{"id":262312,"date":"2026-02-01T09:52:13","date_gmt":"2026-02-01T09:52:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/262312\/"},"modified":"2026-02-01T09:52:13","modified_gmt":"2026-02-01T09:52:13","slug":"biodiversity-implications-of-land-intensive-carbon-dioxide-removal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/262312\/","title":{"rendered":"Biodiversity implications of land-intensive carbon dioxide removal"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rogelj, J. et al. Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk. Science 380, 1014\u20131016 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Boehm, S. et al. State of Climate Action 2023 (World Resources Institute, 2023); https:\/\/doi.org\/10.46830\/wrirpt.23.00010<\/a><\/p>\n

Forster, P. M. et al. Indicators of global climate change 2023: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 16, 2625\u20132658 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Byers, E. et al. AR6 Scenarios Database. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.5886912<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

Riahi, K. et al. IPCC Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).<\/p>\n

Fuss, S. et al. Negative emissions\u2014part 2: costs, potentials and side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 63002 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Deprez, B. A. et al. Sustainability limits needed for CO2 removal. Science 383, 484\u2013486 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Braun, J. et al. Multiple planetary boundaries preclude biomass crops for carbon capture and storage outside of agricultural areas. Commun. Earth Environ. 6, 1\u201314 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

P\u00f6rtner, H. O. et al. IPCC Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023); https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009325844.001<\/a><\/p>\n

Wood Hansen, O. & van den Bergh, J. Environmental problem shifting from climate change mitigation: a mapping review. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA Nexus 3, pgad448 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vaidyanathan, G. Integrated assessment climate policy models have proven useful, with caveats. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2101899118 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Soergel, B. et al. A sustainable development pathway for climate action within the UN 2030 agenda. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 656\u2013664 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hirata, A. et al. The choice of land-based climate change mitigation measures influences future global biodiversity loss. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 259 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hanssen, S. V. et al. Biomass residues as twenty-first century bioenergy feedstock\u2014a comparison of eight integrated assessment models. Clim. Change 163, 1569\u20131586 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hof, C. et al. Bioenergy cropland expansion may offset positive effects of climate change mitigation for global vertebrate diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 13294\u201313299 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ohashi, H. et al. Biodiversity can benefit from climate stabilization despite adverse side effects of land-based mitigation. Nat. Commun. 10, 5240 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Heck, V., Gerten, D., Lucht, W. & Popp, A. Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 151\u2013155 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Azuero-Pedraza, C. G., Lauri, P., Lessa Derci Augustynczik, A. & Thomas, V. M. Managing forests for biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 9175\u20139186 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Powell, T. W. R. & Lenton, T. M. Scenarios for future biodiversity loss due to multiple drivers reveal conflict between mitigating climate change and preserving biodiversity. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 025024 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lecl\u00e8re, D. et al. Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585, 551\u2013556 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45\u201350 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Powers, R. P. & Jetz, W. Global habitat loss and extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates under future land-use-change scenarios. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 323\u2013329 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jantz, S. M. et al. Future habitat loss and extinctions driven by land-use change in biodiversity hotspots under four scenarios of climate-change mitigation. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1122\u20131131 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Warren, R., Price, J., Graham, E., Forstenhaeusler, N. & VanDerWal, J. The projected effect on insects, vertebrates, and plants of limiting global warming to 1.5\u2009\u00b0C rather than 2\u2009\u00b0C. Science 360, 791\u2013795 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Price, J., Warren, R. & Forstenh\u00e4usler, N. Biodiversity losses associated with global warming of 1.5 to 4\u2009\u00b0C above pre-industrial levels in six countries. Clim. Change 177, 47 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

IPCC Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2023); https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009325844<\/a><\/p>\n

Global Indicator Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and Targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A\/RES\/71\/313 (United Nations, 2017).<\/p>\n

Kunming\u2013Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. CBD\/COP\/DEC\/15\/4 (CBD, 2022).<\/p>\n

