Meynet, G. & Maeder, A. Stellar evolution with rotation. X. Wolf–Rayet star populations at solar metallicity. Astron. Astrophys. 404, 975–990 (2003).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Ekström, S. et al. Grids of stellar models with rotation. I. Models from 0.8 to 120 M⊙ at solar metallicity (Z = 0.014). Astron. Astrophys. 537, A146 (2012).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Levesque, E. M. Astrophysics of Red Supergiants 2514–3433 (IOP, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-1329-2

Van Dyk, S. D. Red supergiants as supernova progenitors. Galaxies 13, 33 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Li, W. et al. Identification of the red supergiant progenitor of supernova 2005cs: do the progenitors of type II-P supernovae have low mass? Astrophys. J. 641, 1060–1070 (2006).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kochanek, C. S. et al. A survey about nothing: monitoring a million supergiants for failed supernovae. Astrophys. J. 684, 1336–1342 (2008).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Smartt, S. J., Eldridge, J. J., Crockett, R. M. & Maund, J. R. The death of massive stars—I. Observational constraints on the progenitors of type II-P supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 395, 1409–1437 (2009).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Smartt, S. J. Observational constraints on the progenitors of core-collapse supernovae: the case for missing high-mass stars. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 32, e016 (2015).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kochanek, C. S. On the red supergiant problem. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 4945–4949 (2020).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Fang, Q., Moriya, T. J. & Maeda, K. Red supergiant problem viewed from the nebular phase spectroscopy of type II supernovae. Astrophys. J. 986, 39 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Davies, B. & Beasor, E. R. The ‘red supergiant problem’: the upper luminosity boundary of type II supernova progenitors. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 468–476 (2020).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Davies, B. & Beasor, E. R. ’On the red supergiant problem’: a rebuttal, and a consensus on the upper mass cut-off for II-P progenitors. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 496, L142–L146 (2020).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Beasor, E. R., Smith, N. & Jencson, J. E. The red supergiant progenitor luminosity problem. Astrophys. J. 979, 117 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Strotjohann, N. L., Ofek, E. O. & Gal-Yam, A. A Bias-corrected luminosity function for red supergiant supernova progenitor stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. 964, L27 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Healy, S., Horiuchi, S. & Ashall, C. The red supergiant problem: as seen from the local group’s red supergiant populations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04386 (2024).

De, K. et al. The disappearance of a massive star marking the birth of a black hole in M31. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14778 (2024).

de Jager, C. The yellow hypergiants. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 8, 145–180 (1998).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Gordon, M. S. & Humphreys, R. M. Red supergiants, yellow hypergiants, and post-RSG evolution. Galaxies 7, 92 (2019).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Humphreys, R. M. & Jones, T. J. Episodic gaseous outflows and mass loss from red supergiants. Astron. J. 163, 103 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Jones, T. Red and yellow hypergiants. Galaxies 13, 43 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Humphreys, R. M. The complex upper HR diagram. Galaxies 7, 75 (2019).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Meynet, G. et al. Impact of mass-loss on the evolution and pre-supernova properties of red supergiants. Astron. Astrophys. 575, A60 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Zapartas, E. et al. The effect of mass loss in models of red supergiants in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 697, A167 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Smith, N. Mass loss: its effect on the evolution and fate of high-mass stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 487–528 (2014).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Beasor, E. R. et al. A new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492, 5994–6006 (2020).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Antoniadis, K. et al. Establishing a mass-loss rate relation for red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 686, A88 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Decin, L., Richards, A. M. S., Marchant, P. & Sana, H. ALMA detection of CO rotational line emission in red supergiant stars of the massive young star cluster RSGC1. Determination of a new mass-loss rate prescription for red supergiants. Astron. Astrophys. 681, A17 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Antoniadis, K. et al. Investigating the metallicity dependence of the mass-loss rate relation of red supergiants. Astron. Astrophys. 702, A178 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Richards, A. M. S., Yates, J. A. & Cohen, R. J. Proper motions of water vapour masers and bipolar outflow from NML Cygni. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 282, 665–676 (1996).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Decin, L. et al. Probing the mass-loss history of AGB and red supergiant stars from CO rotational line profiles. I. Theoretical model—mass-loss history unravelled in VY CMa. Astron. Astrophys. 456, 549–563 (2006).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Singh, A. P., Richards, A. M. S., Humphreys, R. M., Decin, L. & Ziurys, L. M. ALMA reveals hidden morphologies in the molecular envelope of VY Canis Majoris. Astrophys. J. Lett. 954, L1 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Glatzel, W. & Kiriakidis, M. Stability of massive stars and the Humphreys/Davidson limit. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 263, 375 (1993).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Humphreys, R. M. & Davidson, K. Studies of luminous stars in nearby galaxies. III. Comments on the evolution of the most massive stars in the Milky Way and the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astrophys. J. 232, 409–420 (1979).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

