{"id":317250,"date":"2026-03-07T06:38:11","date_gmt":"2026-03-07T06:38:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/317250\/"},"modified":"2026-03-07T06:38:11","modified_gmt":"2026-03-07T06:38:11","slug":"high-court-liquidation-threat-looms-as-ex-staff-chase-unpaid-six-figure-awards-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/317250\/","title":{"rendered":"High Court liquidation threat looms as ex-staff chase unpaid six-figure awards"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"font-family:'Sohne',Arial,Sans-serif;display: flex;align-items: center;font-size: 14px;\" class=\"story-paragraph nzherald-paragraph\">First published on <a style=\"background: none !important;\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nzherald.co.nz\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"122px\" height=\"30px\" style=\"display: flex;background: none;\" alt=\"NZ Herald\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/nzherald-117bcaab72f04075ca4e3d3410ff591e0b001b26e2ec22af4bb2efaa4ad5ed42.png\"\/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>By Brianna McIllraith, Open Justice Reporter<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/4JS57J1_Anthony_Corin_avif.jpeg\" width=\"1050\" height=\"590\" alt=\"Property developer Anthony Corin is the owner of Longevity Construction which is facing liquidation.\"\/><\/p>\n<p class=\"photo-captioned__information\">\nProperty developer Anthony Corin is the owner of Longevity Construction which is facing liquidation.<br \/>\nPhoto: Open Justice\/Supplied\n<\/p>\n<p>A construction company owner teetering on liquidation says there is simply &#8220;no money&#8221; to pay more than $300,000 to two former employees.<\/p>\n<p>Auckland property developer Anthony Corin&#8217;s business, Longevity Construction, was ordered by the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) to pay the two workers in compensation and wage arrears after they were unjustifiably dismissed in 2024.<\/p>\n<p>Now Diederik van Heerden and Robert Williams have applied for compliance orders against their former employer after they still had not received their payout almost a year after the ruling in April 2025.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There is no money there,&#8221; Corin told NZME.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The economy drop of 35 percent has destroyed my companies,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m just a victim of a drop in the market.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Longevity and the case of Diederik van Heerden<\/p>\n<p>Diederik took his case for unjustifiable dismissal to the ERA in 2024.<\/p>\n<p>He initially worked as an independent contractor in 2021 but became an employee in May 2023 as a construction operations manager. But in January 2024, he was called to a meeting and told he was being made redundant as the renovation side of the business had closed.<\/p>\n<p>He never received pay for work he completed in February 2024, which authority member Rachel Larmer said was Longevity acting in an &#8220;unlawful manner&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Longevity was ordered to pay van Heerden $206,138.47, consisting of $166,153.85 in lost remuneration, $4984.62 as the compulsory employer contribution to KiwiSaver and $35,000 in distress compensation for his unjustified dismissals.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/4JS57FS_Didi_avif.jpeg\" width=\"1050\" height=\"787\" alt=\"Diederik (Didi) Van Heerden and his wife Elsje were made redundant from Longevity at the same time.\"\/><\/p>\n<p class=\"photo-captioned__information\">\nDiederik (Didi) Van Heerden and his wife Elsje were made redundant from Longevity at the same time.<br \/>\nPhoto: Open Justice\/Supplied\n<\/p>\n<p>When that went unpaid, it was ordered to pay a total of $207,408.59, consisting of $500 as part of the penalty imposed on it for breaching the employment act and $770.12 in wage arrears for the hours he had worked on February 28, 2024, but not been paid for.<\/p>\n<p>The company was also ordered to pay interest on any part of the $207,408.59 van Heerden had been awarded that remained outstanding from May 15, 2025, onwards until paid in full.<\/p>\n<p>Longevity had since paid van Heerden $770.12 for the wage arrears, giving an outstanding amount Longevity still owes of $206,638.47.<\/p>\n<p>Van Heerden&#8217;s wife, Elsje, also worked for the company and was made redundant at the same time. Her case was settled before it reached the ERA.<\/p>\n<p>In May last year, the couple told NZME that the redundancy was like &#8220;having our throats cut&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Longevity and the case of Robert Williams<\/p>\n<p>Williams initially started working with Longevity as an independent contractor in July 2023 until he became a full-time construction operations manager later in the year.<\/p>\n<p>Williams was the site manager for the Three Kings development project that Longevity was undertaking.<\/p>\n<p>Corin emailed Williams in March 2024, raising concerns about the cost overruns that had occurred for the second level of the building project at Three Kings.<\/p>\n<p>Corin informed Williams that the solution to the cost overruns was to change to a fixed price contract for the remainder of the structure.<\/p>\n<p>This meant Corin was to &#8220;get rid of all the labour-only contract workers [14 of them] and to get a fixed price quote from a builder which includes site management&#8221; before he told Williams he was now redundant.<\/p>\n<p>Longevity initially claimed that Williams had resigned or that he had abandoned his employment before acknowledging that his employment had been ended via an email sent by Corin.