{"id":293081,"date":"2026-02-20T07:41:14","date_gmt":"2026-02-20T07:41:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/293081\/"},"modified":"2026-02-20T07:41:14","modified_gmt":"2026-02-20T07:41:14","slug":"elephant-trunks-even-more-complex-than-previously-thought","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/293081\/","title":{"rendered":"Elephant Trunks Even More Complex Than Previously Thought"},"content":{"rendered":"

\nThe writers and editors over at Popular Science are confused. In an article<\/a> highlighting new research on elephant whiskers, they write, \u201cAn elephant\u2019s trunk is a wonder of evolution.\u201d Then in the same paragraph, they state, \u201c[The whiskers] have a design\u201d\u2014well, which is it? Did the elephant\u2019s trunk and whiskers evolve or do they have design? Evolutionists often use the word \u201cdesign\u201d but are oblivious to what they are really stating!<\/p>\n

When science writers describe the wonders of creation<\/a>, they can\u2019t seem to help using that word \u201cdesign,\u201d even as they attribute complexity to evolution<\/a>. But evolution can\u2019t \u201cdesign\u201d anything. It\u2019s supposedly a mindless, purposeless, random process. It has no ability to design or create. And yet that word is used over and over because, well, creation looks designed! (Because it was!)<\/p>\n

Take, for example, these elephant whiskers. An elephant has 1,000 of them on its trunk. Together with a network of extremely precise muscles, these whiskers allow elephants to pick up something as delicate as a tortilla chip without breaking it. But scientists weren\u2019t exactly sure how the whiskers worked. So they scanned several elephant whiskers with micro-CT and discovered that the whiskers weren\u2019t at all like what they expected.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Initially, the team expected that the whiskers would be more similar to the tapered whiskers of mice and rats. These rodent whiskers have a circular cross-section, are completely solid throughout, and have approximately uniform stiffness.\u00a0.\u00a0.\u00a0.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Elephant trunk whiskers are more thick and blade-like, have a flattened cross-section, a hollow base, and several long internal channels that look more like the structure of sheep horns and horse hooves. Having a more porous build reduces the whisker\u2019s mass and provides impact resistance\u2014which helps them eat hundreds of pounds of food without damaging their whiskers.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

These whiskers, which they note have similarities to cat whiskers, were also surprising because they have \u201cstiff bases that transition to soft rubber-like tips.\u201d This is an important design feature that \u201ckeeps them in tact and helps let the elephant determine what it is feeling. The team believes that elephant whiskers\u2019 unusual stiffness gradient helps them know precisely where an object is coming into contact along each of their 1,000 trunk whiskers.\u201d<\/p>\n

One of the study coauthors said,<\/p>\n

It\u2019s pretty amazing! The stiffness gradient provides a map to allow elephants to detect where contact occurs along each whisker.\u00a0.\u00a0.\u00a0. This property helps them know how close or how far their trunk is from an object\u00a0.\u00a0.\u00a0. all baked into the geometry, porosity, and stiffness of the whisker. Engineers call this natural phenomenon embodied intelligence.<\/p>\n

Something as seemingly \u201csimple\u201d as a whisker is actually more complex than previously thought\u2014so much so that these engineers believe the whiskers have \u201cembodied intelligence.\u201d They\u2019re also hopeful the research could help sensors on robots achieve more precision through the whiskers\u2019 \u201csimple yet intelligent design\u201d\u00a0.\u00a0.\u00a0. and yet they give the credit to random chance processes.<\/p>\n

As much as evolutionists want to deny it, it is obvious from creation that there is a Creator.<\/p>\n

As much as evolutionists want to deny it, it is obvious from creation that there is a Creator. As I\u2019ve said in the past (and my dear friend Buddy Davis would sing), \u201cIt\u2019s designed to do what it does do, what it does do it does do well, doesn\u2019t it?\u201d We see the handiwork of God<\/a> in everything he\u2019s made, right down to the individual parts that make up something as complicated as an elephant!<\/p>\n

You can learn more about the complexity of elephants in this video from our YouTube channel:<\/p>\n

Evolutionists are without excuse for rejecting the God of the Bible because he\u2019s made his existence and power evident to all through what he\u2019s made\u2014even through the humble whiskers of the elephant.<\/p>\n

For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools, and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and creeping things. (Romans 1:19\u201323)<\/p>\n

Thanks for stopping by and thanks for praying,
\n
Ken \n<\/p>\n

This item was written with the assistance of AiG\u2019s research team.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The writers and editors over at Popular Science are confused. In an article highlighting new research on elephant…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":293082,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[111,139,69,147,406],"class_list":["post-293081","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-wildlife","tag-new-zealand","tag-newzealand","tag-nz","tag-science","tag-wildlife"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/293081","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=293081"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/293081\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/293082"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=293081"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=293081"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=293081"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}