McDonald, S. L. E., Davies, B. & Beasor, E. R. Red supergiants in M31: the Humphreys–Davidson limit at high metallicity. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, 3132–3144 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Schootemeijer, A. et al. A constant upper luminosity limit of cool supergiant stars down to the extremely low metallicity of I Zw 18. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12594 (2025).

Landri, C. & Pejcha, O. Driving asymmetric red supergiant winds with binary interactions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 531, 3391–3405 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

MacLeod, M. et al. Radial velocity and astrometric evidence for a close companion to Betelgeuse. Astrophys. J. 978, 50 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Sana, H. et al. Binary interaction dominates the evolution of massive stars. Science 337, 444 (2012).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Ivanova, N. et al. Common envelope evolution: where we stand and how we can move forward. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 59 (2013).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Westerlund, B. E., Olander, N. & Hedin, B. Supergiant and giant M type stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 43, 267–295 (1981).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Ohnaka, K., Driebe, T., Hofmann, K. H., Weigelt, G. & Wittkowski, M. Spatially resolved dusty torus toward the red supergiant WOH G64 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 484, 371–379 (2008).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Elias, J. H., Frogel, J. A. & Schwering, P. B. W. Two supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud with thick dust shells. Astrophys. J. 302, 675 (1986).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Levesque, E. M., Massey, P., Plez, B. & Olsen, K. A. G. The physical properties of the red supergiant WOH G64: the largest star known? Astron. J. 137, 4744–4752 (2009).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Beasor, E. R. & Smith, N. The extreme scarcity of dust-enshrouded red supergiants: consequences for producing stripped stars via winds. Astrophys. J. 933, 41 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Ohnaka, K. et al. Imaging the innermost circumstellar environment of the red supergiant WOH G64 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 691, L15 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

van Loon, J. T., Zijlstra, A. A., Bujarrabal, V. & Nyman, L. Å Circumstellar masers in the Magellanic Clouds. Astron. Astrophys. 368, 950–968 (2001).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Marshall, J. R. et al. Asymptotic giant branch superwind speed at low metallicity. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 355, 1348–1360 (2004).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Soszynski, I., Udalski, A., Szymanski, M. K., others, K. & Poleski, R. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. The OGLE-III Catalog of Variable Stars. IV. Long-period variables in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Acta Astron. 59, 239–253 (2009).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Boyd, D. Spectroscopic and photometric study of the Mira stars SU Camelopardalis and RY Cephei. J. Am. Assoc. Var. Star Obs. 49, 157 (2021).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kravchenko, K. et al. Tomography of cool giant and supergiant star atmospheres. II. Signature of convection in the atmosphere of the red supergiant star μ Cep. Astron. Astrophys. 632, A28 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Solf, J. Spectral type and luminosity classification of late-type M stars from near-infrared image tube coudé spectrograms. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 34, 409–416 (1978).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Lamers, H. J. G. L. M., Zickgraf, F.-J., de Winter, D., Houziaux, L. & Zorec, J. An improved classification of B[e]-type stars. Astron. Astrophys. 340, 117–128 (1998).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kraus, M. A census of B[e] supergiants. Galaxies 7, 83 (2019).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Rayner, J. T., Cushing, M. C. & Vacca, W. D. The Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) spectral library: cool stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 185, 289–432 (2009).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Allen, D. A. A catalogue of symbiotic stars. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 5, 369–421 (1984).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Mikołajewska, J. Symbiotic stars: continually embarrassing binaries. Baltic Astron. 16, 1–9 (2007).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Cowley, A. P. The VV Cephei stars. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 81, 297 (1969).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Wright, K. O. The system of VV Cephei derived from an analysis of the Hα line. J. R. Astron. Soc. Can. 71, 152 (1977).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Liimets, T. et al. New insights into the outflows from R Aquarii. Astron. Astrophys. 612, A118 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Soker, N. Close stellar binary systems by grazing envelope evolution. Astrophys. J. 800, 114 (2015).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Dori, N., Bear, E. & Soker, N. Wobbling jets in common envelope evolution. Astrophys. J. 954, 143 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Beristain, G., Edwards, S. & Kwan, J. Helium emission from classical T Tauri stars: dual origin in magnetospheric infall and hot wind. Astrophys. J. 551, 1037–1064 (2001).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Massey, P., Levesque, E. M., Olsen, K. A. G., Plez, B. & Skiff, B. A. HV 11423: the coolest supergiant in the SMC. Astrophys. J. 660, 301–310 (2007).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Munoz-Sanchez, G. et al. Episodic mass loss in the very luminous red supergiant [W60] B90 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 690, A99 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Dessart, L. & Jacobson-Galan, W. V. A modeling perspective on the diversity of red-supergiant stars exploding within circumstellar material. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17676 (2025).

