Fowler, W. A. & Hoyle, F. Neutrino processes and pair formation in massive stars and supernovae. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 9, 201–319 (1964).
Rakavy, G. & Shaviv, G. Instabilities in highly evolved stellar models. Astrophys. J. 148, 803 (1967).
Barkat, Z., Rakavy, G. & Sack, N. Dynamics of supernova explosion resulting from pair formation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 379–381 (1967).
Fraley, G. S. Supernovae explosions induced by pair-production instability. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2, 96–114 (1968).
Heger, A. & Woosley, S. E. The nucleosynthetic signature of population III. Astrophys. J. 567, 532–543 (2002).
Woosley, S. E., Blinnikov, S. & Heger, A. Pulsational pair instability as an explanation for the most luminous supernovae. Nature 450, 390–392 (2007).
Farmer, R., Renzo, M., de Mink, S. E., Marchant, P. & Justham, S. Mind the gap: the location of the lower edge of the pair-instability supernova black hole mass gap. Astrophys. J. 887, 53 (2019).
Abbott, B. P. et al. Binary black hole population properties inferred from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. Astrophys. J. Lett. 882, L24 (2019).
Abbott, R. et al. Population properties of compact objects from the second LIGO–Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog. Astrophys. J. Lett. 913, L7 (2021).
Schulze, S. et al. 1100 days in the life of the supernova 2018ibb. The best pair-instability supernova candidate, to date. Astron. Astrophys. 683, A223 (2024).
Angus, C. R. et al. Double “acct”: a distinct double-peaked supernova matching pulsational pair instability models. Astrophys. J. Lett. 977, L41 (2024).
Aasi, J. et al. Advanced LIGO. Class. Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
Acernese, F. et al. Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector. Class. Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
Akutsu, T. et al. Overview of KAGRA: detector design and construction history. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A101 (2021).
Farmer, R., Renzo, M., Mink, S., Fishbach, M. & Justham, S. Constraints from gravitational-wave detections of binary black hole mergers on the 12C(α, γ)16O rate. Astrophys. J. Lett. 902, L36 (2020).
Abbott, R. et al. Population of merging compact binaries inferred using gravitational waves through GWTC-3. Phys. Rev. X 13, 011048 (2023).
Edelman, B., Doctor, Z. & Farr, B. Poking holes: looking for gaps in LIGO/Virgo’s black hole population. Astrophys. J. Lett. 913, L23 (2021).
Mould, M., Gerosa, D. & Taylor, S. R. Deep learning and Bayesian inference of gravitational-wave populations: hierarchical black-hole mergers. Phys. Rev. D 106, 103013 (2022).
Wang, Y.-Z. et al. Potential subpopulations and assembling tendency of the merging black holes. Astrophys. J. Lett. 941, L39 (2022).
Li, Y.-J., Wang, Y.-Z., Tang, S.-P. & Fan, Y.-Z. Resolving the stellar-collapse and hierarchical-merger origins of the coalescing black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 051401 (2024).
Antonini, F., Romero-Shaw, I. M. & Callister, T. Star cluster population of high mass black hole mergers in gravitational wave data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011401 (2025).
Talbot, C. & Thrane, E. Measuring the binary black hole mass spectrum with an astrophysically motivated parameterization. Astrophys. J. 856, 173 (2018).
Golomb, J., Isi, M. & Farr, W. M. Physical models for the astrophysical population of black holes: application to the bump in the mass distribution of gravitational-wave sources. Astrophys. J. 976, 121 (2024).
Stevenson, S. et al. The impact of pair-instability mass loss on the binary black hole mass distribution. Astrophys. J. 882, 121 (2019).
Croon, D. & Sakstein, J. Prediction of multiple features in the black hole mass function due to pulsational pair-instability supernovae. Phys. Rev. D 112, 063053 (2025).
Gerosa, D. & Fishbach, M. Hierarchical mergers of stellar-mass black holes and their gravitational-wave signatures. Nat. Astron. 5, 749–760 (2021).
Di Carlo, U. N. et al. Merging black holes in young star clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 487, 2947–2960 (2019).
Renzo, M., Cantiello, M., Metzger, B. D. & Jiang, Y.-F. The stellar merger scenario for black holes in the pair-instability gap. Astrophys. J. Lett. 904, L13 (2020).
Siegel, D. M. et al. “Super-kilonovae” from massive collapsars as signatures of black hole birth in the pair-instability mass gap. Astrophys. J. 941, 100 (2022).
