Kalinin, S. V. et al. Automated and autonomous experiments in electron and scanning probe microscopy. ACS Nano 15, 12604–12627 (2021).
Kusne, A. G. et al. On-the-fly closed-loop materials discovery via Bayesian active learning. Nat. Commun. 11, 5966 (2020).
Darvish, K. et al. ORGANA: a robotic assistant for automated chemistry experimentation and characterization. Matter 8, 101897 (2025).
Pyzer-Knapp, E. O. et al. Accelerating materials discovery using artificial intelligence, high performance computing and robotics. Npj Comput. Mater. 8, 84 (2022).
Abolhasani, M. & Kumacheva, E. The rise of self-driving labs in chemical and materials sciences. Nat. Synth. 2, 483–492 (2023).
Epps, R. W., Volk, A. A., Ibrahim, M. Y. S. & Abolhasani, M. Universal self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of materials and molecules. Chem 7, 2541–2545 (2021).
Delgado-Licona, F., Addington, D., Alsaiari, A. & Abolhasani, M. Engineering principles for self-driving laboratories. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2, 277–280 (2025).
Li, J. et al. Autonomous microfluidic experimentation for exploring reaction inference and synthesizing double perovskite nanoplatelets. Nat. Commun. 17, 4514 (2026).
Delgado-Licona, F. et al. Flow-driven data intensification to accelerate autonomous inorganic materials discovery. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2, 436–446 (2025).
Epps, R. W. et al. Artificial chemist: an autonomous quantum dot synthesis bot. Adv. Mater. 32, 2001626 (2020).
Bennett, J. A. et al. Autonomous reaction pareto-front mapping with a self-driving catalysis laboratory. Nat. Chem. Eng. 1, 240–250 (2024).
Burger, B. et al. A mobile robotic chemist. Nature 583, 237–241 (2020).
Gongora, A. E. et al. A Bayesian experimental autonomous researcher for mechanical design. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz1708 (2020).
Szymanski, N. J. et al. An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials. Nature 624, 86–91 (2023).
MacLeod, B. P. et al. Self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of thin-film materials. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8867 (2020).
Slattery, A. et al. Automated self-optimization, intensification, and scale-up of photocatalysis in flow. Science 383, eadj1817 (2024).
Boiko, D. A., MacKnight, R., Kline, B. & Gomes, G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 624, 570–578 (2023).
Steiner, S. et al. Organic synthesis in a modular robotic system driven by a chemical programming language. Science 363, eaav2211 (2019).
Koscher, B. A. et al. Autonomous, multiproperty-driven molecular discovery: From predictions to measurements and back. Science 382, eadi1407 (2023).
Volk, A. A. et al. AlphaFlow: autonomous discovery and optimization of multi-step chemistry using a self-driven fluidic lab guided by reinforcement learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 1403 (2023).
Xu, J. et al. Autonomous multi-robot synthesis and optimization of metal halide perovskite nanocrystals. Nat. Commun. 16, 7841 (2025).
Bennett, J. A. et al. An autonomous lab for data-driven homogeneous catalysis. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-74425-x (2026).
Canty, R. B. & Abolhasani, M. Reproducibility in automated chemistry laboratories using computer science abstractions. Nat. Synth. 3, 1327–1339 (2024).
Coley, C. W., Eyke, N. S. & Jensen, K. F. Autonomous discovery in the chemical sciences part I: progress. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 22858–22893 (2020).
Gromski, P. S., Henson, A. B., Granda, J. M. & Cronin, L. How to explore chemical space using algorithms and automation. Nat. Rev. Chem. 3, 119–128 (2019).
Bennett, J. A. & Abolhasani, M. Autonomous chemical science and engineering enabled by self-driving laboratories. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 36, 100831 (2022).
Montoya, J. H. et al. Toward autonomous materials research: recent progress and future challenges. Appl. Phys. Rev. 9, 011405 (2022).
Seifrid, M. et al. Autonomous chemical experiments: challenges and perspectives on establishing a self-driving lab. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 2454–2466 (2022).
Christensen, M. et al. Automation isn’t automatic. Chem. Sci. 12, 15473–15490 (2021).
Gil, D. & Moler, K. A. Accelerating science with AI. Science 390, 965–965 (2025).
