{"id":158726,"date":"2025-11-28T22:43:17","date_gmt":"2025-11-28T22:43:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/158726\/"},"modified":"2025-11-28T22:43:17","modified_gmt":"2025-11-28T22:43:17","slug":"light-detection-and-ranging-of-natural-systems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/158726\/","title":{"rendered":"Light detection and ranging of natural systems"},"content":{"rendered":"

Duncanson, L. et al. Aboveground biomass density models for NASA\u2019s global ecosystem dynamics investigation (GEDI) lidar mission. Remote. Sens. Environ. 270, 112845 (2022). This paper describes the use of the space-based lidar system GEDI to characterize biomass dynamics globally.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Smith, B. et al. Pervasive ice sheet mass loss reflects competing ocean and atmosphere processes. Science 368, 1239\u20131242 (2020). This paper demonstrates the ability of lidar data to characterize dynamic ice-sheet mass balance and provide insight into global change processes linked to anthropogenic climate change.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Winiwarter, L., Anders, K., Czerwonka-Schr\u00f6der, D. & H\u00f6fle, B. Full four-dimensional change analysis of topographic point cloud time series using Kalman filtering. Earth Surf. Dynam. 11, 593\u2013613 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mandlburger, G., Hauer, C., Wieser, M. & Pfeifer, N. Topo-bathymetric LiDAR for monitoring river morphodynamics and instream habitats\u2014a case study at the Pielach river. Remote. Sens. 7, 6160\u20136195 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hamraz, H., Contreras, M. A. & Zhang, J. Forest understory trees can be segmented accurately within sufficiently dense airborne laser scanning point clouds. Sci. Rep. 7, 6770 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wagner, N., Franke, G., Schmieder, K. & Mandlburger, G. Automatic classification of submerged macrophytes at Lake Constance using laser bathymetry point clouds. Remote. Sens. 16, 2257 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chase, A. F. et al. Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize. J. Archaeo. Sci. 38, 387\u2013398 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Eitel, J. U. H. et al. Beyond 3-D: the new spectrum of lidar applications for earth and ecological sciences. Remote. Sens. Environ. 186, 372\u2013392 (2016). This review provides an overview of ecological lidar applications facilitated by integrating multi-temporal lidar scans and return intensity information.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Baltsavias, E. P. Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 54, 199\u2013214 (1999).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wagner, W. Radiometric calibration of small-footprint full-waveform airborne laser scanner measurements: basic physical concepts. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 65, 505\u2013513 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wehr, A. & Lohr, U. Airborne laser scanning\u2014an introduction and overview. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 54, 68\u201382 (1999).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, Q., Tan, Y. & Mei, Z. Computational methods of acquisition and processing of 3D point cloud data for construction applications. Arch. Computat Methods Eng. 27, 479\u2013499 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pfeifer, N. & Briese, C. Geometrical aspects of airborne laser scanning and terrestrial laser scanning. In ISPRS Workshop on Laser Scanning Vol. XXXVI (eds R\u00f6nnholm P. et al.) 311\u2013319 (ISPRS, 2007).<\/p>\n

Fiocco, G. & Smullin, L. D. Detection of scattering layers in the upper atmosphere (60\u2013140\u2009km) by optical radar. Nature 199, 1275\u20131276 (1963).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rempel, R. C. & Parker, A. K. An information note on an airborne laser terrain profiler for micro-relief studies. In Proc. 3rd Symp. Remote Sensing of Environment 321\u2013337 (University of Michigan Institute of Science and Technology, 1964).<\/p>\n

Schawlow, A. L. & Townes, C. H. Infrared and optical masers. Phys. Rev. 112, 1940\u20131949 (1958).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nelson, R. How did we get here? An early history of forestry lidar. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 39, S6\u2013S17 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lefsky, M. A., Cohen, W. B., Parker, G. G. & Harding, D. J. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience 52, 19 (2002).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Markus, T. et al. The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): science requirements, concept, and implementation. Remote. Sens. Environ. 190, 260\u2013273 (2017). This paper outlines the design and implementation of ICESat-2.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dubayah, R. et al. The global ecosystem dynamics investigation: high-resolution laser ranging of the earth\u2019s forests and topography. Sci. Remote. Sens. 1, 100002 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, J. et al. 3D forest mapping using a low-cost UAV laser scanning system: investigation and comparison. Remote. Sens. 11, 717 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wallace, L., Lucieer, A. & Watson, C. S. Evaluating tree detection and segmentation routines on very high resolution UAV LiDAR data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. 52, 7619\u20137628 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brown, R., Hartzell, P. & Glennie, C. Evaluation of SPL100 single photon lidar data. Remote. Sens. 12, 722 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mandlburger, G., Lehner, H. & Pfeifer, N. A comparison of single photon and full waveform lidar. In ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. Vol. IV-2\/W5 (eds Vosselman G. et al.) 397\u2013404 (ISPRS, 2019).<\/p>\n

