Bonan, G. B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).
Li, Y. et al. Local cooling and warming effects of forests based on satellite observations. Nat. Commun. 6, 6603 (2015).
Su, Y. et al. Asymmetric influence of forest cover gain and loss on land surface temperature. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 823–831 (2023).
Alkama, R. & Cescatti, A. Biophysical climate impacts of recent changes in global forest cover. Science 351, 600–604 (2016).
Lee, X. et al. Observed increase in local cooling effect of deforestation at higher latitudes. Nature 479, 384–387 (2011).
Mahmood, R. et al. Land cover changes and their biogeophysical effects on climate. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 929–953 (2014).
Claussen, M., Brovkin, V. & Ganopolski, A. Biogeophysical versus biogeochemical feedbacks of large-scale land cover change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 1011–1014 (2001).
Kan, F. et al. Diminished biophysical cooling benefits of global forestation under rising atmospheric CO2. Nat. Commun. 16, 4410 (2025).
Alkama, R. et al. Vegetation-based climate mitigation in a warmer and greener world. Nat. Commun. 13, 606 (2022).
Ge, J. et al. Local surface cooling from afforestation amplified by lower aerosol pollution. Nat. Geosci. 16, 781–788 (2023).
Li, Y. et al. Amplified local cooling effect of forestation in warming Europe. Nat. Commun. 16, 8412 (2025).
Oren, R. et al. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 1515–1526 (1999).
Konings, A. G., Williams, A. P. & Gentine, P. Sensitivity of grassland productivity to aridity controlled by stomatal and xylem regulation. Nat. Geosci. 10, 284–288 (2017).
Yuan, W. et al. Impacts of rising atmospheric dryness on terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 6, 712–727 (2025).
Will, R. E., Wilson, S. M., Zou, C. B. & Hennessey, T. C. Increased vapor pressure deficit due to higher temperature leads to greater transpiration and faster mortality during drought for tree seedlings. New Phytol. 200, 366–374 (2013).
Bachofen, C. et al. Stand structure of Central European forests matters more than climate for transpiration sensitivity to VPD. J. Appl. Ecol. 60, 886–897 (2023).
Woodruff, D. R., Meinzer, F. C. & McCulloh, K. A. Height–related trends in stomatal sensitivity to leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficit in a tall conifer. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 203–210 (2010).
Zhong, Z. et al. Disentangling the effects of vapor pressure deficit on northern terrestrial vegetation productivity. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf3166 (2023).
Yan, W. et al. Differentiated influences of atmospheric dryness on urban plant cooling effect between temperate and tropical/subtropical zones. Urban Clim. 55, 101915 (2024).
López, J., Way, D. A. & Sadok, W. Systemic effects of rising atmospheric vapor pressure deficit on plant physiology and productivity. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 1704–1720 (2021).
Tardieu, F. Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand. J. Exp. Bot. 49, 419–432 (1998).
Garcia-Forner, N. et al. Responses of two semiarid conifer tree species to reduced precipitation and warming reveal new perspectives for stomatal regulation. Plant Cell Environ. 39, 38–49 (2016).
Konings, A. G. & Gentine, P. Global variations in ecosystem-scale isohydricity. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 891–905 (2017).
Li, Y. et al. Estimating global ecosystem isohydry/anisohydry using active and passive microwave satellite data. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 122, 3306–3321 (2017).
Martínez–Vilalta, J. & Garcia–Forner, N. Water potential regulation, stomatal behaviour and hydraulic transport under drought. Plant Cell Environ. 40, 962–976 (2017).
Bonan, G. B., Williams, M., Fisher, R. A. & Oleson, K. W. Modeling stomatal conductance in the earth system. Geosci. Model Dev. 7, 2193–2222 (2014).
Roman, D. T. et al. The role of isohydric and anisohydric species in determining ecosystem-scale response to severe drought. Oecologia 179, 641–654 (2015).
