A prominent conservative nonprofit law firm has called on the Federal Communications Commission to launch an inquiry into the future of public broadcasting, potentially leading to the revocation of broadcast licenses held by NPR and PBS affiliates. The Center for American Rights (CAR), known for its involvement in FCC investigations into alleged news distortion under Chairman Brendan Carr, submitted the filing in response to an ongoing proceeding on local broadcasters’ public interest obligations, according to a report from Ars Technica.
The move follows Congress’s decision to eliminate federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), which has long served as the primary conduit for taxpayer support to public radio and television stations. With the CPB winding down operations after the rescission of over $1 billion in allocated funds, CAR argues that this development signals a fundamental shift in the viability of NPR and PBS as national networks and their local affiliates.
CAR contends that the loss of federal subsidies raises serious questions about whether these entities can sustain long-term operations without government aid. The group suggests that if NPR and PBS fail to demonstrate robust business models reliant on private donations and other revenue sources, the FCC should consider reallocating the broadcast spectrum currently occupied by their stations to alternative users. This spectrum, valuable for its reach in both urban and rural areas, could potentially support new commercial or noncommercial licensees.
The filing emphasizes the need for transparency from NPR, PBS, and their member stations regarding financial projections and transition strategies. CAR points out that some public media leaders have warned of stations potentially going off the air due to the funding cuts, which would leave portions of the spectrum unused. In such cases, the organization argues, the FCC has a responsibility to ensure efficient use of public airwaves in the interest of all Americans.
Central to CAR’s argument is the assertion that public broadcasters may no longer fulfill their statutory public interest obligations, particularly after elected officials determined that continued taxpayer support was unwarranted. The group highlights perceptions of ideological imbalance in programming, suggesting that content often aligns more closely with urban, progressive viewpoints, potentially alienating audiences in conservative-leaning regions. This, CAR maintains, undermines the diverse service expected from licensees holding noncommercial educational spectrum.
Concerns extend to specific programming roles, such as PBS’s longstanding provision of children’s educational content during daytime hours. Without a sustainable model, CAR warns, these services could diminish, prompting the FCC to evaluate alternative providers capable of filling such gaps.
Legally, mid-term license revocations remain challenging, but the FCC can scrutinize stations during routine renewal processes or initiate hearings if public interest standards appear unmet. Chairman Carr has previously leveraged license renewal threats in disputes over broadcast content, aligning with broader efforts to hold networks accountable for perceived biases.
The CAR submission fits into a larger FCC proceeding aimed at empowering local stations against national networks’ influence. While primarily focused on commercial television affiliates, the comments extend the discussion to public media, treating NPR and PBS stations similarly in terms of licensing accountability.
Opposition to such scrutiny has emerged from media advocacy groups, which view the proceedings as risking regulatory overreach into editorial decisions. The National Hispanic Media Coalition, in its own comments, expressed alarm that recent FCC actions could prioritize political alignment over independent journalism.
The defunding itself stemmed from Republican-led congressional action, fulfilling longstanding calls to end taxpayer subsidies amid accusations of partisan slant in public media content. The White House and GOP lawmakers framed the cuts as eliminating unnecessary support for outlets seen as promoting divisive ideologies.
As public broadcasters adapt to a post-CPB landscape—relying more heavily on individual contributions, corporate underwriting, and state or local aid—the FCC faces mounting pressure to reassess the role of these networks in a transformed media environment. The outcome could reshape access to educational and informational programming, especially in underserved communities where public stations have historically played a critical role in delivering emergency alerts and local news.
This development underscores ongoing tensions over media regulation, public funding, and spectrum allocation in an era of polarized discourse and evolving technology. The FCC has yet to indicate whether it will formally open the suggested inquiry, but the filing adds to the scrutiny facing America’s public broadcasting system.
Please add Cord Cutters News as a source for your Google News feed HERE. Please follow us on Facebook and X for more news, tips, and reviews. Need cord cutting tech support? Join our Cord Cutting Tech Support Facebook Group for help.