{"id":579105,"date":"2026-08-09T02:20:10","date_gmt":"2026-08-09T02:20:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/579105\/"},"modified":"2026-08-09T02:20:10","modified_gmt":"2026-08-09T02:20:10","slug":"will-pakistan-saudi-turkiye-defence-pact-change-us-strategy-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/579105\/","title":{"rendered":"Will Pakistan-Saudi-Turkiye defence pact change US strategy? | News"},"content":{"rendered":"

Washington, DC \u2013\u00a0The administration of United States President Donald Trump has offered no official response in the hours since Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan signed<\/a> a landmark mutual defence agreement in Mecca.<\/p>\n

The muted reaction, which persisted into Saturday, likely underscores the multilayered \u2014 and still emerging \u2014 implications of the new deal for US strategy, according to analysts.<\/p>\n

Recommended Stories list of 3 itemsend of list<\/p>\n

Considered by many to lay the groundwork for what could be one of the most significant power shifts<\/a> in the region in decades, the deal comes within the context of the US-Israeli war against Iran and Israel\u2019s increasingly aggressive military actions in the region.<\/p>\n

One provision is said to call on signatories to treat an attack on one as an attack on all, reminiscent of NATO\u2019s Article 5.<\/p>\n

Some analysts see the agreement as a reflection of growing wariness towards an unpredictable US government, potentially presaging a wider security realignment that could transform<\/a> the Middle East.<\/p>\n

Others have argued that, while US actions have indeed fostered the conditions that accelerated the deal, the pact fits neatly within US strategic aims of greater burden-sharing among allies.<\/p>\n

In the near term, many experts agree the pact will likely have the greatest impact in the diplomatic sphere, posing a potentially insurmountable challenge to Arab-Israeli normalisation under the Abraham Accords.<\/p>\n

The push for greater regional cooperation with Israel has been the linchpin of the Trump administration\u2019s designs for the Middle East, dating back to his first term. But Sina Toosi, a senior fellow at the Centre for International Policy, explained that the mutual defence pact is likely a setback.<\/p>\n

\u201cIronically, the US and Israel entered the war [with Iran] hoping to reshape the regional balance of power in Israel\u2019s favour and accelerate regional integration through initiatives like the Abraham Accords,\u201d Toosi told Al Jazeera.<\/p>\n

\u201cInstead, one of the first major post-war developments is the emergence of a defence initiative among three major Muslim powers seeking greater strategic autonomy.\u201d<\/p>\n

US posture and messaging?<\/p>\n

The full details of the agreement have not yet been released. Only a joint statement on Friday has addressed the pact\u2019s terms.<\/p>\n

The central pledge of the agreement \u201cstipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all\u201d, according to the statement. But that premise remains so far untested.<\/p>\n

The pact builds on a previous mutual defence agreement with a similar provision, reached between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan in September 2025. It came just days after Israel launched<\/a> an air strike on the Qatari capital Doha, exacerbating concerns about Washington\u2019s ability to control one of its closest allies.<\/p>\n

In the wake of the Hamas-led attacks on October 7, 2023, Israel has led multiple war efforts, including against Iran, Lebanon and a genocidal campaign in Gaza.<\/p>\n

Officials in Riyadh, Ankara and Islamabad have taken pains to stress that Friday\u2019s agreement is meant to supplement, not supplant, any other alliances. Experts have further cautioned that the strengthening of defence ties between the trio does paper over their individual, and at times diverging, interests.<\/p>\n

Saudi Arabia, for instance, said the deal \u201cdoes not represent any orientation toward building a military axis or sectarian\/religious bloc\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe agreement does not come at the expense of the Kingdom\u2019s strategic and strong relations at the Gulf, Arab, and international levels,\u201d it said.<\/p>\n

The country has been the target of a large number of Iran\u2019s retaliatory attacks since the US-Israeli war began on February 28, and more recently, it has seen increased strikes from the Houthis in Yemen and Iran-aligned armed groups in Iraq.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Turkiye\u2019s presidential communication directorate said the strengthened partnership \u201cis not an alternative\u201d to the country\u2019s membership in the 32-country NATO bloc.<\/p>\n