Su, Y. et al. Pervasive but biome-dependent relationship between fragmentation and resilience in forests. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1670–1684 (2025).
Carter, G. A. Primary and secondary effects of water content on the spectral reflectance of leaves. Am. J. Bot. 78, 916–924 (1991).
Sims, D. A. & Gamon, J. A. Estimation of vegetation water content and photosynthetic tissue area from spectral reflectance: a comparison of indices based on liquid water and chlorophyll absorption features. Remote Sens. Environ. 84, 526–537 (2003).
Shaw, R. H. & Pereira, A. R. Aerodynamic roughness of a plant canopy: a numerical experiment. Agric. Meteorol. 26, 51–65 (1982).
Raupach, M. R., Finnigan, J. J. & Brunei, Y. Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: the mixing-layer analogy. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 78, 351–382 (1996).
Zhang, C. et al. Seasonal and long-term dynamics in forest microclimate effects: global pattern and mechanism. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 6, 116 (2023).
Pitman, A. J. et al. Importance of background climate in determining impact of land-cover change on regional climate. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 472–475 (2011).
Seneviratne, S. I. et al. Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: a review. Earth–Sci. Rev. 99, 125–161 (2010).
Su, Y. et al. Quantifying the biophysical effects of forests on local air temperature using a novel three-layered land surface energy balance model. Environ. Int. 132, 105080 (2019).
Schoppach, R. & Sadok, W. Differential sensitivities of transpiration to evaporative demand and soil water deficit among wheat elite cultivars. Environ. Exp. Bot. 84, 1–10 (2012).
Medina, S. et al. The plant–transpiration response to vapor pressure deficit (VPD) in durum wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1107 (2019).
Cernusak, L. A., Goldsmith, G. R., Arend, M. & Siegwolf, R. T. W. Effect of vapor pressure deficit on gas exchange in wild–type and abscisic acid-insensitive plants. Plant Physiol. 181, 1573–1586 (2019).
Li, J. & Li, X. Response of stomatal conductance of two tree species to vapor pressure deficit in three climate zones. J. Arid Land 6, 771–781 (2014).
Martínez-Vilalta, J. et al. A new look at water transport regulation in plants. New Phytol. 204, 105–115 (2014).
Meinzer, F. C. et al. Mapping ‘hydroscapes’ along the iso- to anisohydric continuum of stomatal regulation of plant water status. Ecol. Lett. 19, 1343–1352 (2016).
Novick, K. A., Konings, A. G. & Gentine, P. Beyond soil water potential: an expanded view on isohydricity including land–atmosphere interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 42, 1802–1815 (2019).
Biederman, J. A. et al. CO2 exchange and evapotranspiration across dryland ecosystems of southwestern North America. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4204–4221 (2017).
Chen, C. et al. Biophysical impacts of Earth greening largely controlled by aerodynamic resistance. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb1981 (2020).
Zeng, Z. et al. Climate mitigation from vegetation biophysical feedbacks during the past three decades. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 432–436 (2017).
Winckler, J. et al. Nonlocal effects dominate the global mean surface temperature response to the biogeophysical effects of deforestation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 745–755 (2019).
Luo, X. et al. Local and nonlocal biophysical effects of historical land use and land cover change in CMIP6 models and the intermodel uncertainty. Earth’s Futur. 12, e2023EF004220 (2024).
Friedl, M. & Sulla–Menashe, D. MODIS/Terra+Aqua Land Cover Type Yearly L3 Global 0.05Deg CMG V061. NASA LP DAAC https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MCD12C1.061 (2022).
Potapov, P. et al. The global 2000–2020 land cover and land use change dataset derived from the Landsat archive: first results. Front. Remote Sens. 3, 856903 (2022).
Wan, Z., Hook, S. & Hulley, G. MODIS/Terra Land Surface Temperature/Emissivity Monthly L3 Global 0.05Deg CMG V061. NASA LP DAAC https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD11C3.061 (2021).
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191 (2018).