<\/p>\n<p>The authority ruled in its substantive decision on 26 April, 2025, that Longevity was to pay Williams $67,958.67, consisting of unpaid notice pay as wage arrears and interest, lost remuneration, including the KiwiSaver contributions, holiday pay and distress compensation for his unjustified dismissal.<\/p>\n<p>Longevity was looking to challenge the substantive decision on whether Williams was unjustifiably dismissed after he was let go in 2024.<\/p>\n<p>Lengthy court battle ensued<\/p>\n<p>In a lengthy court battle, Longevity challenged the authority&#8217;s substantive determination in the Employment Court for both Van Heerden and Williams&#8217; cases, while not disputing the costs award.<\/p>\n<p>Both van Heerden and Williams applied to strike out that challenge or impose conditions on it, and Longevity, in turn, sought a stay of execution of the authority&#8217;s substantive decision.<\/p>\n<p>The court heard both applications together and, on 5 December, 2025, declined to strike out the challenge but granted a conditional stay, which required Longevity to pay the awarded sums into court within 28 days, to be held on interest.<\/p>\n<p>Longevity did not pay the required sums into court, and neither Williams nor van Heerden had received payment.<\/p>\n<p>In April 2025, a creditor who was owed $40,000 applied to the High Court to liquidate Longevity, with their debt growing to $60,000. In response, Corin proposed a creditors&#8217; compromise to avoid liquidation.<\/p>\n<p>The proposal was approved by all creditors except by van Heerden and Williams. Although both were listed as &#8220;contingent creditors&#8221;, the proposal did not record the substantial sums they had already been awarded by the authority.<\/p>\n<p>As a result, voting creditors were not informed of these liabilities when approving the compromise in June 2025. While other creditors&#8217; claims exceeded $752,500, including the two employees&#8217; awards, Longevity&#8217;s total debts exceeded $1.1 million.<\/p>\n<p>The original liquidation application is scheduled to return to the High Court on 20 April, this year.<\/p>\n<p>Corin said Longevity is unable to pay van Heerden and Williams the money it has been ordered to pay them, so it will not be doing so.<\/p>\n<p>He said there was a risk that Longevity could be put into liquidation at the High Court hearing, and he was actively working to avoid that.<\/p>\n<p>He did not identify where the money would come from to pay Longevity&#8217;s creditors.<\/p>\n<p>Former employees&#8217; successful case<\/p>\n<p>Both Williams and van Heerden were successful in their cases.<\/p>\n<p>The authority ruled that within 28 days, Longevity had to pay $221,660 to van Heerden, while Corin is ordered to personally pay van Heerden $8436, which includes contributions to his legal costs.<\/p>\n<p>Longevity was ordered to pay $78,013 to Williams, while Corin was ordered to pay $18,401, including more than $10,000 in wage arrears Longevity had defaulted to pay, and $1000 in legal costs.<\/p>\n<p>But Corin told NZME he would be appealing the decisions, saying the ERA had not taken all the evidence into account.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There is an appeal for this decision, because the ERA didn&#8217;t allow substantial evidence to be included in the hearing, which proved my case, because there was too much evidence.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He alleged both Williams and van Heerden knew about looming redundancies and they were not unjustifiably dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There was basically 20,000 pages of minutes that show that all the employees knew about what was happening for a whole year before the redundancy came, and yet they were able to just make a statement and say they never knew anything about it. And that got believed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Employment law advocate Nita Sadie was representing van Heerden and Williams and told NZME the men were seeking only what the authority had already determined was lawfully owed to them.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They remain hopeful that compliance will ultimately be achieved.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>-This story originally appeared in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nzherald.co.nz\/nz\/high-court-liquidation-threat-looms-as-ex-staff-chase-unpaid-six-figure-awards\/64R7B24QCJAG3D3WNEEJ26KHL4\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">New Zealand Herald<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"First published on By Brianna McIllraith, Open Justice Reporter Property developer Anthony Corin is the owner of Longevity&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":317251,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[48,47,111,43,139,69,49,46,44,45],"class_list":{"0":"post-317250","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-new-zealand","8":"tag-audio","9":"tag-current-affairs","10":"tag-new-zealand","11":"tag-news","12":"tag-newzealand","13":"tag-nz","14":"tag-podcasts","15":"tag-public-radio","16":"tag-radio-new-zealand","17":"tag-rnz"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317250","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=317250"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/317250\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/317251"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=317250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=317250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/nz\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=317250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}