United Nations Declaration on the Rghts of Indigenous Peoples (UN, 2007).
Fay, D. & James, D. (eds). The Rights and Wrongs of Land Restitution: ‘Restoring What Was Ours’ (Routledge–Cavendish, 2009).
Correia, J. E. Land matters: how Indigenous land restitution can inform loss and damage policy and chart a path toward an otherwise climate justice. Clim. Dev. 16, 811–825 (2024).
Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues: Report on the Seventeenth Session (United Nations Economic and Social Council, 2018).
Indigenous land rights are key to nature’s future. WWF https://www.worldwildlife.org/news/stories/recognizing-indigenous-peoples-land-interests-is-critical-for-people-and-nature (2020).
The Voice, Choice and Action Framework: A Conservation Practitioner’s Guide to Indigenous and Community-Led Conservation, Version 2.0 (The Nature Conservancy, 2022); https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/TNC-VCAFramework.pdf
Why Indigenous rights matter. Conservation International https://www.conservation.org/news/why-indigenous-rights-matter (2025).
Berkes, F., Colding, J. & Folke, C. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol. Appl. 10, 1251–1262 (2000).
Senos, R., Lake, F. K., Turner, N. & Martinez, D. in Restoring the Pacific Northwest: The Art and Science of Ecological Restoration in Cascadia (eds Apostol, D. & Sinclair, M.) 393–426 (Island Press, 2006).
Watson, R. et al. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (eds Diaz, S. et al.) 22–47 (IPBES Secretariat, 2019); http://www.mari-odu.org/academics/2018su_Leadership/commons/library/Summary
Garnett, S. T. et al. A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nat. Sustain. 1, 369–374 (2018).
Estrada, A. et al. Global importance of Indigenous peoples, their lands, and knowledge systems for saving the world’s primates from extinction. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn2927 (2022).
Nepstad, D. et al. Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conserv. Biol. 20, 65–73 (2006).
Baragwanath, K. & Bayi, E. Collective property rights reduce deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 20495–20502 (2020).
Qin, Y. et al. Forest conservation in Indigenous territories and protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Sustain. 6, 295–305 (2023).
Blackman, A., Corral, L., Lima, E. S. & Asner, G. P. Titling indigenous communities protects forests in the Peruvian Amazon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4123–4128 (2017).
Bonilla-Mejía, L. & Higuera-Mendieta, I. Protected areas under weak institutions: evidence from Colombia. World Dev. 122, 585–596 (2019).
Baragwanath, K., Bayi, E. & Shinde, N. Collective property rights lead to secondary forest growth in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2221346120 (2023).
Alejo, C. et al. Are indigenous territories effective natural climate solutions? A neotropical analysis using matching methods and geographic discontinuity designs. PLoS ONE 16, e0245110 (2021).
Sze, J. S., Carrasco, L. R., Childs, D. & Edwards, D. P. Reduced deforestation and degradation in indigenous lands pan-tropically. Nat. Sustain. 5, 123–130 (2022).
Pratzer, M. et al. Agricultural intensification, Indigenous stewardship and land sparing in tropical dry forests. Nat. Sustain. 6, 671–682 (2023).
Hedin, S. Land restitution in the former Swedish settlement areas in Estonia consequences for land ownership, land use and landscape. Landsc. Urban Plan. 70, 35–44 (2005).
Dell’Angelo, J., D’Odorico, P., Rulli, M. C. & Marchand, P. The tragedy of the grabbed commons: coercion and dispossession in the global land rush. World Dev. 92, 1–12 (2017).
Ley 19.253. Establece normas sobre protección, fomento y desarrollo de los indígenas, y crea la Corporación Nacional de Desarrollo Indígena. Diario Oficial de la República de Chile (5 October 1993).
Montalba Navarro, R., Fonseca Prieto, F. & Parra Riquelme, S. Informe Final: Estudio Evaluación Socio-Productiva de Tierras Adquiridas por el Fondo de Tierras y Aguas de CONADI (Corporación Nacional de Desarrollo Indígena, 2011).
Bruhn, M. & Gallego, F. A. Good, bad, and ugly colonial activities: do they matter for economic development?. Rev. Econ. Stat. 94, 433–461 (2012).
Klubock, T. M. La Frontera: Forests and Ecological Conflict in Chile’s Frontier Territory. Radical Perspectives (Duke Univ. Press, 2014).
Dillehay, T. D. Monuments, Empires, and Resistance: The Araucanian Polity and Ritual Narratives (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Bengoa, J. Historia del Pueblo Mapuche:(Siglo XIX y XX) Vol. 7 (LOM Ediciones, 2000).
Jaimovich, D. & Jordán, F. The Long Shadow of Property Rights in the Mapuche Homeland, Chile. In Roots of Underdevelopment II: A New Economic and Political History of Latin America and the Caribbean (ed. Valencia Caicedo, F.) (Palgrave Macmillan, in the press).
Pinto, J. La Formación del Estado y la Nación, y el Pueblo Mapuche. De la Inclusión a la Exclusión (DIBAM, 2003).
Titiev, M. Araucanian Culture in Transition (Univ. of Michigan Press, 1951).
Jaimovich, D. & Jordán, F. Indigenous property and economic development under Pinochet Dictatorship. In The Pinochet Shock: Radical Change and Life Under Dictatorship (eds González, F. & Prem, M.) 317–348 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2025).
Jordán, F. & Heilmayr, R. Who Gains from Individual Property Rights? Evidence from the Allotment of Mapuche Reservations (World Bank Land Conference, 2024).
