Pithan, F. & Mauritsen, T. Arctic amplification dominated by temperature feedbacks in contemporary climate models. Nat. Geosci. 7, 181–184 (2014).
Rantanen, M. et al. The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 168 (2022).
Mekonnen, Z. A. et al. Arctic tundra shrubification: a review of mechanisms and impacts on ecosystem carbon balance. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 053001 (2021).
Moon, T., Ahlstrøm, A., Goelzer, H., Lipscomb, W. & Nowicki, S. Rising oceans guaranteed: Arctic land ice loss and sea level rise. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 4, 211–222 (2018).
Smith, D. M. et al. Robust but weak winter atmospheric circulation response to future Arctic sea ice loss. Nat. Commun. 13, 727 (2022).
Vihma, T. Effects of Arctic sea ice decline on weather and climate: a review. Surv. Geophys. 35, 1175–1214 (2014).
Griesche, H. J. et al. Low-level Arctic clouds: a blind zone in our knowledge of the radiation budget. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 597–612 (2024).
Kay, J. E. et al. Recent advances in Arctic cloud and climate research. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 2, 159–169 (2016).
Stevens, R. G. et al. A model intercomparison of CCN-limited tenuous clouds in the high Arctic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 11041–11071 (2018).
Prenni, A. J. et al. Can ice-nucleating aerosols affect Arctic seasonal climate? Bull. Am. Meteorolog. Soc. 88, 541–550 (2007).
Curry, J. A., Schramm, J. L., Rossow, W. B. & Randall, D. Overview of Arctic cloud and radiation characteristics. J. Clim. 9, 1731–1764 (1996).
Mauritsen, T. et al. An Arctic CCN-limited cloud-aerosol regime. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 165–173 (2011).
Pernov, J. B. et al. Increased aerosol concentrations in the High Arctic attributable to changing atmospheric transport patterns. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 5, 62 (2022).
Dall’Osto, M. et al. Regions of open water and melting sea ice drive new particle formation in North East Greenland. Sci. Rep. 8, 6109 (2018).
Park, K. et al. Dimethyl sulfide-induced increase in cloud condensation nuclei in the Arctic atmosphere. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 35, e2021GB006969 (2021).
Beck, L. J. et al. Differing mechanisms of new particle formation at two Arctic sites. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL091334 (2021).
Kecorius, S. et al. New particle formation and its effect on cloud condensation nuclei abundance in the summer Arctic: a case study in the Fram Strait and Barents Sea. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 14339–14364 (2019).
Gilgen, A., Huang, W. T. K., Ickes, L., Neubauer, D. & Lohmann, U. How important are future marine and shipping aerosol emissions in a warming Arctic summer and autumn? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 10521–10555 (2018).
Heslin-Rees, D. et al. From a polar to a marine environment: has the changing Arctic led to a shift in aerosol light scattering properties? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 13671–13686 (2020).
Schmale, J. et al. Pan-Arctic seasonal cycles and long-term trends of aerosol properties from 10 observatories. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 3067–3096 (2022).
Breider, T. J. et al. Impact of BrO on dimethylsulfide in the remote marine boundary layer. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, 2009GL040868 (2010).
Browse, J. et al. The complex response of Arctic aerosol to sea-ice retreat. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 7543–7557 (2014).
Chen, H. & Finlayson-Pitts, B. J. New particle formation from methanesulfonic acid and amines/ammonia as a function of temperature. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 243–252 (2017).
Kirkby, J. et al. Atmospheric new particle formation from the CERN CLOUD experiment. Nat. Geosci. 16, 948–957 (2023).
Asmi, E. et al. Secondary new particle formation in northern Finland Pallas site between the years 2000 and 2010. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 12959–12972 (2011).
Asmi, E. et al. Aerosol size distribution seasonal characteristics measured in Tiksi, Russian Arctic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 1271–1287 (2016).
Baccarini, A. et al. Frequent new particle formation over the high Arctic pack ice by enhanced iodine emissions. Nat. Commun. 11, 4924 (2020).
