{"id":135810,"date":"2025-11-15T04:57:30","date_gmt":"2025-11-15T04:57:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/135810\/"},"modified":"2025-11-15T04:57:30","modified_gmt":"2025-11-15T04:57:30","slug":"dual-process-theory-and-decision-making-in-large-language-models","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/135810\/","title":{"rendered":"Dual-process theory and decision-making in large language models"},"content":{"rendered":"

Pierson, B. Lawsuit claims UnitedHealth AI wrongfully denies elderly extended care. Reuters https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/legal\/lawsuit-claims-unitedhealth-ai-wrongfully-denies-elderly-extended-care-2023-11-14<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Schreiber, M. New AI tool counters health insurance denials decided by automated algorithms. The Guardian https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/2025\/jan\/25\/health-insurers-ai<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Au Yeung, J. et al. AI chatbots not yet ready for clinical use. Front. Digit. Health 5, 1161098 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Azaria, A., Azoulay, R. & Reches, S. ChatGPT is a remarkable tool \u2014 for experts. Data Intell. 6, 240\u2013296 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Meyrowitsch, D. W., Jensen, A. K., S\u00f8rensen, J. B. & Varga, T. V. AI chatbots and (mis)information in public health: impact on vulnerable communities. Front. Public Health 11, 1226776 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, J. H. et al. When ChatGPT gives incorrect answers: the impact of inaccurate information by generative AI on tourism decision-making. J. Travel Res. 64, 51\u201373 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sartori, G. & Orr\u00f9, G. Language models and psychological sciences. Front. Psychol. 14, 1279317 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dillion, D., Tandon, N., Gu, Y. & Gray, K. Can AI language models replace human participants? Trends Cogn. Sci. 27, 597\u2013600 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kaddour, J. et al. Challenges and applications of large language models. Preprint at arXiv http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2307.10169<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Griewing, S. et al. Evolution of publicly available large language models for complex decision-making in breast cancer care. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 310, 537\u2013550 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jimenez, C. E. et al. SWE-bench: can language models resolve real-world Github issues? Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2310.06770<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Jusman, I. A., Ausat, A. M. A. & Sumarna, A. Application of ChatGPT in business management and strategic decision making. J. Minfo Polgan 12, 1688\u20131697 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lee, P., Bubeck, S. & Petro, J. Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI chatbot for medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 1233\u20131239 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Basir, A., Puspitasari, E. D., Aristarini, C. C., Sulastri, P. D. & Ausat, A. M. A. Ethical use of ChatGPT in the context of leadership and strategic decisions. J. Minfo Polgan 12, 1239\u20131246 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gloria, B., Melsbach, J., Bienert, S. & Schoder, D. Real-GPT: efficiently tailoring LLMs for informed decision-making in the real estate industry. J. Real Estate Portf. Manag. 31, 56\u201372 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Binz, M. & Schulz, E. Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2218523120 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Demszky, D. et al. Using large language models in psychology. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 688\u2013701 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hagendorff, T. Machine psychology: investigating emergent capabilities and behavior in large language models using psychological methods. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2303.13988<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

White, J. et al. A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with ChatGPT. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2302.11382<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Abbate, F. Natural and artificial intelligence: a comparative analysis of cognitive aspects. Minds Mach. 33, 791\u2013815 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rich, A. S. & Gureckis, T. M. Lessons for artificial intelligence from the study of natural stupidity. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 174\u2013180 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shiffrin, R. & Mitchell, M. Probing the psychology of AI models. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2300963120 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Suri, G., Slater, L. R., Ziaee, A. & Nguyen, M. Do large language models show decision heuristics similar to humans? A case study using GPT-3.5. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 153, 1066\u20131075 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Qu, Y. et al. Promoting interactions between cognitive science and large language models. Innovation 5, 100579 (2024).<\/p>\n

PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Thaler, R. H. Behavioral economics: past, present, and future. Am. Econ. Rev. 106, 1577\u20131600 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kahneman, D. Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 93, 1449\u20131475 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Evans, J. S. & Stanovich, K. E. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Persp. Psychol. Sci. 8, 223\u2013241 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Evans, J. S. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 255\u2013278 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (eds Gilovich, T. et al.) 49\u201381 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).<\/p>\n

