Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).
Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M. & Horodecki, K. Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865–942 (2009).
Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A. & Vedral, V. Entanglement in many-body systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 517–576 (2008).
McCutcheon, W. et al. Experimental verification of multipartite entanglement in quantum networks. Nat. Commun. 7, 13251 (2016).
Jozsa, R. Entanglement and quantum computation. in The Geometric Universe (eds Huggett, S. A. et al.) Ch. 27 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998).
Graham, T. M. et al. Multi-qubit entanglement and algorithms on a neutral-atom quantum computer. Nature 602, 63–68 (2022).
Barz, S. et al. Demonstration of blind quantum computing. Science 335, 303–308 (2012).
Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188–5191 (2001).
Raussendorf, R., Browne, D. E. & Briegel, H. J. Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states. Phys. Rev. A 68, 22312 (2003).
Briegel, H. J., Browne, D. E., Dür, W., Raussendorf, R. & Van den Nest, M. Measurement-based quantum computation. Nat. Phys. 5, 19–26 (2009).
Greganti, C., Roehsner, M.-C., Barz, S., Morimae, T. & Walther, P. Demonstration of measurement-only blind quantum computing. New J. Phys. 18, 13020 (2016).
Raussendorf, R., Harrington, J. & Goyal, K. A fault-tolerant one-way quantum computer. Ann. Phys. 321, 2242–2270 (2006).
Raussendorf, R. & Harrington, J. Fault-tolerant quantum computation with high threshold in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190504 (2007).
Larsen, M. V. et al. Fault-tolerant continuous-variable measurement-based quantum computation architecture. PRX Quantum 2, 030325 (2021).
Azses, D. et al. Identification of symmetry-protected topological states on noisy quantum computers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 120502 (2020).
Paszko, D., Rose, D. C., Szymańska, M. H. & Pal, A. Edge modes and symmetry-protected topological states in open quantum systems. PRX Quantum 5, 30304 (2024).
Else, D. V., Schwarz, I., Bartlett, S. D. & Doherty, A. C. Symmetry-protected phases for measurement-based quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 240505 (2012).
Nautrup, H. P. & Wei, T.-C. Symmetry-protected topologically ordered states for universal quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 92, 52309 (2015).
Liao, P., Sanders, B. C. & Feder, D. L. Topological graph states and quantum error-correction codes. Phys. Rev. A 105, 42418 (2022).
Brown, B. J. & Roberts, S. Universal fault-tolerant measurement-based quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 33305 (2020).
Cao, S. et al. Generation of genuine entanglement up to 51 superconducting qubits. Nature 619, 738–742 (2023).
Ferreira, V. S., Kim, G., Butler, A., Pichler, H. & Painter, O. Deterministic generation of multidimensional photonic cluster states with a single quantum emitter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 260501 (2022).
Paesani, S. & Brown, B. J. High-threshold quantum computing by fusing one-dimensional cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 120603 (2023).
Carrera Vazquez, A. et al. Combining quantum processors with real-time classical communication. Nature 636, 75–79 (2024).
Lanyon, B. P. et al. Measurement-based quantum computation with trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 210501 (2013).
Bluvstein, D. et al. A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays. Nature 604, 451–456 (2022).
Bao, Z. et al. Creating and controlling global Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement on quantum processors. Nat. Commun. 15, 8823 (2024).
Song, C. et al. Generation of multicomponent atomic Schrödinger cat states of up to 20 qubits. Science 365, 574–577 (2019).
Cao, H. et al. A photonic source of heralded GHZ states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 130604 (2023).
Pont, M. et al. High-fidelity four-photon GHZ states on chip. npj Quantum Inf. 9, 50 (2024).
Ladd, T. D. et al. Quantum computers. Nature 464, 45–53 (2010).
Wang, X.-L. et al. 18-qubit entanglement with six photons’ three degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 260502 (2018).
Omran, A. et al. Generation and manipulation of Schrödinger cat states in Rydberg atom arrays. Science 365, 570–574 (2019).
Gong, M. et al. Genuine 12-qubit entanglement on a superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 110501 (2019).
Thomas, P., Ruscio, L., Morin, O. & Rempe, G. Efficient generation of entangled multiphoton graph states from a single atom. Nature 608, 677–681 (2022).
Yan, F. et al. Tunable coupling scheme for implementing high-fidelity two-qubit gates. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 54062 (2018).
Klimov, P. V. et al. Optimizing quantum gates towards the scale of logical qubits. Nat. Commun. 15, 2442 (2024).
Sung, Y. et al. Realization of high-fidelity CZ and ZZ-free iSWAP gates with a tunable coupler. Phys. Rev. X 11, 21058 (2021).