Levesque, E. M., Massey, P., Olsen, K. A. G. & Plez, B. Late-type red supergiants: too cool for the Magellanic Clouds? Astrophys. J. 667, 202–212 (2007).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Paczyński, B. & Sienkiewicz, R. Evolution of close binaries VIII. Mass exchange on the dynamical time scale. Acta Astron. 22, 73–91 (1972).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Ercolino, A., Jin, H., Langer, N. & Dessart, L. Interacting supernovae from wide massive binary systems. Astron. Astrophys. 685, A58 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Clayton, M., Podsiadlowski, P., Ivanova, N. & Justham, S. Episodic mass ejections from common-envelope objects. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 470, 1788–1808 (2017).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Nandez, J. L. A., Ivanova, N. & Lombardi, J. C. J. Recombination energy in double white dwarf formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, L39–L43 (2015).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Valsan, V., Borges, S. V., Prust, L. & Chang, P. Envelope ejection and the transition to homologous expansion in common-envelope events. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 5365–5373 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Hubble, E. & Sandage, A. The brightest variable stars in extragalactic nebulae. I. M31 and M33. Astrophys. J. 118, 353 (1953).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Koumpia, E. et al. Optical and near-infrared observations of the Fried Egg Nebula. Multiple shell ejections on a 100 yr timescale from a massive yellow hypergiant. Astron. Astrophys. 635, A183 (2020).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

van Genderen, A. M. et al. Investigation of the pulsations, outbursts, and evolution of the yellow hypergiants: ρ Cas, HR 8752, and HR 5171A, with notes on HD 179821. Astron. Astrophys. 694, A136 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Humphreys, R. M., Jones, T. J. & Gehrz, R. D. The enigmatic object variable A in M33. Astron. J. 94, 315 (1987).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Humphreys, R. M. et al. M33’s variable A: a hypergiant star more than 35 years in eruption. Astron. J. 131, 2105–2113 (2006).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Smith, N. et al. MagAO-X images of the inner core of VY Canis Majoris: a disk and a companion. In American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts Vol. 245, 163.13 (American Astronomical Society, 2025).

De Beck, E., Andrews, H., Quintana-Lacaci, G. & Vlemmings, W. H. T. The circumstellar environment around the extreme Galactic red supergiant NML Cygni: dense, dusty, and asymmetric. Astron. Astrophys. 698, A179 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Marchant, P. & Bodensteiner, J. The evolution of massive binary stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 62, 21–61 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

van Loon, J. T. & Ohnaka, K. A phoenix rises from the ashes: WOH G64 is still a red supergiant, for now. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02057 (2026).

Davies, B., Plez, B. & Petrault, M. Explosion imminent: the appearance of red supergiants at the point of core-collapse. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 517, 1483–1490 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Sengupta, S., Sujit, D. & Sarangi, A. Dance to demise—how massive stars may form dense circumstellar shells before explosion. Astrophys. J. 996, 18 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Bronner, V. A., Laplace, E., Schneider, F. R. N. & Podsiadlowski, P. Explosions of pulsating red supergiants: a natural pathway for the diversity of type II-P/L supernovae. Astron. Astrophys. 703, A61 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Laplace, E., Bronner, V. A., Schneider, F. R. N. & Podsiadlowski, P. Pulsations change the structures of massive stars before they explode: interpreting the nearby supernova SN 2023ixf. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11088 (2025).