McKernan, B., Ford, K. E. S., Lyra, W. & Perets, H. B. Intermediate mass black holes in AGN discs – I. Production and growth. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 425, 460–469 (2012).
Abac, A. G. et al. GWTC-4.0: updating the gravitational-wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA observing run. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18082 (2025).
Woosley, S. E. Pulsational pair-instability supernovae. Astrophys. J. 836, 244 (2017).
Abac, A. G. et al. GW231123: a binary black hole merger with total mass 190–265 M⊙. Astrophys. J. Lett. 993, L25 (2025).
Gottlieb, O. et al. Spinning into the gap: direct-horizon collapse as the origin of GW231123 from end-to-end general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 993, L5ss4 (2025).
Payne, E. & Thrane, E. Model exploration in gravitational-wave astronomy with the maximum population likelihood. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 023013 (2023).
Fitchett, M. J. The influence of gravitational wave momentum losses on the centre of mass motion of a Newtonian binary system. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 203, 1049–1062 (1983).
Gerosa, D., Hébert, F. & Stein, L. C. Black-hole kicks from numerical-relativity surrogate models. Phys. Rev. D 97, 104049 (2018).
Antonini, F. & Rasio, F. A. Merging black hole binaries in galactic nuclei: implications for advanced-LIGO detections. Astrophys. J. 831, 187 (2016).
Rodriguez, C. L. et al. Black holes: the next generation—repeated mergers in dense star clusters and their gravitational-wave properties. Phys. Rev. D 100, 043027 (2019).
Abac, A. G. et al. GWTC-4.0: population properties of merging compact binaries. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18083 (2025).
Pierra, G., Mastrogiovanni, S. & Perriès, S. The spin magnitude of stellar-mass black holes evolves with the mass. Astron. Astrophys. 692, A80 (2024).
Antonini, F. et al. Gravitational waves reveal the pair-instability mass gap and constrain nuclear burning in massive stars. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04637 (2025).
McKernan, B. & Ford, K. E. S. Constraining the LVK AGN channel with black hole spins. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 531, 3479–3485 (2024).
Fishbach, M. & Holz, D. E. Minding the gap: GW190521 as a straddling binary. Astrophys. J. Lett. 904, L26 (2020).
deBoer, R. J. et al. The 12C(α, γ)16O reaction and its implications for stellar helium burning. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035007 (2017).
Buchmann, L. New stellar reaction rate for 12C(α, γ)16O. Astrophys. J. Lett. 468, L127 (1996).
Kunz, R. et al. Astrophysical reaction rate of 12C(α, γ)16O. Astrophys. J. 567, 643–650 (2002).
Shen, Y. et al. New determination of the 12C(α, γ)16O reaction rate and its impact on the black-hole mass gap. Astrophys. J. 945, 41 (2023).
Farr, W. M., Fishbach, M., Ye, J. & Holz, D. E. A future percent-level measurement of the Hubble expansion at redshift 0.8 with advanced LIGO. Astrophys. J. Lett. 883, L42 (2019).
Talbot, C., Farah, A., Galaudage, S., Golomb, J. & Tong, H. GWPopulation: hardware agnostic population inference for compact binaries and beyond. J. Open Source Softw. 10, 7753 (2025).
Fishbach, M., Holz, D. E. & Farr, W. M. Does the black hole merger rate evolve with redshift? Astrophys. J. Lett. 863, L41 (2018).
Thrane, E. & Talbot, C. An introduction to Bayesian inference in gravitational-wave astronomy: parameter estimation, model selection, and hierarchical models. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 36, e010 (2019).
Mandel, I., Farr, W. M. & Gair, J. R. Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 486, 1086–1093 (2019).
Vitale, S., Gerosa, D., Farr, W. M. & Taylor, S. R. in Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy (eds Bambi, C. et al.) 1-160 (Springer, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_45-1
Abac, A. G. et al. GWTC-4.0: methods for identifying and characterizing gravitational-wave transients. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18081 (2026).
Buikema, A. et al. Sensitivity and performance of the Advanced LIGO detectors in the third observing run. Phys. Rev. D 102, 062003 (2020).
Ganapathy, D. et al. Broadband quantum enhancement of the LIGO detectors with frequency-dependent squeezing. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041021 (2023).
Jia, W. et al. Squeezing the quantum noise of a gravitational-wave detector below the standard quantum limit. Science 385, 1318–1321 (2024).
Capote, E. et al. Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run. Phys. Rev. D 111, 062002 (2025).
Soni, S. et al. LIGO detector characterization in the first half of the fourth observing run. Class. Quantum Gravity 42, 085016 (2025).