Indeed, experts have said the agreement does not appear to have any bearing on any NATO commitments, although it could eventually lead to a diversion of resources in the event of multiple escalations.<\/p>\n

Turkiye has the second-largest standing army in NATO, as well as access to advanced military technology. Saudi Arabia is understood as bringing its vast power of the purse to the agreement. Pakistan is the only nuclear-armed power of the three.<\/p>\n

Alienation of allies?<\/p>\n

Despite assurances that the pact is not a regional re-orientation, some observers have connected the new alliance to the Trump administration\u2019s at-times caustic approach towards NATO and its wider pivot away from multilateralism.<\/p>\n

They argue it represents a clear, if nascent, weakening of Washington\u2019s strategic sway.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe basis for our alliance in the Middle East, in the Persian Gulf, and certainly with NATO and with our allies in Asia, have been shaken,\u201d Harlan Ullman, the chairman of the Killowen Group advisory firm and a former naval officer, told Al Jazeera in a television interview.<\/p>\n

\u201cHow badly remains to be seen. It may only be stirred, not shaken. But it\u2019s something that we need to worry about.\u201d<\/p>\n

The US approach to the Gulf has largely been based on forging military, economic and diplomatic ties in the region. In turn, Gulf states have expected de facto security guarantees.<\/p>\n

That strategy was energised in the early 1980s upon the founding of the Gulf Cooperation Council, and it grew amid the US invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, part of Washington\u2019s so-called \u201cglobal war on terror\u201d.<\/p>\n

The US has about 50,000 troops stationed across 19 sites in the Middle East, with US-controlled bases in Turkiye, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar and the UAE, and a presence at bases in Saudi Arabia, Oman, Jordan, Iraq and Israel.<\/p>\n

Qatar, Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Egypt are among the countries in the region that the US has designated as \u201cmajor non-NATO allies\u201d, underscoring the importance of their military and economic ties. Pakistan is also a major non-NATO ally.<\/p>\n

But critics have argued the US-Israeli war with Iran has degraded the foundations of those alliances.<\/p>\n

Nawaf Obaid, a senior fellow at the Department of War Studies at King\u2019s College London, has characterised the Pakistan-Saudi-Turkiye deal as the clearest sign yet of the shift away from an \u201cAmerican-designed regional security order\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe US-Iran war accelerated a transformation already under way,\u201d Obaid argued in a column for Al Jazeera.<\/p>\n

He pointed out that hosting US bases has made several Gulf states targets for attacks during the ongoing war with Iran.<\/p>\n

\u201cIranian retaliatory strikes exposed the vulnerability of the US basing structure in the Gulf and forced the repositioning of substantial combat forces,\u201d Obaid said.<\/p>\n

The loosening bonds can also be seen on the US side. Successive administrations \u2014 including those led by former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden \u2014 have attempted to pivot away from the Middle East, pursuing instead a renewed emphasis on China and the Asia Pacific.<\/p>\n

The 2025 National Security Strategy, early in Trump\u2019s second term, gave only brief mention to the region.<\/p>\n

While Washington\u2019s \u201cintelligence relationships, military power, technology and economic influence will remain formidable\u201d in the region, Obaid predicts the US presence will wane.<\/p>\n

\u201cSeveral American bases will eventually close, as they have lost strategic utility,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n

In line with US goals?<\/p>\n

Asli Aydintasbas, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, also pointed to a desire within the Trump administration to shift away from the Middle East, particularly when it comes to so-called \u201cdemocracy building\u201d.<\/p>\n

But that desire has generally not extended to withdrawing military forces in the Gulf, she explained. With efforts to end the five-month war in Iran repeatedly stalled, any short-term change in the US military posture remains unlikely.<\/p>\n

