{"id":79732,"date":"2025-10-17T02:51:09","date_gmt":"2025-10-17T02:51:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/79732\/"},"modified":"2025-10-17T02:51:09","modified_gmt":"2025-10-17T02:51:09","slug":"worlds-first-truly-free-software-phone-thats-the-fsfs-new-long-game","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/79732\/","title":{"rendered":"World&#8217;s first truly free software phone? That&#8217;s the FSF&#8217;s new &#8216;long game&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/gettyimages-1582657756.jpg\" alt=\"glowing phone\" width=\"1280\" height=\"640\" fetchpriority=\"low\"\/>   klyaksun\/iStock\/Getty Images Plus<\/p>\n<p>Follow ZDNET: <a href=\"https:\/\/cc.zdnet.com\/v1\/otc\/00hQi47eqnEWQ6T9d4QLBUc?element=BODY&amp;element_label=Add+us+as+a+preferred+source&amp;module=LINK&amp;object_type=text-link&amp;object_uuid=3bff3a69-4b79-4041-b24a-1fcca849262a&amp;position=1&amp;split_test_identifier=deals_module&amp;split_test_variant=test1&amp;template=article&amp;track_code=__COM_CLICK_ID__&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fcc.zdnet.com%2Fv1%2Fotc%2F00hQi47eqnEWQ6T9d4QLBUc%3Felement%3DBODY%26element_label%3DAdd%2Bus%2Bas%2Ba%2Bpreferred%2BGoogle%2Bsource%26module%3DLINK%26object_type%3Dtext-link%26object_uuid%3D5e5d2e64-4b30-43e6-8555-26eac7e449f3%26position%3D1%26template%3Darticle%26track_code%3D__COM_CLICK_ID__%26url%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.google.com%252Fpreferences%252Fsource%253Fq%253Dzdnet.com%26view_instance_uuid%3D379e95d2-6b56-476b-a90b-043a8dd63bd3&amp;view_instance_uuid=fdbe002f-41cc-4b7b-b0ed-1c2aa37d078c\" rel=\"noopener nofollow sponsored\" target=\"_blank\">Add us as a preferred source<\/a> on Google.<\/p>\n<p>ZDNET&#8217;s key takeawaysNo one has managed to make a fully free software smartphone.Open-source and free software projects have had limited success.The problem is proprietary tech with no public documentation.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fsf.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">Free Software Foundation (FSF)<\/a> has unveiled a new initiative called <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fsf.org\/news\/librephone-project\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">LibrePhone<\/a>, with the ambitious goal of a completely free software <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/article\/best-phone\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">smartphone<\/a> ecosystem. Good luck with that, because this aim is not &#8212; in any way, shape, or form &#8212; an easy thing to achieve.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Zo\u00eb Kooyman, the FSF&#8217;s executive director, acknowledged this fact, saying, &#8220;Given the complexity of the devices, this work will take time, but we&#8217;re used to playing the long game.&#8221;\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Also: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/article\/10-open-source-windows-apps-i-cant-live-without-and-theyre-all-free\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">10 open-source Windows apps I can&#8217;t live without &#8211; and they&#8217;re all free<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Project LibrePhone wants to remove all proprietary code from mobile devices. That code includes firmware, drivers, and the binary &#8220;blobs&#8221; that phones must have to operate.<\/p>\n<p>Although several projects, such as <a href=\"https:\/\/grapheneos.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">GrapheneOS<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/postmarketos.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">postmarketOS<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/e.foundation\/fr\/e-os\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">\/e\/OS<\/a>, have removed Google-specific software from the <a href=\"https:\/\/source.android.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">Android Open Source Project (AOSP)<\/a> codebase, the devices still rely on closed components for hardware support. Kooyman said that mobile computing has long been &#8220;the last frontier of software freedom,&#8221; and that it remains dominated by closed ecosystems, such as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/article\/my-favorite-ios-26-productivity-feature-is-highly-useful-but-hidden-heres-how-to-find-it\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Apple&#8217;s iOS<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/article\/google-is-killing-the-android-phone-feature-that-once-made-them-popular-and-theres-a-big-reason-why\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Google&#8217;s Android<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Also:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/article\/want-to-ditch-windows-this-linux-distro-makes-that-transition-easy\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Want to ditch Windows? This Linux distro makes that transition easy<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The FSF should be aware of whether this is true, as they&#8217;ve attempted to overcome this challenge before. <a href=\"https:\/\/replicant.us\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">Replicant<\/a>, a free-software-based Android distribution, was launched in 2010. It replaced Google&#8217;s proprietary Android components with free software equivalents.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>However, Replicant quickly hit hardware and firmware compatibility limits. Many phone functions, particularly graphics acceleration, GPS, and modem control, still depend on undocumented, closed-source firmware. As of 2025, Replicant runs on outdated devices like the Galaxy S3 and Nexus S, but it&#8217;s far from perfect even on these phones.