Begley, C. G. & Ellis, L. M. Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483, 531–533 (2012).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Errington, T. M., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E. & Nosek, B. A. Reproducibility in cancer biology: challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology. eLife 10, e67995 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454 (2016).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Munafò, M. R. et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0021 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Baker, M. & Dolgin, E. Cancer reproducibility project releases first results. Nature 541, 269 (2017).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Johansson, P. et al. Ten ways to fool the masses when presenting battery research. Batteries Supercaps 4, 1785–1788 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Boggild, P. Research on scalable graphene faces a reproducibility gap. Nat. Commun. 14, 1126 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Lanza, M., Smets, Q., Huyghebaert, C. & Li, L. J. Yield, variability, reliability, and stability of two-dimensional materials based solid-state electronic devices. Nat. Commun. 11, 5689 (2020).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kauling, A. P. et al. The worldwide graphene flake production. Adv. Mater. 30, 1803784 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Chatterjee, S., Abadie, T., Wang, M. H., Matar, O. K. & Ruoff, R. S. Repeatability and reproducibility in the chemical vapor deposition of 2D films: a physics-driven exploration of the reactor black box. Chem. Mater. 36, 1290–1298 (2024).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Amontree, J. et al. Reproducible graphene synthesis by oxygen-free chemical vapour deposition. Nature 630, 636–642 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Guo, W., Wu, B., Wang, S. & Liu, Y. Q. Controlling fundamental fluctuations for reproducible growth of large single-crystal graphene. ACS Nano 12, 1778–1784 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Turner, P. et al. International interlaboratory comparison of Raman spectroscopic analysis of CVD-grown graphene. 2D Mater. 9, 035010 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Mackenzie, D. M. A. et al. Quality assessment of terahertz time-domain spectroscopy transmission and reflection modes for graphene conductivity mapping. Opt. Express 26, 9220–9229 (2018).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Fan, Y. et al. Recent advances in growth of large-sized 2D single crystals on Cu substrates. Adv. Mater. 33, e2003956 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Wittmann, S. et al. Assessment of wafer-level transfer techniques of graphene with respect to semiconductor industry requirements. Adv. Mater. Technol. 8, 2201587 (2023).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Cheng, Z. H. et al. How to report and benchmark emerging field-effect transistors. Nat. Electron. 5, 416–423 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Cheng, Z. H. et al. How to report and benchmark emerging field-effect transistors. Nat. Electron. 5, 620–620 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

McClellan, C. J. et al. 2D Device Trends (Stanford, accessed 17 April 2025); http://2d.stanford.edu/2D_Trends.html.

Díez-Mérida, J. et al. High-yield fabrication of bubble-free magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene devices with high twist angle homogeneity. Newton 1, 100007 (2025).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Canto, B. et al. Multi-project wafer runs for electronic graphene devices in the European 2D-experimental pilot line project. Nat. Commun. 16, 1417 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Nosek, B. et al. Reproducibility and transparency: what’s going on and how can we help. Nat. Commun. 16, 1082 (2025).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Munafò, M. Raising research quality will require collective action. Nature 576, 183–183 (2019).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kent, B. A. et al. Recommendations for empowering early career researchers to improve research culture and practice. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001680 (2022).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Higginson, A. D. & Munafò, M. R. Current incentives for scientists lead to underpowered studies with erroneous conclusions. PLoS Biol. 14, e2000995 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Gammelgaard, L., Whelan, P. R., Booth, T. J. & Boggild, P. Long-term stability and tree-ring oxidation of WSe2 using phase-contrast AFM. Nanoscale 13, 19238–19246 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Johann, D., Neufeld, J., Thomas, K., Rathmann, J. & Rauhut, H. The impact of researchers’ perceived pressure on their publication strategies. Res. Eval. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae011 (2024).

Smith, A. Who discovered the magnetocaloric effect? Eur. Phys. J. H. 38, 507–517 (2013).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Lau, C. N., Bockrath, M. W., Mak, K. F. & Zhang, F. Reproducibility in the fabrication and physics of moire materials. Nature 602, 41–50 (2022).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Kapfer, M. et al. Programming twist angle and strain profiles in 2D materials. Science 381, 677–681 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Knoepfler, P. Reviewing post-publication peer review. Trends Genet. 31, 221–223 (2015).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Dance, A. Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off. Nature 614, 581–583 (2023).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Woolston, C. Workplace habits: full-time is full enough. Nature 546, 175–177 (2017).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Promoting reproducibility with registered reports. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0034 (2017).

Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Clifford, C. A. et al. The importance of international standards for the graphene community. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 233–235 (2021).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

The Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. https://ufm.dk/en/publications/2014/the-danish-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity (accessed 6 June 2025). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/european-code-of-conduct-for-research-integrity_horizon_en.pdf (accessed 6 June 2025).

Go forth and replicate! Nature 536, 373 (2016).

Begley, C. G., Buchan, A. M. & Dirnagl, U. Robust research institutions must do their part for reproducibility. Nature 525, 25–27 (2015).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Shiffrin, R. M., Börner, K. & Stigler, S. M. Scientific progress despite irreproducibility: a seeming paradox. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2632–2639 (2018).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Yuan, Y. et al. On the quality of commercial chemical vapour deposited hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Commun. 15, 4518 (2024).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Pizzocchero, F. et al. The hot pick-up technique for batch assembly of van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 7, 11894 (2016).

Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar
 

Whelan, P. R. et al. Electrical homogeneity mapping of epitaxial graphene on silicon carbide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 31641–31647 (2018).

Article 

Google Scholar
 

Consort 2010. Lancet 375, 1136 (2010).

von Elm, E. et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370, 1453–1457 (2007).

Article 

Google Scholar