Boyer, M. et al. A full year of aerosol size distribution data from the central Arctic under an extreme positive Arctic Oscillation: insights from the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 389–415 (2023).
Freud, E. et al. Pan-Arctic aerosol number size distributions: seasonality and transport patterns. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 8101–8128 (2017).
Lee, H. et al. Atmospheric new particle formation characteristics in the Arctic as measured at Mount Zeppelin, Svalbard, from 2016 to 2018. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 13425–13441 (2020).
Nguyen, Q. T. et al. Seasonal variation of atmospheric particle number concentrations, newparticle formation and atmospheric oxidation capacity at the high Arcticsite Villum Research Station, Station Nord. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 11319–11336 (2016).
Tunved, P., Ström, J. & Krejci, R. Arctic aerosol life cycle: linking aerosol size distributions observed between 2000 and 2010 with air mass transport and precipitation at Zeppelin station, Ny-Ålesund. Svalbard. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 3643–3660 (2013).
Winiger, P. et al. Source apportionment of circum-Arctic atmospheric black carbon from isotopes and modeling. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau8052 (2019).
Quinn, P. K. et al. Arctic haze: current trends and knowledge gaps. Tellus B: Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 59, 99 (2007).
Sharma, S. et al. A factor and trends analysis of multidecadal lower tropospheric observations of Arctic aerosol composition, black carbon, ozone, and mercury at Alert, Canada. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124, 14133–14161 (2019).
Willis, M. D., Leaitch, W. R. & Abbatt, J. P. D. Processes controlling the composition and abundance of Arctic aerosol. Rev. Geophys. 56, 621–671 (2018).
Breider, T. J. et al. Multidecadal trends in aerosol radiative forcing over the Arctic: contribution of changes in anthropogenic aerosol to Arctic warming since 1980. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 3573–3594 (2017).
Heslin-Rees, D. et al. Increase in precipitation scavenging contributes to long-term reductions of light-absorbing aerosol in the Arctic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 2059–2075 (2024).
Mackie, A. R. et al. Reduced Arctic air pollution due to decreasing European and North American emissions. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 8692–8700 (2016).
Giamarelou, M. et al. Indirect evidence of the composition of nucleation mode atmospheric particles in the high Arctic. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 965–975 (2016).
Price, R. et al. Late summer transition from a free-tropospheric to boundary layer source of Aitken mode aerosol in the high Arctic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 2927–2961 (2023).
Croft, B. et al. Arctic marine secondary organic aerosol contributes significantly to summertime particle size distributions in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 2787–2812 (2019).
Korhonen, H., Carslaw, K. S., Spracklen, D. V., Ridley, D. A. & Ström, J. A global model study of processes controlling aerosol size distributions in the Arctic spring and summer. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D08211 (2008).
Virtanen, A. et al. High sensitivity of cloud formation to aerosol changes. Nat. Geosci. 18, 289–295 (2025).
Choudhury, G. & Tesche, M. A first global height-resolved cloud condensation nuclei data set derived from spaceborne lidar measurements. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 15, 3747–3760 (2023).
Boyer, M. et al. The annual cycle and sources of relevant aerosol precursor vapors in the central Arctic during the MOSAiC expedition. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 24, 12595–12621 (2024).
Collins, D. B. et al. Frequent ultrafine particle formation and growth in Canadian Arctic marine and coastal environments. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 13119–13138 (2017).
Freitas, G. P. et al. A comprehensive characterisation of natural aerosol sources in the high Arctic during the onset of sea ice melt. Faraday Discuss. 258, 120–146 (2025).
Dall´Osto, M. et al. Arctic sea ice melt leads to atmospheric new particle formation. Sci. Rep. 7, 3318 (2017).
Becagli, S. et al. Relationships linking primary production, sea ice melting, and biogenic aerosol in the Arctic. Atmos. Environ. 136, 1–15 (2016).
Jokinen, T. et al. Measurement report: long-term measurements of aerosol precursor concentrations in the Finnish subarctic boreal forest. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22, 2237–2254 (2022).