N\u00e6sset, E. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote. Sens. Environ. 80, 88\u201399 (2002). This paper outlines the concept of using area-based lidar summary metrics to predict forest attributes.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Butler, H., Chambers, B., Hartzell, P. & Glennie, C. PDAL: an open source library for the processing and analysis of point clouds. Computers Geosci. 148, 104680 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Roussel, J.-R. et al. lidR: an R package for analysis of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. Remote. Sens. Environ. 251, 112061 (2020). This paper outlines an open-source software package that was originally developed for processing lidar point cloud data into output datasets for ALS in forest environments and is now widely used across many applications.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Goodbody, T. R. H. et al. Integration of airborne laser scanning data into forest ecosystem management in canada: current status and future directions. Forestry Chron. 100, 238\u2013258 (2024). This paper outlines the integration of ALS into the management of Canadian forests, exemplifying the multi-use and cost-sharing principles of modern ALS collections.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

White, J. C. et al. Enhanced forest inventories in Canada: implementation, status, and research needs. Can. J. For. Res. 55, 1\u201337 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Puliti, S. et al. Benchmarking tree species classification from proximally sensed laser scanning data: introducing the FOR-species20K dataset. Methods Ecol. Evol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/2041-210X.14503<\/a> (2025). This paper demonstrates various deep learning techniques that accurately classify tree species from lidar point clouds.<\/p>\n

Li, N. et al. A progress review on solid-state LiDAR and nanophotonics-based LiDAR sensors. Laser Photonics Rev. 16, 2100511 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stysley, P. R. et al. Long term performance of the high output maximum efficiency resonator (HOMER) laser for NASAresonator (HOMER) laser for NASA\u2019s global ecosystem dynamics investigation (GEDI) lidar. Opt. Laser Technol. 68, 67\u201372 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Magruder, L., Brunt, K., Neumann, T., Klotz, B. & Alonzo, M. Passive ground-based optical techniques for monitoring the on-orbit ICESat-2 altimeter geolocation and footprint diameter. Earth Space Sci. 8, e2020EA001414 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hopkinson, C., Chasmer, L., Gynan, C., Mahoney, C. & Sitar, M. Multisensor and multispectral LiDAR characterization and classification of a forest environment. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 42, 501\u2013520 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Szafarczyk, A. & To\u015b, C. The use of green laser in LiDAR bathymetry: state of the art and recent advancements. Sensors 23, 292 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Irwin, L., Coops, N. C., Queinnec, M., McCartney, G. & White, J. C. Single photon lidar signal attenuation under boreal forest conditions. Remote. Sens. Lett. 12, 1049\u20131060 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Degnan, J. Scanning, multibeam, single photon lidars for rapid, large scale, high resolution, topographic and bathymetric mapping. Remote. Sens. 8, 958 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gluckman, J. Design of the processing chain for a high-altitude, airborne, single photon lidar mapping instrument. In Laser Radar Technology and Applications XXI Vol. 9832 (eds Turner, M. D. & Kamerman, G. W.) 1\u20139 (SPIE, 2016).<\/p>\n

Riu, J., Sicard, M., Royo, S. & Comer\u00f3n, A. Silicon photomultiplier detector for atmospheric lidar applications. Opt. Lett. 37, 1229 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Buzhan, P. et al. Silicon photomultiplier and its possible applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 504, 48\u201352 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

White, J. C. et al. Evaluating the capacity of single photon lidar for terrain characterization under a range of forest conditions. Remote. Sens. Environ. 252, 112169 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brown, R., Hartzell, P. & Glennie, C. Evaluation of SPL100 Single Photon Lidar Data. Remote Sensing. 12, 722 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shan, J. & Toth, C. K. Topographic Laser Ranging and Scanning: Principles and Processing (CRC Press, 2018). This text explains the fundamentals of laser scanning and its applications in topography and across other disciplines.<\/p>\n

Glira, P., Pfeifer, N. & Mandlburger, G. Rigorous strip adjustment of UAV-based laser scanning data including time-dependent correction of trajectory errors. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 82, 945\u2013954 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, X., Liang, X., Campos, M., Zhang, J. & Wang, Y. Benchmarking of laser-based simultaneous localization and mapping methods in forest environments. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. 62, 1\u201321 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ullrich, A. Resolving range ambiguities in high-repetition rate airborne light detection and ranging applications. J. Appl. Remote. Sens. 6, 063552 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rieger, P. Range ambiguity resolution technique applying pulse-position modulation in time-of-flight scanning lidar applications. Opt. Eng. 53, 061614 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kersten, T. P. & Lindstaedt, M. Geometric accuracy investigations of terrestrial laser scanner systems in the laboratory and in the field. Appl. Geomat. 14, 421\u2013434 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lin, Y., Hyypp\u00e4, J. & Kukko, A. Stop-and-go mode: sensor manipulation as essential as sensor development in terrestrial laser scanning. Sensors 13, 8140\u20138154 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Knechtel, J., Klingbeil, L., Haunert, J.-H. & Dehbi, Y. Optimal position and path planning for stop-and-go laser scanning for the acquisition of 3D building models. In ISPRS Ann. Photogrammetry, Remote. Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. Vol. V-4-2022 (eds Zlatanova S. et al.) 129\u2013136 (ISPRS, 2022).<\/p>\n