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The simple, sad truth is that without vendor documentation, open-source and free software developers cannot legally recreate replacements. The situation is compounded by stringent non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) from chipmakers, such as Qualcomm and Broadcom, that block programmers from reading their technical documentation.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Without this documentation, working with their proprietary code is like trying to sew while wearing boxing gloves. Linux-based smartphone projects, such as <a href=\"https:\/\/postmarketos.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">postmarketOS<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ubuntu-touch.io\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">Ubuntu Touch<\/a>, allow limited use of proprietary blobs. Yet this is a compromise that the FSF&#8217;s stricter standards reject.<\/p>\n<p>Also: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/article\/10-linux-tips-i-give-to-both-beginners-and-professionals-for-improved-productivity\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">10 Linux tips I give to both beginners and professionals for improved productivity<\/a><\/p>\n<p>You may have noticed I&#8217;ve been saying &#8220;free software&#8221; a lot rather than &#8220;open-source.&#8221; That&#8217;s because, while they may be similar concepts, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/article\/40-years-of-gnu-and-the-free-software-foundation\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">FSF&#8217;s founder, Richard M. Stallman (RMS), wants nothing to do with open source.<\/a>\u00a0Without getting too deep into the weeds, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gnu.org\/philosophy\/free-sw.en.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">Free Software Definition<\/a> is stricter than the Open Source Initiative&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/opensource.org\/osd\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">Open Source Definition<\/a>\u00a0rules.<\/p>\n<p>Leaving aside the philosophical debates, the technical lead for LibrePhone, Rob Savoye, a long-time GNU contributor best known for creating <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gnu.org\/software\/gnash\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">Gnash<\/a>, the free Adobe Flash alternative, faces the massive task of reverse-engineering proprietary firmware with minimal documentation. When that intractable challenge is overcome, his team must then create open substitutes that meet the FSF&#8217;s stringent guidelines for fully free systems.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Savoye bravely said: &#8220;As a long-time embedded systems engineer who has worked on mobile devices for decades, I&#8217;m looking forward to this opportunity to work towards a freedom-supporting phone and help users gain control over their phone hardware.&#8221; I wish him luck; he&#8217;s going to need it.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Also: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/article\/i-abandoned-google-for-a-search-tool-that-doesnt-track-me-or-push-ai-and-it-gets-better\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">I abandoned Google for a search tool that doesn&#8217;t track me or push AI &#8211; and it gets better<\/a><\/p>\n<p>As <a href=\"https:\/\/www.androidauthority.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">Android Authority<\/a> reported, the first challenge for the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.androidauthority.com\/librephone-3607324\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" class=\"c-regularLink\">LibrePhone team is identifying a handset with the &#8220;fewest, most fixable freedom problems.&#8221;<\/a> That&#8217;s the easy part. Once selected, engineers plan to document and replicate the behavior of proprietary code with transparent, auditable alternatives. This reverse-engineering process could eventually produce the first smartphone operating system certified as entirely free under FSF standards.<\/p>\n<p>Mind you, I emphasize &#8220;could&#8221; not &#8220;will.&#8221; Reverse-engineering firmware and blobs with so little information to go on has kept all programmers to date from creating a truly free or open-source phone. Still, if no one even tries, the goal can never be reached. I wish the FSF developers all the best with this daunting challenge.\u00a0<br \/>Get the morning&#8217;s top stories in your inbox each day with our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.zdnet.com\/newsletters\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Tech Today newsletter.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"klyaksun\/iStock\/Getty Images Plus Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google. ZDNET&#8217;s key takeawaysNo one has&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":79733,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[85,46,321,125],"class_list":["post-79732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-mobile","tag-il","tag-israel","tag-mobile","tag-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=79732"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/79732\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/79733"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=79732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=79732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/il\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=79732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}