Ercolino, A. et al. The demographics of core-collapse supernovae I. The role of binary evolution and CSM interaction. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.04872 (2025).

Van Dyk, S. D. et al. The progenitor of supernova 1993J revisited. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 114, 1322–1332 (2002).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Folatelli, G. et al. The progenitor of the type IIb SN 2008ax revisited. Astrophys. J. 811, 147 (2015).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

O’Connor, E. & Ott, C. D. Black hole formation in failing core-collapse supernovae. Astrophys. J. 730, 70 (2011).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Wright, E. L. et al. The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): mission description and initial on-orbit performance. Astron. J. 140, 1868–1881 (2010).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Cutri, R. M. et al. AllWISE data release (Cutri+ 2013). VizieR Online Data Catalog II/328 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014yCat.2328….0C (2021).

Tonry, J. L. et al. ATLAS: a high-cadence all-sky survey system. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 130, 064505 (2018).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Gaia Collaboration et al. The Gaia mission. Astron. Astrophys. 595, A1 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Gaia Collaboration et al. Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 674, A1 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Alcock, C. et al. The MACHO Project Large Magellanic Cloud microlensing results from the first two years and the nature of the Galactic dark halo. Astrophys. J. 486, 697–726 (1997).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Mainzer, A. et al. Preliminary results from NEOWISE: an enhancement to the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer for Solar System science. Astrophys. J. 731, 53 (2011).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Udalski, A., Kubiak, M. & Szymanski, M. Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. OGLE-2—the second phase of the OGLE project. Acta Astron. 47, 319–344 (1997).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Udalski, A. et al. The Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. OGLE-III photometric maps of the Large Magellanic Cloud. Acta Astron. 58, 89–102 (2008).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Udalski, A., Szymański, M. K. & Szymański, G. OGLE-IV: fourth phase of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Acta Astron. 65, 1–38 (2015).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Heinze, A. N. et al. A first catalog of variable stars measured by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS). Astron. J. 156, 241 (2018).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Shingles, L. et al. Release of the ATLAS Forced Photometry server for public use. Transient Name Server AstroNote 7, 1–7 (2021).

Alcock, C. et al. Calibration of the MACHO Photometry Database. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 111, 1539–1558 (1999).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Marshall, J. L. et al. The MagE spectrograph. Proc. SPIE 7014, 701454 (2008).

Kelson, D. D., Illingworth, G. D., van Dokkum, P. G. & Franx, M. The evolution of early-type galaxies in distant clusters. II. Internal kinematics of 55 galaxies in the z=0.33 cluster CL 1358+62. Astrophys. J. 531, 159–183 (2000).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kelson, D. D. Optimal techniques in two-dimensional spectroscopy: background subtraction for the 21st century. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 115, 688–699 (2003).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Dekker, H., D’Odorico, S., Kaufer, A., Delabre, B. & Kotzlowski, H. Iye, M. & Moorwood, A. F. Design, construction, and performance of UVES, the echelle spectrograph for the UT2 Kueyen Telescope at the ESO Paranal Observatory. Proc. SPIE 4008, 534–545 (2000).

Vernet, J. et al. X-shooter, the new wide band intermediate resolution spectrograph at the ESO Very Large Telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 536, A105 (2011).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Ballester, P. et al. The UVES data reduction pipeline. The Messenger 101, 31–36 (2000).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Modigliani, A. et al. Silva, D. R., Peck, A. B. & Soifer, B. T. Observatory operations: 912 strategies, processes, and systems III. Proc. SPIE 7737, 773728 (2010).

Smette, A. et al. Molecfit: a general tool for telluric absorption correction. I. Method and application to ESO instruments. Astron. Astrophys. 576, A77 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Houck, J. R. et al. Mather, J. C. (ed.) The infrared spectrograph on the Spitzer Space Telescope Proc. SPIE 5487, 62–76 (2004).