Fujimori, S. et al. Downscaling Global Emissions and Its Implications Derived from Climate Model Experiments. PLoS One 12, e0169733\u2013e0169733 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hasegawa, T., Fujimori, S., Ito, A., Takahashi, K. & Masui, T. Global land-use allocation model linked to an integrated assessment model. Sci. Total Environ. 580, 787\u2013796 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Havl\u00edk, P. et al. Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3709\u20133714 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

IMAGE Framework Version Overview (PBL, 2025).<\/p>\n

van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 237\u2013250 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, M. et al. Global land use for 2015\u20132100 at 0.05\u00b0 resolution under diverse socioeconomic and climate scenarios. Sci. Data 7, 320 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kriegler, E. et al. Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): an energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 297\u2013315 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Popp, A. et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 331\u2013345 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fesenmyer, K. A. et al. Addressing critiques refines global estimates of reforestation potential for climate change mitigation. Nat. Commun. 16, 4572 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stenzel, F. et al. biospheremetrics v1.0.2: an R package to calculate two complementary terrestrial biosphere integrity indicators\u2014human colonization of the biosphere (BioCol) and risk of ecosystem destabilization (EcoRisk). Geosci. Model Dev. 17, 3235\u20133258 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Smith, J. R., Beaury, E. M., Cook-Patton, S. C. & Levine, J. M. Variable impacts of land-based climate mitigation on habitat area for vertebrate diversity. Science 387, 420\u2013425 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hu, X., Huang, B., Verones, F., Cavalett, O. & Cherubini, F. Overview of recent land-cover changes in biodiversity hotspots. Front. Ecol. Environ. 19, 91\u201397 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Winberg, J., Smith, H. G. & Ekroos, J. Bioenergy crops, biodiversity and ecosystem services in temperate agricultural landscapes\u2014a review of synergies and trade-offs. GCB Bioenergy 15, 1204\u20131220 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

ESA CCI\/C3S Global Land Cover product 2022 v2.1.1 (ESA, 2022); https:\/\/maps.elie.ucl.ac.be\/CCI\/viewer\/download.php<\/a><\/p>\n

Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., Doelman, J. & Stehfest, E. Anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene\u2014HYDE 3.2. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 9, 927\u2013953 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Simkin, R. D., Seto, K. C., McDonald, R. I. & Jetz, W. Biodiversity impacts and conservation implications of urban land expansion projected to 2050. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2117297119 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Molotoks, A. et al. Global projections of future cropland expansion to 2050 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 5895\u20135908 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Soergel, B. et al. Multiple pathways towards sustainable development goals and climate targets. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 124009 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Doelman, J. C. et al. Quantifying synergies and trade-offs in the global water-land\u2013food\u2013climate nexus using a multi-model scenario approach. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 045004 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Urban, M. C. Climate change extinctions. Science 386, 1123\u20131128 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

World Bank Country and Lending Groups (World Bank, 2025); https:\/\/datahelpdesk.worldbank.org\/knowledgebase\/articles\/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups<\/a><\/p>\n

Fyson, C. L., Baur, S., Gidden, M. & Schleussner, C. F. Fair-share carbon dioxide removal increases major emitter responsibility. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 836\u2013841 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rajamani, L. et al. National \u2018fair shares\u2019 in reducing greenhouse gas emissions within the principled framework of international environmental law. Clim. Policy 21, 983\u20131004 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

United Nations Framework Convention On Climate Change (United Nations, 1992).<\/p>\n

Carton, W., Lund, J. F. & Dooley, K. Undoing equivalence: rethinking carbon accounting for just carbon removal. Front. Clim. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fclim.2021.664130<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n