M. J. Kratsios, D. O. Sacks, & M. A. Rubio. America’s AI Action Plan (The White House, 2025).
Torres-Acosta, M. A., Lye, G. J. & Dikicioglu, D. Automated liquid-handling operations for robust, resilient, and efficient bio-based laboratory practices. Biochem. Eng. J. 188, 108713 (2022).
Harre, M., Tilstam, U. & Weinmann, H. Breaking the new bottleneck: automated synthesis in chemical process research and development. Org. Process. Res. Dev. 3, 304–318 (1999).
Waltz, D. & Buchanan, B. G. Automating science. Science 324, 43–44 (2009).
Kim, Y. et al. Self-driving laboratories with artificial intelligence: an overview of process systems engineering perspective. Comput. Chem. Eng. 203, 109266 (2025).
Tobias, A. V. & Wahab, A. Autonomous ‘self-driving’ laboratories: a review of technology and policy implications. R. Soc. Open. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.250646 (2025).
Tom, G. et al. Self-driving laboratories for chemistry and materials science. Chem. Rev. 124, 9633–9732 (2024).
Lindsey, J. S. A retrospective on the automation of laboratory synthetic chemistry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 17, 15–45 (1992).
Andrew Corkan, L. & Lindsey, J. S. Experiment manager software for an automated chemistry workstation, including a scheduler for parallel experimentation. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 17, 47–74 (1992).
Plouvier, J.-C., Andrew Corkan, L. & Lindsey, J. S. Experiment planner for strategic experimentation with an automated chemistry workstation. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 17, 75–94 (1992).
Andrew Corkan, L., Plouvier, J.-C. & Lindsey, J. S. Application of an automated chemistry workstation to problems in synthetic chemistry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 17, 95–105 (1992).
King, R. D. et al. The automation of science. Science 324, 85–89 (2009).
Angello, N. H. et al. Closed-loop optimization of general reaction conditions for heteroaryl suzuki-miyaura coupling. Science 378, 399–405 (2022).
Orouji, N. et al. Autonomous catalysis research with human–AI–robot collaboration. Nat. Catal. 8, 1135–1145 (2025).
Langner, S. et al. Beyond ternary OPV: high-throughput experimentation and self-driving laboratories optimize multicomponent systems. Adv. Mater. 32, 1907801 (2020).
Volk, A. A., Campbell, Z. S., Ibrahim, M. Y. S., Bennett, J. A. & Abolhasani, M. Flow chemistry: a sustainable voyage through the chemical universe en route to smart manufacturing. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 13, 45–72 (2022).
Mukhin, N., Jha, P. & Abolhasani, M. The role of flow chemistry in self-driving labs. Matter 8, 102205 (2025).
Granda, J. M., Donina, L., Dragone, V., Long, D.-L. & Cronin, L. Controlling an organic synthesis robot with machine learning to search for new reactivity. Nature 559, 377–381 (2018).
Hou, W. et al. Automatic generation of 3D-printed reactionware for chemical synthesis digitization using ChemSCAD. ACS Cent. Sci. 7, 212–218 (2021).
Waldron, C. et al. An autonomous microreactor platform for the rapid identification of kinetic models. React. Chem. Eng. 4, 1623–1636 (2019).
McMullen, J. P. & Jensen, K. F. Rapid determination of reaction kinetics with an automated microfluidic system. Org. Process. Res. Dev. 15, 398–407 (2011).
Gómez-Bombarelli, R. et al. Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 268–276 (2018).
Shen, R., Luo, G. & Su, A. Bayesian optimization for chemical synthesis in the era of artificial intelligence: advances and applications. Processes 13, 2687 (2025).
Zhou, Z., Li, X. & Zare, R. N. Optimizing chemical reactions with deep reinforcement learning. ACS Cent. Sci. 3, 1337–1344 (2017).
Snapp, K. L. et al. Superlative mechanical energy absorbing efficiency discovered through self-driving lab-human partnership. Nat. Commun. 15, 4290 (2024).
Canty, R. B. et al. Science acceleration and accessibility with self-driving labs. Nat. Commun. 16, 3856 (2025).
Vescovi, R. et al. Towards a modular architecture for science factories. Digit. Discov. 2, 1980–1998 (2023).
Rauschen, R., Guy, M., Hein, J. E. & Cronin, L. Universal chemical programming language for robotic synthesis repeatability. Nat. Synth. 3, 488–496 (2024).
