Urban, M. C. et al. Interactions between climate change and urbanization will shape the future of biodiversity. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 436–447 (2024).
Aronson, M. F. J. et al. Hierarchical filters determine community assembly of urban species pools. Ecology 97, 2952–2963 (2016).
Haight, J. D. et al. Urbanization, climate and species traits shape mammal communities from local to continental scales. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1654–1666 (2023).
Hawkins, B. A. Ecology’s oldest pattern? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 470 (2001).
Hillebrand, H. On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Am. Nat. 163, 192–211 (2004).
Pontarp, M. et al. The latitudinal diversity gradient: novel understanding through mechanistic eco-evolutionary models. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 211–223 (2019).
Feng, X. et al. Rethinking ecological niches and geographic distributions in face of pervasive human influence in the Anthropocene. Biol. Rev. 99, 1481–1503 (2024).
Díaz, M. et al. The geography of fear: a latitudinal gradient in anti-predator escape distances of birds across Europe. PLoS ONE 8, e64634 (2013).
Capinha, C., Essl, F., Seebens, H., Moser, D. & Pereira, H. M. Biogeography. The dispersal of alien species redefines biogeography in the Anthropocene. Science 348, 1248–1251 (2015).
Keck, F. et al. The global human impact on biodiversity. Nature 641, 395–400 (2025).
Finn, C., Grattarola, F. & Pincheira-Donoso, D. More losers than winners: investigating Anthropocene defaunation through the diversity of population trends. Biol. Rev. 98, 1732–1748 (2023).
Murthy, A. C., Fristoe, T. S. & Burger, J. R. Homogenizing effects of cities on North American winter bird diversity. Ecosphere 7, e01216 (2016).
Mariyappan, M. et al. Ecological role and ecosystem services of birds: a review. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change 13, 76–87 (2023).
Barbet-Massin, M. & Jetz, W. The effect of range changes on the functional turnover, structure and diversity of bird assemblages under future climate scenarios. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2917–2928 (2015).
Şekercioğlu, Ç. H. Promoting community-based bird monitoring in the tropics: conservation, research, environmental education, capacity-building, and local incomes. Biol. Conserv. 151, 69–73 (2012).
Sullivan, B. L. et al. The eBird enterprise: an integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biol. Conserv. 169, 31–40 (2014).
Rodrigues, J. F. M. & Botero, C. A. The global determinants of climate niche breadth in birds. Nat. Commun. 16, 3685 (2025).
Morelli, F. et al. Insurance for the future? Potential avian community resilience in cities across Europe. Climatic Change 159, 195–214 (2020).
Backstrom, L. J., Callaghan, C. T., Worthington, H., Fuller, R. A. & Johnston, A. Estimating sampling biases in citizen science datasets. Ibis 167, 73–87 (2024).
Chao, A. et al. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 45–67 (2014).
Barnosky, A. D. et al. Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature 486, 52–58 (2012).
Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016).
Rigal, S. et al. Farmland practices are driving bird population decline across Europe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2216573120 (2023).
Kaminski, A., Bauer, D. M., Bell, K. P., Loftin, C. S. & Nelson, E. J. Using landscape metrics to characterize towns along an urban–rural gradient. Landsc. Ecol. 36, 2937–2956 (2021).
Blackburn, T. M. & Duncan, R. P. Determinants of establishment success in introduced birds. Nature 414, 195–197 (2001).
Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).
Gudex-Cross, D. et al. Winter conditions structure extratropical patterns of species richness of amphibians, birds and mammals globally. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 1366–1380 (2022).
Fristoe, T. S. et al. Metabolic heat production and thermal conductance are mass-independent adaptations to thermal environment in birds and mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15934–15939 (2015).
Hsiung, A. C., Boyle, W. A., Cooper, R. J. & Chandler, R. B. Altitudinal migration: ecological drivers, knowledge gaps, and conservation implications: animal altitudinal migration review. Biol. Rev. 93, 2049–2070 (2018).
Bonnet-Lebrun, A.-S., Manica, A. & Rodrigues, A. S. L. Effects of urbanization on bird migration. Biol. Conserv. 244, 108423 (2020).
Oro, D., Genovart, M., Tavecchia, G., Fowler, M. S. & Martínez-Abraín, A. Ecological and evolutionary implications of food subsidies from humans. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1501–1514 (2013).
Shochat, E., Lerman, S. & Fernández-Juricic, E. Birds in urban ecosystems: population dynamics, community structure, biodiversity, and conservation. In Agronomy Monographs (eds Aitkenhead-Peterson, J. & Volder, A.) 75–86 (American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 2010).
Stark, J. R. & Fridley, J. D. Microclimate-based species distribution models in complex forested terrain indicate widespread cryptic refugia under climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 562–575 (2022).
Kurucz, K., Purger, J. J. & Batáry, P. Urbanization shapes bird communities and nest survival, but not their food quantity. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 26, e01475 (2021).
