The court documents showed Henderson attended an appointment on October 9, 2023.
“He provided a sample, but it was not human urine.”
He was later recalled to prison and was charged by police on November 3 with “wilfully attempting to pervert the course of justice under Section 117(e) of the Crimes Act” for providing a false urine sample under a Parole Act 2002 special condition for release.
Police stated, “Analysis of the defendant’s sample returned a result of ‘inconsistent with human urine’.”
The offender pleaded guilty on November 10 to a single charge under Section 71A of the Parole Act of failing to provide a valid urine sample. He was convicted and discharged.
Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.