Tiwari, V. Estimation of the sensitive volume for gravitational-wave source populations using weighted Monte Carlo integration. Class. Quantum Gravity 35, 145009 (2018).
Farr, W. M. Accuracy requirements for empirically measured selection functions. Res. Notes AAS 3, 66 (2019).
Essick, R. & Farr, W. Precision requirements for Monte Carlo sums within hierarchical Bayesian inference. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.00461 (2022).
Essick, R. et al. Compact binary coalescence sensitivity estimates with injection campaigns during the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaborations’ fourth observing run. Phys. Rev. D 112, 102001 (2025).
Ashton, G. et al. Bilby: a user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 241, 27 (2019).
Romero-Shaw, I. M. et al. Bayesian inference for compact binary coalescences with BILBY: validation and application to the first LIGO–Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalogue. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499, 3295–3319 (2020).
Speagle, J. S. DYNESTY: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 3132–3158 (2020).
Abbott, R. et al. GWTC-2.1: deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run. Phys. Rev. D 109, 022001 (2024).
Abbott, R. et al. GWTC-3: compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
Abbott, R. et al. Properties and astrophysical implications of the 150 M⊙ binary black hole merger GW190521. Astrophys. J. Lett. 900, L13 (2020).
Woosley, S. E. The evolution of massive helium stars, including mass loss. Astrophys. J. 878, 49 (2019).
Marchant, P. et al. Pulsational pair-instability supernovae in very close binaries. Astrophys. J. 882, 36 (2019).
Woosley, S. E. & Heger, A. The pair-instability mass gap for black holes. Astrophys. J. Lett. 912, L31 (2021).
Renzo, M. & Smith, N. Pair-instability evolution and explosions in massive stars. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.16113 (2024).
Spera, M. & Mapelli, M. Very massive stars, pair-instability supernovae and intermediate-mass black holes with the SEVN code. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 470, 4739–4749 (2017).
Romero-Shaw, I. M., Thrane, E. & Lasky, P. D. When models fail: an introduction to posterior predictive checks and model misspecification in gravitational-wave astronomy. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 39, e025 (2022).
Miller, S. J., Ko, Z., Callister, T. & Chatziioannou, K. Gravitational waves carry information beyond effective spin parameters but it is hard to extract. Phys. Rev. D 109, 104036 (2024).
Fishbach, M., Essick, R. & Holz, D. E. Does matter matter? Using the mass distribution to distinguish neutron stars and black holes. Astrophys. J. Lett. 899, L8 (2020).
Farah, A. M., Fishbach, M. & Holz, D. E. Two of a kind: comparing big and small black holes in binaries with gravitational waves. Astrophys. J. 962, 69 (2024).
Antonini, F., Callister, T., Dosopoulou, F., Romero-Shaw, I. & Chattopadhyay, D. Inferring the pair-instability mass gap from gravitational wave data. Phys. Rev. D 112, 063040 (2025).
Abbott, R. et al. GW190521: a binary black hole merger with a total mass of 150 M⊙. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 101102 (2020).
Galaudage, S., Talbot, C. & Thrane, E. Gravitational-wave inference in the catalog era: evolving priors and marginal events. Phys. Rev. D 102, 083026 (2020).
Fishbach, M., Farr, W. M. & Holz, D. E. The most massive binary black hole detections and the identification of population outliers. Astrophys. J. Lett. 891, L31 (2020).
Doctor, Z., Wysocki, D., O’Shaughnessy, R., Holz, D. E. & Farr, B. Black hole coagulation: modeling hierarchical mergers in black hole populations. Astrophys. J. 893, 35 (2020).
Kimball, C. et al. Black hole genealogy: identifying hierarchical mergers with gravitational waves. Astrophys. J. 900, 177 (2020).
Kimball, C. et al. Evidence for hierarchical black hole mergers in the second LIGO–Virgo gravitational wave catalog. Astrophys. J. Lett. 915, L35 (2021).
Tong, H. et al. Evidence of the pair instability gap in the distribution of black hole masses data release. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18222409 (2026).
LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration & KAGRA Collaboration. GWTC-4.0: parameter estimation data release. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16053484 (2025).
LIGO Scientific Collaboration & Virgo Collaboration. GWTC-2.1: deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run – parameter estimation data release. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6513631 (2022).
LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration & KAGRA Collaboration. GWTC-3: compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run — parameter estimation data release. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5546663 (2021).
LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration & KAGRA Collaboration. GWTC-4.0 cumulative search sensitivity estimates. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16740128 (2025).