Weiser, H. et al. Individual tree point clouds and tree measurements from multi-platform laser scanning in German forests. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 2989\u20133012 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kissling, W. D. et al. Country-wide data of ecosystem structure from the third Dutch airborne laser scanning survey. Data Brief. 46, 108798 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vosselman, G. Automated planimetric quality control in high accuracy airborne laser scanning surveys. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 74, 90\u2013100 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Takeuchi, N., Baba, H., Sakurai, K. & Ueno, T. Diode-laser random-modulation CW lidar. Appl. Opt. 25, 63 (1986).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nasim, H. & Jamil, Y. Diode lasers: from laboratory to industry. Opt. Laser Technol. 56, 211\u2013222 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fitzgerald A. M. MEMS inertial sensors. In Position, Navigation, and Timing Technologies in the 21st Century: Integrated Satellite Navigation, Sensor Systems, and Civil Applications Vol. 2 (eds Morton Y. et al.) 1435\u20131446 (Wiley, 2021).<\/p>\n

Wulder, M. A. et al. Fifty years of Landsat science and impacts. Remote. Sens. Environ. 280, 113195 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Toth, C. & J\u00f3\u017ak\u00f3w, G. Remote sensing platforms and sensors: a survey. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 115, 22\u201336 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Thomas, T. C., Luthcke, S. B., Pennington, T. A., Nicholas, J. B. & Rowlands, D. D. ICESat-2 precision orbit determination. Earth Space Sci. 8, e2020EA001496 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sun, X. Review of photodetectors for space lidars. Sensors 24, 6620 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Neumann, T. A. et al. The Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 mission: a global geolocated photon product derived from the advanced topographic laser altimeter system. Remote. Sens. Environ. 233, 111325 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brede, B. et al. Non-destructive tree volume estimation through quantitative structure modelling: comparing UAV laser scanning with terrestrial LIDAR. Remote. Sens. Environ. 233, 111355 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dubayah, R. et al. GEDI launches a new era of biomass inference from space. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 095001 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Deems, J. S., Painter, T. H. & Finnegan, D. C. Lidar measurement of snow depth: a review. J. Glaciol. 59, 467\u2013479 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

C\u00f4t\u00e9, J.-F., Fournier, R. A. & Egli, R. An architectural model of trees to estimate forest structural attributes using terrestrial LiDAR. Environ. Model. Softw. 26, 761\u2013777 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hodgson, M. E. & Bresnahan, P. Accuracy of airborne lidar-derived elevation: empirical assessment and error budget. Photogramm. Eng. Remote. Sens. 70, 331\u2013339 (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

May, N. C. & Toth, C. Point positioning accuracy of airborne LIDAR systems: a rigorous analysis. In PIA07: Photogramm. Image Analysis Vol. 36 (eds Stilla U. et al.) 107\u2013111 (ISPRS, 2007).<\/p>\n

Bae, S. et al. Performance of ICESat-2 precision pointing determination. Earth Space Sci. 8, e2020EA001478 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Acar, M. et al. Deformation analysis with total least squares. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 6, 663\u2013669 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Besl, P. J. & McKay, N. D. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14, 239\u2013256 (1992).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Glira, P., Pfeifer, N., Briese, C. & Ressl, C. A correspondence framework for ALS strip adjustments based on variants of the ICP algorithm. PFG 2015, 275\u2013289 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Legat, K. Approximate direct georeferencing in national coordinates. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 60, 239\u2013255 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Makadia, A., Patterson, A. I. & Daniilidis, K. Fully automatic registration of 3D point clouds. In 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition\u2014Volume 1 (CVPR\u201906) Vol. 1 1297\u20131304 (IEEE, 2006).<\/p>\n

Schr\u00f6der, D., Anders, K., Winiwarter, L. & Wujanz, D. Permanent terrestrial LiDAR monitoring in mining, natural hazard prevention and infrastructure protection\u2014chances, risks, and challenges: a case study of a rockfall in Tyrol, Austria. In Proc. 5th Joint Int. Symp. Deformation Monitoring\u2014JISDM 2022 (Editorial de la Univ. Polit\u00e8cnica de Val\u00e8ncia, 2022).<\/p>\n