Bengtsson, A. et al. Model-based optimization of superconducting qubit readout. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 100603 (2024).
Blais, A., Grimsmo, A. L., Girvin, S. M. & Wallraff, A. Circuit quantum electrodynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 25005 (2021).
Jeffrey, E. et al. Fast accurate state measurement with superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 190504 (2014).
Macklin, C. et al. A near–quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier. Science 350, 307–310 (2015).
Woods, W. et al. Determining interface dielectric losses in superconducting coplanar-waveguide resonators. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 14012 (2019).
Murray, C. E., Gambetta, J. M., McClure, D. T. & Steffen, M. Analytical determination of participation in superconducting coplanar architectures. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn. 66, 3724–3733 (2018).
Wenner, J. et al. Surface loss simulations of superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 113513 (2011).
Kamakari, H., Sun, S.-N., Motta, M. & Minnich, A. J. Digital quantum simulation of open quantum systems using quantum imaginary–time evolution. PRX Quantum 3, 10320 (2022).
Ferracin, S. et al. Efficiently improving the performance of noisy quantum computers. Quantum 8, 1410 (2024).
Maurya, S., Mude, C. N., Oliver, W. D., Lienhard, B. & Tannu, S. Scaling qubit readout with hardware efficient machine learning architectures. In Proc. 50th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture 1–13 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2023).
Karamlou, A. H. et al. Probing entanglement in a 2D hard-core Bose–Hubbard lattice. Nature 629, 561–566 (2024).
Guo, Y. & Yang, S. Noise effects on purity and quantum entanglement in terms of physical implementability. npj Quantum Inf. 9, 11 (2023).
Krastanov, S., de la Cerda, A. S. & Narang, P. Heterogeneous multipartite entanglement purification for size-constrained quantum devices. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 33164 (2021).
De Léséleuc, S. et al. Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with rydberg atoms. Science 365, 775–780 (2019).
Walther, P. et al. Experimental one-way quantum computing. Nature 434, 169–176 (2005).
Tame, M. S. et al. Experimental realization of Deutsch’s algorithm in a one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140501 (2007).
Gühne, O. & Tóth, G. Entanglement detection. Phys. Rep. 474, 1–75 (2009).
Flammia, S. T. & Liu, Y.-K. Direct fidelity estimation from few Pauli measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 230501 (2011).
Place, A. P. M. et al. New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds. Nat. Commun. 12, 1779 (2021).
Wu, Y. et al. Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180501 (2021).
Bravyi, S., Sheldon, S., Kandala, A., Mckay, D. C. & Gambetta, J. M. Mitigating measurement errors in multiqubit experiments. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 103, 42605 (2021).
Miller, J. & Miyake, A. Resource quality of a symmetry-protected topologically ordered phase for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 120506 (2015).
Chirame, S., Burnell, F. J., Gopalakrishnan, S. & Prem, A. Stable symmetry-protected topological phases in systems with heralded noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 10403 (2025).
Raussendorf, R., Okay, C., Wang, D.-S., Stephen, D. T. & Nautrup, H. P. Computationally universal phase of quantum matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 90501 (2019).
Stephen, D. T., Wang, D.-S., Prakash, A., Wei, T.-C. & Raussendorf, R. Computational power of symmetry-protected topological phases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 10504 (2017).
Deutsch, D. & Jozsa, R. Rapid solution of problems by quantum computation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A: Math. Phys. Sci. 439, 553–558 (1992).
Broadbent, A. & Kashefi, E. Parallelizing quantum circuits. Theor. Comput. Sci. 410, 2489–2510 (2009).
Lee, W.-R., Qin, Z., Raussendorf, R., Sela, E. & Scarola, V. W. Measurement-based time evolution for quantum simulation of fermionic systems. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L032013 (2022).
de Oliveira, M., Barbosa, L. S. & Galvão, E. F. Quantum advantage in temporally flat measurement-based quantum computation. Quantum 8, 1312 (2024).
Kaldenbach, T. N. & Heller, M. Mapping quantum circuits to shallow-depth measurement patterns based on graph states. Quantum Sci. Technol. 10, 15010 (2024).
Bourassa, J. E. et al. Blueprint for a scalable photonic fault-tolerant quantum computer. Quantum 5, 392 (2021).
Brown, B. J., Nickerson, N. H. & Browne, D. E. Fault-tolerant error correction with the gauge color code. Nat. Commun. 7, 12302 (2016).
Campbell, E. T., Terhal, B. M. & Vuillot, C. Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation. Nature 549, 172–179 (2017).