Sulo, J. et al. Long-term measurement of sub-3 nm particles and their precursor gases in the boreal forest. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 695–715 (2021).
Garmash, O. et al. Heatwave reveals potential for enhanced aerosol formation in Siberian boreal forest. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 014047 (2024).
Heintzenberg, J., Tunved, P., Galí, M. & Leck, C. New particle formation in the Svalbard region 2006–2015. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 6153–6175 (2017).
Moschos, V. et al. Equal abundance of summertime natural and wintertime anthropogenic Arctic organic aerosols. Nat. Geosci. 15, 196–202 (2022).
Gerland, S. et al. Still Arctic?—the changing Barents Sea. Elem. Sci. Anth. 11, 00088 (2023).
Lind, S., Ingvaldsen, R. B. & Furevik, T. Arctic warming hotspot in the northern Barents Sea linked to declining sea-ice import. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 634–639 (2018).
Bousiotis, D. et al. The effect of meteorological conditions and atmospheric composition in the occurrence and development of new particle formation (NPF) events in Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 3345–3370 (2021).
Li, X. et al. Relative humidity effect on the formation of highly oxidized molecules and new particles during monoterpene oxidation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 1555–1570 (2019).
Byrne, B. et al. Carbon emissions from the 2023 Canadian wildfires. Nature 633, 835–839 (2024).
Lampilahti, A. et al. Insights into new particle formation in a Siberian boreal forest from nanoparticle ranking analysis. Aerosol Res. 3, 441–459 (2025).
Kharuk, V. I. et al. Wildfires in the Siberian taiga. Ambio 50, 1953–1974 (2021).
Wang, Z. et al. Role of atmospheric rivers in shaping long term Arctic moisture variability. Nat. Commun. 15, 5505 (2024).
Dada, L. et al. A central arctic extreme aerosol event triggered by a warm air-mass intrusion. Nat. Commun. 13, 5290 (2022).
Motos, G. et al. Aerosol and dynamical contributions to cloud droplet formation in Arctic low-level clouds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 13941–13956 (2023).
Schmale, J., Zieger, P. & Ekman, A. M. L. Aerosols in current and future Arctic climate. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 95–105 (2021).
Leaitch, W. R. et al. Dimethyl sulfide control of the clean summertime Arctic aerosol and cloud. Elem. Sci. Anth. 1, 000017 (2013).
Regayre, L. A. et al. Identifying climate model structural inconsistencies allows for tight constraint of aerosol radiative forcing. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23, 8749–8768 (2023).
Lehtipalo, K. et al. Multicomponent new particle formation from sulfuric acid, ammonia, and biogenic vapors. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau5363 (2018).
Sipilä, M. et al. Molecular-scale evidence of aerosol particle formation via sequential addition of HIO3. Nature 537, 532–534 (2016).
Kolesar, K. R. et al. Effect of Prudhoe Bay emissions on atmospheric aerosol growth events observed in Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska. Atmos. Environ. 152, 146–155 (2017).
Kyrö, E.-M. et al. Trends in new particle formation in eastern Lapland, Finland: effect of decreasing sulfur emissions from Kola Peninsula. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 4383–4396 (2014).
Wang, H. et al. High temperature sensitivity of Arctic isoprene emissions explained by sedges. Nat. Commun. 15, 6144 (2024).
Chang, R. Y.-W. et al. Relating atmospheric and oceanic DMS levels to particle nucleation events in the Canadian Arctic. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D00S03 (2011).
Meier, W., Fetterer, F., Windnagel, A., Stewart, J. S. & Stafford, T. NOAA/NSIDC climate data record of passive microwave sea ice concentration ver. 5. National Snow and Ice Data Center https://doi.org/10.7265/RJZB-PF78 (2024).
ERA5 monthly averaged data on single levels from 1940 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) https://doi.org/10.24381/CDS.F17050D7 (2019).
Beck, I. et al. Automated identification of local contamination in remote atmospheric composition time series. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 15, 4195–4224 (2022).