Kuhlmann, H., Schwieger, V., Wieser, A. & Niemeier, W. Engineering geodesy\u2014definition and core competencies. J. Appl. Geodesy 8, 279\u2013290 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Axelsson, P. Processing of laser scanner data\u2014algorithms and applications. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 54, 138\u2013147 (1999).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Axelsson, P. DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 33, 110\u2013117 (2000).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhao, X. et al. A comparison of LiDAR filtering algorithms in vegetated mountain areas. Can. J. Remote. Sens. 44, 287\u2013298 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jin, S., Su, Y., Zhao, X., Hu, T. & Guo, Q. A point-based fully convolutional neural network for airborne LiDAR ground point filtering in forested environments. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote. Sens. 13, 3958\u20133974 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Van Ewijk, K. Y., Treitz, P. M. & Scott, N. A. Characterizing forest succession in central Ontario using lidar-derived indices. Photogramm. Eng. Remote. Sens. 77, 261\u2013269 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lefsky, M. A. et al. Lidar remote sensing of the canopy structure and biophysical properties of Douglas-fir western hemlock forests. Remote. Sens. Environ. 70, 339\u2013361 (1999).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Drake, J. B. et al. Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar. Remote. Sens. Environ. 79, 305\u2013319 (2002).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Popescu, S. C. & Wynne, R. H. Seeing the trees in the forest: using lidar and multispectral data fusion with local filtering and variable window size for estimating tree height. Photogramm. Eng. Remote. Sens. 70, 589\u2013604 (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhao, H., Morgenroth, J., Pearse, G. & Schindler, J. A systematic review of individual tree crown detection and delineation with convolutional neural networks (CNN). Curr. Forestry Rep. 9, 149\u2013170 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Otepka, J., Ghuffar, S., Waldhauser, C., Hochreiter, R. & Pfeifer, N. Georeferenced point clouds: a survey of features and point cloud management. IJGI 2, 1038\u20131065 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Remondino, F. From point cloud to surface: the modeling and visualization problem. In Int. Workshop on Visualization and Animation of Reality-based 3D Models (eds Gruen A. et al.) 1\u201311 (ISPRS, 2003).<\/p>\n

Li, J. & Wong, D. W. S. Effects of DEM sources on hydrologic applications. Computers Environ. Urban. Syst. 34, 251\u2013261 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lague, D., Brodu, N. & Leroux, J. Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z). ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 82, 10\u201326 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

\u00d6tsch, E., Harmening, C. & Neuner, H. Investigation of space-continuous deformation from point clouds of structured surfaces. J. Appl. Geodesy 17, 1\u201313 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Harmening, C., Hobmaier, C. & Neuner, H. Laser scanner-based deformation analysis using approximating B-spline surfaces. Remote. Sens. 13, 3551 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gojcic, Z., Zhou, C. & Wieser, A. F2S3: robustified determination of 3D displacement vector fields using deep learning. J. Appl. Geodesy 14, 177\u2013189 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

De G\u00e9lis, I., Lef\u00e8vre, S. & Corpetti, T. Siamese KPConv: 3D multiple change detection from raw point clouds using deep learning. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 197, 274\u2013291 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Han, M., Sha, J., Wang, Y. & Wang, X. PBFormer: point and bi-spatiotemporal transformer for pointwise change detection of 3D urban point clouds. Remote. Sens. 15, 2314 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kharroubi, A., Poux, F., Ballouch, Z., Hajji, R. & Billen, R. Three dimensional change detection using point clouds: a review. Geomatics 2, 457\u2013485 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schwarz, R. K., Pfeifer, N., Pfennigbauer, M. & Mandlburger, G. Depth measurement bias in pulsed airborne laser hydrography induced by chromatic dispersion. IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett. 18, 1332\u20131336 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Guenther, G. C., Cunningham, A. G., LaRocque, P. E. & Reid, D. J. Meeting the accuracy challenge in airborne laser bathymetry. In Proc. EARSeL LiDAR Workshop Vol. 1, 1\u201327 (EARSeL, 2000).<\/p>\n

Mandlburger, G., Pfennigbauer, M. & Pfeifer, N. Analyzing near water surface penetration in laser bathymetry\u2014a case study at the River Pielach. In ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. Vol. II-5\/W2 (eds Scaioni M. et al.) 175\u2013180 (ISPRS, 2013).<\/p>\n

Wang, C. et al. A comparison of waveform processing algorithms for single-wavelength LiDAR bathymetry. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 101, 22\u201335 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schwarz, R., Mandlburger, G., Pfennigbauer, M. & Pfeifer, N. Design and evaluation of a full-wave surface and bottom-detection algorithm for LiDAR bathymetry of very shallow waters. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 150, 1\u201310 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schwarz, R., Pfeifer, N., Pfennigbauer, M. & Ullrich, A. Exponential decomposition with implicit deconvolution of lidar backscatter from the water column. PFG 85, 159\u2013167 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mitchell, S., Thayer, J. P. & Hayman, M. Polarization lidar for shallow water depth measurement. Appl. Opt. 49, 6995 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ackroyd, C., Donahue, C. P., Menounos, B. & Skiles, S. M. Airborne lidar intensity correction for mapping snow cover extent and effective grain size in mountainous terrain. GIScience Remote Sens. 61, 2427326 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Studinger, M. et al. Estimating differential penetration of green (532\u2009nm) laser light over sea ice with NASA\u2019s airborne topographic mapper: observations and models. Cryosphere 18, 2625\u20132652 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