J\u00e4ger, F. et al. Fire weather compromises forestation-reliant climate mitigation pathways. Earth Syst. Dyn. 15, 1055\u20131071 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fujimori, S. et al. Land-based climate change mitigation measures can affect agricultural markets and food security. Nat. Food 3, 110\u2013121 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stevanovi\u0107, M. et al. Mitigation strategies for greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and land-use change: consequences for food prices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 365\u2013374 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Weiskopf, S. R. et al. Biodiversity loss reduces global terrestrial carbon storage. Nat. Commun. 15, 4354 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mori, A. S. et al. Biodiversity\u2013productivity relationships are key to nature-based climate solutions. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 543\u2013550 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yang, Y., Tilman, D., Furey, G. & Lehman, C. Soil carbon sequestration accelerated by restoration of grassland biodiversity. Nat. Commun. 10, 718 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Veldman, J. W. et al. Where tree planting and forest expansion are bad for biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience 65, 1011\u20131018 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pr\u00fctz, R., Fuss, S., L\u00fcck, S., Stephan, L. & Rogelj, J. A taxonomy to map evidence on the co-benefits, challenges, and limits of carbon dioxide removal. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 1\u201311 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Di Sacco, A. et al. Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 1328\u20131348 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Seddon, N., Turner, B., Berry, P., Chausson, A. & Girardin, C. A. J. Grounding nature-based climate solutions in sound biodiversity science. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 84\u201387 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Griscom, B. W. et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645\u201311650 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stenzel, F., Gerten, D. & Hanasaki, N. Global scenarios of irrigation water abstractions for bioenergy production: a systematic review. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 25, 1711\u20131726 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Humpen\u00f6der, F. et al. Large-scale bioenergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs?. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 024011 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

N\u00e6ss, J. S., Cavalett, O. & Cherubini, F. The land\u2013energy\u2013water nexus of global bioenergy potentials from abandoned cropland. Nat. Sustain. 4, 525\u2013536 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Werling, B. P. et al. Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1652\u20131657 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Immerzeel, D. J., Verweij, P. A., van der Hilst, F. & Faaij, A. P. C. Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state-of-the-art review. GCB Bioenergy 6, 183\u2013209 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Strefler, J. et al. Carbon dioxide removal technologies are not born equal. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 074021 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bergero, C., Wise, M., Lamers, P., Wang, Y. & Weber, M. Biochar as a carbon dioxide removal strategy in integrated long-run mitigation scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 074076 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rueda, O., Mogoll\u00f3n, J. M., Tukker, A. & Scherer, L. Negative-emissions technology portfolios to meet the 1.5\u2009\u00b0C target. Glob. Environ. Change 67, 102238 (2021).<\/p>\n

Fuhrman, J. et al. Diverse carbon dioxide removal approaches could reduce impacts on the energy\u2013water\u2013land system. Nat. Clim. Change https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41558-023-01604-9<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Rodriguez Mendez, Q., Creutzig, F. & Fuss, S. Deep uncertainty in carbon dioxide removal portfolios. Environ. Res. Lett. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/1748-9326\/adc613<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Terlouw, T., Treyer, K., Bauer, C. & Mazzotti, M. Life cycle assessment of direct air carbon capture and storage with low-carbon energy sources. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 11397\u201311411 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Adam, M., Kleinen, T., May, M. M. & Rehfeld, K. Land conversions not climate effects are the dominant indirect consequence of sun-driven CO2 capture, conversion, and sequestration. Environ. Res. Lett. 20, 034011 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shindell, D. & Rogelj, J. Preserving carbon dioxide removal to serve critical needs. Nat. Clim. Change https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41558-025-02251-y<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Buck, H. J., Carton, W., Lund, J. F. & Markusson, N. Why residual emissions matter right now. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 351\u2013358 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rogelj, J. et al. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 \u00b0C. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 325\u2013332 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153\u2013168 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

van Vuuren, D. P. et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim. Change 109, 5 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Warren, R., Price, J., VanDerWal, J., Cornelius, S. & Sohl, H. The implications of the United Nations Paris Agreement on climate change for globally significant biodiversity areas. Clim. Change 147, 395\u2013409 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Warren, R. et al. Quantifying the benefit of early climate change mitigation in avoiding biodiversity loss. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 678\u2013682 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Olson, D. M. & Dinerstein, E. The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 89, 199 (2002).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853\u2013858 (2000).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hoffman, M., Koenig, K., Bunting, G., Costanza, J. & Williams, K. J. Biodiversity hotspots (version 2016.1). Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/ZENODO.3261807<\/a> (2016).<\/p>\n