Gigerenzer, G. & Brighton, H. Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1, 107\u2013143 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kahneman, D. & Klein, G. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. Am. Psychol. 64, 515\u2013526 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Smolensky, P. Connectionist AI, symbolic AI, and the brain. Artif. Intell. Rev. 1, 95\u2013109 (1987).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Goel, A. Looking back, looking ahead: symbolic versus connectionist AI. AI Mag. 42, 83\u201385 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bellini-Leite, S. C. Dual process theory: embodied and predictive; symbolic and classical. Front. Psychol. 13, 805386 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bellini-Leite, S. C. Dual process theory for large language models: an overview of using psychology to address hallucination and reliability issues. Adapt. Behav. 32, 329\u2013343 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Clark, A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 181\u2013204 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Newell, A. Physical symbol systems. Cogn. Sci. 4, 135\u2013183 (1980).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Marcus, G. The next decade in AI: four steps towards robust artificial intelligence. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2002.06177<\/a> (2020).<\/p>\n

Hagendorff, T., Fabi, S. & Kosinski, M. Human-like intuitive behavior and reasoning biases emerged in large language models but disappeared in ChatGPT. Nat. Comput. Sci. 3, 833\u2013838 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ma, D., Zhang, T. & Saunders, M. Is ChatGPT humanly irrational? Preprint at Res. Sq. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21203\/rs.3.rs-3220513\/v1<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Wei, J. et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 24824\u201324837 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gigerenzer, G. & Gaissmaier, W. Heuristic decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 451\u2013482 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124\u20131131 (1974).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Frederick, S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econ. Perspect. 19, 25\u201342 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Erickson, T. D. & Mattson, M. E. From words to meaning: a semantic illusion. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 20, 540\u2013551 (1981).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Toplak, M. E., West, R. F. & Stanovich, K. E. The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Mem. Cogn. 39, 1275\u20131289 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J. & Fugelsang, J. A. Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition? Behav. Res. Meth. 48, 341\u2013348 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, Y., Kirshner, S. N., Ovchinnikov, A., Andiappan, M. & Jenkin, T. A manager and an AI walk into a bar: does ChatGPT make biased decisions like we do? Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag.\u00a027, 339\u2013678 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jones, E. & Steinhardt, J. Capturing failures of large language models via human cognitive biases. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 11785\u201311799 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pantana, G., Castello, M. & Torre, I. Examining cognitive biases in ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 through human evaluation and linguistic comparison. In Proc. 16th Conf. Assoc. Mach. Transl. Am. (eds Knowles, R., Eriguchi, A. & Goel, S.) 250\u2013260 (AMTA, 2024).<\/p>\n

Ryu, J., Kim, J. & Kim, J. A study on the representativeness heuristics problem in large language models. IEEE Access. 12, 147958\u2013147966 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453\u2013458 (1981).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nickerson, R. S. Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2, 175\u2013220 (1998).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lou, J. & Sun, Y. Anchoring bias in large language models: an experimental study. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2412.06593<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Talboy, A. N. & Fuller, E. Challenging the appearance of machine intelligence: cognitive bias in LLMs and best practices for adoption. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2304.01358<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Azaria, A. ChatGPT: more human-like than computer-like, but not necessarily in a good way. In 2023 IEEE 35th Int. Conf. Tools Artif. Intell. (eds Esposito, A., Yang, M. & Cordasco, G.) 468\u2013473 (IEEE, 2023).<\/p>\n

Acerbi, A. & Stubbersfield, J. M. Large language models show human-like content biases in transmission chain experiments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2313790120 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schramowski, P., Turan, C., Andersen, N., Rothkopf, C. A. & Kersting, K. Large pre-trained language models contain human-like biases of what is right and wrong to do. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 258\u2013268 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gallegos, I. O. et al. Bias and fairness in large language models: a survey. Comput. Linguist. 50, 1097\u20131179 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, P., Xiao, Z., Chen, H. & Oswald, F. L. Will the real Linda please stand up\u2026to large language models? Examining the representativeness heuristic in LLMs. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2404.01461<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Nguyen, J. K. Human bias in AI models? Anchoring effects and mitigation strategies in large language models. J. Behav. Exp. Finance\u00a043, 100971 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychol. Rev. 90, 293\u2013315 (1983).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn. Psychol. 5, 207\u2013232 (1973).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G. & Prelec, D. \u201cCoherent arbitrariness\u201d: stable demand curves without stable preferences*. Q. J. Econ. 118, 73\u2013106 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search. Commun. ACM 19, 113\u2013126 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yao, S. et al. Tree of thoughts: deliberate problem solving with large language models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 11809\u201311822 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Du, M. Machine vs. human, who makes a better judgment on innovation? Take GPT-4 for example. Front. Artif. Intell. 6, 1206516 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ziegler, D. M. et al. Fine-tuning language models from human preferences. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.1909.08593<\/a> (2019).<\/p>\n