White, J. C. et al. A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach. Forestry Chron. 89, 722\u2013723 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Keefe, R. F., Zimbelman, E. G. & Picchi, G. Use of individual tree and product level data to improve operational forestry. Curr. Forestry Rep. 8, 148\u2013165 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Krisanski, S., Taskhiri, M. S., Gonzalez Aracil, S., Herries, D. & Turner, P. Sensor agnostic semantic segmentation of structurally diverse and complex forest point clouds using deep learning. Remote Sens. 13, 1413 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Puliti, S., Breidenbach, J. & Astrup, R. Estimation of forest growing stock volume with UAV laser scanning data: can it be done without field data? Remote Sens. 12, 1245 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Seely, H. et al. Modelling tree biomass using direct and additive methods with point cloud deep learning in a temperate mixed forest. Sci. Remote Sens. 8, 100110 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yrttimaa, T. et al. Exploring tree growth allometry using two-date terrestrial laser scanning. For. Ecol. Manag. 518, 120303 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Riofr\u00edo, J., White, J. C., Tompalski, P., Coops, N. C. & Wulder, M. A. Harmonizing multi-temporal airborne laser scanning point clouds to derive periodic annual height increments in temperate mixedwood forests. Can. J. For. Res. 52, 1334\u20131352 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tompalski, P. et al. Estimating changes in forest attributes and enhancing growth projections: a review of existing approaches and future directions using airborne 3D point cloud data. Curr. Forestry Rep. 7, 1\u201324 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jarron, L. R., Coops, N. C., MacKenzie, W. H., Tompalski, P. & Dykstra, P. Detection of sub-canopy forest structure using airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 244, 111770 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dakin Kuiper, S. et al. Characterizing stream morphological features important for fish habitat using airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sens. Environ. 272, 112948 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stackhouse, L. A. et al. Characterizing riparian vegetation and classifying riparian extent using airborne laser scanning data. Ecol. Indic. 152, 110366 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tompalski, P., Coops, N. C., White, J. C., Wulder, M. A. & Yuill, A. Characterizing streams and riparian areas with airborne laser scanning data. Remote Sens. Environ. 192, 73\u201386 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dakin Kuiper, S., Coops, N. C., Jarron, L. R., Tompalski, P. & White, J. C. An automated approach to detecting instream wood using airborne laser scanning in small coastal streams. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 118, 103272 (2023).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jarron, L. R., Coops, N. C., MacKenzie, W. H. & Dykstra, P. Detection and quantification of coarse woody debris in natural forest stands using airborne LiDAR. For. Sci. 67, 550\u2013563 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cosgrove, C., Coops, N., Waterhouse, F. & Goodbody, T. Modeling marbled murrelet nesting habitat: a quantitative approach using airborne laser scanning data in British Columbia, Canada. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 19, art5 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Neuenschwander, A. & Pitts, K. The ATL08 land and vegetation product for the ICESat-2 mission. Remote Sens. Environ. 221, 247\u2013259 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Queinnec, M., Coops, N. C. & White, J. C. Characterizing post-fire northern boreal forest height dynamics. Int. J. Remote Sens. 45, 2182\u20132207 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Travers-Smith, H. et al. Mapping vegetation height and identifying the northern forest limit across Canada using ICESat-2, Landsat time series and topographic data. Remote Sens. Environ. 305, 114097 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Arkin, J., Coops, N. C., Daniels, L. D. & Plowright, A. Estimation of vertical fuel layers in tree crowns using high density LiDAR data. Remote Sens. 13, 4598 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gerbrecht, E. C., Coops, N. C., Carroll, A. L., Bater, C. W. & Buechner, L. Estimation of forest structure and fuel change across mountain pine beetle-attacked forests using mobile and RPAS-based LiDAR. Can. J. Remote Sensing. 51, 2505418 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Qi, Y., Coops, N. C., Daniels, L. D. & Butson, C. R. Comparing tree attributes derived from quantitative structure models based on drone and mobile laser scanning point clouds across varying canopy cover conditions. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 192, 49\u201365 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kraus, K. & Pfeifer, N. Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 53, 193\u2013203 (1998).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fabbri, S., Sauro, F., Santagata, T., Rossi, G. & De Waele, J. High-resolution 3-D mapping using terrestrial laser scanning as a tool for geomorphological and speleogenetical studies in caves: an example from the Lessini Mountains (North Italy). Geomorphology 280, 16\u201329 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Xiong, L., Li, S., Tang, G. & Strobl, J. Geomorphometry and terrain analysis: data, methods, platforms and applications. Earth Sci. Rev. 233, 104191 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Passalacqua, P. et al. Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes: a review. Earth Sci. Rev. 148, 174\u2013193 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Telling, J., Lyda, A., Hartzell, P. & Glennie, C. Review of Earth science research using terrestrial laser scanning. Earth Sci. Rev. 169, 35\u201368 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brasington, J., Vericat, D. & Rychkov, I. Modeling river bed morphology, roughness, and surface sedimentology using high resolution terrestrial laser scanning. Water Resour. Res. 48, W11519 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wheaton, J. M., Brasington, J., Darby, S. E. & Sear, D. A. Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: improved sediment budgets. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 35, 136\u2013156 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jaboyedoff, M. et al. Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: a review. Nat. Hazards 61, 5\u201328 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dietrich, A. & Krautblatter, M. Deciphering controls for debris-flow erosion derived from a LiDAR-recorded extreme event and a calibrated numerical model (Ro\u00dfbichelbach, Germany). Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 44, 1346\u20131361 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jaboyedoff, M. et al. in Natural Hazards (eds Singh, R. P. & Bartlett, D.) 397\u2013420 (CRC, 2018).<\/p>\n