Croft, B. et al. Processes controlling the annual cycle of Arctic aerosol number and size distributions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 3665–3682 (2016).
Karlsson, L. et al. Physical and chemical properties of cloud droplet residuals and aerosol particles during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 127, e2021JD036383 (2022).
Väänänen, R. et al. Analysis of particle size distribution changes between three measurement sites in northern Scandinavia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 11887–11903 (2013).
Aliaga, D. et al. Nanoparticle ranking analysis: determining new particle formation (NPF) event occurrence and intensity based on the concentration spectrum of formed (sub-5 nm) particles. Aerosol Res. 1, 81–92 (2023).
Kulmala, M. et al. Quiet new particle formation in the atmosphere. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 912385 (2022).
Lampilahti, J. et al. A cross-correlation-based method for determining size-resolved particle growth rates. Aerosol Res. 3, 637–647 (2025).
Agrò, M. et al. Ventilation and low pollution enhancing new particle formation in Milan, Italy. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 26, 6521–6539 (2026).
Aliaga, D. et al. New particle formation dynamics in the central Andes: contrasting urban and mountaintop environments. Aerosol Res. 3, 15–44 (2025).
Zhang, T. et al. Differential characterization of air ions in boreal forest of Finland and a megacity of eastern China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 25, 10027–10048 (2025).
Dal Maso, M. et al. Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyytiälä, Finland. Boreal Environ. Res. 10, 323 (2005).
Kulmala, M. et al. Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1651–1667 (2012).
Doelling, D. R. et al. Advances in geostationary-derived longwave fluxes for the CERES synoptic (SYN1deg) product. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 33, 503–521 (2016).
Rienecker, M. M. et al. MERRA: NASA’s modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications. J. Clim. 24, 3624–3648 (2011).
Smith, G. L. et al. Clouds and Earth Radiant Energy System (CERES), a review: past, present and future. Adv. Space Res. 48, 254–263 (2011).
Su, W., Charlock, T. P. & Rose, F. G. Deriving surface ultraviolet radiation from CERES surface and atmospheric radiation budget: Methodology. J. Geophys. Res. 110, (2005).
Young, S. A. et al. Extinction and optical depth retrievals for CALIPSO’s Version 4 data release. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11, 5701–5727 (2018).
Didan, K. MODIS/terra vegetation indices monthly L3 global 1 km SIN Grid V061. NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD13A3.061 (2021).
Sea ice concentration from 1978 to present derived from satellite observations. ECMWF https://doi.org/10.24381/CDS.3CD8B812 (2020).
Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 785–794 https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 (ACM, 2016).
Choudhury, G. & Tesche, M. Estimating cloud condensation nuclei concentrations from CALIPSO lidar measurements. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 15, 639–654 (2022).
Choudhury, G. et al. Pristine oceans are a significant source of uncertainty in quantifying global cloud condensation nuclei. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 25, 3841–3856 (2025).
Choudhury, G. & Tesche, M. Assessment of CALIOP-derived CCN concentrations by in situ surface measurements. Remote Sens. 14, 3342 (2022).
Danabasoglu, G. et al. The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2). J. Adv. Model Earth Syst. 12, e2019MS001916 (2020).
Döscher, R. et al. The EC-Earth3 Earth system model for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6. Geosci. Model Dev. 15, 2973–3020 (2022).
Hajima, T. et al. Development of the MIROC-ES2L Earth system model and the evaluation of biogeochemical processes and feedbacks. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 2197–2244 (2020).
Seland, Ø et al. Overview of the Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) and key climate response of CMIP6 DECK, historical, and scenario simulations. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 6165–6200 (2020).
Sellar, A. A. et al. UKESM1: description and evaluation of the U.K. Earth system model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 4513–4558 (2019).
ERA5-Land monthly averaged data from 1950 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) https://doi.org/10.24381/CDS.68D2BB30 (2019).
Chua, S. D. X. & Lehtipalo, K. Dataset for contrasting aerosol-cloud feedbacks across a warming Arctic. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22127460 (2026).