Strieth-Kalthoff, F. et al. Delocalized, asynchronous, closed-loop discovery of organic laser emitters. Science 384, eadk9227 (2024).
Pendleton, I. M. et al. Experiment specification, capture and laboratory automation technology (ESCALATE): a software pipeline for automated chemical experimentation and data management. MRS Commun. 9, 846–859 (2019).
Bai, J. et al. A dynamic knowledge graph approach to distributed self-driving laboratories. Nat. Commun. 15, 462 (2024).
Pascazio, L. et al. Chemical species ontology for data integration and knowledge discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 63, 6569–6586 (2023).
Walsh, D. J. et al. Community resource for innovation in polymer technology (CRIPT): a scalable polymer material data structure. ACS Cent. Sci. 9, 330–338 (2023).
Guevarra, D. et al. Orchestrating nimble experiments across interconnected labs. Digit. Discov. 2, 1806–1812 (2023).
Sim, M. et al. ChemOS 2.0: An orchestration architecture for chemical self-driving laboratories. Matter https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2024.04.022 (2024).
Zhang, W. et al. IvoryOS: an interoperable web interface for orchestrating Python-based self-driving laboratories. Nat. Commun. 16, 5182 (2025).
Scheffler, M. et al. FAIR data enabling new horizons for materials research. Nature 604, 635–642 (2022).
Adesiji, A. D., Wang, J., Kuo, C.-S. & Brown, K. A. Benchmarking self-driving labs. Digit. Discov. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5DD00337G (2026).
Volk, A. A. & Abolhasani, M. Performance metrics to unleash the power of self-driving labs in chemistry and materials science. Nat. Commun. 15, 1378 (2024).
Kopetz, H. & Steiner, W. in Real-Time Systems: Design Principles for Distributed Embedded Applications (eds Kopetz, H. & Steiner, W.) 325–341 (Springer, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11992-7_13.
Soori, M., Arezoo, B. & Dastres, R. Internet of things for smart factories in industry 4.0, a review. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 3, 192–204 (2023).
Remote controlled life sciences lab. Emerald Cloud Lab https://www.emeraldcloudlab.com/ (2026).
Hogan, A. The semantic web: two decades on. Semantic Web 11, 169–185 (2020).
Shadbolt, N., Berners-Lee, T. & Hall, W. The semantic web revisited. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21, 96–101 (2006).
Zhang, J. et al. Self-driving AMADAP laboratory: accelerating the discovery and optimization of emerging perovskite photovoltaics. MRS Bull. 49, 1284–1294 (2024).
Ruan, Y. et al. An automatic end-to-end chemical synthesis development platform powered by large language models. Nat. Commun. 15, 10160 (2024).
Mahmud, S., Kutlu, M. & Alan, A. T. Optimizing multi-agent system swarm performance through explainable AI. In 2025 11th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMRE64970.2025.10976319 (IEEE, 2025).
Tian, F. et al. An outlook on the opportunities and challenges of multi-agent AI systems. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18397 (2025).
Ghafarollahi, A. & Buehler, M. J. SciAgents: automating scientific discovery through bioinspired multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning. Adv. Mater. 37, 2413523 (2025).
Song, T. et al. A multiagent-driven robotic AI chemist enabling autonomous chemical research on demand. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 12534–12545 (2025).
Darvish, K. et al. MATTERIX: toward a digital twin for robotics-assisted chemistry laboratory automation. Nat. Comput. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-025-00924-4 (2025).
Juchli, D. in Smart Biolabs of the Future (eds Beutel, S. & Lenk, F.) 147–174; https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2022_204 (Springer, 2022).
Hannelius, T., Salmenpera, M. & Kuikka, S. Roadmap to adopting OPC UA. In 2008 6th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics 756–761 (IEEE, 2008); https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN.2008.4618203.
Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation. Standards. IVI Foundation https://ivifoundation.org/About-IVI/default.html (2001).
H. M. N. H. Irving, H. Freiser, & T. S. West. Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature (Pergamon, 1978).
xdl 2.0.1.dev12+g8fdf586b documentation. XDL Documentation https://croningroup.gitlab.io/chemputer/xdl/ (2022).
Autoprotocol. Autoprotocol.org http://autoprotocol.org/ (2023).
Kearnes, S. M. et al. The open reaction database. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 18820–18826 (2021).
