Abrahms, B. et al. Climate change as a global amplifier of human–wildlife conflict. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 224–234 (2023).
Chavez-Rosales, S., Josephson, E., Palka, D. & Garrison, L. Detection of habitat shifts of cetacean species: a comparison between 2010 and 2017 habitat suitability conditions in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 877580 (2022).
Storrie, L., Lydersen, C., Andersen, M., Wynn, R. B. & Kovacs, K. M. Determining the species assemblage and habitat use of cetaceans in the Svalbard Archipelago, based on observations from 2002 to 2014. Polar Res. 37, 1463065 (2018).
Braun, C. D. et al. Widespread habitat loss and redistribution of marine top predators in a changing ocean. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi2718 (2023).
Ramp, C., Delarue, J., Palsbøll, P. J., Sears, R. & Hammond, P. S. Adapting to a warmer ocean—seasonal shift of baleen whale movements over three decades. PLOS ONE 10, e0121374 (2015).
Pendleton, D. E. et al. Decadal-scale phenology and seasonal climate drivers of migratory baleen whales in a rapidly warming marine ecosystem. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 4989–5005 (2022).
Szesciorka, A. R. et al. Timing is everything: drivers of interannual variability in blue whale migration. Sci. Rep. 10, 7710 (2020).
Jouffray, J.-B., Blasiak, R., Norström, A. V., Österblom, H. & Nyström, M. The blue acceleration: the trajectory of human expansion into the ocean. One Earth 2, 43–54 (2020).
Halpern, B. S. et al. Recent pace of change in human impact on the world’s ocean. Sci. Rep. 9, 11609 (2019).
Sherman, P., Chen, X. & McElroy, M. Offshore wind: an opportunity for cost-competitive decarbonization of China’s energy economy. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax9571 (2020).
Hauser, D. D. W., Laidre, K. L. & Stern, H. L. Vulnerability of Arctic marine mammals to vessel traffic in the increasingly ice-free Northwest Passage and Northern Sea Route. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7617–7622 (2018).
Abrahms, B. et al. Dynamic ensemble models to predict distributions and anthropogenic risk exposure for highly mobile species. Divers. Distrib. 25, 1182–1193 (2019).
Meyer-Gutbrod, E., Greene, C. & Davies, K. Marine species range shifts necessitate advanced policy planning: the case of the North Atlantic right whale. Oceanography 31, 19–23 (2018).
Hazen, E. L. et al. Predicted habitat shifts of Pacific top predators in a changing climate. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 234–238 (2013).
The Potential of the Blue Economy: Increasing Long-Term Benefits of the Sustainable Use of Marine Resources for Small Island Developing States and Coastal Least Developed Countries (World Bank Group, 2017); https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/cee24b6c-2e2f-5579-b1a4-457011419425/content
von Krauland, A.-K., Long, Q., Enevoldsen, P. & Jacobson, M. Z. United States offshore wind energy atlas: availability, potential, and economic insights based on wind speeds at different altitudes and thresholds and policy-informed exclusions. Energy Convers. Manag. X 20, 100410 (2023).
Jacobson, M. Z., Von Krauland, A.-K., Coughlin, S. J., Palmer, F. C. & Smith, M. M. Zero air pollution and zero carbon from all energy at low cost and without blackouts in variable weather throughout the U.S. with 100% wind-water-solar and storage. Renew. Energy 184, 430–442 (2022).
Barthelmie, R. J. & Pryor, S. C. Climate change mitigation potential of wind energy. Climate 9, 136 (2021).
Musial, W. et al. Offshore Wind Market Report: 2023(US Department of Energy, 2023).
Executive Office of the President. Temporary Withdrawal of All Areas on the Outer Continental Shelf From Offshore Wind Leasing and Review of the Federal Government’s Leasing and Permitting Practices for Wind Projects 90 FR 8363 (Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration, 2025); https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/FR-2025-01-29/2025-01966/p
Gasparatos, A., Doll, C. N. H., Esteban, M., Ahmed, A. & Olang, T. A. Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 70, 161–184 (2017).
Allison, T. D. et al. Impacts to Wildlife of Wind Energy Siting and Operation in the United States (Ecological Society of America, 2019).
Kraus, S. D., Kenney, R. D. & Thomas, L. A Framework for Studying the Effects of Offshore Wind Development on Marine Mammals and Turtles (Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 2019).
Southall, B., Morse, L., Williams, K. & Jenkins, E. Marine Mammals Workgroup Report State of the Science Workshop on Wildlife and Offshore Wind Energy 2020: Cumulative Impacts (NY State E-TWG, 2021); https://www.nyetwg.com/2020-workgroups
Hastie, G. D. et al. Sound exposure in harbour seals during the installation of an offshore wind farm: predictions of auditory damage. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 631–640 (2015).
Graham, I. M. et al. Harbour porpoise responses to pile-driving diminish over time. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 190335 (2019).
