The letter prompted the work to be postponed for further engagement with residents and a comprehensive report on the matter was brought to a recent projects and services meeting.
The report, by transportation manager Ann-Elise Reynolds, showed that chip seal was by far the cheapest option.
The committee voted unanimously to chip seal the road.
Councillor Gavin Dennis, who moved the option, said he could “appreciate a lot of people would like to have asphalt”.
“I’d like to have asphalt on my road and I’d like to have gold-plated curbing too,” Dennis said.
Stone said he accepted the decision, but was disappointed in the outcome.
Waterways resident Chris Stone has accepted that the quality asphalt surface of his street will soon be downgraded to chip seal.
“What they’re doing is taking an expensive, high-grade surface and replacing it with an inferior surface.”
He likened the move to putting “old tyres on a new car”.
“This is an unfortunate logic in budget-conscious times,” he said.
“I still believe that the rejuvenation of asphalt surfaces is the most logical long-term use of a high-value asset.”
Reynolds’ report showed that, although the rejuvenation treatment was a much cheaper option than a new asphalt surface, it was still two to three times the cost of chip seal.
It was an issue that came up whenever asphalt roads laid by developers came up for renewal.
Developers often used asphalt in preference to chip seal due to its attractiveness to prospective property buyers.
Asphalt provided a smoother finish, a tidier appearance, an absence of loose chip after treatment and was a quieter surface to drive on.
However, once the roads were vested to local councils to maintain, it was necessary to use the cheapest whole-of-life option for the road.
Although chip seal has a shorter lifespan of 10 to 15 years rather than 15 to 25 years, the relative cost made it the cheapest whole-of-life option for the road surface.
The chip sealing of the Waterways street, for example, would cost $21,000 compared to $228,000 for asphalt. The rejuvenation treatment would cost $52,000 and require pre-treatment of any cracks.
New Zealand Transport Agency, which co-funds 65% of resurfacing costs on local roads in the Whakatāne district, would only fund the cheapest whole-of-life option.
The chip sealing of the Waterways street, for example, would cost $21,000 compared to $228,000 for asphalt.
The policy meant the councils’ portion of the cost would be $214,000 for asphalt or $38,000 for a rejuvenation treatment, as opposed to $7350 for chip seal.
The report also stated that, as rejuvenation treatments were relatively new to the roading industry, they were not as thoroughly tested as chip seal and asphalt.
Based on other towns in New Zealand where they had been used, the expected life of the treatments were approximately six to 10 years.
Resident Deb Woollett, who first alerted the neighbourhood to the chip sealing in February, said she was happy with the plan now that there had been improved communication between residents and council staff.
She had been reassured by Reynolds that the grade of chip would be much finer and smoother than that used on nearby higher-traffic roads.
She felt that her feedback had been taken on board and that, in cases when road surfaces were being dramatically changed from what residents were used to, the council would recognise the need for more “tailored messaging”.
Shortly after Local Democracy Reporting’s story about the resealing of Waterways was published in February, the council had been approached by Muriwai Drive residents where a section of asphalt road was also due to be resurfaced in chip seal.
The residents asked that rather than chip seal the section, the asphalt be extended to the entire length of the road.
This section of road was also put on hold to be considered alongside Waterways, but will now receive chip seal this summer.
The committee approved staff to draft a Road Maintenance Policy, to be brought back to a future committee meeting for endorsement to provide clarity and consistency in the future when similar situations arose.
– LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.