Deng, J. et al. ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. 2009 IEEE Conf. Computer Vis. Pattern Recognit. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848 (2009).
Wang, A. et al. GLUE: a multi-task benchmark and analysis platform for natural language understanding. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.07461 (2019).
Oates, P. M. & Harvey, C. F. A colorimetric reaction to quantify fluid mixing. Exp. Fluids 41, 673–683 (2006).
Plutschack, M. B., Pieber, B., Gilmore, K. & Seeberger, P. H. The hitchhiker’s guide to flow chemistry. Chem. Rev. 117, 11796–11893 (2017).
Holland, I. & Davies, J. A. Automation in the life science research laboratory. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 571777 (2020).
Autor, D. H. Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. J. Econ. Perspect. 29, 3–30 (2015).
Dwivedi, Y. K. et al. Artificial intelligence (AI): multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 57, 101994 (2021).
Eshraghian, F., Hafezieh, N., Farivar, F. & de Cesare, S. AI in software programming: understanding emotional responses to GitHub Copilot. Inf. Technol. People 38, 1659–1685 (2024).
Goethals, F. & Ziegelmayer, J. L. Anxiety buffers and the threat of extreme automation: a terror management theory perspective. Inf. Technol. People 35, 96–118 (2021).
Hung, L. et al. Autonomous laboratories for accelerated materials discovery: a community survey and practical insights. Digit. Discov. 3, 1273–1279 (2024).
Gaidimas, M. A. et al. Computer vision for high-throughput materials synthesis: a tutorial for experimentalists. Digit. Discov. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5DD00384A (2026).
Sadeghi, S. et al. Engineering a sustainable future: harnessing automation, robotics, and artificial intelligence with self-driving laboratories. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 12, 12695–12707 (2024).
Nikolaev, P. et al. Autonomy in materials research: a case study in carbon nanotube growth. Npj Comput. Mater. 2, 1–6 (2016).
Li, J. et al. Autonomous discovery of optically active chiral inorganic perovskite nanocrystals through an intelligent cloud lab. Nat. Commun. 11, 2046 (2020).
Wagner, J. et al. The evolution of materials acceleration platforms: toward the laboratory of the future with AMANDA. J. Mater. Sci. 56, 16422–16446 (2021).
Nambiar, A. M. K. et al. Bayesian optimization of computer-proposed multistep synthetic routes on an automated robotic flow platform. ACS Cent. Sci. 8, 825–836 (2022).
Vogler, M. et al. Autonomous battery optimization by deploying distributed experiments and simulations. Adv. Energy Mater. 14, 2403263 (2024).
Brocklehurst, C. E. et al. MicroCycle: an integrated and automated platform to accelerate drug discovery. J. Med. Chem. 67, 2118–2128 (2024).
Zaki, M., Prinz, C. & Ruehle, B. A self-driving lab for nano- and advanced materials synthesis. ACS Nano 19, 9029–9041 (2025).
Hamilton company. Anal. Chem. 47, 1044A–1044A (1975).
Rocha, C., Dias, J., Moreira, A. P., Veiga, G. & Costa, P. A kinesthetic teaching approach for automating micropipetting repetitive tasks. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 118, 651–663 (2022).
Ruzicka, J. & Hansen, E. H. Flow injection analysis with intermittent flow. Patent no. US4315754A (1982).
HAMILTON. Anal. Chem. 55, 537A (1983).
About. Laboratory Robotics Interest Group (LRIG) https://www.lrig.org/home/about.
ISLAR’98 Sixteenth Annual International Symposium on Laboratory Automation and Robotics Held in Boston. J. Assoc. Lab. Autom. 3, 90–91 (1998).
Hallock, N. Creative combustion: a history of the association for laboratory automation. SLAS Technol. 10, 423–431 (2005).
Thurow, K. & Junginger, S. in Devices and Systems for Laboratory Automation 1–39 (John Wiley and Sons, 2022); https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527829446.ch1.
Hahn, H. Introduction to automated chemistry analyzers — FS3700. OI Analytical Webinars (2020); https://www.xylem.com/siteassets/brand/oi-analytical/resources/presentations/oia-presentation-automated-chemistry-analyzers-training-fs3700.pdf.
The history of automated liquid handling. LabAutopedia https://diyhpl.us/~bryan/irc/labautopedia-history-of-automated-liquid-handling.html (2009).