Ouyang, L. et al. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 27730\u201327744 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Su, D., Sukhbaatar, S., Rabbat, M., Tian, Y. & Zheng, Q. Dualformer: controllable fast and slow thinking by learning with randomized reasoning traces. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2410.09918<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Shang, Y., Li, Y., Xu, F. & Li, Y. Defint: a default-interventionist framework for efficient reasoning with hybrid large language models. Preprint at arXiv 2402.02563 (2024).<\/p>\n

Kojima, T., Gu, S. (Shane)., Reid. M., Matsuo. Y, & Iwasawa, Y. Large language models are zero-shot reasoners. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 22199\u201322213 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Weston, J. & Sukhbaatar, S. System 2 Attention (is something you might need too). Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2311.11829<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Zhang, H., Huang, J., Li, Z., Naik, M. & Xing, E. Improved logical reasoning of language models via differentiable symbolic programming. In Find. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (eds Rogers, A., Boyd-Graber, J. & Okazaki, N.) 3062\u20133077 (ACL, 2023).<\/p>\n

Zhu, X. et al. Solving math word problems via cooperative reasoning induced language models. In Proc. 61st Ann. Meet. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (Rogers, A., Boyd-Graber, J. & Okazaki, N.) 4471\u20134485 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n

Raoelison, M., Thompson, V. A. & De Neys, W. The smart intuitor: cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking. Cognition 204, 104381 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

De Neys, W. & Pennycook, G. Logic, fast and slow: advances in dual-process theorizing. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 28, 503\u2013509 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Reyna, V. F. & Brainerd, C. J. Numeracy, gist, literal thinking and the value of nothing in decision making. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 421\u2013439 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bubeck, S. et al. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: early experiments with GPT-4. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2303.12712<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Sclar, M., Choi, Y., Tsvetkov, Y. & Suhr, A. Quantifying language models\u2019 sensitivity to spurious features in prompt design or: how I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting. Prepint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2310.11324<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Pezeshkpour, P. & Hruschka, E. Large language models sensitivity to the order of options in multiple-choice questions. In Find. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (eds Duh, K., Gomez, H. & Bethard, S.) 2006\u20132017 (ACL, 2024).<\/p>\n

Loya, M., Sinha, D. A. & Futrell, R. Exploring the sensitivity of LLMs\u2019 decision-making capabilities: insights from prompt variation and hyperparameters. In Find. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (eds Bouamor, H., Pino, J. & Bali, K.) 3711\u20133716 (ACL, 2023).<\/p>\n

Barez, F. et al. Chain-of-thought is not explainability. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/www.alphaxiv.org\/overview\/2025.02v3<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Zhang, Z. et al. Multimodal chain-of-thought reasoning in language models. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. https:\/\/openreview.net\/forum?id=y1pPWFVfvR<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Chakraborty, N., Ornik, M. & Driggs-Campbell, K. Hallucination detection in foundation models for decision-making: a flexible definition and review of the state of the art. ACM Comput. Surv. 57, 188:1\u2013188:35 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stella, M., Hills, T. T. & Kenett, Y. N. Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-like models needs to extend beyond human biases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA\u00a0120, e2312911120 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, L. et al. A survey on hallucination in large language models: principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 43, 42 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Smith, A. L., Greaves, F. & Panch, T. Hallucination or confabulation? Neuroanatomy as metaphor in large language models. PLoS Digital Health 2, e0000388 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Singh, A. K., Lamichhane, B., Devkota, S., Dhakal, U. & Dhakal, C. Do large language models show human-like biases? Exploring confidence\u2013competence gap in AI. Information 15, 92 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Borji, A. A Categorical archive of ChatGPT failures. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2302.03494<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Kopelman, M. D. Varieties of confabulation and delusion. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry 15, 14\u201337 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Johnson, D. D. P. & Fowler, J. H. The evolution of overconfidence. Nature 477, 317\u2013320 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

