{"id":246204,"date":"2026-01-22T14:06:07","date_gmt":"2026-01-22T14:06:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/246204\/"},"modified":"2026-01-22T14:06:07","modified_gmt":"2026-01-22T14:06:07","slug":"the-winners-and-losers-so-far-from-trumps-tariffs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/246204\/","title":{"rendered":"The Winners And Losers So Far From Trump&#8217;s Tariffs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(<a style=\"color:black\" href=\"https:\/\/menafn.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">MENAFN<\/a>&#8211; Asia Times)<br \/>\nDuring the 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump promised to ease economic pressures on households and restore US economic strength.<\/p>\n<p>Central to that promise was the claim that tariffs would revive manufacturing and rebalance trade in America&#8217;s favor. Once in office, the second administration quickly made trade policy \u2013 especially tariffs \u2013 a central pillar of its economic agenda.<\/p>\n<p>The introduction of a sweeping tariff regime on April 2, framed as\u201creciprocal tariffs\u201d, became the signature economic intervention of the administration&#8217;s first year in power \u2013 and it appears we have not heard the last of it.<\/p>\n<p>The tariffs were not a single event but a sequence of trade actions launched immediately after Trump&#8217;s inauguration. In January, the administration announced the \u201cAmerica first\u201d trade policy.<\/p>\n<p>This prioritized reductions in the US trade deficit to revitalize domestic manufacturing and promised tougher economic relations with China. Sector and country-specific tariffs followed.<\/p>\n<p>While Trump&#8217;s so-called\u201cLiberation Day\u201d in April set the stage as he announced a range of tariffs to levy against various countries with which the US was running a trade deficit, the implementation was delayed until August, creating prolonged uncertainty for firms and trading partners.<\/p>\n<p>The tariff regime pursued three objectives: raising government revenue, reducing the US trade deficit and compelling changes in China&#8217;s trade behavior. But one year into Trump&#8217;s second term, has this strategy worked?<\/p>\n<p>What worked<\/p>\n<p>On revenue, the policy has delivered. Customs revenue rose sharply by US$287 billion, generating additional fiscal revenue outside the normal congressional appropriations process. In headline terms, the tariffs achieved what they were designed to do: they raised money \u2013 but mainly (96%) from American buyers.<\/p>\n<p>Progress on the trade balance (exports minus imports) has been far less convincing. Despite a modest depreciation of the US dollar and stronger export growth during much of 2025, the total US trade balance (goods and services) fell by $69 billion. While the deficit on the goods trade balance (without services) at times narrowed, there is no evidence that this will be a sustained trend.<\/p>\n<p>Addressing the trade imbalance with China is at the core of the Trump&#8217;s tariff strategy. According to trade data from the US Department of Commerce, during the first ten months of 2025, US imports from China declined by 27% \u2013 the largest of all US trading partners bilateral decline observed.<\/p>\n<p><a style=\"color:black\" href=\"https:\/\/menafn.com\/1110636251\/The-Winners-And-Losers-So-Far-From-Trumps-Tariffs\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\"><\/p>\n<p>MENAFN22012026000159011032ID1110636251<\/p>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"(MENAFN&#8211; Asia Times) During the 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump promised to ease economic pressures on households and&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":246205,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[138,219,111,139,69],"class_list":{"0":"post-246204","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-economy","8":"tag-business","9":"tag-economy","10":"tag-new-zealand","11":"tag-newzealand","12":"tag-nz"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246204","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=246204"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246204\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/246205"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=246204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=246204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=246204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}