Shimizu, Y. Capacitive liquid level sensor for automatic chemical analyzer. Patent US4818492A (1989).
From innovation to repetition — a history of pipetting. Singer Instruments https://www.singerinstruments.com/resource/from-innovation-to-repetition-a-history-of-pipetting/ (2026).
Beugelsdijk, T. J. Association for Laboratory Automation. Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/19961227031521/http:/labautomation.org/ (1996).
Bär, H., Hochstrasser, R. & Papenfuß, B. SiLA: basic standards for rapid integration in laboratory automation. SLAS Technol. 17, 86–95 (2012).
Unified Architecture — Landingpage. OPC Foundation https://opcfoundation.org/about/opc-technologies/opc-ua/ (2026).
Crook, M. ALA &SBS: two towers of excellence to become one. JALA J. Assoc. Lab. Autom. 15, 9–9 (2010).
SiLA2. GitLab https://gitlab.com/SiLA2?sort=created_desc (2024).
Bahr, M. N., Morris, M. A., Tu, N. P. & Nandkeolyar, A. Recent advances in high-throughput automated powder dispensing platforms for pharmaceutical applications. Org. Process. Res. Dev. 24, 2752–2761 (2020).
Bahr, M. N. et al. Collaborative evaluation of commercially available automated powder dispensing platforms for high-throughput experimentation in pharmaceutical applications. Org. Process. Res. Dev. 22, 1500–1508 (2018).
Winicov, H. et al. Chemical process optimization by computer — a self-directed chemical synthesis system. Anal. Chim. Acta 103, 469–476 (1978).
Di Bella, C. W. & Stevens, W. F. Process optimization by nonlinear programming. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev. 4, 16–20 (1965).
Morgan, S. L. & Deming, S. N. Simplex optimization of analytical chemical methods. Anal. Chem. 46, 1170–1181 (1974).
Berridge, J. C. Unattended optimisation of reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic separations using the modified simplex algorithm. J. Chromatogr. A 244, 1–14 (1982).
Lindsey, J. S., Corkan, L. A., Erb, D. & Powers, G. J. Robotic work station for microscale synthetic chemistry: on-line absorption spectroscopy, quantitative automated thin-layer chromatography, and multiple reactions in parallel. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 940–950 (1988).
Kleeman, W. P. & Bailey, L. C. Simplex optimization of the blue tetrazolium assay procedure for α-ketol steroids. J. Pharm. Sci. 74, 655–659 (1985).
Reiko, M., Mumio, I. & Mitsuru, U. Simplex optimization of reaction condition using laboratory robotic system. 藥學雜誌 107, 683–689 (1987).
Isenhour, T. L. Robotics in the laboratory. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 25, 292–295 (1985).
Hoskins, J. C. & Himmelblau, D. M. Artificial neural network models of knowledge representation in chemical engineering. Comput. Chem. Eng. 12, 881–890 (1988).
Jan M. Zytkow, J. Z. Automated Discovery in a Chemistry Laboratory. In AAAI’90 Proc. 8th National conference on Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2, 889–894 (AAAI, 1990); https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1865609.1865633.
Sasaki, M. A fully automated clinical laboratory: the history of the systemic and robotic automated clinical laboratory at the kochi medical school. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 21, 159–168 (1993).
Lindsey, J. S. & Dixon, J. M. Performance of search algorithms in the examination of chemical reaction spaces with an automated chemistry workstation. JALA J. Assoc. Lab. Autom. 9, 364–374 (2004).
Krishnadasan, S., Brown, R. J. C., deMello, A. J. & deMello, J. C. Intelligent routes to the controlled synthesis of nanoparticles. Lab. Chip 7, 1434–1441 (2007).
Segal, M. An operating system for the biology lab. Nature 573, S112–S113 (2019).
Strateos. Strateos Company Fact Sheet https://go.strateos.com/hubfs/Website%20URLs/Media%20Kit/Strateos_CompanyFactSheet_Oct2021%20V2.pdf (2021).
Williams, K. et al. Cheaper faster drug development validated by the repositioning of drugs against neglected tropical diseases. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20141289 (2015).
Walter, H., Basset, G., Beierlein, T., Von Mühlenen, A. & Nisato, G. Combinatorial approach for fast screening of functional materials. J. Polym. Sci. Part. B Polym. Phys. 48, 1587–1593 (2010).
