It doesn\u2019t often happen during interviews. Something inside the person starts shifting. Fresh ideas get forged in real time.<\/p>\n
Our new podcast series Radical Thinking with Aditya Chakrabortty<\/a> has already managed to generate many such moments. Each time it happens, you can almost hear the expression changing on the guest\u2019s face. At one point, I switched from audio to video to witness the change and then watch as they refined their thoughts.<\/p>\n The effect is riveting. It\u2019s also by design.<\/p>\n \u201cWe didn\u2019t want this podcast to be a boxing match,\u201d says Kirsty Major, a Guardian deputy opinion editor and an executive producer of Radical Thinking. \u201cWe hold guests to account where needed, but ultimately it\u2019s about giving them the space to really think.\u201d<\/p>\n The series sees Guardian columnist Aditya Chakrabortty sit down with some of today\u2019s major thinkers to discuss the forces that are transforming our world and how we can meet the myriad challenges that are confounding conventional wisdom.<\/p>\n Fellow executive producer Maz Ebtehaj likens the approach to focusing on people\u2019s thought processes. \u201cWe\u2019re encouraging people to think about why they think a certain thing,\u201d she says. \u201cWe\u2019re sort of holding a magnifying glass up to their politics and their values, but in an exploratory way not a confrontational way.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019re also trying to get a better understanding of where a guest\u2019s thinking leads them,\u201d says Aditya. \u201cI might not always agree with what they think, but I\u2019m really interested in how they got there and whether we share any premises. And because the interviews are exploratory rather than accusatory, we get those moments when a guest says something they perhaps didn\u2019t expect to say.\u201d<\/p>\n Whether you are listening to the podcast or watching it, it\u2019s striking how each episode of Radical Thinking leaves you feeling notably nourished. That owes as much to the podcast\u2019s radical approach as it does the radical ideas discussed on the show. By deliberately letting listeners and viewers experience a guest\u2019s thought processes rather than simply hear their hot takes, the team hopes the podcast will feel distinct.<\/p>\n \u201cI expressly think of it as anti-brain rot,\u201d says Aditya. \u201cWhen people talk about doomscrolling and brain rot, notice that they often slip into the passive voice. What they\u2019re really talking about is how they no longer feel as if they have control over their lives. People want a different way of thinking about what\u2019s going on in their world and that\u2019s what we\u2019re trying to provide.\u201d<\/p>\n Michael Gove exploring his political views on Radical Thinking Photograph: James Tindale\/The Guardian<\/p>\n This sense of mission is coupled with an urgency that informs the series as the far right continues to gain power around the world by exploiting people\u2019s grievances. \u201cWe\u2019re living through some very precarious moments right now, and that requires us to come up with new ideas urgently, or at least to press the ideas people have into service,\u201d says Aditya.<\/p>\n \u201cThe systems and the ideas and frameworks that we\u2019re used to don\u2019t work any more, so it does call for radical thinking,\u201d adds Maz. \u201cSome of our guests are inherently radical thinkers. Others have radical thoughts.\u201d<\/p>\n The show\u2019s guests are drawn from across the political spectrum, including former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis, Spectator magazine editor and former Conservative deputy prime minister Michael Gove, Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor, the playwright James Graham, and the writer and Guardian columnist Nesrine Malik.<\/p>\n Guardian columnist Aditya Chakrabortty Photograph: Linda Nylind\/The Guardian<\/p>\n \u201cThat plurality of voices comes from within the Guardian\u2019s own traditions,\u201d says Aditya. \u201cThere\u2019s a fascinating bit in the interview with Gove<\/a> when I ask what his abiding principle in politics is and he says, I want to fight inequality. How does someone on the right explain that to the rest of us? Not with me saying to him, \u2018but you did austerity, you backed Brexit and now this new nativism\u2019… I want to know what throughline he sees there. And actually, what he tells us is shattering.\u201d<\/p>\n Another such moment from the first few episodes is when Varoufakis explains<\/a> how his experience of power radicalised him. \u201cThere is the look of defeat on his face,\u201d says Aditya. \u201cThere\u2019s also the genuine look of surprise on Naomi Klein and Astrid Taylor\u2019s faces<\/a> when we start talking about how the left might respond when the AI bubble bursts.\u201d<\/p>\n These sorts of moments are spontaneous, but also the result of the way the whole team carefully plans and structures each episode. \u201cI\u2019ve just come out of an all-day meeting where we were thinking about how to structure our interview with James Graham<\/a>,\u201d says Aditya. \u201cThe really big, guiding question we wanted to discuss was whether stories can heal a divided country. What is it like to be the nation\u2019s playwright at a point when the nation is falling apart?\u201d<\/p>\n Those meetings are key to the alchemy of the series. \u201cWe plot it through,\u201d says Maz. \u201cWhat\u2019s the guiding thought? Where and what are we going to get to? For example, with Varoufakis, we started by asking him about his upbringing and how he felt during certain moments of his life \u2013 because the personal can be very revealing about a person\u2019s political views. We have time to draw emotional connections to people\u2019s politics because each episode is an hour long. So the conversation should feel like a story and by the end the audience should feel they\u2019ve arrived at some sort of answer to that initial guiding thought.\u201d<\/p>\n For Kirsty, some aspects of the prep were very different from the kinds of journalism she\u2019s previously done. \u201cI went from editing and writing articles to working with the audio team, and they\u2019ve opened my eyes to how you might structure a conversation and plan it out,\u201d she says. \u201cAn incredible amount of work goes into that. We have to know what\u2019s already out there and what a guest might say, but we want to go beyond that. By the end of it, you really feel as if you live in their head.\u201d<\/p>\n As well as being familiar with each guest\u2019s body of work, Aditya has also written about some of them before. \u201cAnother thing that helps inform some of these discussions is that I\u2019ve known some of our guests for a while during the course of my reporting,\u201d he says. \u201cSo there\u2019s a degree of informality. I\u2019m not trying to impose on our guests; I want to draw out the best of them. I know their work, I know where the broader conversation is, so I can think about how it can be taken to a different place or how we can add different perspectives. Journalism to me has always been about adding value like that.\u201d<\/p>\n One regular feature involves asking each guest what they would do if they had a billion pounds. The answers aren\u2019t just instructive, they are often informed by the preceding discussion. Another feature involves Aditya summing up what he has taken from each interview \u2013 underscoring how everyone comes away from the encounter feeling fortified.<\/p>\n Aditya says he hopes this also extends to listeners and viewers and that Radical Thinking proves empowering for audiences \u2013 just as he felt empowered by certain news outlets back when he was growing up. \u201cDuring my childhood and early youth, newspapers and the media always played that role. It was a tool for the rising classes to make themselves better informed about the world.\u201d<\/p>\n The podcast\u2019s combination of informative and informal is also aided by its physical space. \u201cWe spent a lot of time thinking about the setting,\u201d says Maz. \u201cIt\u2019s very dark. It\u2019s very low-lit. At first, we had two sofas but Aditya said it didn\u2019t feel right because it wasn\u2019t how he\u2019d have a conversation. So we put in a table and chairs.\u201d<\/p>\n Even without the sofas, however, the work and thought that goes into each episode means the interviews very quickly morph into a more intimate conversation. \u201cIt feels pretty therapeutic,\u201d says Aditya. \u201cA lot of stuff spills out.\u201d<\/p>\n Watch every episode of the podcast on the Guardian\u2019s Politics Weekly YouTube channel www.youtube.com\/@politicsweekly<\/a>, or listen wherever you get your podcasts.<\/p>\n