Cayul, P., Corvalán, A., Duran-Micco, E. & Jaimovich, D. El conflicto de autodeterminación entre el estado de Chile y el pueblo Mapuche: una descripción usando microdatos georreferenciados de MACEDA (1990-2021). Rev. Cienc. Polít. 45, 531–260 (2025).
Cayul, P., Corvalan, A., Jaimovich, D. & Pazzona, M. Introducing MACEDA: new micro-data on an indigenous self-determination conflict. J. Peace Res. 59, 903–912 (2022).
Carruthers, D. & Rodriguez, P. Mapuche protest, environmental conflict and social movement linkage in Chile. Third World Q. 30, 743–760 (2009).
Ortiz, A. M. D. et al. Listening deeply to Indigenous people: a collaborative perspective and reflection between a Mapuche Machi and ecologists. Ecol. Evol. 15, e71914 (2025).
Jaimovich, D. & Toledo-Concha, F. The grievances of a failed reform: Chilean land reform and conflict with indigenous communities. Econ. J. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueag029 (2026).
Di Giminiani, P. Sentient Lands: Indigeneity, Property, and Political Imagination in Neoliberal Chile (Univ. of Arizona Press, 2018).
Bauer, K. Land versus territory: evaluating Indigenous land policy for the Mapuche in Chile. J. Agrar. Change 16, 627–645 (2016).
Informe de Resultados: Recomendaciones al Estado de Chile en materia de tierras y derechos del pueblo mapuche. Comisión Presidencial para la Paz y el Entendimiento (2025); https://www.comisionpazyentendimiento.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Informe-de-Resultados-VFinal.pdf
Bauer, K. Negotiating Autonomy: Mapuche Territorial Demands and Chilean Land Policy (Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, 2021).
Holmes, G. What is a land grab? Exploring green grabs, conservation, and private protected areas in southern Chile. J. Peasant Stud. 41, 547–567 (2014).
Cabaña Chávez, Carlos. Plantaciones Forestales Efectuadas Durante El Año 2024 (CONAF, 2025).
Aburto, F., Cartes, E., Mardones, O. & Rubilar, R. Hillslope soil erosion and mobility in pine plantations and native deciduous forest in the coastal range of south Central Chile. Land Degrad. Dev. 32, 453–466 (2021).
Busch, J. & Ferretti-Gallon, K. What drives and stops deforestation, reforestation, and forest degradation? An updated meta-analysis. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 17, 217–250 (2023).
Ostrom, E. in Handbook of Agricultural Economics Vol. 2, 1315–1339 (Elsevier, 2002).
Adamopoulos, T. & Restuccia, D. Land reform and productivity: a quantitative analysis with micro data. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 12, 1–39 (2020).
Sims, D. A. et al. On the use of MODIS EVI to assess gross primary productivity of North American ecosystems. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JG000162 (2006).
Kang, Y. et al. How universal is the relationship between remotely sensed vegetation indices and crop leaf area index? A global assessment. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070597 (2016).
Informe Final: Estudio de Predios Adquiridos Biobío y Araucanía por CONADI (CONADI, 2017).
Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).
Lu, F. E. The common property regime of the Huaorani Indians of Ecuador: implications and challenges to conservation. Hum. Ecol. 29, 425–447 (2001).
Meza, L. E. Mapuche struggles for land and the role of private protected areas in Chile. J. Lat. Am. Geogr. 8, 149–163 (2009).
Roth, J., Sant’Anna, P. H. C., Bilinski, A. & Poe, J. What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. J. Econom. 235, 2218–2244 (2023).
Callaway, B. & Sant’Anna, P. H. C. Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. J. Econom. 225, 200–230 (2021).
Goodman-Bacon, A. Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. J. Econom. 225, 254–277 (2021).
Graesser, J. et al. Temporally-consistent annual land cover from Landsat time series in the southern cone of South America. Remote Sens. 14, 4005 (2022).
MapBiomas Chile Version 1.0 (MapBiomas, 2024); https://chile.mapbiomas.org
Heilmayr, R., Echeverría, C. & Lambin, E. F. Impacts of Chilean forest subsidies on forest cover, carbon and biodiversity. Nat. Sustain. 3, 701–709 (2020).
Sanginés de Cárcer, P. et al. Quantification Methodology and Accounting Framework for Carbon Sequestration in Perennial Cropping Systems (Quantis and Cool Farm Alliance, 2022).
Ibarra, M., Mancilla, G. & Peralta, M. Evaluación de la erosión hídrica bajo tres tipos de cubierta arbórea en la Cordillera de Nahuelbuta. Rev. Cienc. For. 11, 2–6 (1996).
Determinación de la Erosión Actual y Potencial de los Suelos de Chile (Centro de Información de Recursos Naturales de Chile, 2010).
Johnson, D. M. A comprehensive assessment of the correlations between field crop yields and commonly used MODIS products. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 52, 65–81 (2016).
Guerini Filho, M., Kuplich, T. M. & De Quadros, F. L. F. Estimating natural grassland biomass by vegetation indices using Sentinel 2 remote sensing data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 41, 2861–2876 (2020).
Huete, A. et al. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 195–213 (2002).
INE (Chile). VI Censo Nacional Agropecuario y Forestal 1997 (Instituto Nacional de Estadisticas de Chile, 1998).
Landsat Imagery (USGS, 2024).
Boisier, P. CR2MET: a high-resolution precipitation and temperature dataset for the period 1960–2021 in continental Chile (Version 2.5). Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7529682 (2023).
Jaimovich, D. et al. Data and code for: Environmental impacts of Indigenous land restitution in Chile. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20617725 (2026).