Evans, I. S. Geomorphometry and landform mapping: what is a landform? Geomorphology 137, 94\u2013106 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tarolli, P. High-resolution topography for understanding earth surface processes: opportunities and challenges. Geomorphology 216, 295\u2013312 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sz\u00e9kely, B., Z\u00e1molyi, A., Draganits, E. & Briese, C. Geomorphic expression of neotectonic activity in a low relief area in an airborne laser scanning DTM: a case study of the Little Hungarian Plain (Pannonian Basin). Tectonophysics 474, 353\u2013366 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Qin, R., Tian, J. & Reinartz, P. 3D change detection\u2014approaches and applications. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 122, 41\u201356 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rosser, N. J., Petley, D. N., Lim, M., Dunning, S. A. & Allison, R. J. Terrestrial laser scanning for monitoring the process of hard rock coastal cliff erosion. QJEGH 38, 363\u2013375 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jaboyedoff, M. et al. Use of terrestrial laser scanning for the characterization of retrogressive landslides in sensitive clay and rotational landslides in river banks. Can. Geotech. J. 46, 1379\u20131390 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Abell\u00e1n, A., Calvet, J., Vilaplana, J. M. & Blanchard, J. Detection and spatial prediction of rockfalls by means of terrestrial laser scanner monitoring. Geomorphology 119, 162\u2013171 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Anders, N. S., Seijmonsbergen, A. C. & Bouten, W. Geomorphological change detection using object-based feature extraction from multi-temporal LiDAR data. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 10, 1587\u20131591 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Goodwin, N. R., Armston, J., Stiller, I. & Muir, J. Assessing the repeatability of terrestrial laser scanning for monitoring gully topography: a case study from Aratula, Queensland, Australia. Geomorphology 262, 24\u201336 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cosma, M. et al. Sedimentology of a hypertidal point bar (Mont-Saint-Michel Bay, north-western France) revealed by combining lidar time-series and sedimentary core data. Sedimentology 69, 1179\u20131208 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lindenbergh, R. C., Soudarissanane, S. S., De Vries, S., Gorte, B. G. H. & De Schipper, M. A. Aeolian beach sand transport monitored by terrestrial laser scanning. Photogramm. Record 26, 384\u2013399 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lindenbergh, R. et al. Permanent terrestrial laser scanning for near-continuous environmental observations: systems, methods, challenges and applications. ISPRS Open J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 17, 100094 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Czerwonka-Schr\u00f6der, D. & Gaisecker, T. The permanent three-dimensional data acquisition of geotechnical structures by means of a web-based application of terrestrial LiDAR sensors. Geomech. Tunn. 15, 596\u2013604 (2022).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kromer, R. A. et al. Automated terrestrial laser scanning with near-real-time change detection\u2014monitoring of the S\u00e9chilienne landslide. Earth Surf. Dynam. 5, 293\u2013310 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vos, S. et al. A high-resolution 4D terrestrial laser scan dataset of the Kijkduin beach-dune system, The Netherlands. Sci Data 9, 191 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Campos, M. B. et al. A long-term terrestrial laser scanning measurement station to continuously monitor structural and phenological dynamics of boreal forest canopy. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 606752 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Williams, J. G., Rosser, N. J., Hardy, R. J. & Brain, M. J. The importance of monitoring interval for rockfall magnitude\u2013frequency estimation. JGR Earth Surface 124, 2841\u20132853 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Perks, M. T., Pitman, S. J., Bainbridge, R., D\u00edaz-Moreno, A. & Dunning, S. A. An evaluation of low-cost terrestrial lidar sensors for assessing hydrogeomorphic change. Earth Space Sci. 11, e2024EA003514 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ruttner-Jansen, P. et al. Monitoring snow depth variations in an avalanche release area using low-cost lidar and optical sensors. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 25, 1315\u20131330 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mandlburger, G. A review of active and passive optical methods in hydrography. IHR 28, 8\u201352 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wozencraft, J. & Millar, D. Airborne lidar and integrated technologies for coastal mapping and nautical charting. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 39, 27\u201335 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hickman, G. D. & Hogg, J. E. Application of an airborne pulsed laser for near shore bathymetric measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 1, 47\u201358 (1969).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Parrish, C. E., Dijkstra, J. A., O\u2019Neil-Dunne, J. P. M., McKenna, L. & Pe\u2019eri, S. Post-sandy benthic habitat mapping using new topobathymetric lidar technology and object-based image classification. J. Coastal Res. 76, 200\u2013208 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

European Parliament. Directive 2000\/60\/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. Publications Office of the European Union. Document 32000L0060 (European Parliament, 2000).<\/p>\n