Oda, T. & Maksyutov, S. ODIAC Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions Dataset (ODIAC2024). Center Glob. Environ. Res. NIES https://doi.org/10.17595/20170411.001 (2024).
Ulmer, M., Scheidegger, C. & Bühlmann, P. Spectrally deconfounded random forests. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 35, 758–768 (2025).
Liu, P. et al. Quantile regression forests for predictor selection in standardized anomaly postprocessing. SOLA 21, 132–142 (2025).
Hastie, T. J. Generalized additive models. in Statistical Models in S (ed Hastie, T. J.) 249–307 (Routledge, 2017).
Roberts, D. R. et al. Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography 40, 913–929 (2017).
Akaike, H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19, 716–723 (1974).
Berdugo, M. et al. Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity. Science 367, 787–790 (2020).
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Meta-analysis reveals that hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns of drought-induced tree mortality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5024–5029 (2016).
Franks, P. J., Drake, P. L. & Froend, R. H. Anisohydric but isohydrodynamic: seasonally constant plant water potential gradient. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 19–30 (2007).
West, A. G. et al. Diverse functional responses to drought in a Mediterranean-type shrubland. New Phytol. 195, 396–407 (2012).
Baba, K., Shibata, R. & Sibuya, M. Partial correlation and conditional correlation as measures of conditional independence. Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 46, 657–664 (2004).
Hoerl, A. E. & Kennard, R. W. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12, 55–67 (1970).
Shen, P. et al. Biodiversity buffers the response of spring leaf unfolding to climate warming. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 863–868 (2024).
Potapov, P. et al. Mapping and monitoring global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 253, 112165 (2021).
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
Besnard, S. et al. Mapping global forest age from forest inventories, biomass and climate data. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 4881–4896 (2021).
Santoro, M. & Cartus, O. ESA Biomass Climate Change Initiative (Biomass_cci): global datasets of forest above–ground biomass, v6.0. Centre Environ. Data Anal. https://doi.org/10.5285/af60720c24404f329d31405f63659247 (2025).
Liang, J. et al. Co–limitation towards lower latitudes shapes global forest diversity gradients. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1423–1437 (2022).
Myneni, R., Knyazikhin, Y. & Park, T. MODIS/Terra Leaf Area Index/FPAR 8-Day L4 Global 500 m SIN Grid V061. NASA LP DAAC https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD15A2H.061 (2021).
Liu, Y., Konings, A. G., Kennedy, D. & Gentine, P. Global coordination in plant physiological and rooting strategies in response to water stress. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 35, e2020GB006758 (2021).
Poggio, L. et al. SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. SOIL 7, 217–240 (2021).
Peng, S. et al. Asymmetric effects of daytime and night-time warming on Northern Hemisphere vegetation. Nature 501, 88–92 (2013).
Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 58, 267–288 (1996).
Duveiller, G., Hooker, J. & Cescatti, A. The mark of vegetation change on Earth’s surface energy balance. Nat. Commun. 9, 679 (2018).
Zhang, M. et al. Response of surface air temperature to small-scale land clearing across latitudes. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 034002 (2014).
Luyssaert, S. et al. Land management and land-cover change have impacts of similar magnitude on surface temperature. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 389–393 (2014).
Running, S., Mu, Q. & Zhao, M. MODIS/Terra Net Evapotranspiration 8-Day L4 Global 500 m SIN Grid V061. NASA LP DAAC https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD16A2.061 (2021).
O’Neill, B. C. et al. The scenario model intercomparison project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 3461–3482 (2016).
Tebaldi, C. et al. Climate model projections from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) of CMIP6. Earth Syst. Dyn. 12, 253–293 (2021).
Yang, X. et al. Amazon rainforests are rejuvenating their canopies by producing more photosynthetically efficient young leaves under climate change. Nat. Plants 12, 520–531 (2026).
Zhang, C. Code to support ‘Globally constrained forest biophysical cooling benefits under rising atmospheric dryness’. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20174250 (2026).