Trobe, M. & Burke, M. D. The molecular industrial revolution: automated synthesis of small molecules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 4192–4214 (2018).
Prabhu, G. R. D. & Urban, P. L. The dawn of unmanned analytical laboratories. TrAC. Trends Anal. Chem. 88, 41–52 (2017).
Deneault, J. R. et al. Toward autonomous additive manufacturing: Bayesian optimization on a 3D printer. MRS Bull. 46, 566–575 (2021).
Elder, S. et al. Cross-platform bayesian optimization system for autonomous biological assay development. SLAS Technol. 26, 579–590 (2021).
Rooney, M. B. et al. A self-driving laboratory designed to accelerate the discovery of adhesive materials. Digit. Discov. 1, 382–389 (2022).
Kanda, G. N. et al. Robotic search for optimal cell culture in regenerative medicine. eLife 11, e77007 (2022).
MacLeod, B. P. et al. A self-driving laboratory advances the Pareto front for material properties. Nat. Commun. 13, 995 (2022).
Ha, T. et al. AI-driven robotic chemist for autonomous synthesis of organic molecules. Sci. Adv. 9, eadj0461 (2023).
Lunt, A. M. et al. Modular, multi-robot integration of laboratories: an autonomous workflow for solid-state chemistry. Chem. Sci. 15, 2456–2463 (2024).
Rapp, J. T., Bremer, B. J. & Romero, P. A. Self-driving laboratories to autonomously navigate the protein fitness landscape. Nat. Chem. Eng. 1, 97–107 (2024).
Vogler, M. et al. Brokering between tenants for an international materials acceleration platform. Matter 6, 2647–2665 (2023).
Toong, H. D. & Gupta, A. Personal computers. Sci. Am. 247, 86–107 (1982).
Joque, J. The invention of the object: object orientation and the philosophical development of programming languages. Philos. Technol. 29, 335–356 (2016).
Makino, H. Development of the SCARA. J. Robot. Mechatron. 26, 5–8 (2014).
O’Regan, G. A Brief History of Computing (ed. O’Regan, G.) 143–154 (Springer, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66599-9_13.
Introduction to the IETF. IETF https://www.ietf.org/about/introduction/ (2014).
Kogatam, S. The birth, evolution and future of microprocessor. Academia https://www.academia.edu/91702498/The_Birth_Evolution_and_Future_of_Microprocessor (2014).
Pahlavan, K. & Krishnamurthy, P. Evolution and impact of Wi-Fi technology and applications: a historical perspective. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 28, 3–19 (2021).
Specification Downloads. IVI Foundation https://ivifoundation.org/specifications/default.html (2001).
Colgate, J. E., Wannasuphoprasit, W. & Peshkin, M. A. in ASME 1996 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition 433–439 (ASME, 2023); https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE1996-0367.
Voelz, V. A., Pande, V. S. & Bowman, G. R. Folding@home: achievements from over 20 years of citizen science herald the exascale era. Biophys. J. 122, 2852–2863 (2023).
Collobert, R. Bengio, S. & Mariéthoz, J. Torch: A Modular Machine Learning Software Library https://infoscience.epfl.ch/bitstreams/7513f344-91b6-427d-a020-7836b150a150/download (2002).
Gutiérrez, J. A. On the Use of IEEE Std. 802.15.4 to enable wireless sensor networks in building automation. Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Netw. 14, 295–301 (2007).
Goldsborough, P. A tour of TensorFlow. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.01178 (2016).
Ketkar, N. in Deep Learning with Python: A Hands-on Introduction (ed. Ketkar, N.) 97–111 (Apress, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2766-4_7.
Jia, Y. et al. Caffe: convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. In Proc. 22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia 675–678 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2014); https://doi.org/10.1145/2647868.2654889.
onnx/onnx. Open Neural Network Exchange (GitHub, 2026); https://github.com/onnx/onnx.
Unwala, I., Taqvi, Z. & Lu, J. Thread: An IoT protocol. In 2018 IEEE Green Technologies Conference (GreenTech); https://doi.org/10.1109/GreenTech.2018.00037 (IEEE, 2018).
Armoni, M. Tensor Processing Units (TPU): A Technical Analysis and Their Impact on Artificial Intelligence https://tech4future.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Tensor-Processing-Units-TPU-Paper-ENG.pdf (2024).