McCoy, R. T., Yao, S., Friedman, D., Hardy, M. & Griffiths, T. L. Embers of autoregression: understanding large language models through the problem they are trained to solve. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2309.13638<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Perkovi\u0107, G., Drobnjak, A. & Boti\u010dki, I. Hallucinations in LLMs: understanding and addressing challenges. In 47th MIPRO ICT Electron. Conv. (ed. Babic, S.) 2084\u20132088 (IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n

Sun, F., Li, N., Wang, K. & Goette, L. Large language models are overconfident and amplify human bias. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2505.02151<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Casper, S. et al. Open problems and fundamental limitations of reinforcement learning from human feedback. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3929\/ethz-b-000651806<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhou, K., Hwang, J. D., Ren, X. & Sap, M. Relying on the unreliable: the impact of language models\u2019 reluctance to express uncertainty. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2401.06730<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Zhou, K., Jurafsky, D. & Hashimoto, T. Navigating the grey area: how expressions of uncertainty and overconfidence affect language models. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2302.13439<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Dunning, D. in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. 44 (eds Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P.) 247\u2013296 (Academic, 2011).<\/p>\n

Ji, Z. et al. Towards mitigating LLM hallucination via self reflection. In Find. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (eds Bouamor, H., Pino, J. & Bali, K.) 1827\u20131843 (ACL, 2023).<\/p>\n

O\u2019Leary, D. E. Confirmation and specificity biases in large language models: an explorative study. IEEE Intell. Syst. 40, 63\u201368 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wei, J. et al. Emergent abilities of large language models. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. https:\/\/openreview.net\/forum?id=yzkSU5zdwD<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

McCoy, R. T., Pavlick, E. & Linzen, T. Right for the wrong reasons: diagnosing syntactic heuristics in natural language inference. In Proc. Conf. 57th Ann. Meet. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (eds Korhonen, A., Traum, D. & M\u00e0rquez, L.) 3428\u20133448 (ACL, 2020).<\/p>\n

Webson, A. & Pavlick, E. Do prompt-based models really understand the meaning of their prompts? In Proc. 2022 Conf. North Am. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguist. Hum. Lang. Technol. (eds Carpuat, M., de Marneffe, M.-C. & Meza Ruiz, I. V.) 2300\u20132344 (ACL, 2022).<\/p>\n

Lampinen, A. K. et al. Language models, like humans, show content effects on reasoning tasks. PNAS Nexus 3, 233 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brown, T. et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 1877\u20131901 (2020).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zheng, H. & Zhan, H. ChatGPT in scientific writing: a cautionary tale. Am. J. Med. 136, 725\u2013726.e6 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mitchell, M. & Krakauer, D. C. The debate over understanding in AI\u2019s large language models. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA\u00a0120, e2215907120 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nelson, A. B. & Shiffrin, R. M. The co-evolution of knowledge and event memory. Psychol. Rev. 120, 356\u2013394 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A. & Shmitchell, S. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: can language models be too big? In Proc. 2021 ACM Conf. Fairness Account. Transpar. (eds Elish, M. C., Isaac, W. & Zemel, R.) 610\u2013623 (ACM, 2021).<\/p>\n

Webb, T., Holyoak, K. J. & Lu, H. Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1526\u20131541 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Heinlein, R. A. Stranger in a Strange Land (Putnam, 1969).<\/p>\n