González-Lagos, C., Cardador, L. & Sol, D. Invasion success and tolerance to urbanization in birds. Ecography 44, 1642–1652 (2021).
Hellmann, J. J., Byers, J. E., Bierwagen, B. G. & Dukes, J. S. Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv. Biol. 22, 534–543 (2008).
Hurlbert, A. H. & White, E. P. Disparity between range map- and survey-based analyses of species richness: patterns, processes and implications: range map- vs. survey-based species richness. Ecol. Lett. 8, 319–327 (2005).
Jin, J. et al. Concurrent and lagged effects of spring greening on seasonal carbon gain and water loss across the Northern Hemisphere. Int. J. Biometeorol. 64, 1343–1354 (2020).
Zhang, L. et al. Direct and indirect impacts of urbanization on vegetation growth across the world’s cities. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo0095 (2022).
Wang, R. & Zhao, J. Effects of evergreen trees on landscape preference and perceived restorativeness across seasons. Landsc. Res. 45, 649–661 (2020).
Sulaiman, S., Mohamad, N. H. N. & Idilfitri, S. Contribution of vegetation in urban parks as habitat for selective bird community. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 85, 267–281 (2013).
Hernández-Brito, D., Carrete, M., Popa-Lisseanu, A. G., Ibáñez, C. & Tella, J. L. Crowding in the city: losing and winning competitors of an invasive bird. PLoS ONE 9, e100593 (2014).
Pelletier, N., Arndt, J., Darvill, R. & Cyr, M.-A. Natural and human-made nesting habitat use by bank swallow (Riparia riparia) in Canada. Can. Field Nat. 136, 228–236 (2023).
Bernat-Ponce, E., Gil-Delgado, J. A. & López-Iborra, G. M. House sparrow nesting site selection in urban environments: a multivariate approach in Mediterranean Spain. Urban Sci. 8, 108 (2024).
Larson, D. W., Matthes, U., Kelly, P. E., Lundholm, J. & Gerrath, J. A. The urban cliff hypothesis and its relevance to ekistics. Ekistics 71, 76–82 (2004).
Mikula, P., Blumstein, D. T. & Tryjanowski, P. Behavioral convergence under urbanization: an overlooked dimension of biotic homogenization. PLoS Biol. 24, e3003689 (2026).
Mikula, P., Morelli, F., Menzel, A. & Tryjanowski, P. Urban birds’ detectability is affected by inter- and intraspecific variation in shyness. Ibis 168, 711–722 (2026).
Chace, J. F. & Walsh, J. J. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc. Urban Plann. 74, 46–69 (2006).
Chen, G. et al. Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways. Nat. Commun. 11, 537 (2020).
Beatley, T. The Bird-Friendly City: Creating Safe Urban Habitats (Island Press, 2020).
eBird. eBird Basic Dataset. Cornell Lab of Ornithology https://science.ebird.org/en/use-ebird-data/download-ebird-data-products (accessed 21 September 2021).
Qiao, H. et al. Global birdwatching data reveal uneven consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. Biol. Conserv. 288, 110351 (2023).
Hochachka, W. M., Alonso, H., Gutiérrez-Expósito, C., Miller, E. & Johnston, A. Regional variation in the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quantity and quality of data collected by the project eBird. Biol. Conserv. 254, 108974 (2021).
Zhang, G. Spatial and temporal patterns in volunteer data contribution activities: a case study of eBird. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9, 597 (2020).
EBird Basic Dataset Metadata v1.14. Scribd https://www.scribd.com/document/855010075/EBird-Basic-Dataset-Metadata-v1-14 (2022).
Sullivan, B. L. et al. eBird: a citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biol. Conserv. 142, 2282–2292 (2009).
Fink, D. et al. Modeling avian full annual cycle distribution and population trends with citizen science data. Ecol. Appl. 30, e02056 (2020).
Callaghan, C. T. et al. Quantifying effort needed to estimate species diversity from citizen science data. Ecosphere 13, e3966 (2022).
Fink, D. et al. Spatiotemporal exploratory models for broad-scale survey data. Ecol. Appl. 20, 2131–2147 (2010).
Shen, F.-Y., Ding, T.-S. & Tsai, J.-S. Comparing avian species richness estimates from structured and semi-structured citizen science data. Sci. Rep. 13, 1214 (2023).
Steen, V. A., Elphick, C. S. & Tingley, M. W. An evaluation of stringent filtering to improve species distribution models from citizen science data. Divers. Distrib. 25, 1857–1869 (2019).
Buckley, Y. M. & Catford, J. Does the biogeographic origin of species matter? Ecological effects of native and non-native species and the use of origin to guide management. J. Ecol. 104, 4–17 (2016).
Both, C. et al. Avian population consequences of climate change are most severe for long-distance migrants in seasonal habitats. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277, 1259–1266 (2010).