Brandt, M. et al. Disturbance of harbour porpoises during construction of the first seven offshore wind farms in Germany. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 596, 213–232 (2018).
Beelen, S., Nijhof, M., de Jong, C., van Wijngaarden, L. & Krug, D. Bubble curtains for noise mitigation: one vs two. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 157, 1336–1355 (2025).
Protected Species Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (Sunrise Wind, 2022); https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/2022-06/SunriseWind_2022App_PSMMP_OPR1_508.pdf
Supplemental North Atlantic Right Whale Monitoring and Mitigation Plan for Pile Driving (SouthCoast Wind Energy, 2024).
Revolution Wind Pile Driving Monitoring Plan (Revolution Wind, 2024).
Quintana, J. A. Alternative Installation Methods for Offshore Wind Substations (Univ. Strathclyde Engineering, 2016).
Maienza, C. et al. A life cycle cost model for floating offshore wind farms. Appl. Energy 266, 114716 (2020).
Myhr, A., Bjerkseter, C., Ågotnes, A. & Nygaard, T. A. Levelised cost of energy for offshore floating wind turbines in a life cycle perspective. Renew. Energy 66, 714–728 (2014).
Ioannou, A., Angus, A. & Brennan, F. Stochastic financial appraisal of offshore wind farms. Renew. Energy 145, 1176–1191 (2020).
O’Brien, O. et al. Repatriation of a historical North Atlantic right whale habitat during an era of rapid climate change. Sci. Rep. 12, 12407 (2022).
National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion Construction, Operation, Maintenance, and Decommissioning of the Revolution Wind Offshore Energy Project (Lease OCS-A 0486) (NOAA, 2023); https://doi.org/10.25923/CC4Z-HX25
National Marine Fisheries Service Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion Construction, Operation, Maintenance, and Decommissioning of the Vineyard Wind 1 Offshore Energy Project (Lease OCS-A 0501)—Reinitiation (NOAA, 2024); https://doi.org/10.25923/ASR1-0357
Estabrook, B. et al. Dynamic spatiotemporal acoustic occurrence of North Atlantic right whales in the offshore Rhode Island and Massachusetts Wind Energy Areas. Endanger. Species Res. 49, 115–133 (2022).
Roberts, J. et al. North Atlantic right whale density surface model for the US Atlantic evaluated with passive acoustic monitoring. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 732, 167–192 (2024).
Davies, K. et al. Variation in North Atlantic right whale Eubalaena glacialis occurrence in the Bay of Fundy, Canada, over three decades. Endanger. Species Res. 39, 159–171 (2019).
Record, N. et al. Rapid climate-driven circulation changes threaten conservation of endangered North Atlantic right whales. Oceanography 32, 162–169 (2019).
Pendleton, D. et al. Weekly predictions of North Atlantic right whale Eubalaena glacialis habitat reveal influence of prey abundance and seasonality of habitat preferences. Endanger. Species Res. 18, 147–161 (2012).
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (As Amended 2007) (NOAA, 1972).
Limpert, K. et al. SouthCoast Wind Additional Underwater Acoustic Modeling Scenarios (JASCO Applied Sciences, 2024); https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/s3/2024-06/SouthCoastWind-2024Rule-SupplementalAcousticModeling-OPR1.pdf
Pyc, C., Zeddies, D., Denes, S. & Weirathmueller, M. Appendix III-M: REVISED DRAFT—Supplemental Information for the Assessment of Potential Acoustic and Non-Acoustic Impact Producing Factors on Marine Fauna During Construction of the Vineyard Wind Project (Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 2018); https://www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/renewable-energy-program/State-Activities/MA/Vineyard-Wind/Vineyard-Wind-COP-Volume-III-Appendix-III-M.pdf
Kusel, E. et al. Sunrise Wind Farm Project Underwater Noise and Exposure Modeling (JASCO Applied Sciences, 2022); https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/2022-06/SunriseWind_2022App_AcousticModelingReport_OPR1_0.pdf
White, C., Halpern, B. S. & Kappel, C. V. Ecosystem service tradeoff analysis reveals the value of marine spatial planning for multiple ocean uses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4696–4701 (2012).
Best, B. D. & Halpin, P. N. Minimizing wildlife impacts for offshore wind energy development: winning tradeoffs for seabirds in space and cetaceans in time. PLOS ONE 14, e0215722 (2019).
White, C. et al. Spatial planning offshore wind energy farms in California for mediating fisheries and wildlife conservation impacts. Environ. Dev. 51, 101005 (2024).
Incidental Harassment Authorization for Vineyard Wind 1, LLC. 16 U.S.C 1371(a)(5)(D) 25 (NOAA, 2025); https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-09-16/pdf/2024-20541.pdf
Vineyard Wind 1 Protected Species Observer Final Report—Construction 2023–2024 (Vineyard Wind, 2025).
Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Monitoring During Windfarm Construction (South Fork Wind, 2024); https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/s3/2024-06/SouthForkWind-ConstructionPSOPAMReport-PlusAppendices-OPR1.pdf
Baumgartner, M. Efficacy of real-time passive acoustic monitoring near wind energy industrial activities for mitigating risks to right whales. Endanger. Species Res. 57, 413–430 (2025).
Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Phase 2 Construction of the Vineyard Wind 1 Offshore Wind Project Off Massachusetts. 89 FR 31008 (NOAA, 2024).
Hansen, T. A. et al. Five grand challenges of offshore wind financing in the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 107, 103329 (2024).
McDermott, J. An offshore wind project for New York may be abandoned over Trump administration delays. AP News https://apnews.com/article/offshore-wind-energy-trump-empire-wind-9f895b06d2d535c2e1369c7a38464b76 (2025).
North Atlantic Right Whale and Offshore Wind Strategy (BOEM, 2024).
Stone, K. M. et al. Distribution and abundance of cetaceans in a wind energy development area offshore of Massachusetts and Rhode Island. J. Coast. Conserv. 21, 527–543 (2017).
R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022).
Miller, D., Rexstad, E., Burt, L., Bravington, M. & Hedley, S. dsm: Density surface modelling of distance sampling data. R version 2.3.4 (2013).
Potential Hydrodynamic Impacts of Offshore Wind Energy on Nantucket Shoals Regional Ecology: An Evaluation from Wind to Whales (National Academies, 2024); https://doi.org/10.17226/27154
White, T. P. & Veit, R. R. Spatial ecology of long-tailed ducks and white-winged scoters wintering on Nantucket Shoals. Ecosphere 11, e03002 (2020).
US Coastal Relief Model—Northeast Atlantic. NOAA https://doi.org/10.7289/V5MS3QNZ (1999).
Pante, E. & Simon-Bouhet, B. marmap: a package for importing, plotting and analyzing bathymetric and topographic data in R. PLOS ONE 8, e73051 (2013).
MODIS-Aqua Level 3 Mapped Chlorophyll Data Version R2018.0 (NASA Ocean Biology Distributed Active Archive Center, 2017); https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/catalog/ob-cloud-modisa-l3m-chl-2022.0
DeLorenzo Costa, A., Durbin, E., Mayo, C. & Lyman, E. Environmental factors affecting zooplankton in Cape Cod Bay: implications for right whale dynamics. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 323, 281–298 (2006).
Multi-Mission Optimally Interpolated Sea Surface Salinity 7-Day Global Dataset V1 (NASA Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center, 2021); https://doi.org/10.5067/SMP10-4U7CS
GHRSST Level 4 MUR Global Foundation Sea Surface Temperature Analysis (v4.1) (NASA Physical Oceanography Distributed Active Archive Center, 2015); https://doi.org/10.5067/GHGMR-4FJ04
Miller, D. L. et al. Estimating uncertainty in density surface models. PeerJ 10, e13950 (2022).
Bailey, H. et al. Assessing underwater noise levels during pile-driving at an offshore windfarm and its potential effects on marine mammals. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 60, 888–897 (2010).
Bellmann, M. et al. Underwater Noise during Percussive Pile Driving: Influencing Factors on Pile-Driving Noise and Technical Possibilities to Comply with Noise Mitigation Values (ITAP, 2020); https://www.itap.de/media/experience_report_underwater_era-report.pdf
Kusel, E. et al. Underwater Sound Field Verification: Vineyard Wind 1 Final Report (JASCO Applied Sciences, 2024); https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.fisheries.noaa.gov/2024-04/VW1-2023IHA-SFVRep-OPR1.pdf
Special Marine Construction (Hydrotechnik Lubeck, 2022); https://www.hydrotechnik-luebeck.de/portfolio-catalogs/01-portfolio-offshore/
Denes, S., Weirathmueller, M. & Zeddies, D. Foundation Installation at South Fork Wind Farm: Animal Exposure Modelling (JASCO Applied Sciences, 2019); https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/2021-02/July2020_App%20P2_SFWF_Animal%20Exposure%20Modeling%20Report_OPR1.pdf?null
Conditions of Construction and Operations Plan Approval Lease Number OCS-A 0534. 88 (US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 2024).
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion for Construction, Operation, Maintenance and Decommissioning of the Vineyard Wind Offshore Energy Project (Lease OCS-A 0501) (National Marine Fisheries Service, 2020).
Protected Species Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (South Fork Wind, 2021); https://www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/documents/environment/Protected-Species-Mitigation-Monitoring-Plan_0.pdf
Freeman, E. et al. ICOADS Release 3.0: a major update to the historical marine climate record. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 2211–2232 (2017).
Ganley, L. C. Tradeoffs. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20510084 (2026).