Power, A., Burda, Y., Edwards, H., Babuschkin, I. & Misra, V. Grokking: generalization beyond overfitting on small algorithmic datasets. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2201.02177<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F. & Sripada, C. Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Persp. Psychol. Sci. 8, 119\u2013141 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liu, S. et al. Using AI-generated suggestions from ChatGPT to optimize clinical decision support. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 30, 1237\u20131245 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gu, Y. et al. Domain-specific language model pretraining for biomedical natural language processing. ACM Trans. Comput. Healthc. 3, 2 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Silva, G. A. Can AI understand what it\u2019s telling you? Forbes https:\/\/www.forbes.com\/sites\/gabrielasilva\/2025\/04\/23\/can-ai-understand-the-chinese-room-argument-says-no-but-is-it-right<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Ananthaswamy, A. New theory suggests chatbots can understand text. Quanta Magazine https:\/\/www.quantamagazine.org\/new-theory-suggests-chatbots-can-understand-text-20240122\/<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Moskvichev, A. K., Odouard, V. V. & Mitchell, M. The ConceptARC benchmark: evaluating understanding and generalization in the ARC domain. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. https:\/\/openreview.net\/forum?id=8ykyGbtt2q<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Dijkstra, E. W. On IPW\u2019s. Univ. Texas Austin https:\/\/www.cs.utexas.edu\/~EWD\/transcriptions\/EWD08xx\/EWD867.html<\/a> (1983).<\/p>\n

Thirunavukarasu, A. J. et al. Large language models in medicine. Nat. Med. 29, 1930\u20131940 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nori, H., King, N., McKinney, S. M., Carignan, D. & Horvitz, E. Capabilities of GPT-4 on medical challenge problems. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2303.13375<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Nori, H. et al. Sequential diagnosis with language models. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2506.22405<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Nie, Y. et al. A survey of large language models for financial applications: progress, prospects and challenges. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2406.11903<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Ayd\u0131n, \u00d6. & Karaarslan, E. OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: digital twin in healthcare. Emerg. Comput. Technol. 2, 22\u201331 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ke, L., Tong, S., Cheng, P. & Peng, K. Exploring the frontiers of LLMs in psychological applications: a comprehensive review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 58, 305 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hua, S., Jin, S. & Jiang, S. The limitations and ethical considerations of ChatGPT. Data Intell. 6, 201\u2013239 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chuma, E. L. & de Oliveira, G. G. Generative AI for business decision-making: a case of ChatGPT. Manag. Sci. Bus. Decis. 3, 5\u201311 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P. & Rock, D. GPTs are GPTs: labor market impact potential of LLMs. Science 384, 1306\u20131308 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Weidinger, L. et al. Ethical and social risks of harm from language models. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2112.04359<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n

Chen, J., Liu, L., Ruan, S., Li, M. & Yin, C. Are different versions of ChatGPT\u2019s ability comparable to the clinical diagnosis presented in case reports? A descriptive study. J. Multidisc. Healthc. 16, 3825\u20133831 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

OpenAI. Introducing ChatGPT. OpenAI https:\/\/openai.com\/blog\/chatgpt<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

An, J., Huang, D., Lin, C. & Tai, M. Measuring gender and racial biases in large language models. Preprint at arXiv http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2403.15281<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Liang, P. P., Wu, C., Morency, L.-P. & Salakhutdinov, R. Towards understanding and mitigating social biases in language models. In Proc. 38th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (eds Meila, M. & Zhang, T.) 6565\u20136576 (PMLR, 2021).<\/p>\n

Peters, D., Vold, K., Robinson, D. & Calvo, R. A. Responsible AI \u2014 two frameworks for ethical design practice. IEEE Trans. Technol. Soc. 1, 34\u201347 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Gershman, S. J. Building machines that learn and think like people. Behav. Brain Sci. 40, e253 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liang, J. T., Lin, M., Rao, N. & Myers, B. A. Prompts are programs too! Understanding how developers build software containing prompts. Proc. ACM Softw. Eng. 2, 1591\u20131614 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

De Neys, W. Bias and conflict: a case for logical intuitions. Persp. Psychol. Sci. 7, 28\u201338 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Neys, W. D. Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinking. Behav. Brain Sci. 46, e111 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yao, S. et al. ReAct: synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2210.03629<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Wang, G. et al. Voyager: an open-ended embodied agent with large language models. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. https:\/\/openreview.net\/forum?id=ehfRiF0R3a<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Nathani, D. et al. MLGym: a new framework and benchmark for advancing AI research agents. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2502.14499<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Paglieri, D. et al. BALROG: benchmarking agentic LLM and VLM reasoning on games. In Proc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. (ICLR, 2025).<\/p>\n