About North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS). USGS https://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/bbs/about/ (2023).
METADATA: Digital Distribution Maps on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN, 2017).
Chiron, F., Shirley, S. & Kark, S. Human-related processes drive the richness of exotic birds in Europe. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276, 47–53 (2009).
Lazarina, M. et al. Urbanization and human population favor species richness of alien birds. Diversity 12, 72 (2020).
Maréchaux, I., Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Charpentier, A. The value of coarse species range maps to inform local biodiversity conservation in a global context. Ecography 40, 1166–1176 (2017).
Hawkins, B. A., Rueda, M. & Rodríguez, M. Á. What do range maps and surveys tell us about diversity patterns? Folia Geobot 43, 345–355 (2008).
Mathias, P. V. C., Mendonça, C. V., Rangel, T. F. L. V. & Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. Sensitivity of macroecological patterns of South American parrots to differences in data sources. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 13, 193–198 (2004).
Jensen, A. J. et al. Mammals on the margins: identifying the drivers and limitations of range expansion. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70222 (2025).
Lemoine, R. T. & Svenning, J.-C. Nativeness is not binary—a graduated terminology for native and non-native species in the Anthropocene. Restor. Ecol. 30, e13636 (2022).
Geluso, K. Winter activity of Brazilian free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) at Carlsbad Cavern, New Mexico. Southwest. Nat. 53, 243–247 (2008).
Feng, X. et al. A review of the heterogeneous landscape of biodiversity databases: opportunities and challenges for a synthesized biodiversity knowledge base. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 1242–1260 (2022).
Lepage, D., Vaidya, G. & Guralnick, R. Avibase—a database system for managing and organizing taxonomic concepts. Zookeys 420, 117–135 (2014).
Hughes, A. C. et al. Sampling biases shape our view of the natural world. Ecography 44, 1259–1269 (2021).
Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H. & Chao, A. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1451–1456 (2016).
Chao, A. & Jost, L. Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93, 2533–2547 (2012).
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. LmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26 (2017).
Dormann, C. F. et al. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30, 609–628 (2007).
Aguirre-López, L. J., Hurlbert, A. H. & Feng, X. The multifaceted effects of anthropogenic and climatic factors on ecological networks. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 35, e70246 (2026).
Fairbairn, A. J. et al. NDVI and vegetation volume as predictors of urban bird diversity. Sci. Rep. 15, 12863 (2025).
Turner, W. R., Nakamura, T. & Dinetti, M. Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience 54, 585 (2004).
Burger, J. R., Weinberger, V. P. & Marquet, P. A. Extra-metabolic energy use and the rise in human hyper-density. Sci. Rep. 7, 43869 (2017).
Burger, J. R. et al. Global city densities: re-examining urban scaling theory. Front. Conserv. Sci. 3, 879934 (2022).
Liao, C., Luo, Y., Tang, X., Ma, Z. & Li, B. Effects of human population density on the pattern of terrestrial nature reserves in China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 20, e00762 (2019).
Karger, D. N. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci. Data 4, 170122 (2017).
Bondarenko, M. et al. The spatial distribution of population in 2015-2030 at a resolution of 30 arc (approximately 1km at the equator), R2025A version v1. WorldPop–University of Southampton https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/WP00845 (2025).
Didan, K. MODIS/Terra vegetation indices monthly L3 global 1km SIN Grid V061. NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD13A3.061 (2021).
Huang, K. & Lu, M. Nested economies of scale in global city mass. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.03960 (2025).
Zhang, Y., Song, Y. G., Zhang, C. Y., Wang, T. R. & Su, T. H. Latitudinal diversity gradient in the changing world: retrospectives and perspectives. Diversity 14, 334 (2022).
Clark, C. Urban population densities. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 114, 490 (1951).
Hawley, A. H. Population density and the city. Demography 9, 521–529 (1972).
Chen, Y. et al. Urbanization-induced vegetation phenological changes: variability across vegetation types and zones in China. Urban For. Urban Green 107, 128782 (2025).
Lefcheck, J. S. piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579 (2016).
Ferenc, M. et al. Are cities different? Patterns of species richness and beta diversity of urban bird communities and regional species assemblages in Europe: urban bird species richness and beta diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 479–489 (2014).
Uchida, K. et al. Urban biodiversity and the importance of scale. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 123–131 (2021).
Chapman, S., Watson, J. E. M., Salazar, A., Thatcher, M. & McAlpine, C. A. The impact of urbanization and climate change on urban temperatures: a systematic review. Landscape Ecol. 32, 1921–1935 (2017).
Breheny, P. & Burchett, W. Visualization of regression models using visreg. R J. 9, 56–71 (2017).
Xie, Y., Chen, X., Burger, J., Hurlbert, A. & Feng, X. Code and data for cities alter the latitudinal diversity gradient of birds in North America. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21172733 (2026).