Trump administration<\/a> for blocking insurance coverage of gender-affirming healthcare.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The Human Rights Campaign Foundation (HRCF) and the DC-based law firm Correia &amp; Puth filed the lawsuit on Monday morning against the federal office of personnel management (OPM), arguing that the prohibition violates Title VII, which protects against sex discrimination.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The Trump administration had been \u201cfixated\u201d on ending gender-affirming care, said Cynthia Cheng-Wun Weaver, HRCF\u2019s senior director of litigation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">\u201cA lot of the criticism and attack on this care is for treating minors, but this exclusion is for all ages,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Federal insurance plans cover about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/06\/02\/2026-11022\/federal-employees-health-benefits-program-verification-requirements-for-family-member-coverage\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">8.3 million<\/a> people in America \u2013 not just employees and retirees themselves but also their partners and other family members.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Health insurance coverage for gender-affirming care is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.opm.gov\/healthcare-insurance\/carriers\/fehb\/2025\/2025-01b.pdf\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">no longer<\/a> covered by federal insurance plans as of January, with the exception of mental health counseling, including faith-based counseling.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">There was also an exception for those who are in \u201cmid-treatment\u201d, though it didn\u2019t detail which treatments exactly qualified. And a subsequent letter in March eliminated this exception beginning in 2027.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">At least 39,400 enrollees will be affected by the prohibition on gender-affirming care coverage, according to a recent <a href=\"https:\/\/williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu\/wp-content\/uploads\/FEHB-Trans-Impact-Jul-2026.pdf\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">estimate<\/a> from the UCLA School of Law Williams Institute.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">\u201cHealthcare access should never be weaponized to advance discrimination \u2013 and the denial of coverage for critical healthcare based simply on who you are blatantly violates the rights of all of us,\u201d said Kelley Robinson, the HRCF president, in a statement.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Federal workers and their families have been forced to pay out of pocket for gender-affirming care, including routine doctor\u2019s visits, while others have foregone the care entirely. Some employees have left their jobs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The pseudonymous plaintiffs detailed the exorbitant costs of care that they are now forced to pay out of pocket or forgo entirely. Trans employees have begun receiving bills for hundreds of dollars for annual exams, bloodwork, follow-up appointments, and hormone replacement therapy. Costs for surgery, deemed by their doctors as medically necessary, run in the thousands of dollars. A US Postal Service employee had to turn to his savings to cover his daughter\u2019s gender-affirming care.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">One of the plaintiffs previously had a surgery that was covered, and they now require post-surgical care that is not covered.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">\u201cThis person is now stuck in this untenable, very unsafe situation, having to decide whether they can actually pay untold amounts of money or risk having serious complications,\u201d Cheng-Wun Weaver said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Even though the ban is on insurance coverage, not on the care itself, the financial burdens amount to prohibition for some individuals, Cheng-Wun Weaver said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">Gender-affirming care can be life-saving, and major medical organizations <a href=\"https:\/\/glaad.org\/medical-association-statements-supporting-trans-youth-healthcare-and-against-discriminatory\/\" data-link-name=\"in body link\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">support<\/a> it as medically necessary. The complaint likened the move to denying coverage of other life-saving care like insulin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">\u201cIf you have diabetes and you need to receive insulin for treatment that is ongoing \u2013 to have it taken away from you, it\u2019s a devastating situation because your health is at stake, and now you have to budget for this care that adds up as you live on,\u201d Cheng-Wun Weaver said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">The temporary exception for \u201cmid-treatment\u201d coverage has been \u201cvery confusing\u201d, Cheng-Wun Weaver said. The vague language in the letter to carriers means that insurers are left to interpret what is covered on their own, and \u201cit\u2019s really a crapshoot\u201d, she said. Patients are calling their doctors and insurers before every visit and blood draw to see what will be covered.<\/p>\n<p class=\"dcr-1s160rg\">To have coverage of medically necessary care prohibited based on no medical or scientific reason is \u201ccruelty\u201d, Cheng-Wun Weaver said. And it set the precedent of politically motivated coverage bans for any population, she added: \u201cIf this can happen to a very small population of a country, it can happen to anyone else.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"US federal employees and their families are joining a class-action lawsuit against the Trump administration for blocking insurance&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":573672,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[163,521,85,46],"class_list":["post-573671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-healthcare","tag-health","tag-healthcare","tag-il","tag-israel"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=573671"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/573671\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/573672"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=573671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=573671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=573671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}