Liu, X. et al. Agentbench: evaluating LLMs as agents. In Proc. Int. Conf. Learning Represent. (ICLR, 2024).<\/p>\n

Huang, J. et al. How far are we on the decision-making of LLMs? Evaluating LLMs\u2019 gaming ability in multi-agent environments. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2403.11807<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Leng, Y. & Yuan, Y. Do LLM agents exhibit social behavior? Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2312.15198<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Costarelli, A. et al. GameBench: evaluating strategic reasoning abilities of LLM agents. In Lang. Gamific. NeurIPS 2024 Workshop (NeurIPS, 2024).<\/p>\n

Trencsenyi, V., Mensfelt, A. & Stathis, K. Approximating human strategic reasoning with LLM-enhanced recursive reasoners leveraging multi-agent hypergames. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2502.07443<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Dwivedi, Y. K. et al. Opinion paper: \u201cSo what if ChatGPT wrote it?\u201d Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inform. Manag. 71, 102642 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vaugrante, L., Niepert, M. & Hagendorff, T. A looming replication crisis in evaluating behavior in language models? Evidence and solutions. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2409.20303<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Koo, R. et al. Benchmarking cognitive biases in large language models as evaluators. In Find. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (eds Ku, L.-W., Martins, A. & Srikumar, V.) 517\u2013545 (ACL, 2024).<\/p>\n

Wang, Y., Cai, Y., Chen, M., Liang, Y. & Hooi, B. Primacy effect of ChatGPT. In Proc. 2023 Conf. Empir. Methods Nat. Lang. Process. (eds Bouamor, H., Pino, J. & Bali, K.) 108\u2013115 (ACL, 2023).<\/p>\n

Mina, M., Ruiz-Fern\u00e1ndez, V., Falc\u00e3o, J., Vasquez-Reina, L. & Gonzalez-Agirre, A. Cognitive biases, task complexity, and result intepretability in large language models. In Proc. 31st Int. Conf. Comput. Linguist. (eds Rambow, O. et al.) 1767\u20131784 (ACL, 2025).<\/p>\n

Hochreiter, S. & Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735\u20131780 (1997).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Radford, A. et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog 1, 9 (2019).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

OpenAI. Learning to reason with LLMs. OpenAI https:\/\/openai.com\/index\/learning-to-reason-with-llms<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Pfau, J., Merrill, W. & Bowman, S. R. Let\u2019s think dot by dot: hidden computation in transformer language models. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2404.15758<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Guo, D. et al. DeepSeek-R1 incentivizes reasoning in LLMs through reinforcement learning. Nature 645, 633\u2013638 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kosinski, M. Evaluating large language models in theory of mind tasks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2405460121 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Turpin, M., Michael, J., Perez, E. & Bowman, S. Language models don\u2019t always say what they think: unfaithful explanations in chain-of-thought prompting. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 36, 74952\u201374965 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ameisen, E. et al. Circuit tracing: revealing computational graphs in language models. AI Transformer Circuits Thread https:\/\/transformer-circuits.pub\/2025\/attribution-graphs\/methods.html<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Peter, S., Riemer, K. & West, J. D. The benefits and dangers of anthropomorphic conversational agents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2415898122 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Guthrie, S. E. Faces in the Clouds: A New Theory of Religion (Oxford Univ. Press, 1995).<\/p>\n

Jones, C. R. & Bergen, B. K. Large language models pass the Turing test. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2503.23674<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Singhal, K. et al. Toward expert-level medical question answering with large language models. Nat. Med. 31, 943\u2013950 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zerkouk, M., Mihoubi, M. & Chikhaoui, B. A comprehensive review of AI-based intelligent tutoring systems: applications and challenges. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2507.18882<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Colombatto, C. & Fleming, S. M. Folk psychological attributions of consciousness to large language models. Neurosci. Conscious. 2024, niae013 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Aldahoul, N. et al. Large language models are often politically extreme, usually ideologically inconsistent, and persuasive even in informational contexts. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2505.04171<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Lawrence, H. R. et al. The opportunities and risks of large language models in mental Health. JMIR Ment. Health 11, e59479 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhang, Y., Zhao, D., Hancock, J. T., Kraut, R. & Yang, D. The rise of AI companions: how human-chatbot relationships influence well-being. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2506.12605<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Akbulut, C., Weidinger, L., Manzini, A., Gabriel, I. & Rieser, V. All too human? Mapping and mitigating the risk from anthropomorphic AI. In Proc. AAAI\/ACM Conf. AI Ethics Soc. Vol. 7 (eds Das, S. et al.) 13\u201326 (AAAI, 2024).<\/p>\n