Noss, R. F. et al. How global biodiversity hotspots may go unrecognized: lessons from the North American coastal plain. Divers. Distrib. 21, 236\u2013244 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Williams, K. J. et al. in Biodiversity Hotspots: Distribution and Protection of Conservation Priority Areas (eds Zachos, F. E. & Habel, J. C.) (Springer, 2011); https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-20992-5_16<\/a><\/p>\n

Elson, P. et al. SciTools\/cartopy: REL: v0.24.1. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/ZENODO.1182735<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Pr\u00fctz, R. et al. Biodiversity implications of land-intensive carbon dioxide removal. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/ZENODO.15210722<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190, 231\u2013259 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fujimori, S. & Hasegawa, T. AIM-SSP\/RCP gridded emissions and land-use data. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18959\/20180403.001<\/a> (2018).<\/p>\n

Frank, S. et al. Land-based climate change mitigation potentials within the agenda for sustainable development. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 24006 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hasler, N. et al. Accounting for albedo change to identify climate-positive tree cover restoration. Nat. Commun. 15, 2275 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Doelman, J. C. & Stehfest, E. The risks of overstating the climate benefits of ecosystem restoration. Nature 609, E1\u2013E3 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Scherer, L. et al. Biodiversity impact assessment considering land use intensities and fragmentation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 19612\u201319623 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

World Administrative Boundaries\u2014Countries and Territories (World Food Programme, 2019).<\/p>\n

Pelz, S. Unofficial regional\u2014iso3c mapping. GitHub https:\/\/github.com\/setupelz\/regioniso3c<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n

Country classification (UNCTAD, 2025); https:\/\/unctadstat.unctad.org\/EN\/Classifications.html<\/a><\/p>\n

Stuart-Smith, R. F. et al. Implications of states\u2019 dependence on carbon dioxide removal for achieving the Paris temperature goal. Clim. Policy https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14693062.2025.2528775<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Chen, M. et al. Global Land Use for 2015\u20132100 at 0.05\u00b0 Resolution Under Diverse Socioeconomic and Climate Scenarios (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 2, 2020); https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25584\/DATA.2020-07.1357\/1644253<\/a><\/p>\n

Krisztin, T., Havlik, P. & Lecl\u00e8re, D. Downscaled land cover for SSP IAM \u2018marker\u2019 scenarios, 2010\u20132100. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/ZENODO.15964077<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Doelman, J. & Daioglou, V. Gridded SSP-RCP land cover data from IMAGE 3.0.1. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/ZENODO.17046335<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Popp, A. & Humpen\u00f6der, F. Gridded SSP-RCP land cover data from REMIND-MAgPIE 1.6-3.0. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/ZENODO.17047534<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Braun, J. et al. Code and data for \u2018Multiple planetary boundaries preclude BECCS outside of agricultural areas\u2019. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/ZENODO.14514051<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Rogelj, J. et al. Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk. Science 380, 1014\u20131016…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":262313,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[3093,390,6576,84132,273,6609,2294,111,139,69,147],"class_list":{"0":"post-262312","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-environment","8":"tag-biodiversity","9":"tag-climate-change","10":"tag-climate-change-climate-change-impacts","11":"tag-climate-change-mitigation","12":"tag-environment","13":"tag-environmental-law-policy-ecojustice","14":"tag-general","15":"tag-new-zealand","16":"tag-newzealand","17":"tag-nz","18":"tag-science"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262312","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=262312"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262312\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/262313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=262312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=262312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=262312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}