Richter, K., Maas, H.-G., Westfeld, P. & Wei\u00df, R. An approach to determining turbidity and correcting for signal attenuation in airborne lidar bathymetry. PFG 85, 31\u201340 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rhomberg-Kauert, J., Dammert, L., Gr\u00f6mer, M., Pfennigbauer, M. & Mandlburger, G. Macrophyte detection with bathymetric LiDAR\u2014applications of high-dimensional data analysis for submerged ecosystems. IHR 30, 98\u2013115 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Haslinger, K. et al. Increasing hourly heavy rainfall in Austria reflected in flood changes. Nature 639, 667\u2013672 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Danielson, J. J. et al. Topobathymetric elevation model development using a new methodology: coastal national elevation database. J. Coastal Res. 76, 75\u201389 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bhardwaj, A., Sam, L., Bhardwaj, A. & Mart\u00edn-Torres, F. J. LiDAR remote sensing of the cryosphere: present applications and future prospects. Remote Sens. Environ. 177, 125\u2013143 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hopkinson, C., Sitar, M., Chasmer, L. & Treitz, P. Mapping snowpack depth beneath forest canopies using airborne lidar. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 70, 323\u2013330 (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kirchner, P. B., Bales, R. C., Molotch, N. P., Flanagan, J. & Guo, Q. LiDAR measurement of seasonal snow accumulation along an elevation gradient in the southern Sierra Nevada, California. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 4261\u20134275 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sch\u00f6ber, J. et al. Snow cover characteristics in a glacierized catchment in the Tyrolean Alps\u2014improved spatially distributed modelling by usage of lidar data. J. Hydrol.\u00a0519, 3492\u20133510 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Varhola, A. et al. The influence of ground- and lidar-derived forest structure metrics on snow accumulation and ablation in disturbed forests. Can. J. For. Res. 40, 812\u2013821 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hopkinson, C. & Demuth, M. N. Using airborne lidar to assess the influence of glacier downwasting on water resources in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Can. J. Remote Sens. 32, 212\u2013222 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bamber, J. L., Krabill, W., Raper, V., Dowdeswell, J. A. & Oerlemans, J. Elevation changes measured on Svalbard glaciers and ice caps from airborne laser data. Ann. Glaciol. 42, 202\u2013208 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rees, W. G. & Arnold, N. S. Mass balance and dynamics of a valley glacier measured by high-resolution LiDAR. Polar Record 43, 311\u2013319 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Berthier, E., Schiefer, E., Clarke, G. K. C., Menounos, B. & R\u00e9my, F. Contribution of Alaskan glaciers to sea-level rise derived from satellite imagery. Nat. Geosci. 3, 92\u201395 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Herzfeld, U. C., Trantow, T., Lawson, M., Hans, J. & Medley, G. Surface heights and crevasse morphologies of surging and fast-moving glaciers from ICESat-2 laser altimeter data\u2014application of the density-dimension algorithm (DDA-ice) and evaluation using airborne altimeter and Planet SkySat data. Sci. Remote Sens. 3, 100013 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zwally, H. J., Yi, D., Kwok, R. & Zhao, Y. ICESat measurements of sea ice freeboard and estimates of sea ice thickness in the Weddell Sea. J. Geophys. Res. 113, 2007JC004284 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vinci, G., Vanzani, F., Fontana, A. & Campana, S. LiDAR applications in archaeology: a systematic review. Archaeological Prospection 32, 81\u2013101 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cairo, F., Di Liberto, L., Dionisi, D. & Snels, M. Understanding aerosol\u2013cloud interactions through lidar techniques: a review. Remote Sens. 16, 2788 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, W. et al. Review of airborne oceanic lidar remote sensing. Intell. Mar. Technol. Syst. 1, 10 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Churnside, J. H., Marchbanks, R. D., Vagle, S., Bell, S. W. & Stabeno, P. J. Stratification, plankton layers, and mixing measured by airborne lidar in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas. Deep Sea Res. Part II 177, 104742 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, Z. & Menenti, M. Challenges and opportunities in lidar remote sensing. Front. Remote Sens. 2, 641723 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

N\u00e6sset, E. Effects of different sensors, flying altitudes, and pulse repetition frequencies on forest canopy metrics and biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 148\u2013159 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

H\u00f6fle, B. & Pfeifer, N. Correction of laser scanning intensity data: data and model-driven approaches. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 62, 415\u2013433 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Isenburg, M. LASzip: lossless compression of lidar data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 79, 209\u2013217 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Neumann, T. et al. Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat-2) Project Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for Global Geolocated Photons ATL03 Version 6 (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 2022).<\/p>\n

Fassnacht, F. E., White, J. C., Wulder, M. A. & N\u00e6sset, E. Remote sensing in forestry: current challenges, considerations and directions. Forestry Int. J. For. Res. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/forestry\/cpad024<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Winiwarter, L. et al. Virtual laser scanning with HELIOS++: a novel take on ray tracing-based simulation of topographic full-waveform 3D laser scanning. Remote Sens. Environ. 269, 112772 (2022). This paper explains the concept of VLS, which can simulate lidar point clouds from user-defined and sensor-specific parameters applied across a scene.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sch\u00e4fer, J. et al. Assessing the potential of synthetic and ex situ airborne laser scanning and ground plot data to train forest biomass models. Forestry Int. J. For. Res.\u00a097, 512\u2013530 (2024).<\/p>\n

ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Esmor\u00eds, A. M., Weiser, H., Winiwarter, L., Cabaleiro, J. C. & H\u00f6fle, B. Deep learning with simulated laser scanning data for 3D point cloud classification. ISPRS J. Photogramm.Remote Sens. 215, 192\u2013213 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Takhtkeshha, N., Mandlburger, G., Remondino, F. & Hyypp\u00e4, J. Multispectral light detection and ranging technology and applications: a review. Sensors 24, 1669 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Murray, B. A., Coops, N. C., White, J. C., Dick, A. & Ragab, A. Tree species proportion prediction using airborne laser scanning and Sentinel-2 data within a deep learning based dual-stream data fusion approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 46, 5436\u20135464 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Queinnec, M. et al. Mapping dominant boreal tree species groups by combining area-based and individual tree crown LiDAR metrics with Sentinel-2 data. Can. J. Remote Sens. 49, 2130742 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stackhouse, L. A. et al. Modeling instream temperature from solar insolation under varying timber harvesting intensities using RPAS laser scanning. Sci. Total Environ. 912, 169459 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Coops, N. C., Goodbody, T. R. H. & Cao, L. Four steps to extend drone use in research. Nature 572, 433\u2013435 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jarraya, I. et al. GNSS-denied unmanned aerial vehicle navigation: analyzing computational complexity, sensor fusion, and localization methodologies. Satell. Navig. 6, 9 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Olson, L. G., Coops, N. C., Moreau, G., Hamelin, R. C. & Achim, A. The assessment of individual tree canopies using drone-based intra-canopy photogrammetry. Comput. Electron. Agric.\u00a0234, 110200 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

You, H., Xu, F., Ye, Y., Xia, P. & Du, J. Adaptive LiDAR scanning based on RGB information. Autom. Constr.\u00a0160, 105337 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Martino, A. J. et al. ICESat-2\/ATLAS at 4 years: instrument performance and projected life. In Advanced Photon Counting Techniques XVII (eds Itzler, M. A., McIntosh, K. A. & Bienfang, J. C.) 17 (SPIE, 2023).<\/p>\n

Gastellu-Etchegorry, J. P., Martin, E. & Gascon, F. DART: a 3D model for simulating satellite images and studying surface radiation budget. Int. J. Remote Sens. 25, 73\u201396 (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Caltagirone, L., Bellone, M., Svensson, L. & Wahde, M. LIDAR\u2013camera fusion for road detection using fully convolutional neural networks. Robotics Autonomous Syst. 111, 125\u2013131 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Berrio, J. S., Shan, M., Worrall, S. & Nebot, E. Camera\u2013LIDAR integration: probabilistic sensor fusion for semantic mapping. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transport. Syst. 23, 7637\u20137652 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mandlburger, G. et al. Improved topographic models via concurrent airborne lidar and dense image matching. In\u00a0ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.\u00a0Vol. IV-2\/W4, 259\u2013266 (ISPRS, 2017).<\/p>\n

Winiwarter, L., Mandlburger, G., Schmohl, S. & Pfeifer, N. Classification of ALS point clouds using end-to-end deep learning. PFG 87, 75\u201390 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

K\u00f6lle, M. et al. The Hessigheim 3D (H3D) benchmark on semantic segmentation of high-resolution 3D point clouds and textured meshes from UAV LiDAR and Multi-View-Stereo. ISPRS Open J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 1, 100001 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Irwin, L. UAV laser scanning\u2014managed forest transect\u2014classified and normalized. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.16413906<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Wang, J., Letard, M., Chang, M. & Anders, K. Terrestrial laser scanning point clouds of the Isar river bed near Wallgau acquired in August and November 2024. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.16633317<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Winiwarter, L., Anders, K. & H\u00f6fle, B. M3C2-EP: pushing the limits of 3D topographic point cloud change detection by error propagation. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 178, 240\u2013258 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mandlburger, G. et al. Mapping shallow inland running waters with UAV-borne photo and laser bathymetry. J. Applied Hydrography 130, 22\u201331 (2025).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Irwin, L. UAV laser scanning\u2014managed forest\u2014pre and post commercial thinning. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.16413783<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Irwin, L. A. K. UAV laser scanning\u2014natural forest\u2014normalized point cloud. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.16413742<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Duncanson, L. et al. Aboveground biomass density models for NASA\u2019s global ecosystem dynamics investigation (GEDI) lidar mission. Remote.…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":158727,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[22580,3238,2294,74309,111,139,69,393,147],"class_list":{"0":"post-158726","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-environmental-sciences","9":"tag-forestry","10":"tag-general","11":"tag-imaging-and-sensing","12":"tag-new-zealand","13":"tag-newzealand","14":"tag-nz","15":"tag-physics","16":"tag-science"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158726","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158726"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158726\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/158727"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158726"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158726"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158726"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}