Shanahan, M. Talking about large language models. Commun. ACM 67, 68\u201379 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zador, A. et al. Catalyzing next-generation artificial intelligence through neuroAI. Nat. Commun. 14, 1597 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Moser, E. I., Kropff, E. & Moser, M.-B. Place cells, grid cells, and the brain\u2019s spatial representation system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, 69\u201389 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., Summerfield, C. & Botvinick, M. Neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence. Neuron 95, 245\u2013258 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mirzadeh, S. I. et al. GSM-symbolic: understanding the limitations of mathematical reasoning in large language models. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2410.05229<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Kumaran, D., Hassabis, D. & McClelland, J. L. What learning systems do intelligent agents need? Complementary learning systems theory updated. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 512\u2013534 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Connell, L. & Lynott, D. What can language models tell us about human cognition? Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 33, 181\u2013189 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mart\u00ednez, L., Ruan, D. & Herrera, F. Computing with words in decision support systems: an overview on models and applications. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 3, 382\u2013395 (2010).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Perlis, R. H., Goldberg, J. F., Ostacher, M. J. & Schneck, C. D. Clinical decision support for bipolar depression using large language models. Neuropsychopharmacology 49, 1412\u20131416 (2024)<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chiriatti, M., Ganapini, M., Panai, E., Ubiali, M. & Riva, G. The case for human\u2013AI interaction as system 0 thinking. Nat. Hum. Behav. 8, 1829\u20131830 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Essuman, A. B. & Amankwa, J. O. ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 6, 100198 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rasmequan, S. & Russ, S. Cognitive artefacts for decision support. In SMC 2000 Proc. Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybernet. (von Keutz, S. et al.) 651\u2013656 (IEEE, 2000).<\/p>\n

Vicente, L. & Matute, H. Humans inherit artificial intelligence biases. Sci. Rep. 13, 15737 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Treiman, L. S., Ho, C.-J. & Kool, W. The consequences of AI training on human decision-making. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2408731121 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Frentz, T. S. Memory, myth, and rhetoric in plato\u2019s phaedrus. Rhetor. Soc. Q. 36, 243\u2013262 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Heersmink, R. Extended mind and cognitive enhancement: moral aspects of cognitive artifacts. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 16, 17\u201332 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Carr, N. The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains (W. W. Norton, 2020).<\/p>\n

Tanil, C. T. & Yong, M. H. Mobile phones: the effect of its presence on learning and memory. PLoS ONE 15, e0219233 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Clemenson, G. D., Maselli, A., Fiannaca, A. J., Miller, A. & Gonzalez-Franco, M. Rethinking GPS navigation: creating cognitive maps through auditory clues. Sci. Rep. 11, 7764 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dahmani, L. & Bohbot, V. D. Habitual use of GPS negatively impacts spatial memory during self-guided navigation. Sci. Rep. 10, 6310 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bai, L., Liu, X. & Su, J. ChatGPT: the cognitive effects on learning and memory. Brain-X 1, e30 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Costello, T. H., Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. Durably reducing conspiracy beliefs through dialogues with AI. Science 385, eadq1814 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Heersmink, R. Use of large language models might affect our cognitive skills. Nat. Hum. Behav. 8, 805\u2013806 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Pierson, B. Lawsuit claims UnitedHealth AI wrongfully denies elderly extended care. Reuters https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/legal\/lawsuit-claims-unitedhealth-ai-wrongfully-denies-elderly-extended-care-2023-11-14 (2023). Schreiber, M. New AI…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":135811,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[44706,2294,27677,111,139,69,2290,147],"class_list":["post-135810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-science","tag-decision-making","tag-general","tag-human-behaviour","tag-new-zealand","tag-newzealand","tag-nz","tag-psychology","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=135810"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135810\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/135811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=135810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=135810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=135810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}