Calzoletti, L. et al. REMIR: the REM infrared camera to follow up the early phases of GRBs afterglows. Nuovo Cimento C 28, 759 (2005).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Gustafsson, B. et al. A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars. I. Methods and general properties. Astron. Astrophys. 486, 951–970 (2008).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

van Loon, J. T., Cioni, M. R. L., Zijlstra, A. A. & Loup, C. An empirical formula for the mass-loss rates of dust-enshrouded red supergiants and oxygen-rich asymptotic giant branch stars. Astron. Astrophys. 438, 273–289 (2005).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Jian, M., Matsunaga, N., Jiang, B., Yuan, H. & Zhang, R. Exploring Be phenomena in OBA stars: A mid-infrared search. Astron. Astrophys. 682, A59 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Tabernero, H. M., Dorda, R., Negueruela, I. & González-Fernández, C. An LTE effective temperature scale for red supergiants in the Magellanic clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 476, 3106–3123 (2018).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Humphreys, R. M., Weis, K., Davidson, K., Bomans, D. J. & Burggraf, B. Luminous and variable stars in M31 and M33. II. Luminous blue variables, candidate LBVs, Fe II emission line stars, and other supergiants. Astrophys. J. 790, 48 (2014).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Bergemann, M., Kudritzki, R.-P., Gazak, Z., Davies, B. & Plez, B. Red supergiant stars as cosmic abundance probes. III. NLTE effects in J-band magnesium lines. Astrophys. J. 804, 113 (2015).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Accetta, K. et al. The Seventeenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys: complete release of MaNGA, MaStar, and APOGEE-2 data. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 259, 35 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

de Wit, S. et al. Properties of luminous red supergiant stars in the Magellanic Clouds. Astron. Astrophys. 669, A86 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Patrick, L. R. et al. Red supergiant stars in binary systems. I. Identification and characterization in the small magellanic cloud from the UVIT ultraviolet imaging survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 513, 5847–5860 (2022).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Neugent, K. F., Massey, P., Skiff, B. & Meynet, G. Yellow and red supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astrophys. J. 749, 177 (2012).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Mathewson, D. S. & Clarke, J. N. Supernova remnants in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astrophys. J. 180, 725–738 (1973).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

van Loon, J. T., Hekkert, P. T. L., Bujarrabal, V., Zijlstra, A. A. & Nyman, L.-A. Discovery of H2O maser emission from the red supergiant IRAS04553−6825 in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 337, 141–144 (1998).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kravchenko, K. et al. Atmosphere of Betelgeuse before and during the Great Dimming event revealed by tomography. Astron. Astrophys. 650, L17 (2021).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kourniotis, M., Kraus, M., Maryeva, O., Borges Fernandes, M. & Maravelias, G. Revisiting the evolved hypergiants in the Magellanic Clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 511, 4360–4376 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Humphreys, R. M., Jones, T. J. & Martin, J. C. Yellow supergiants and post-red supergiant evolution in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. J. 166, 50 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Lobel, A. et al. High-resolution spectroscopy of the yellow hypergiant ρ Cassiopeiae from 1993 through the outburst of 2000–2001. Astrophys. J. 583, 923–954 (2003).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

van Genderen, A. M. et al. Pulsations, eruptions, and evolution of four yellow hypergiants. Astron. Astrophys. 631, A48 (2019).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Nieuwenhuijzen, H. et al. The hypergiant HR 8752 evolving through the yellow evolutionary void. Astron. Astrophys. 546, A105 (2012).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Oudmaijer, R. D., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Matthews, H. E., Blommaert, J. A. D. L. & Sahu, K. C. The spectral energy distribution and mass-loss history of IRC+10420. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 280, 1062–1070 (1996).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Nieuwenhuijzen, H. & de Jager, C. Checking the yellow evolutionary void. Three evolutionary critical hypergiants: HD 33579, HR 8752 & IRC +10420. Astron. Astrophys. 353, 163–176 (2000).

ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Dotter, A. MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) 0: Methods for the construction of stellar isochrones. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 222, 8 (2016).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Choi, J. et al. Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled models. Astrophys. J. 823, 102 (2016).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Munoz-Sanchez, G. et al. The dramatic transition of the extreme red supergiant WOH G64 to a yellow hypergiant. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30738671 (2025).