\u201cI never thought I\u2019d have to wait this long for the money. It\u2019s been very hard on me financially. I left the village for personal family reasons,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n
Troy Churton of the Retirement Village Residents\u2019 Association wants the Commerce Commission to take action against Metlifecare. Photo \/ NZME<\/p>\n
Troy Churton and Nigel Matthews of the association complained to the commission about Metlifecare\u2019s $30,000 cashback incentive to new buyers, which they said disadvantaged people like Price.<\/p>\n
The association alleged Metlifecare<\/a> had breached the Fair Trading Act and retirement villages regulations and wants the company to get a warning for its conduct and for enforcement action to occur.<\/p>\n It had long-held concerns with operators\u2019 promotional techniques relating to the sale and resale of units in villages across the industry, the complaint said.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is strong potential that some promotional techniques impact not only on new unit sales times but also existing unit resale times and therefore impact on the rights of residents entering and exiting villages. The commission has previously recognised strong public interest in ensuring terms in occupational right agreements are fair,\u201d the November 13 complaint said.<\/p>\n Metlifecare\u2019s spokeswoman said incentives to sell new units brought further buyers for existing ones and the company had done all it could to sell Price\u2019s apartment.<\/p>\n \u201cThis resident\u2019s unit has essentially been sold three times in the past 15 months,\u201c she said, citing contracts signed but without final settlement.<\/p>\n Two buyers failed to settle because sales on their homes could not be completed. <\/p>\n \u201cThis is not Metlifecare\u2019s fault or doing, but entirely the result of a signed incoming resident\u2019s deal being unable to settle. It happens, unfortunately, in this market,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Price said what irked her most is the marketing priority given to new units at Greenwich Gardens, with Metlifecare offering a $30,000 cash-back incentive to new buyers.<\/p>\n She hoped a live offer would settle.<\/p>\n Metlifecare does too.<\/p>\n The company spokeswoman said of the commission complaint: \u201cWe have no knowledge of this. Metlifecare hasn\u2019t been contacted and FYI the cashback promotion is not anything to do with unfair contract terms, so unlikely the commission will be interested at all.\u201d<\/p>\n The company said nor was it at fault for Price\u2019s place remaining unsold.<\/p>\n \u201cThe falling over of multiple offers on this unit is definitely unfortunate and perhaps reflective of the wider real estate market and general economy. <\/p>\n \u201cHowever, that does not in any way indicate that Metlifecare, as the operator, is unable to sell units, resale or otherwise,\u201d the spokeswoman said.<\/p>\n Matthews said other incentives offered to new buyers offered were:<\/p>\n Free\u00a0laundry\/linen service for towels and bed sheets;Free happy hour on Thursdays in the new units block only;Free daily morning tea, coffee and muffin.<\/p>\n But the Metlifecare spokeswoman said incentives had not had a negative impact on Price\u2019s resale.<\/p>\n \u201cOn the contrary, it has brought more buyers into the village overall as it was intended to do, some of whom have then decided to buy resale units instead,\u201d she said on the $30,000 cashback offer.<\/p>\n On allegations the promotion disadvantages resales, the spokeswoman said: \u201cIt has had no negative impact on former residents who are awaiting repayment of their capital sum. <\/p>\n \u201cWe have sold many resale units while the cashback offer on new units was in place, so it\u2019s wrong to claim that the campaign negatively impacted resales.\u201d<\/p>\n The $30,000 offer finished last month, she said.<\/p>\n A commission spokesman said a complaint has been received but it has yet to go through the assessment process.<\/p>\n No decision has been made on whether further action was required.<\/p>\nNigel Matthews, of the Retirement Village Residents Association, is among those who want the Government to refresh laws that they say disadvantage residents.<\/p>\n
Greenwich Gardens at Unsworth Heights in Auckland.<\/p>\n
The exterior of Greenwich Gardens at Unsworth Heights, where a number of incentives are offered to new buyers.<\/p>\n