{"id":278785,"date":"2026-02-11T13:55:07","date_gmt":"2026-02-11T13:55:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/278785\/"},"modified":"2026-02-11T13:55:07","modified_gmt":"2026-02-11T13:55:07","slug":"what-to-watch-out-for-in-the-us-labour-market-report-later","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/278785\/","title":{"rendered":"What to watch out for in the US labour market report later?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">As per usual, the three main components will be the headline non-farm payrolls number, the unemployment rate, and average hourly earnings. And typically, we will also get the two-month revision to the payrolls figure. However, this time around will feature the annual adjustments from the benchmark revision<br \/>\nup to March 2025.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">On the latter component, a large negative revision is already well expected. But still, it doesn&#8217;t mean that markets will not react negatively to the release. It needs to be put into context alongside the other components too. If the overall report is a softer one, this will just compound the impact it will have on markets.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">The expected revision is for something along the lines of 800k, or perhaps a little more than that. Fed governor Waller already warned of the negative labour market picture as implied by what this revision will entail:<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">&#8220;Compared to the prior<br \/>\nten-year average of about 1.9 million jobs created per year, payrolls increased just under 600,000 for 2025. And,<br \/>\nlast year&#8217;s data will be revised downward soon to likely show that there was virtually no growth in payroll <\/p>\n<p>employment in 2025&#8230; This does not remotely look like a healthy labour market.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">And this is what analysts are estimating for the figure (reminder that the preliminary estimate is 911k):<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">Besides that, there is also going to be an adjustment or should I say update to the birth-death model starting from April 2025 onwards with seasonal adjustment factors for the past five years. Why is this important?<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">For the uninitiated, the birth-death model isn&#8217;t what the name implies. It basically is a statistical model used to estimate job creation from new businesses (births) and losses from business closures (deaths).<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">The BLS will now amend the model and the methodology used to incorporate sample-based information each month. In essence, it will make real-time monthly data more sensitive to actual employment developments.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">At the balance, most analysts are expecting this to have a meaningful downwards revision to monthly jobs. Barclays outlines the reason for that being &#8220;the<br \/>\nmodels had overshot true birth-death effects over the remainder of the 2025 benchmark period&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">As for the overall labour market report itself, let&#8217;s see what key analysts have to say based on their calls.<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">Goldman Sachs<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; NFP growth of 45k, unemployment rate of 4.4%<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;We estimate that the birth-death model &#8211; which will be updated with this report\u2014could<br \/>\ncontribute 30-50k fewer jobs to payroll growth on a seasonally adjusted basis than in recent months&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; Jobless rate has risks skewed to the downside as &#8220;the bar for<br \/>\nrounding down to 4.3% is not high from an unrounded 4.38% in December and the January unemployment<br \/>\nrate appears to suffer from modestly negative residual seasonality&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;Cumulative payroll growth between April 2024 and Mar 2025 likely 750-900k lower than shown<br \/>\nin existing payrolls data&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">Citi<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; NFP growth of 135k, unemployment rate of 4.4%<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;January employment data is unlikely to materially change the outlook for the labour market after a drop in<br \/>\nthe unemployment rate in December alleviated some concerns over a further weakening in employment&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;We would caution that seemingly stronger January job growth may heavily reflect issues with seasonal<br \/>\nadjustment that have boosted January employment figures in the past&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;Benchmark revisions released with January figures should also show much lower employment in 2025,<br \/>\nlikely by around 700k, complicating the market reaction to the data&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;Overall, we do not expect that January employment data will significantly change our view that the labor<br \/>\nmarket will continue to gradually weaken, even if this weakening is not consistent each month and more<br \/>\nlikely to appear into the spring and summer&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">BofA<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; NFP growth of 45k, unemployment rate of 4.4%<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;The weaker jobs forecast reflects expected downward revisions tied to the updated Birth-Death model&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;Also, Apr &#8217;25 onwards, we think the updated firm Birth-Death model will lead to a 20<br \/>\n30k downward revision to monthly jobs&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;We estimate payrolls as of Mar &#8217;25 will be revised down by 800k-850k (65k<br \/>\n70k\/month), still historically large but slightly smaller than the preliminary estimate of -911k&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; \u201cIf the downward revisions are modest and concentrated in 2H24, they should be less concerning for the<br \/>\nFed because policymakers are more focused on the recent outlook. The Fed has already been penciling in<br \/>\na 60k\/month downward revision&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;Hence, this would further reinforce the Fed&#8217;s optimism about the labor<br \/>\nmarket&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">JP Morgan<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; NFP growth of 75k, unemployment rate of 4.4%<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; \u201cIn recent January reports, the November and December change has tended to get revised up, so the trend<br \/>\ncould soon look stronger&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;There is also a slight tendency for January to print above the trend that was<br \/>\nknown at the time of the release&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;Employment growth from March 2024 to March 2025 should be revised down by<br \/>\nabout 800k, with the lower growth evenly spread across the 12 months&#8221;<br data-v-4026719d=\"\"\/>&#8211; &#8220;While we expect the unemployment rate will continue to round to 4.4%, it could move from a<br \/>\nlow-side to a high-side reading, setting up a rise to 4.5% by February&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"text-align-justify\" data-v-4026719d=\"\">(h\/t @ MNI Markets)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"As per usual, the three main components will be the headline non-farm payrolls number, the unemployment rate, and&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":225574,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[138,219,111,139,69],"class_list":{"0":"post-278785","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-economy","8":"tag-business","9":"tag-economy","10":"tag-new-zealand","11":"tag-newzealand","12":"tag-nz"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=278785"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278785\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/225574"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=278785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=278785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=278785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}