\u201cNow there\u2019s a hot war in the Middle East. Obviously, it\u2019s not really the time to pull US troops or commitments,\u201d Aydintasbas said.<\/p>\n

\u201cOn the other hand, we\u2019ve also seen the limits of US deterrence in the region in the form of Iranian attacks on US allies and Iran\u2019s continuing ability to inflict pain on US allies and global trade, despite its weaker military model.\u201d<\/p>\n

Aydintasbas is among experts who believe that Washington likely sees the new security agreement as in line with its calls for more burden-sharing among allies.<\/p>\n

The Trump administration has been dogged by reports of munitions shortages during the war with Iran, and it has called on its allies, particularly in NATO, to crank up their military spending.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think the United States is not bothered by a deal among three close US allies for their own protection. It is consistent with the Trump administration\u2019s ideas on burden-sharing and regional solutions,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

Aydintasbas also questioned whether Turkiye or Pakistan would indeed retaliate against the Houthis or Iran in response to attacks on Saudi Arabia, under the terms of the pact.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt also really is an agreement that has its own limits, and US officials know that full well,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n

Burcu Ozcelik, a senior research fellow for Middle East security at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), also said she would \u201cresist reading this as evidence of a post-American Middle East\u201d.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf anything, it fits the broader US preference for greater regional burden-sharing, regional powers assuming more responsibility for deterrence and security while remaining embedded, to different degrees, within a US-centred security architecture,\u201d she wrote in a post on the social media platform X.<\/p>\n

\u201cStronger regional security cooperation among US partners is entirely compatible with the direction of American strategy.\u201d<\/p>\n

Signal on Abraham Accords<\/p>\n

While Friday\u2019s mutual defence deal may not shift US military strategy in the foreseeable future, the agreement appears to send a potent message about the normalisation of regional ties with Israel<\/a> under the Abraham Accords.<\/p>\n

That push has been a cornerstone of the Trump administration\u2019s diplomatic approach to the Middle East: Trump oversaw the UAE, Bahrain and Morocco signing onto the accords during his first term.<\/p>\n

Israel\u2019s genocidal war on Gaza, however, derailed any recent progress on the effort, which was already criticised for sidelining the issue of Palestinian peace and statehood.<\/p>\n

Normalising Saudi Arabia-Israel relations has long been a crowning, if elusive, goal for the Trump administration. But experts say the Pakistan-Turkiye-Saudi Arabia deal puts the prospect of expanding the Abraham Accords further out of reach, if not sounding a death knell altogether.<\/p>\n

That is particularly true after Trump retroactively made joining the Abraham Accords a condition for the sale of nuclear reactors to Saudi Arabia, according to defence analyst Alex Alfirraz Scheers.<\/p>\n

\u201cI think the fact that the president of the United States basically said that the Saudi nuclear cooperation agreement was contingent on the Saudis joining the Abraham Accords certainly sounded alarms all across the Gulf,\u201d Alfirraz Scheers told Al Jazeera in a television interview.<\/p>\n

\u201c[It showed] the Abraham Accords are now being used for coercive purposes.\u201d<\/p>\n

Aydintasbas, the fellow at the Brookings Institution, said the pact removes any ambiguity about Riyadh\u2019s position.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis makes it crystal clear that the Saudis are not going to join the Abraham Accords as long as the Palestinian issue remains unresolved,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n

Brian Osgood contributed reporting.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Washington, DC \u2013\u00a0The administration of United States President Donald Trump has offered no official response in the hours…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":579106,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[337,42,87,46,47,43,338,78,40,38,41,39,1582,1032,1156],"class_list":["post-579105","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-headlines","tag-asia","tag-headlines","tag-iran","tag-israel","tag-middle-east","tag-news","tag-pakistan","tag-saudi-arabia","tag-top-news","tag-top-stories","tag-topnews","tag-topstories","tag-turkey","tag-united-states","tag-us-canada"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579105","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=579105"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579105\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/579106"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=579105"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=579105"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=579105"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}