{"id":301813,"date":"2026-02-25T18:21:17","date_gmt":"2026-02-25T18:21:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/301813\/"},"modified":"2026-02-25T18:21:17","modified_gmt":"2026-02-25T18:21:17","slug":"health-worker-guilty-of-illegally-accessing-ex-partners-medical-records-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/301813\/","title":{"rendered":"Health worker guilty of illegally accessing ex-partner\u2019s medical records"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-family:'Sohne',Arial,Sans-serif;display: flex;align-items: center;font-size: 14px;\" class=\"story-paragraph nzherald-paragraph\">First published on <a style=\"background: none !important;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nzherald.co.nz\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"122px\" height=\"30px\" style=\"display: flex;background: none;\" alt=\"NZ Herald\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/nzherald-117bcaab72f04075ca4e3d3410ff591e0b001b26e2ec22af4bb2efaa4ad5ed42.png\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/4O1S3TZ_copyright_image_137311.jpeg\" width=\"1050\" height=\"656\" alt=\"no caption.\"\/><\/p>\n<p class=\"photo-captioned__information\">\nThe woman admitted to viewing the records under another person&#8217;s login. File photo.<br \/>\nPhoto: vetdoctor\/123RF\n<\/p>\n<p>A medical professional tapped into a health agency database to check if her ex&#8217;s new partner was a druggie, claiming she was worried a heroin user was looking after her children.<\/p>\n<p>The woman&#8217;s offending came to light after her ex-partner and his new girlfriend requested an audit of their medical records, which showed their files had been accessed using another staff member&#8217;s account.<\/p>\n<p>When confronted, the woman admitted to viewing the records under another person&#8217;s login and, after a months-long internal process, her role was terminated.<\/p>\n<p>Having already lost her job for accessing private information, the woman &#8211; who has interim name suppression &#8211; appeared in the Wellington District Court on Tuesday where she denied two charges of accessing a computer system for a dishonest purpose with the intention of gaining a benefit.<\/p>\n<p>The fact the woman deliberately accessed the agency&#8217;s computer system to look at the couple&#8217;s health records without their permission was not in dispute.<\/p>\n<p>The only issue Judge Lance Rowe had to decide was whether the woman obtained a benefit, or advantage, during the 33 seconds she accessed the files.<\/p>\n<p>For the police, Sergeant Mike Stonyer submitted that the search &#8220;came from left field, and was both personal and cruel&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The woman had used the information as a &#8220;moral weapon&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>But the woman&#8217;s lawyer Letitia Smith submitted that as the search had shown nothing, there could be no benefit.<\/p>\n<p>She didn&#8217;t look up the system to invade their privacy and didn&#8217;t want anyone to find out about what she&#8217;d done, including the couple whom she only told what had happened after they knew their records had been accessed.<\/p>\n<p>Difficult and hostile<\/p>\n<p>The court heard the woman and her ex-partner&#8217;s separation was &#8220;difficult and hostile&#8221;. The Family Court was determining custody arrangements and a protection order had been breached.<\/p>\n<p>The judge noted the woman&#8217;s actions followed a report of concern to Oranga Tamariki made by contractors who found her children alone at her ex-partner&#8217;s house and a few weeks after the new girlfriend had moved in with her ex-partner.<\/p>\n<p>The woman claimed the new girlfriend had been a heroin user and she wanted to know if this was still the case.<\/p>\n<p>She said she had accessed the records in a moment of impulsivity, against the background of a hostile and difficult relationship breakdown.<\/p>\n<p>She had only accessed the medical records after her ex-partner, his mother and his lawyer declined to answer her question about whether the new partner was still an IV drug user, she said.<\/p>\n<p>The woman accessed the girlfriend&#8217;s medical records for 12 seconds to look at her lab results.<\/p>\n<p>She spent 21 seconds looking at her former partner&#8217;s file, searching his lab results and his next of kin information.<\/p>\n<p>But her search was fruitless, something she admitted in a subsequent email to the new partner.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Did you actually realise that accessing someone&#8217;s records means very little? That there is minimal information gleaned apart from medical tests, of which there were none.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I was wanting to see if you were still an IV drug user who was caring for my children, and the information gave me no insight.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>She also told the court she had accessed the next of kin page because she was being &#8220;nosey&#8221; as she was not able to ask him.<\/p>\n<p>But Judge Rowe found that in the context of an acrimonious separation and the concerns she had about her children&#8217;s care, accessing her ex-partner&#8217;s details did give the woman an advantage.<\/p>\n<p>He ruled the information about next of kin was relevant to the care of their children, as this person may step into the father&#8217;s shoes or manage his affairs if he was unable to do so.<\/p>\n<p>Actions were &#8216;humiliating and shameful&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>The woman said she had searched the woman&#8217;s file looking for visits to the alcohol and drug service or liver test results &#8211; telltale signs of intravenous drug use.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, in her evidence, the new partner denied ever using intravenous drugs.<\/p>\n<p>She said the woman&#8217;s actions had been humiliating and shameful and, as a result, she had been reluctant to enrol with a doctor or visit the hospital, fearing her records would be accessed.<\/p>\n<p>But under questioning from the woman&#8217;s lawyer, the new partner also said she did not remember sending the woman an image of the audit, with the words, &#8220;You&#8217;re going down&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Accused sought ammunition against her ex&#8217;s new partner: judge<\/p>\n<p>That left Judge Rowe to decide if, by accessing the computer system and obtaining no information, the woman had gained a benefit or advantage.<\/p>\n<p>Without knowing what information the woman accessed, the judge said he was not prepared to extend the definition of &#8220;benefit&#8221; to the absence of information.<\/p>\n<p>But he did find the woman guilty of an alternative charge, that she intended to access the system.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Her purpose of going into the database is to obtain information that she could use in respect to the ongoing care of her children,&#8221; he said, adding she had looked at the records to gather information that would assist her in the context of a hostile dispute.<\/p>\n<p>He said it was clear the woman did not approve of the new girlfriend caring for her children and wanted to obtain information or ammunition against the new partner.<\/p>\n<p>After the hearing, the woman was remanded on bail until her next hearing in May.<\/p>\n<p>Smith asked that no convictions be entered because her client would be seeking a discharge without conviction.<\/p>\n<p>A decision on whether to grant permanent name suppression will also be made at the hearing.<\/p>\n<p>This story originally appeared in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nzherald.co.nz\/nz\/crime\/health-worker-guilty-of-illegally-accessing-ex-partners-medical-records\/GOZSHNHXMBHSZHLBDBVY4CM3IY\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">New Zealand Herald<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"First published on The woman admitted to viewing the records under another person&#8217;s login. File photo. Photo: vetdoctor\/123RF&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":301814,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[48,47,42,43,49,46,44,45,40,38,41,39],"class_list":{"0":"post-301813","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-headlines","8":"tag-audio","9":"tag-current-affairs","10":"tag-headlines","11":"tag-news","12":"tag-podcasts","13":"tag-public-radio","14":"tag-radio-new-zealand","15":"tag-rnz","16":"tag-top-news","17":"tag-top-stories","18":"tag-topnews","19":"tag-topstories"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301813","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=301813"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301813\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/301814"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=301813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=301813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=301813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}