A flatbed pulls off the hill track with a sawn length of blade strapped across it, white and hollow and lighter than it looks.<\/p>\n
Behind it, a line of concrete stumps where towers used to bolt down.<\/p>\n
The machines came off this ridge in South Lanarkshire in 2023, after turning there since 1995.<\/p>\n
What left the site went in two directions, and the two could not have been\u00a0more different.<\/p>\n
Most of it went to a scrapyard half an hour away. The rest crossed the Irish Sea.<\/p>\n
Which is the thing a single number\u00a0cannot show you.<\/p>\n
Why 99.9 percent is a weight and not a count<\/p>\n
A recovery rate for a wind turbine is a share of its mass, and mass is almost entirely steel.<\/p>\n
The tower is a rolled steel tube standing hundreds of feet tall. The nacelle is a box of castings, shafts, copper and a gearbox. Those parts are heavy, and they are the ones a furnace will take without asking what they used to be.<\/p>\n
The blades are the opposite. They are glass fibre set in resin, built to be stiff and light, and\u00a0light is the point.<\/p>\n
So a percentage by weight is carried almost entirely by the metal. Recover every ounce of steel and send every blade to a hole in the ground, and the number still looks excellent.<\/p>\n
That is not what happened here, and it matters that it is not.<\/p>\n
But it is why one figure can cover\u00a0two different industries.<\/p>\n
26 machines at 600 kilowatts since 1995<\/p>\n
Hagshaw Hill sits in South Lanarkshire, on high ground above Douglas.<\/p>\n
Related<\/p>\n
It started turning in 1995 as the first commercial wind farm in Scotland, with 26 machines rated at 600 kilowatts each, which comes to 15.6 megawatts for the whole site.<\/p>\n
By modern standards that is one turbine. The replacements going up now are rated several times higher apiece.<\/p>\n
When the 26 came down in 2023 it was the first onshore wind farm in Scotland to be decommissioned, which made the site\u00a0a test case\u00a0rather than a routine job.<\/p>\n
Steel, copper and gearbox parts went to scrap buyers and component dealers, most of them within 30 miles.<\/p>\n
The blades went to\u00a0a single processor\u00a0in Northern Ireland.<\/p>\n
79.5 percent recycled and 20.4 percent reused<\/p>\n
The headline figure breaks into two numbers, and the split is the useful part.<\/p>\n
A report compiled by an engineering consultancy puts recycling at 79.5 percent and reuse at 20.4 percent, which adds to the 99.9 that has travelled around the trade press.<\/p>\n
Reuse here means components kept whole, held as spares or passed on for training rather than melted. Contracts went to\u00a0at least 10\u00a0supply chain companies in Scotland and elsewhere in the United Kingdom.<\/p>\n
The blades were turned into a polymer that goes into site fencing, marker posts and drainage parts, replacing concrete, timber and virgin plastic.<\/p>\n
That processor says its output this year is half again what it was last year, which was itself a third higher than the year before.<\/p>\n
Which is real growth from\u00a0a small base.<\/p>\n
The 0.1 percent nobody describes<\/p>\n
Two things sit under the number and neither is hidden.<\/p>\n
Related<\/p>\n
The report was commissioned by the site\u2019s owner rather than by a regulator, and\u00a0the operator\u2019s account<\/a>\u00a0is where the 79.5 and the 20.4 come from, in the way that\u00a0an earlier count<\/a>\u00a0or\u00a0a folding rotor<\/a>\u00a0turns into\u00a0a settled question.<\/p>\n The two percentages add to exactly 99.9, so the missing tenth is simply not described anywhere.<\/p>\n And the industry\u2019s own estimate for how much of a turbine is recyclable sits at 85 to 95 percent, below what this site reported, which tells you the usual number and this number are not measuring the same thing.<\/p>\n